Amazon RDS vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and MongoDB are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while MongoDB is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 26.1% mindshare in DS, compared to MongoDB’s 15.0% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 53 Amazon RDS reviews

6,202 Views
5,238 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

MongoDB Atlas

Read 47 MongoDB Atlas reviews

4,552 Views
2,700 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

MongoDB Atlas

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Amazon RDS and MongoDB Atlas are two prominent database services. MongoDB Atlas has the upper hand in flexible schema design and horizontal scalability, while Amazon RDS is preferred for compatibility with various SQL databases and robust infrastructure.

Features: Amazon RDS offers automated backups, software patching, and read replicas. MongoDB Atlas includes auto-sharding, built-in data visualization tools, and real-time performance insights. MongoDB Atlas is dynamic for unstructured data, while Amazon RDS supports SQL databases.

Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS could enhance its interface and provide more flexibility in scaling. MongoDB Atlas needs more detailed documentation and better performance optimization options. MongoDB Atlas users seek better support resources, whereas Amazon RDS users want improved scaling efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is known for its straightforward deployment process and reliable support. MongoDB Atlas has a quick setup but mixed reviews on customer support. Users find Amazon RDS more consistent in customer service, although MongoDB Atlas offers faster deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS users report favorable setup costs and good ROI with predictable pricing. MongoDB Atlas has flexible pricing that can seem higher initially, but its performance and advanced features justify the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB Atlas

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed NoSQL Databases (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 26.1%, down from 28.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 15.0%, up from 13.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Samuel Ebite

AICE Graduate at alx_africa

Ensure high availability with robust encryption and seamless backups

Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS. The best practices we've employed with RDS help design a well-architected framework, encompassing security, encryption, scalability with multi-availability zone deployment, and operational excellence with automated backups. RDS features, such as reserved instances, storage auto-scaling, monitoring with technologies like CloudWatch, and proxies, contribute to cost optimization. The solution enhances security with IAM authentication and offers high availability to end users.

Read full review

Luca Botti

Partner at Red software systems

Supportive features enable effective data management and growth

I find MongoDB Atlas highly scalable and easy to use, with very good support. The pricing is quite scalable and applies to various scenarios, both for smaller and bigger companies. MongoDB Atlas has supported our data growth well, and my overall impression is very positive. It is easy to work with and has a reliable support structure. For structured data storage and performance, it provides a comprehensive solution, and the feedback was generally positive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very easy to set up initially."

"The product's installation phase is easy."

"The provisioning is much faster. You don't have to prepare hardware or install software. You just need to create an instance and you have a database."

"I found it to be a stable solution."

"The product's initial setup phase is totally easy."

"Amazon RDS gives us the ability to select as many tools, replicas, regions, and zones as we want."

"The product solved our DevOps and admin problems."

"Being able to change the size of an RDS MySQL instance is amazing."

More Amazon RDS pros

"It enables us to get work done quickly and get to our data."

"The stability and performance are great. The high availability feature is great. Moreover, I am happy with the automated backup and restore functionality."

"The product is user-friendly."

"The speed of it is the most valuable feature."

"Object-based data storing capability and managing non-structured data capability are the most valuable features of MongoDB Atlas."

"The dynamic structures are the most valuable."

"The key feature of MongoDB Atlas that has been helpful for us is the ease of deploying new databases."

"I am impressed with the tool's integrations."

More MongoDB Atlas pros

Cons

"I also don't think it's very scalable."

"There are some advanced monitoring queries that we cannot execute because Amazon doesn't give admin privileges to the end users."

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"For improvements, Amazon RDS could work on more features for multi-availability zone deployment to enhance higher availability, and on simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises to cloud environments."

"It would be helpful if they made it easier to migrate from an existing on-premises solution to the cloud-based service."

"Amazon RDS should have a more user-friendly graphical user interface and include better database management options."

"Amazon cannot guarantee the stability of some extensions, and there is a need for different extensions to meet PCI requirements."

"It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with Microsoft products. Our clients use the Microsoft Tally application server. We already tried to create a reputation from, for example, an on-premises environment from our client to Amazon RDS using Microsoft Tally server, and we couldn't do that because we didn't have a strong user in RDS. We couldn't create a reputation from an on-premises environment from the Microsoft Tally server to RDS. I think that it would be a good implementation, and it would help us with this case."

More Amazon RDS cons

"MongoDB Atlas should add more APIs in their Terraform module because sometimes I find it difficult to find the resources in their Terraform model."

"Searching and browsing through the collection must be made easier."

"Customer support needs improvement knowledge-wise."

"The UI application for MongoDB crashes a lot, so we would have to use a third-party plugin to make it work."

"One improvement that I would like to see is a feature to export changes made in the environment, such as creating a new user."

"The replica side, like the venue, can be improved."

"Going forward, we would like to have pure AWS Cloud (native) storage instead regular storage on the AWS integration side."

"The initial configuration fine-tuning for performance can be time-consuming."

More MongoDB Atlas cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform pricing is on the higher side, but given its capabilities and ease of use, it remains competitive."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution is fairly priced."

"Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."

"The solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."

"The cost is manageable because you can see the expense associated with each instance and utilize tools for tagging and cost control."

"By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise tier."

"The pricing is good. We originally chose it over DynamoDB because of the pricing."

"The price of MongoDB Atlas is highly expensive to use and maintain. They are taking advantage of the users with such a high price."

"It is too expensive. They need to work on this."

"MongoDB Atlas is more cost-effective than Amazon DocumentDB. It also has a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Apart from the standard licensing cost, you must also pay to get MongoDB Atlas technical support, which is expensive."

"It is an open-source platform."

"We're currently using the Atlas for the night and don't require a license. However, it can be a problem if you want to use their enterprise environment. Then you need to purchase the license."

"The solution is expensive overall. It does not require a license but if you want the support then you will need to purchase the license. They use a pay-as-you-go model and you are able to receive some discounts by making longer usage commitments."

More MongoDB Atlas pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

I find the pricing of Amazon RDS fair, as AWS operates on a pay-for-what-you-use model. Auto scalability helps handle varying demand, making it cost-efficient without overprovisioning resources.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

For improvements, Amazon RDS could work on more features for multi-availability zone deployment to enhance higher availability, and on simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?

There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?

The pricing is quite acceptable and scalable. For our service, it was around 300 to 600 euros per month, which was acceptable for our customers. We could scale up for better performance and scale d...

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?

I am not an expert on what improvements could be made to MongoDB. The service is continually evolving with new features while maintaining reasonable pricing, making it attractive for developers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 17% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 15% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 4% of the time

Upstash vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 3% of the time

Amazon DocumentDB vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 2% of the time

More MongoDB Atlas Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

January 2025

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Atlas

January 2025

Download MongoDB Atlas product report

Also Known As

RDS

Atlas

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MongoDB

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

MongoDB Atlas offers a cloud-based database service known for speed, scalability, ease of use, and flexibility. Its robust features and advanced security measures support various business needs, making it ideal for unstructured data management.

MongoDB Atlas maximizes data handling capabilities by providing a seamless integration and high availability environment. The platform's schemaless architecture and rich query support make it suitable for complex data processing. With cloud-based infrastructure, deployment and maintenance are simplified, serving sectors such as healthcare, finance, and more. Organizations benefit from autoscaling, clustering, and APIs for effective project management. Continuous improvements in user experience, cost-effectiveness, query performance, and security are expected to meet evolving expectations.

What are the most important features?

Speed: Optimized for fast data handling and processing.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without hassle.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface for efficient navigation.
Flexibility: Supports unstructured data with ease.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with cloud environments.
High Availability: Ensures uninterrupted data access and operations.
Advanced Security: Protects data with robust security measures.
Schemaless Architecture: Enables dynamic data structure management.
Rich Query Support: Facilitates complex queries and analytics.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Easy Deployment: Streamlines the setup process in cloud environments.
Efficient Project Management: APIs and tools enhance workflow.
Cost-Effectiveness: Potential for more flexible pricing models.
Data Management: Automates backups and supports clustering.
Advanced Tools: Enables comprehensive data processing capabilities.

MongoDB Atlas is widely implemented in industries such as healthcare, finance, and technology. It serves applications requiring high availability and scalability, handling tasks from patient data management to real-time analytics. With its adaptable infrastructure, Atlas supports diverse use cases from IoT integration to transactional processing in cloud environments.

Sample Customers

Edmodo

Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.