Google Cloud SQL vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

Google and MongoDB are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while MongoDB is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Google holds a 16.5% mindshare in DS, compared to MongoDB’s 14.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud SQL

Read 22 Google Cloud SQL reviews

3,161 Views
2,874 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB Atlas

Read 48 MongoDB Atlas reviews

3,963 Views
2,403 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Google Cloud SQL

MongoDB Atlas

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Google Cloud SQL and MongoDB Atlas compete in the managed database services category. Google Cloud SQL has the upper hand in SQL database management, while MongoDB Atlas is better suited for NoSQL databases with flexible schema design.

Features: Google Cloud SQL offers automated backups, high availability, and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services. MongoDB Atlas includes rich querying capabilities, horizontal scaling, and global clusters.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud SQL needs better cost management tools and more comprehensive logging features. MongoDB Atlas can improve support responsiveness and documentation clarity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud SQL is known for its straightforward deployment process and robust customer service. MongoDB Atlas is easy to deploy but has slightly lower marks for customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud SQL is more affordable, especially for smaller projects, with good ROI through efficient resource management. MongoDB Atlas, while offering significant features, is seen as relatively more expensive.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud SQL

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB Atlas

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed NoSQL Databases (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud SQL is 16.5%, down from 18.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 14.5%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Prathap Sankar

Analytics Delivery Manager at Tredence Inc.

Gain control and flexibility with customizable tools but has slower performance

I am majorly working in Google Cloud SQL for building my applications Google Cloud SQL provides complete customization options, along with a dashboarding tool and a comprehensive suite of tools that can be used to customize and build any application needed. The deployment model allows for…

Read full review

Laksiri Bala

DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global

Room for improvement in data handling leads to enhanced cost-effective data management performance

It would be beneficial if MongoDB Atlas could better support OLTP aspects and data frames, as well as enhance its capabilities for data pipelines and visualization dashboards. Furthermore, supporting the medallion architecture could be a valuable addition, and incorporating improved spatial and vector handling for geographical data could make it more competitive. Enhancing vector processing for AI capabilities would also be critical.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The implementation part of the product was easy."

"My suggestion to anyone thinking about this solution is to jump into it head-first!"

"It is not the cool features that I find valuable, it is the stability of Google Cloud Platform."

"This is a stable solution and offers good performance."

"Google Cloud SQL is easy to start with and allows me to scale as needed, which is advantageous from a developer perspective."

"What I like the most about Google Cloud SQL is that it handles the management, which allows us to concentrate on our applications."

"It supports different databases, like Postgres and MySQL."

"The deployment model allows for significant control and flexibility."

More Google Cloud SQL pros

"The most valuable feature is the schemaless architecture."

"It can store data as a flat file, similar to a file system."

"The most beneficial MongoDB features for our workload are the ability to scale up and down using automatic sharding and clustering."

"MongoDB Atlas was explicitly designed to support IoT applications. Many databases offer features tailored for IoT use cases."

"The speed of it is the most valuable feature."

"MongoDB is a NoSQL tool."

"The product is simple to use and enterprise-ready. It is also open-source."

"I find MongoDB Atlas highly scalable and easy to use, with very good support."

More MongoDB Atlas pros

Cons

"The product's user interface could be more user-friendly to improve the overall user experience."

"I would like to see better availability of the product in different regions. It should also improve the security with encryption."

"For data analysis, the AI area of the product has certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"When discussing media files, such as images and audio files, stored in Google Cloud, concerns about handling large amounts of data arise."

"The most vulnerable problem with Google SQL is that while you can customize your access control list, it provides you with a public IP address."

"The customer support should be improved."

"I would like to see better integration with all the different tools on the platform."

"I would appreciate more flexibility with specific extensions applicable to engines like PostgreSQL."

More Google Cloud SQL cons

"It would be better if there were more integration capabilities with other products."

"MongoDB Atlas should add more APIs in their Terraform module because sometimes I find it difficult to find the resources in their Terraform model."

"If it could be cheaper, that would make us happy."

"Customer support needs improvement knowledge-wise."

"In the past, MongoDB offered more features for free, but now it's quite limited. The free version is limited, and you need to pay extra to fully utilize it. The pricing could be improved."

"I am not an expert on what improvements could be made to MongoDB."

"MongoDB Atlas is effective for unstructured and semi-structured data, but when it comes to OLTP transactions, its performance declines."

"That is the only drawback that I find with MongoDB: creating the trigger."

More MongoDB Atlas cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided."

"The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."

"The solution is affordable."

"It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."

"You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."

"From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."

"It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."

"It is too expensive. They need to work on this."

"The tool is free since it's an open-source product."

"The price of MongoDB Atlas is highly affordable."

"It is an open-source platform."

"The solution is fairly priced. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"Pricing could always be better."

"The pricing and licensing is great."

"MongoDB Atlas is more cost-effective than Amazon DocumentDB. It also has a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Apart from the standard licensing cost, you must also pay to get MongoDB Atlas technical support, which is expensive."

More MongoDB Atlas pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Retailer

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud SQL?

The implementation part of the product was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud SQL?

The cost is expensive, especially for services like BigQuery, which charge based on query operations. We pay as we use, with no fixed cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud SQL?

Google Cloud SQL needs to improve its support for high-end I/O operations. On-prem systems with high I/O capabilities perform better, as Google Cloud SQL takes more time to handle the same tasks. T...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?

There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?

The price of MongoDB Atlas is reasonable, which is why many organizations, including mine, are opting for it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 41% of the time

Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 36% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 6% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud SQL Competitors

Amazon RDS vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 44% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 16% of the time

MongoDB vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 6% of the time

Upstash vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon DocumentDB vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Atlas Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL

April 2025

Download Google Cloud SQL product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Atlas

April 2025

Download MongoDB Atlas product report

Also Known As

No data available

Atlas

Overview

Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.

Google

MongoDB Atlas offers a cloud-based database service known for speed, scalability, ease of use, and flexibility. Its robust features and advanced security measures support various business needs, making it ideal for unstructured data management.

MongoDB Atlas maximizes data handling capabilities by providing a seamless integration and high availability environment. The platform's schemaless architecture and rich query support make it suitable for complex data processing. With cloud-based infrastructure, deployment and maintenance are simplified, serving sectors such as healthcare, finance, and more. Organizations benefit from autoscaling, clustering, and APIs for effective project management. Continuous improvements in user experience, cost-effectiveness, query performance, and security are expected to meet evolving expectations.

What are the most important features?

Speed: Optimized for fast data handling and processing.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without hassle.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface for efficient navigation.
Flexibility: Supports unstructured data with ease.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with cloud environments.
High Availability: Ensures uninterrupted data access and operations.
Advanced Security: Protects data with robust security measures.
Schemaless Architecture: Enables dynamic data structure management.
Rich Query Support: Facilitates complex queries and analytics.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Easy Deployment: Streamlines the setup process in cloud environments.
Efficient Project Management: APIs and tools enhance workflow.
Cost-Effectiveness: Potential for more flexible pricing models.
Data Management: Automates backups and supports clustering.
Advanced Tools: Enables comprehensive data processing capabilities.

MongoDB Atlas is widely implemented in industries such as healthcare, finance, and technology. It serves applications requiring high availability and scalability, handling tasks from patient data management to real-time analytics. With its adaptable infrastructure, Atlas supports diverse use cases from IoT integration to transactional processing in cloud environments.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync

Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas

April 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.