Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Google is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 25.9% mindshare in DS, compared to Google’s 17.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 53 Amazon RDS reviews

6,510 Views
5,468 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Google Cloud SQL

Read 21 Google Cloud SQL reviews

4,054 Views
3,702 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

Google Cloud SQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL are leading options in database management solutions. Google Cloud SQL is often preferred due to its advanced features, as deduced from these comparisons.

Features: Amazon RDS offers reliable service with seamless AWS integration, automated backups, and scalable solutions. Google Cloud SQL is noted for its advanced data security, flexibility, and integration with Google Cloud services, alongside superior performance metrics.

Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS could improve its interface intuitiveness, simplify its setup, and enhance documentation detail. Google Cloud SQL users point to documentation enhancements and extended programming language support, while suggesting more intuitive interface updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS allows efficient deployment with strong customer support, aiding troubleshooting. Google Cloud SQL deployment is known for its speed and simplicity, but could benefit from more direct support options.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS is cost-effective, providing satisfactory ROI. Google Cloud SQL is seen as more expensive but justifies the cost with its high-end features, delivering returns aligned with its pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud SQL

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 25.9%, down from 28.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud SQL is 17.2%, down from 19.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

Provides excellent authentication, authorization, integration, data protection, and autoscaling features

The product should support new databases. RocketDB is written in C++. It is useful when we work with Kafka. The product should support more databases and not just the standard four to five databases. It will help the users to explore new avenues and not be confined to the standard ones. The tool provides automatic backup, but the recovery is slow if something goes wrong. We need to wait for some time. If a failure happens, recovery takes some time. Meanwhile, we lose business. It would be great if it happens much faster. The cross-region replication settings are very complex. We need to do careful planning.

Read full review

Prathap Sankar

Analytics Delivery Manager at Tredence Inc.

Gain control and flexibility with customizable tools but has slower performance

I am majorly working in Google Cloud SQL for building my applications Google Cloud SQL provides complete customization options, along with a dashboarding tool and a comprehensive suite of tools that can be used to customize and build any application needed. The deployment model allows for…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward, and technical support is good."

"The most valuable aspect of Amazon RDS is it is on the cloud."

"It is easy to use, flexible, and powerful."

"Encryption is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable features of Amazon RDS are its scalability, reliability, and intelligence."

"Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS."

"I recommend RDS because it makes your life super easy."

"One of the most valuable features is that it is serverless, so we don't have to worry about scaling."

More Amazon RDS pros

"Google Cloud SQL enhances our AI-driven projects by providing features like query optimization and scalability for efficiently processing large datasets."

"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use, simple, and user-friendly."

"It's SQL. SQL is so easy if you know something about databases. It's easy to learn."

"It directly provides robust data safety. It also offers various other storage options, such as Google Cloud Storage. These services ensure data security and redundancy. Furthermore, it includes different storage classes, allowing flexible data management tailored to specific needs."

"I found its storage and security to be the most valuable. It was a good experience. It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is perfect."

"Ease of management and the ability to oversee the statistics of your SQL."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The deployment model allows for significant control and flexibility."

More Google Cloud SQL pros

Cons

"In the next release, it would be great to see RDS provide connection pooling out of the box."

"A lot of the features are disabled by default. The solution should enable more features. I understand this could cause challenges to management for many clients using RDS, however."

"Amazon cannot guarantee the stability of some extensions, and there is a need for different extensions to meet PCI requirements."

"The solution's connectivity and response logs could be improved."

"One notable improvement that could enhance the database management experience, particularly during migration scenarios, is the accessibility of the root user."

"Currently, we are using Fargate. Instead of that, we are planning to use EC2 instances, but we are facing some problems, and we are unable to enable NAT gateway for Elastic Load Balancer. When we enable auto-scaling, the instance count increases, and we get IP addresses dynamically. We need to whitelist the IPs of these instances, but there is no option to whitelist those IPs in Amazon RDS. We need one static IP that we can assign to ELB so that we can whitelist this IP."

"Amazon RDS should have a more user-friendly graphical user interface and include better database management options."

"The Performance Monitor they have is a little clanky, at least in regards to the UI."

More Amazon RDS cons

"The customer support should be improved."

"I would appreciate more flexibility with specific extensions applicable to engines like PostgreSQL."

"The monitoring part could be better."

"The only thing that could be better is the pricing."

"Google Cloud SQL still needs better connectivity to outside, existing data sources."

"For data analysis, the AI area of the product has certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The performance compared to AWS is not as fast, and the technical support could be better as they don't have a dedicated team, but mostly AI handles the support now."

"To create a seamless data integration, the title integration of these databases with the data integration platforms is essential. This is what we would like to have in a future release."

More Google Cloud SQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."

"The substantial initial credit and cost-effectiveness make Amazon an attractive option."

"Amazon RDS is less expensive than other solutions."

"We are paying for a service license."

"The prices for different regions are different."

"The solution's price is good."

"The cost depends on the kind of instance we use."

"The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided."

"The solution is affordable."

"It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."

"From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."

"You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."

"The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."

"It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

I find the pricing of Amazon RDS fair, as AWS operates on a pay-for-what-you-use model. Auto scalability helps handle varying demand, making it cost-efficient without overprovisioning resources.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

For improvements, Amazon RDS could work on more features for multi-availability zone deployment to enhance higher availability, and on simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises...

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud SQL?

The implementation part of the product was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud SQL?

The solution is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud SQL?

When discussing media files, such as images and audio files, stored in Google Cloud, concerns about handling large amounts of data arise. If these files exceed 3 GB, backing them up can be challeng...

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 31% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 40% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 5% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 2% of the time

IBM Db2 on Cloud vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud SQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

December 2024

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL

December 2024

Download Google Cloud SQL product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.

Sample Customers

Edmodo

BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

December 2024

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.