Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure SQL Database
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MongoDB Atlas
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Managed NoSQL Databases (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure SQL Database is 18.2%, down from 19.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 16.6%, up from 12.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

RV
Nov 9, 2022
Around-the-clock access to your database, maintenance-free, and good performance
Our primary use case of this solution is to host our databases and it is fulfilling our requirements The most valuable feature from the infra point of view is you don't have to keep any on-prem infrastructure, it is available all the time whenever you want to access it. The solution can be…
AL
Jan 23, 2024
Easy to scale and offers good performance and stability
It's good for performance and stability if you need a non-SQL database to store data We use it as a database for some of our microservices. We use it as a database for a few of our microservices. The stability and performance are great. The high availability feature is great. Moreover, I am…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's user-friendly. Compared to other solutions, it's based more on clicks, not on scripts. It's easy to manage."
"We like the ease of integrating it with our on-premises environment. We use a hybrid model. We have a SQL Server on-premises, and we have an integration with the cloud version. We do CPU or disk intensive processes on-premises. For accessibility, we offload onto the cloud. When you do a lot of IO and things like that in the cloud, Microsoft charges for the CPU activity."
"Database services and Active Directory related functions for this solution are good. Stable, scalable, and easy to install. Its technical support is good."
"Cost savings are the most valuable. The DR/high availability is also valuable. The failover group with the built-in DR/high availability features is probably one of the easiest things."
"SQL is a simpler database. We use it more than other databases."
"The main advantage of it is that there is no infrastructure cost. We don't have to host it here. So, there is no infrastructure cost."
"I am very happy with this solution; right now, I don't think there is anything I would change."
"The solution is quite straightforward to set up."
"The dynamic structures are the most valuable."
"The product is user-friendly."
"What I found most valuable in MongoDB Atlas is its Elasticsearch feature. It also has high availability, so it's stable."
"It is nice because our developers create tables whenever they need to sync data."
"The stability and performance are great. The high availability feature is great. Moreover, I am happy with the automated backup and restore functionality."
"The most valuable feature of MongoDB Atlas is it's seamless when working with a lot of different systems. Additionally, it is able to adjust the data based on the data being received."
"It's flexible. We don't need to have a solid upstream availability failover, and everything is seamless in Atlas."
"The product allows us to easily set up and store large amounts of unstructured data."
 

Cons

"Although the solution integrates well into Azure’s ecosystem, it has limited capability and is incompatible with many third-party applications or tools."
"The only problem we have with Azure is regarding the price."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"It does take some time to learn about the environment."
"SQL Azure's performance monitoring features need to be improved. It has a pricing calculator, but it would be great if we could get a rough estimate of the pricing based on fewer parameters, like the data size and the scale of the company."
"Lacks some tools on the SQL Server for data virtualization."
"In terms of support, they don't give much support."
"The solution could be less expensive. They need to work on their pricing model."
"If it could be cheaper, that would make us happy."
"I would like a more comprehensive dashboard."
"During the configuration, we did some migrations where we had to reindex about 70,000 indexes, which took around an hour. They should improve this and optimize the indexing."
"I would like the solution to offer more integration capabilities since it is an area where the solution lacks."
"The web console isn't very intuitive, especially for large data."
"From an improvement standpoint, MongoDB can improve security."
"The replica side, like the venue, can be improved."
"I am still new with it, but since I mentioned that I'm using this product for only the last six months and my experience with this product is good thus far, on a scale of one to ten, I would give MongoDB Atlas a six."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"It requires a license. As compared to its competitors, such as Oracle, it is affordable and reasonable."
"I have an annual spend number, and it is in the hundred thousand dollar range. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees. Even though you have to look at the cost numbers of what you're going to be charged on a monthly basis, what you have to also remember is that your application may need a lot of rewriting and things like that. You get charged not just for the monthly costs but also for the transactions that occur. If your access to the data layer is not so efficient, your costs will go up because you're pulling far more data than you potentially need. These are hidden costs that nobody ever considers. If your application is not written very efficiently, you may actually increase your costs over on-prem versus cloud."
"We have the licensing fee, and we are also paying a third party to maintain it with an SLA. There is no infrastructure cost, but its running costs are higher than expected. There is the cost of the Azure cloud, which is pricier than expected, but it is not specific to SQL Azure. It is specific to the cloud. You expect it to be cheaper, but it is more expensive to run it."
"You can use it for smaller instances and pay less. You can also go for the premium product with all the security, scalability, and business continuity features, but you have to pay a premium amount."
"The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
"SQL Azure is an expensive solution."
"I would like it to be cheaper, but comparatively, it is reasonably priced."
"I am using the free version of the solution."
"For me, MongoDB is expensive, but I think it is not so expensive for customers."
"The solution is fairly priced."
"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise tier."
"It is an open-source platform."
"Comparing the price between the MongoDB and Microsoft SQL Server, we are using the enterprise edition of Microsoft SQL Server, which is more expensive than MongoDB."
"The price of MongoDB Atlas is highly expensive to use and maintain. They are taking advantage of the users with such a high price."
"We pay for a license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
68%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Healthcare Company
2%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
7%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SQL Azure?
The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
What needs improvement with SQL Azure?
The solution’s pricing needs improvement because it is too high.
What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?
There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...
What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?
Searching and browsing through the collection must be made easier.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Atlas
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.