Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Organizations save costs and boost ROI with Azure SQL by reducing data center size, capital expenses, and infrastructure expenditure.
Sentiment score
7.9
Organizations benefit from MongoDB Atlas with cost savings, efficiency, scalable features, but should manage data to avoid extra costs.
It is ensuring we receive what we pay for through the blend of price, performance, and features.
If you're managing your own data center, you always have to overprovision your systems and pay for storage space you're not using.
We've reduced costs by about 20 percent after two or three years.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Microsoft Azure SQL Database's customer service is praised for its resources and support, but satisfaction varies by subscription plans.
Sentiment score
7.0
MongoDB Atlas customer service is generally appreciated, but experiences with technical support vary based on plan and response time.
Microsoft played a significant role, even from a training perspective, and provided resources that directed us toward the right deployment path.
Once I reach the right people, the support is incredibly knowledgeable and thorough.
Microsoft provides excellent service and is always available to support us.
I have used them sometimes, even recently, and found the feedback to be spot on our needs.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Azure SQL Database offers efficient scalability with both manual and automated options, supporting various team sizes effectively.
Sentiment score
7.7
MongoDB Atlas is highly scalable and adaptable, efficiently managing data despite sharding costs and configuration challenges.
Scaling the solution is incredibly simple and involves just clicking a button or dragging a slider.
Azure's scalability features like Elasticity are essential.
Microsoft Azure SQL Database is cloud-based, so it's great for scaling workloads.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Microsoft Azure SQL Database offers high stability, reliability, and performance, consistently receiving top ratings for minimal issues and strong technology.
Sentiment score
8.0
MongoDB Atlas is highly reliable and stable, with strong performance and customer satisfaction, despite minor UI issues.
We can't tell the difference between running on-prem or Azure because we no longer have those latency issues.
SQL never crashes or suddenly becomes unavailable.
Therefore, it is preferable to provision an instance local to the connection point to optimize performance and minimize latency.
 

Room For Improvement

Users desire better security, scalability, cost-efficiency, documentation, integration, pricing, support, automation, monitoring, and search functionalities for Azure SQL Database.
MongoDB Atlas requires a more user-friendly dashboard, better integration, enhanced security, and improved support for efficient scalability.
It would be helpful if CPU performance were not pinned to the amount of storage you're using, and we could scale different properties of the Azure SQL database independently.
I could not get an accurate quote on what my monthly costs would be based on my needs.
To overcome this, we collaborated with the network team to develop alternative solutions.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure SQL Database provides flexible pricing options, although cost complexity can challenge budget management for larger deployments.
MongoDB Atlas offers flexible, cost-effective cloud pricing with scalable options, though support costs can be high without discounts.
Azure Hybrid Benefit reduced costs by facilitating an easy transition of on-premises databases to the cloud.
Microsoft Azure SQL Database is not cheap.
It greatly reduces the total cost of ownership through efficient licensing depending on the client, the cost savings, and hybrid benefits.
For our service, it was around 300 to 600 euros per month, which was acceptable for our customers.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure SQL Database enhances efficiency with scalability, integration, cost savings, global access, security, and AI-powered data processing.
MongoDB Atlas provides high scalability, flexibility, and ease of use with excellent security and seamless integrations for diverse data needs.
The simplicity in usability, along with improved organizational productivity where we no longer need to maintain on-premises SQL servers, is invaluable.
Some of the best features of Microsoft Azure SQL Database are its scalability, pricing, and ease of setup.
Azure SQL helps in reducing the company's total cost of ownership because we don't have to manage on-premises infrastructure.
I find MongoDB Atlas highly scalable and easy to use, with very good support.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure SQL Database
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
116
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MongoDB Atlas
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
Managed NoSQL Databases (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure SQL Database is 15.9%, down from 18.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 14.8%, up from 14.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Charley Hanania - PeerSpot reviewer
It is very easy to implement, manage, and offers great insights into what is happening inside the engine
Microsoft Azure SQL Database is integrated into other Azure capabilities and has a great foundation being on SQL Server with a long history of security, performance, and usability from a DBA perspective. Once you've set up a server, adding databases is easy. There's a minor challenge with having data in separate databases that you want to connect like we do on premises. I'm looking forward to using some of these new AI-driven functions that have come out around vectorization. Having the data closer to my transactional databases or data makes it easy to augment and enhance the Database and applications I currently use. It's great that Azure SQL now seamlessly integrates with Microsoft Fabric. It's a first-tier service in the cloud that connects to web applications and other databases. The data transformation orchestration capabilities within Database Factory and similar capabilities make it effortless to move that stuff forward.
Luca Botti - PeerSpot reviewer
Supportive features enable effective data management and growth
I find MongoDB Atlas highly scalable and easy to use, with very good support. The pricing is quite scalable and applies to various scenarios, both for smaller and bigger companies. MongoDB Atlas has supported our data growth well, and my overall impression is very positive. It is easy to work with and has a reliable support structure. For structured data storage and performance, it provides a comprehensive solution, and the feedback was generally positive.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
73%
Computer Software Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Healthcare Company
2%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SQL Azure?
The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SQL Azure?
The price for running the server increased more than expected in recent months, and better alignment of pricing expectations is needed. Notably, costs related to IT staff coming into the office on ...
What needs improvement with SQL Azure?
We're trying to manage our costs better. We've noticed an unexpected increase in the cost of running the server over the past few months. Addressing pricing clarity and alignment would help us. Als...
What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?
There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?
The pricing is quite acceptable and scalable. For our service, it was around 300 to 600 euros per month, which was acceptable for our customers. We could scale up for better performance and scale d...
What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?
I am not an expert on what improvements could be made to MongoDB. The service is continually evolving with new features while maintaining reasonable pricing, making it attractive for developers.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Atlas
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.