Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud SQL vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud SQL
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MongoDB Atlas
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Managed NoSQL Databases (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud SQL is 17.6%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 15.7%, up from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

PradeepKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy-to-use solution with good features and functionality
The solution is easy to use. I am impressed with the tool's features and functionality.  I would like to see better availability of the product in different regions. It should also improve the security with encryption.  I have been using the product for six years.  I would rate the product's…
AhmetÖzdemir - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows our business to analyze social media data with machine learning and store the data in MongoDB
I have also used Microsoft SQL databases. There's a distinction between SQL and MongoDB because one of them is based on the schema first. The other is not schema, not permanent, because of ACID compliant databases. The transaction is very important at the SQL, MYSQL, and Postgre databases, so if any transaction fails, it has to roll back because of the schema at most of ACID compliant databases. There are 35 million customers that consume those databases, like a POC system. Lots of transactions passing through the system are based on Microsoft SQL. Only semi-structured data – like a document based system like Twitter and social media data – is based on MongoDB.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The valuable feature of Google Cloud SQL is its high availability option. The product is stable."
"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use, simple, and user-friendly."
"I found its storage and security to be the most valuable. It was a good experience. It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is perfect."
"Ease of management and the ability to oversee the statistics of your SQL."
"It is not the cool features that I find valuable, it is the stability of Google Cloud Platform."
"Its most valuable feature is that it's scalable. I can start off with a base of a lot of data and move as much as I want and it's the same as if asked to do a lot of infrastructure changes."
"The solution is easy to use. I am impressed with the tool's features and functionality."
"The product is scalable."
"Object-based data storing capability and managing non-structured data capability are the most valuable features of MongoDB Atlas."
"The key feature of MongoDB Atlas that has been helpful for us is the ease of deploying new databases."
"The most valuable feature is that it's all web-based. So one can browse collections just from the web. MongoDB Atlas is very accessible, quick to understand, and quick to learn. People who have never used CLI can hop into the web interface and browse the database."
"You can start quickly on projects which allow you to store many things."
"Its most valuable features are high availability and zero maintenance."
"It has a flexible integration with our easy API."
"There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple features, including built-in backup, all under the same roof, without the need for external tools."
"For security reasons, I prefer MongoDB Atlas. It supports role-based access control, so you have an entity for each individual."
 

Cons

"The monitoring part could be better."
"They could improve documentation and dashboard stability for efficient user experience and database management."
"I would like to see better availability of the product in different regions. It should also improve the security with encryption."
"For data analysis, the AI area of the product has certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"To create a seamless data integration, the title integration of these databases with the data integration platforms is essential. This is what we would like to have in a future release."
"It is hard to do logging with the solution."
"The most challenging part is dealing with legacy data from your old systems and migrating it into the new setup, but once you've completed the data migration, it becomes quite convenient to use."
"Google Cloud SQL still needs better connectivity to outside, existing data sources."
"I would like a more comprehensive dashboard."
"It would be great if it were easier to integrate MongoDB Atlas with AWS services. Technical support for MongoDB Atlas could be better."
"MongoDB Atlas should add more APIs in their Terraform module because sometimes I find it difficult to find the resources in their Terraform model."
"An area for improvement in MongoDB Atlas is that it does not support individual or personal database backup, though it supports cloud cluster backup."
"Querying a dataset is not very intuitive, so I think that it can be improved."
"When I edit a document from a document, a lot of clicking is involved, like changing data type manually from a drop-down. It would be super nice if I could just edit the document in a JSON format. The JSON-based document editor should have a multi-language feature. Also, it would be great if there was a connect option from Google Looker Studio."
"The initial setup is not too difficult but can be somewhat tricky."
"The cost needs improvement. The product is good, but the cost that we paid for it is expensive, so it wasn't that valuable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."
"You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."
"It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."
"While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided."
"It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."
"The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."
"The solution is affordable."
"The pricing is not that expensive, but it can be, especially when we have deployed it across multiple zones."
"We pay for the license on a monthly basis. It's not cheap or expensive. For smaller companies, it's definitely expensive."
"Comparing the price between the MongoDB and Microsoft SQL Server, we are using the enterprise edition of Microsoft SQL Server, which is more expensive than MongoDB."
"For me, MongoDB is expensive, but I think it is not so expensive for customers."
"The price of MongoDB Atlas is highly expensive to use and maintain. They are taking advantage of the users with such a high price."
"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise tier."
"MongoDB Atlas is not expensive, and since it's a cloud-based solution, you pay by usage."
"The solution is expensive overall. It does not require a license but if you want the support then you will need to purchase the license. They use a pay-as-you-go model and you are able to receive some discounts by making longer usage commitments."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Retailer
8%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Healthcare Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud SQL?
The implementation part of the product was easy.
What needs improvement with Google Cloud SQL?
When discussing media files, such as images and audio files, stored in Google Cloud, concerns about handling large amounts of data arise. If these files exceed 3 GB, backing them up can be challeng...
What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?
There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...
What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?
Searching and browsing through the collection must be made easier.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Atlas
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync
Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.