Amazon RDS vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and MongoDB are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while MongoDB is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 25.1% mindshare in DS, compared to MongoDB’s 14.8% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 54 Amazon RDS reviews

5,644 Views
4,707 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

MongoDB Atlas

Read 47 MongoDB Atlas reviews

4,194 Views
2,515 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

MongoDB Atlas

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Amazon RDS and MongoDB Atlas are two prominent database services. MongoDB Atlas has the upper hand in flexible schema design and horizontal scalability, while Amazon RDS is preferred for compatibility with various SQL databases and robust infrastructure.

Features: Amazon RDS offers automated backups, software patching, and read replicas. MongoDB Atlas includes auto-sharding, built-in data visualization tools, and real-time performance insights. MongoDB Atlas is dynamic for unstructured data, while Amazon RDS supports SQL databases.

Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS could enhance its interface and provide more flexibility in scaling. MongoDB Atlas needs more detailed documentation and better performance optimization options. MongoDB Atlas users seek better support resources, whereas Amazon RDS users want improved scaling efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is known for its straightforward deployment process and reliable support. MongoDB Atlas has a quick setup but mixed reviews on customer support. Users find Amazon RDS more consistent in customer service, although MongoDB Atlas offers faster deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS users report favorable setup costs and good ROI with predictable pricing. MongoDB Atlas has flexible pricing that can seem higher initially, but its performance and advanced features justify the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,145 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB Atlas

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed NoSQL Databases (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 25.1%, down from 28.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 14.8%, up from 14.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Samuel Ebite

AICE Graduate at alx_africa

Ensure high availability with robust encryption and seamless backups

Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS. The best practices we've employed with RDS help design a well-architected framework, encompassing security, encryption, scalability with multi-availability zone deployment, and operational excellence with automated backups. RDS features, such as reserved instances, storage auto-scaling, monitoring with technologies like CloudWatch, and proxies, contribute to cost optimization. The solution enhances security with IAM authentication and offers high availability to end users.

Read full review

Luca Botti

Partner at Red software systems

Supportive features enable effective data management and growth

I find MongoDB Atlas highly scalable and easy to use, with very good support. The pricing is quite scalable and applies to various scenarios, both for smaller and bigger companies. MongoDB Atlas has supported our data growth well, and my overall impression is very positive. It is easy to work with and has a reliable support structure. For structured data storage and performance, it provides a comprehensive solution, and the feedback was generally positive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to use, flexible, and powerful."

"Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS."

"Amazon RDS is a scalable solution."

"The provisioning is much faster. You don't have to prepare hardware or install software. You just need to create an instance and you have a database."

"Amazon RDS is good for backups, auto-scanning, and disaster recovery. It's also appropriate for the office server."

"The time to install or set up a database environment is very fast."

"Amazon RDS fulfills PCI requirements, which is a valuable feature for us."

"Amazon RDS is easy to maintain and easy to deploy."

More Amazon RDS pros

"It enables us to get work done quickly and get to our data."

"The key feature of MongoDB Atlas that has been helpful for us is the ease of deploying new databases."

"What I found most valuable in MongoDB Atlas is its Elasticsearch feature. It also has high availability, so it's stable."

"The stability and performance are great. The high availability feature is great. Moreover, I am happy with the automated backup and restore functionality."

"It can store data as a flat file, similar to a file system."

"The most valuable feature of MongoDB Atlas is it's seamless when working with a lot of different systems. Additionally, it is able to adjust the data based on the data being received."

"The product provides quick transaction service, high availability, and efficient scalability features."

"Our databases used to be in-house. Now, they are in the cloud with MongoDB and everything is much easier."

More MongoDB Atlas pros

Cons

"There are some use cases that might come up where we would want to understand the performance aspects better."

"The solution's version upgrade and performance could be improved."

"The technical support from Amazon could improve. I would rate them a six out of ten as they do not fully meet my expectations."

"The product must add more older versions of the database engines."

"There are a few aspects of database management that have room for improvement. There are a few parameters in the solution that are a bit unclear at our end as it's not understandable."

"For improvements, Amazon RDS could work on more features for multi-availability zone deployment to enhance higher availability, and on simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises to cloud environments."

"Amazon has a policy of automatically restarting the server every seven days."

"Currently, we are using Fargate. Instead of that, we are planning to use EC2 instances, but we are facing some problems, and we are unable to enable NAT gateway for Elastic Load Balancer. When we enable auto-scaling, the instance count increases, and we get IP addresses dynamically. We need to whitelist the IPs of these instances, but there is no option to whitelist those IPs in Amazon RDS. We need one static IP that we can assign to ELB so that we can whitelist this IP."

More Amazon RDS cons

"That is the only drawback that I find with MongoDB: creating the trigger."

"It would be better if there were more integration capabilities with other products."

"The web console isn't very intuitive, especially for large data."

"I would like the solution to offer more integration capabilities since it is an area where the solution lacks."

"Based on its own habitat, it's not ACID compliant. If it had an ACID compliant option, it would be more useful for database administration."

"I would like a more comprehensive dashboard."

"The UI is not currently designed in a manner to make it possible for a non-technical person or a layman to update the database easily."

"We had some bad trainers when we first came onboard and would rate them fairly low. They did not seem staffed properly to fulfill the training services that they offered."

More MongoDB Atlas cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Amazon RDS is reasonable."

"The solution's price is good."

"On a scale from one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, and one is the cheapest, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"The prices for different regions are different."

"The substantial initial credit and cost-effectiveness make Amazon an attractive option."

"if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."

"The platform pricing is on the higher side, but given its capabilities and ease of use, it remains competitive."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"We're currently using the Atlas for the night and don't require a license. However, it can be a problem if you want to use their enterprise environment. Then you need to purchase the license."

"The pricing is good. We originally chose it over DynamoDB because of the pricing."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise tier."

"We pay for a license."

"I am using the free version of the solution."

"MongoDB Atlas is more cost-effective than Amazon DocumentDB. It also has a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Apart from the standard licensing cost, you must also pay to get MongoDB Atlas technical support, which is expensive."

"The pricing and licensing is great."

"It is an open-source platform."

More MongoDB Atlas pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

The pricing for Amazon RDS is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

One key improvement would be adding support for multi-storage paradigms, including columnar support, as seen in TiDB. The serverless support with Aurora could also be enhanced. Additionally, having...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?

There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?

The pricing is quite acceptable and scalable. For our service, it was around 300 to 600 euros per month, which was acceptable for our customers. We could scale up for better performance and scale d...

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?

I am not an expert on what improvements could be made to MongoDB. The service is continually evolving with new features while maintaining reasonable pricing, making it attractive for developers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon RDS

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 15% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 14% of the time

MongoDB vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 6% of the time

Upstash vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 5% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 4% of the time

More MongoDB Atlas Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

March 2025

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Atlas

March 2025

Download MongoDB Atlas product report

Also Known As

RDS

Atlas

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MongoDB Atlas offers a cloud-based database service known for speed, scalability, ease of use, and flexibility. Its robust features and advanced security measures support various business needs, making it ideal for unstructured data management.

MongoDB Atlas maximizes data handling capabilities by providing a seamless integration and high availability environment. The platform's schemaless architecture and rich query support make it suitable for complex data processing. With cloud-based infrastructure, deployment and maintenance are simplified, serving sectors such as healthcare, finance, and more. Organizations benefit from autoscaling, clustering, and APIs for effective project management. Continuous improvements in user experience, cost-effectiveness, query performance, and security are expected to meet evolving expectations.

What are the most important features?

Speed: Optimized for fast data handling and processing.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without hassle.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface for efficient navigation.
Flexibility: Supports unstructured data with ease.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with cloud environments.
High Availability: Ensures uninterrupted data access and operations.
Advanced Security: Protects data with robust security measures.
Schemaless Architecture: Enables dynamic data structure management.
Rich Query Support: Facilitates complex queries and analytics.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Easy Deployment: Streamlines the setup process in cloud environments.
Efficient Project Management: APIs and tools enhance workflow.
Cost-Effectiveness: Potential for more flexible pricing models.
Data Management: Automates backups and supports clustering.
Advanced Tools: Enables comprehensive data processing capabilities.

MongoDB Atlas is widely implemented in industries such as healthcare, finance, and technology. It serves applications requiring high availability and scalability, handling tasks from patient data management to real-time analytics. With its adaptable infrastructure, Atlas supports diverse use cases from IoT integration to transactional processing in cloud environments.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

Edmodo

Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas

March 2025

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.