Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 26.1% mindshare in DS, compared to Google’s 17.3% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 53 Amazon RDS reviews

6,202 Views
5,238 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Google Cloud SQL

Read 21 Google Cloud SQL reviews

3,809 Views
3,489 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

Google Cloud SQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL compete in the cloud-based relational database service market. Amazon RDS seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features, supporting multiple database engines and offering deployment flexibility.

Features: Amazon RDS offers deployment agility, support for multiple database engines, fully managed services, and high availability with multi-AZ deployments. It also includes automated backups and easy scalability. Google Cloud SQL focuses on ease of management, high availability options, and seamless database migrations. It is especially suitable for handling diverse data with extensive storage and redundancy.

Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS users are concerned about complex migrations, lack of shell access, and limited database support. Integration with Microsoft products and cost-effective management are desired. Google Cloud SQL could improve by enhancing security related to public IP addresses and expanding database integration capabilities, such as better analytics and AI capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL offer cloud and on-premises hybrid solutions. Amazon RDS has comprehensive documentation, but some users find technical support reliant on service tier commitments. Google Cloud SQL is known for prompt customer service, though initial configuration can be complex.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS is cost-effective when optimized but requires careful cloud provisioning to avoid unexpected expenses. Its pay-as-you-go model helps in reducing DBA overheads. Google Cloud SQL's pricing is competitive, slightly more expensive than AWS but attractive due to simplicity and lower management costs. Both solutions offer potential ROI, with users noting cost savings from reduced infrastructure investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud SQL

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 26.1%, down from 28.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud SQL is 17.3%, down from 19.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Samuel Ebite

AICE Graduate at alx_africa

Ensure high availability with robust encryption and seamless backups

Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS. The best practices we've employed with RDS help design a well-architected framework, encompassing security, encryption, scalability with multi-availability zone deployment, and operational excellence with automated backups. RDS features, such as reserved instances, storage auto-scaling, monitoring with technologies like CloudWatch, and proxies, contribute to cost optimization. The solution enhances security with IAM authentication and offers high availability to end users.

Read full review

Prathap Sankar

Analytics Delivery Manager at Tredence Inc.

Gain control and flexibility with customizable tools but has slower performance

I am majorly working in Google Cloud SQL for building my applications Google Cloud SQL provides complete customization options, along with a dashboarding tool and a comprehensive suite of tools that can be used to customize and build any application needed. The deployment model allows for…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of Amazon RDS is it is on the cloud."

"Amazon RDS is a scalable solution."

"It is stable, scalable, and easy to deploy."

"It makes it easy to administer the database. It helps to scale your database by providing Read Replicas, which reduce transaction time. It is highly available and durable which helps in disaster recovery and management."

"The solution is scalable and can be configured with AWS Secrets Manager."

"It significantly reduces database management overhead."

"It handles large-scale data migrations perfectly. Amazon RDS's performance is quite good. Charges are incurred after you utilize the service"

"The product's installation phase is easy."

More Amazon RDS pros

"The valuable feature of Google Cloud SQL is its high availability option. The product is stable."

"What I like the most about Google Cloud SQL is that it handles the management, which allows us to concentrate on our applications."

"The implementation part of the product was easy."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"It directly provides robust data safety. It also offers various other storage options, such as Google Cloud Storage. These services ensure data security and redundancy. Furthermore, it includes different storage classes, allowing flexible data management tailored to specific needs."

"Ease of management and the ability to oversee the statistics of your SQL."

"It supports different databases, like Postgres and MySQL."

"The product is scalable."

More Google Cloud SQL pros

Cons

"The setup might be a bit challenging for multi-level applications."

"Amazon RDS should have a more user-friendly graphical user interface and include better database management options."

"You can only get access from the sales support. That means if you want to buy something or renew your subscription or upgrade, all these services are easily available. Yet, if you would like to get some technical support, you have to pay for it. You have to pay for an additional subscription."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"Amazon RDS needs to have an overall dashboard where I can view all the tables in the form of pie charts and Gantt charts. The deployment is complex, and we would like to see automated scripts. It needs to incorporate performance insights."

"Currently, we are using Fargate. Instead of that, we are planning to use EC2 instances, but we are facing some problems, and we are unable to enable NAT gateway for Elastic Load Balancer. When we enable auto-scaling, the instance count increases, and we get IP addresses dynamically. We need to whitelist the IPs of these instances, but there is no option to whitelist those IPs in Amazon RDS. We need one static IP that we can assign to ELB so that we can whitelist this IP."

"Amazon cannot guarantee the stability of some extensions, and there is a need for different extensions to meet PCI requirements."

"The security features could be improved."

More Amazon RDS cons

"When discussing media files, such as images and audio files, stored in Google Cloud, concerns about handling large amounts of data arise."

"I would like to see better availability of the product in different regions. It should also improve the security with encryption."

"They could improve documentation and dashboard stability for efficient user experience and database management."

"The most challenging part is dealing with legacy data from your old systems and migrating it into the new setup, but once you've completed the data migration, it becomes quite convenient to use."

"The most vulnerable problem with Google SQL is that while you can customize your access control list, it provides you with a public IP address."

"To create a seamless data integration, the title integration of these databases with the data integration platforms is essential. This is what we would like to have in a future release."

"I would like to see better integration with all the different tools on the platform."

"For data analysis, the AI area of the product has certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

More Google Cloud SQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon RDS is less expensive than other solutions."

"The price could be better."

"Amazon RDS is cheaper compared to other tools."

"We are paying for a service license."

"The cost depends on the kind of instance we use."

"On a scale from one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, and one is the cheapest, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution's price is good."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."

"The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."

"While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided."

"You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."

"The solution is affordable."

"It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."

"It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

I find the pricing of Amazon RDS fair, as AWS operates on a pay-for-what-you-use model. Auto scalability helps handle varying demand, making it cost-efficient without overprovisioning resources.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

For improvements, Amazon RDS could work on more features for multi-availability zone deployment to enhance higher availability, and on simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises...

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud SQL?

The implementation part of the product was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud SQL?

Google Cloud SQL is competitively priced compared to other services like RDS from Amazon.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud SQL?

I would appreciate more flexibility with specific extensions applicable to engines like PostgreSQL. This would enhance the capabilities of Google Cloud SQL.

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 31% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 41% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 5% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 2% of the time

IBM Db2 on Cloud vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud SQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

January 2025

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL

January 2025

Download Google Cloud SQL product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.

Sample Customers

Edmodo

BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.