Microsoft Azure SQL Database and Google Cloud SQL compete in the cloud database solutions category. Google seems to have the upper hand with its feature-rich environment, while Microsoft excels in pricing and support.
Features: Microsoft integrates AI-driven capabilities and seamless integration with its existing products, along with strong performance metrics. On the other hand, Google provides robust security features, flexibility in handling multiple SQL dialects, and efficient handling of complex queries.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft users suggest the need for simplification in backup processes, enhancements in reporting tools, and operational improvements. Google users look for better native analytics, clearer documentation, and enhancements in usability to overcome productivity hindrances.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft is highlighted for its quick deployment and robust customer support, offering extensive resources. Google is easy to deploy but has mixed feedback regarding customer service efficiency.
Pricing and ROI: Azure's setup costs are competitive, with positive ROI from bundling options. Google’s pricing is higher, but its rich features justify this for some users, generating solid ROI.
It is ensuring we receive what we pay for through the blend of price, performance, and features.
If you're managing your own data center, you always have to overprovision your systems and pay for storage space you're not using.
We've reduced costs by about 20 percent after two or three years.
They don't have a dedicated technical team; mostly AI is handling that now.
Microsoft played a significant role, even from a training perspective, and provided resources that directed us toward the right deployment path.
Microsoft provides excellent service and is always available to support us.
there's so much information online that you can troubleshoot your issues without getting support involved
Google Cloud SQL offers automated scaling, which helps meet the growth demands when there's an increase in traffic or performance requirements.
Scaling the solution is incredibly simple and involves just clicking a button or dragging a slider.
Azure's scalability features like Elasticity are essential.
Microsoft Azure SQL Database is cloud-based, so it's great for scaling workloads.
The stability of Google Cloud SQL is rated eight out of ten.
We can't tell the difference between running on-prem or Azure because we no longer have those latency issues.
SQL never crashes or suddenly becomes unavailable.
Therefore, it is preferable to provision an instance local to the connection point to optimize performance and minimize latency.
The technical support could be better as they don't have a dedicated team, but mostly AI handles the support now.
I would appreciate more flexibility with specific extensions applicable to engines like PostgreSQL.
It would be helpful if CPU performance were not pinned to the amount of storage you're using, and we could scale different properties of the Azure SQL database independently.
I could not get an accurate quote on what my monthly costs would be based on my needs.
To overcome this, we collaborated with the network team to develop alternative solutions.
The pricing will fall on the lower side, slightly, almost equal to AWS, and cheaper than Azure.
Google Cloud SQL is competitively priced compared to other services like RDS from Amazon.
Azure Hybrid Benefit reduced costs by facilitating an easy transition of on-premises databases to the cloud.
Microsoft Azure SQL Database is not cheap.
It greatly reduces the total cost of ownership through efficient licensing depending on the client, the cost savings, and hybrid benefits.
From a database management perspective, it provides services without the need for me to worry about backups, scaling, or other operational issues.
Google Cloud SQL provides complete customization options, along with a dashboarding tool and a comprehensive suite of tools that can be used to customize and build any application needed.
The simplicity in usability, along with improved organizational productivity where we no longer need to maintain on-premises SQL servers, is invaluable.
Some of the best features of Microsoft Azure SQL Database are its scalability, pricing, and ease of setup.
Azure SQL helps in reducing the company's total cost of ownership because we don't have to manage on-premises infrastructure.
Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.
Microsoft Azure SQL Database is a relational database-as-a-service that delivers predictable performance, scalability, business continuity, data protection, and near-zero administration to cloud developers and solution architects. This is the deep technical library for Azure SQL Database.
We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
