Amazon RDS vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 25.9% mindshare in DS, compared to Oracle’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 53 Amazon RDS reviews

6,510 Views
5,468 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Read 6 Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer reviews

975 Views
517 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Amazon RDS and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer compete in the cloud database solutions category. Amazon RDS seems to have the upper hand in deployment ease and pricing, while Oracle Exadata stands out with its advanced features and performance.

Features: Amazon RDS provides automation, scalability, and straightforward integration with other AWS services, which users find highly valuable. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer offers advanced database capabilities, superior performance, and comprehensive security features. Users who require extensive database functionalities and high performance lean towards Oracle Exadata.

Room for Improvement: Users of Amazon RDS highlight the need for better performance for complex queries and more extensive support for non-relational databases. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer users seek improvements in usability and wish for an easier initial setup process. Both products have room for optimization, but the focus areas differ, with Amazon RDS needing performance enhancements and Oracle aiming to simplify its setup and usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is praised for its simple deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, while more complex to deploy, is highly regarded for its dedicated customer support. Users find Amazon’s deployment swift and hassle-free, whereas Oracle’s product requires a more involved setup but comes with excellent support.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS is cost-effective, appealing to businesses looking for affordable database solutions. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer offers higher setup costs but delivers substantial ROI for enterprises demanding top-tier database performance and features. Pricing efficiency is a selling point for Amazon RDS, while Oracle’s high investment is justified by its advanced capabilities and performance yields.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 25.9%, down from 28.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is 4.2%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

Provides excellent authentication, authorization, integration, data protection, and autoscaling features

The product should support new databases. RocketDB is written in C++. It is useful when we work with Kafka. The product should support more databases and not just the standard four to five databases. It will help the users to explore new avenues and not be confined to the standard ones. The tool provides automatic backup, but the recovery is slow if something goes wrong. We need to wait for some time. If a failure happens, recovery takes some time. Meanwhile, we lose business. It would be great if it happens much faster. The cross-region replication settings are very complex. We need to do careful planning.

Read full review

RODRIGOPETERSON

Senior Architect at Capgemini

Leverages cloud capabilities and offers minimal latency with operation model

Customers have less operational burden and more responsibility regarding the management of hardware. Increasing the scale of Oracle Exadata Cloud provides more capacity, higher performance, and expanded storage, CPU, and memory resources. If you need to scale Oracle's capacity up or down, the appliance can be adjusted on-premise. When you purchase Oracle Exadata Cloud, you must acquire either a half or full rack. If you need to increase capacity, you can scale up by adding more hardware. This hardware commitment lasts four to five years, meaning you must maintain this infrastructure and continue payments for that period. While you can scale up to meet increased demands, scaling down is more challenging. I recommend the solution when the customer desires to transition to a cloud-native solution but needs to retain their data in OpenEdge due to compatibility issues or the requirement to interact with on-premise systems to minimize latency. This solution offers minimal latency and modernizes Oracle capabilities through a gateway. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"For me, RDS is a great solution. I like that Amazon RDS is a very simple solution to implement and to start using."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it requires an easy setup phase, and it is also easy to use while not being too heavy on its users."

"Amazon RDS is quite a well-managed and stable service...The initial setup was very easy."

"The product's initial setup phase is totally easy."

"It handles large-scale data migrations perfectly. Amazon RDS's performance is quite good. Charges are incurred after you utilize the service"

"The product's installation phase is easy."

"One of the most valuable features is that it is serverless, so we don't have to worry about scaling."

More Amazon RDS pros

"Performance has significantly improved."

"The most valuable feature is that it is based on Exadata infrastructure, which is Oracle 's leading engineered system that is trusted, fault-tolerant, and has unique performance features."

"Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime."

"The operation model is the most valuable feature."

"I am particularly fond of the intelligent capabilities that enhance the backend, utilizing technology to analyze SQL queries."

"I like that Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is a stable, well-positioned product in the market today, and it's very scalable."

Cons

"Amazon RDS needs to have an overall dashboard where I can view all the tables in the form of pie charts and Gantt charts. The deployment is complex, and we would like to see automated scripts. It needs to incorporate performance insights."

"The support team of Amazon RDS provides us with some links to go through whenever we face some issues, but it doesn't work for us."

"For improvements, Amazon RDS could work on more features for multi-availability zone deployment to enhance higher availability, and on simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises to cloud environments."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"The solution's version upgrade and performance could be improved."

"The security features could be improved."

"The solution's connectivity and response logs could be improved."

"The product must add more older versions of the database engines."

More Amazon RDS cons

"Scalability is not straightforward."

"For the data migration, we used ZDM. It was not integrated with the databases, and the documentation lacks clarity."

"As a customer, you can't see the boot messages of your virtualized guest machines."

"A room for improvement in Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that they need to train more partners to gain more knowledge because currently, they are keeping a lot to themselves. For example, they are still keeping a lot of information on their campus, so information sharing is limited."

"The solution is expensive."

"We had some problems in the developer's environment. We had some problems with the initial installation environment."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is fairly priced."

"Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."

"The price of Amazon RDS is expensive."

"By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."

"Amazon RDS is an expensive solution."

"if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."

"The cost depends on the kind of instance we use."

"The solution is expensive."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"The machine and the cloud model itself already have licensing advantages."

"The price is too much."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

37%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

I find the pricing of Amazon RDS fair, as AWS operates on a pay-for-what-you-use model. Auto scalability helps handle varying demand, making it cost-efficient without overprovisioning resources.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

For improvements, Amazon RDS could work on more features for multi-availability zone deployment to enhance higher availability, and on simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

The pricing is reasonable due to a universal agreement, which often positions Oracle solutions better against others. I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

Scalability is not straightforward, as you can scale up and not down. Improvements could be made to make scalability more flexible.

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 31% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 16% of the time

Yugabyte Platform vs Amazon RDS

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Oracle Database as a Service vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 52% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 11% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 8% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

December 2024

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

December 2024

Download Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Oracle Cloud@Customer brings Oracle’s complete portfolio of public cloud infrastructure, fully managed cloud services, and Oracle Fusion SaaS applications into your data center. It enables you to run applications faster and lower your costs using the same high-performance capabilities, autonomous operations, and low-cost subscription pricing in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). You get all this while maintaining complete control of your data so you can address data residency, security, and connectivity concerns.

Sample Customers

Edmodo

IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish Water, trueblue, AirAsia, droptank

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

December 2024

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.