Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 25.4% mindshare in DS, compared to Google’s 16.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 53 Amazon RDS reviews

5,944 Views
4,999 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Google Cloud SQL

Read 21 Google Cloud SQL reviews

3,636 Views
3,324 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

Google Cloud SQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL compete in the cloud-based relational database service market. Amazon RDS seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features, supporting multiple database engines and offering deployment flexibility.

Features: Amazon RDS offers deployment agility, support for multiple database engines, fully managed services, and high availability with multi-AZ deployments. It also includes automated backups and easy scalability. Google Cloud SQL focuses on ease of management, high availability options, and seamless database migrations. It is especially suitable for handling diverse data with extensive storage and redundancy.

Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS users are concerned about complex migrations, lack of shell access, and limited database support. Integration with Microsoft products and cost-effective management are desired. Google Cloud SQL could improve by enhancing security related to public IP addresses and expanding database integration capabilities, such as better analytics and AI capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL offer cloud and on-premises hybrid solutions. Amazon RDS has comprehensive documentation, but some users find technical support reliant on service tier commitments. Google Cloud SQL is known for prompt customer service, though initial configuration can be complex.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS is cost-effective when optimized but requires careful cloud provisioning to avoid unexpected expenses. Its pay-as-you-go model helps in reducing DBA overheads. Google Cloud SQL's pricing is competitive, slightly more expensive than AWS but attractive due to simplicity and lower management costs. Both solutions offer potential ROI, with users noting cost savings from reduced infrastructure investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 837,501 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud SQL

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 25.4%, down from 28.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud SQL is 16.6%, down from 18.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Samuel Ebite

AICE Graduate at alx_africa

Ensure high availability with robust encryption and seamless backups

Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS. The best practices we've employed with RDS help design a well-architected framework, encompassing security, encryption, scalability with multi-availability zone deployment, and operational excellence with automated backups. RDS features, such as reserved instances, storage auto-scaling, monitoring with technologies like CloudWatch, and proxies, contribute to cost optimization. The solution enhances security with IAM authentication and offers high availability to end users.

Read full review

Prathap Sankar

Analytics Delivery Manager at Tredence Inc.

Gain control and flexibility with customizable tools but has slower performance

I am majorly working in Google Cloud SQL for building my applications Google Cloud SQL provides complete customization options, along with a dashboarding tool and a comprehensive suite of tools that can be used to customize and build any application needed. The deployment model allows for…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is very easy to use and configure."

"Relational databases excel in extensive normalization, eliminating data redundancy and efficiently structuring tables which leads to a clear and efficient relationship between tables using primary keys."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable aspect of Amazon RDS is it is on the cloud."

"It is stable, scalable, and easy to deploy."

"It's a fully managed database, so that makes our life easier from the operational standpoint. That is the key, basically."

"One of the most valuable features is that it is serverless, so we don't have to worry about scaling."

"I found it to be a stable solution."

More Amazon RDS pros

"What I like the most about Google Cloud SQL is that it handles the management, which allows us to concentrate on our applications."

"I found its storage and security to be the most valuable. It was a good experience. It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is perfect."

"Google Cloud SQL enhances our AI-driven projects by providing features like query optimization and scalability for efficiently processing large datasets."

"The product is scalable."

"The valuable feature of Google Cloud SQL is its high availability option. The product is stable."

"From a database management perspective, it provides services without the need for me to worry about backups, scaling, or other operational issues."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"This is a stable solution and offers good performance."

More Google Cloud SQL pros

Cons

"There are a few aspects of database management that have room for improvement. There are a few parameters in the solution that are a bit unclear at our end as it's not understandable."

"It would be helpful if they made it easier to migrate from an existing on-premises solution to the cloud-based service."

"One notable improvement that could enhance the database management experience, particularly during migration scenarios, is the accessibility of the root user."

"The Performance Monitor they have is a little clanky, at least in regards to the UI."

"The only thing that needs improvement would be the pricing of the solution."

"The running cost could be improved."

"The support team of Amazon RDS provides us with some links to go through whenever we face some issues, but it doesn't work for us."

"Sometimes the interface has many moving parts, which is a concern."

More Amazon RDS cons

"I would like to see better integration with all the different tools on the platform."

"The most challenging part is dealing with legacy data from your old systems and migrating it into the new setup, but once you've completed the data migration, it becomes quite convenient to use."

"I would like to see better availability of the product in different regions. It should also improve the security with encryption."

"They could improve documentation and dashboard stability for efficient user experience and database management."

"The performance compared to AWS is not as fast, and the technical support could be better as they don't have a dedicated team, but mostly AI handles the support now."

"I would appreciate more flexibility with specific extensions applicable to engines like PostgreSQL."

"To create a seamless data integration, the title integration of these databases with the data integration platforms is essential. This is what we would like to have in a future release."

"In the case of Google, they need to work on a more easy interface for users."

More Google Cloud SQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is fairly priced."

"The cost depends on the kind of instance we use."

"The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."

"Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."

"Amazon RDS is less expensive than other solutions."

"Amazon RDS is an expensive solution."

"The price of Amazon RDS is reasonable."

"Amazon RDS is cheaper compared to other tools."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided."

"The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."

"The solution is affordable."

"From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."

"You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."

"It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."

"It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

I find the pricing of Amazon RDS fair, as AWS operates on a pay-for-what-you-use model. Auto scalability helps handle varying demand, making it cost-efficient without overprovisioning resources.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

For improvements, Amazon RDS could work on more features for multi-availability zone deployment to enhance higher availability, and on simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises...

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud SQL?

The implementation part of the product was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud SQL?

Google Cloud SQL is competitively priced compared to other services like RDS from Amazon.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud SQL?

I would appreciate more flexibility with specific extensions applicable to engines like PostgreSQL. This would enhance the capabilities of Google Cloud SQL.

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 30% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon RDS

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 41% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 5% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud SQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

February 2025

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL

February 2025

Download Google Cloud SQL product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.

Google

Sample Customers

Edmodo

BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.