We use the solution as VMware SRM’s database storage.
Manager implementation at XENOTTABYTE
A scalable solution for database storage
Pros and Cons
- "The tool’s support is feasible."
- "The solution’s stability could be better. The tool’s pricing is high and depends on the partner."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The tool’s support is feasible.
What needs improvement?
The solution’s stability could be better. The tool’s pricing is high and depends on the partner.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for two to three years.
Buyer's Guide
HPE Nimble Storage
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about HPE Nimble Storage. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
817,354 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten. The solution is quite stable. We rarely have issues with storage.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The tool is almost scalable. We have one to two users for the solution.
How are customer service and support?
HPE’s support is good. They respond fast.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The product’s initial setup is straightforward. The initial setup was done by HPE. We manage the solution’s storage and maintenance.
What about the implementation team?
We are the solution’s integrators.
What was our ROI?
We have seen ROI with the tool’s use.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution’s licensing is on a yearly basis.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. We require one technical engineer for the product’s maintenance.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
Product Manager at Nuxiba
Stable, easy installation, with good compression
Pros and Cons
- "The capacity for data storage and compression is good."
- "I have problems with the next servicer. For example, I have a new device and it needs to connect to Nimble."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use it for storage.
What is most valuable?
The capacity for data storage and compression is good.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see some additional features included in the next release.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using HPE Nimble Storage for the past eight months.
How was the initial setup?
It was on track, but I have problems with the next servicer. For example, I have a new device and it needs to connect to Nimble.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I do not pay for it.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate HPE Nimble Storage a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
HPE Nimble Storage
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about HPE Nimble Storage. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
817,354 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Infrastructure Engineer at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Every user is ten times faster at doing whatever work they're doing
Pros and Cons
- "We have seen our average latency go from four milliseconds to point four. Therefore, we are getting 10 times better performance down to the end user on everything. We have seen an increase in our IOPS by ten times."
- "I want to see the full integration with OneView. I know they have started it, but I haven't had a chance to look at and evaluate it."
What is our primary use case?
In our company, it is the back-end storage for virtual machines and file storage.
On our website, there are many different business-critical things running.
How has it helped my organization?
We migrated from a hybrid cloud to an all-flash. We have seen our average latency go from four milliseconds to point four. Therefore, we are getting 10 times better performance down to the end user on everything. We have seen an increase in our IOPS by ten times.
Infosight is good. We watch the capacity side of it. That is about all we have seen on there. InfoSight does allow us to get servers back up faster. We run a lot of virtual servers, so it is about ten times faster from deploying until it is up.
What needs improvement?
I want to see the full integration with OneView. I know they have started it, but I haven't had a chance to look at and evaluate it.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Uptime has been a 100 percent in our environment.
The product is very stable. There was some concern about HPE buying Nimble, but I think that it has gone okay, so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is very scalable.
The deduplication of all-flash enables you to grow without having to actually grow the storage. That piece of the all-flash enables you to really grow, not having to keep growing in the racks.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We came from a spinning SAN to hybrid SAN to all-flash. We just followed that path.
We moved to all-flash because we were pushing the latency of the hybrid so far it was unusable.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very easy. I don't even know if we had to look at documentation, except in the very beginning, where we have to consult in. The solution provided what we needed to set it up.
What about the implementation team?
We did it ourselves.
What was our ROI?
The solution has improved our throughput, because when we move large data it is just that much faster.
Every user is ten times faster at doing whatever work they're doing.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Performance per dollar, when we looked at it, was the highest that we could get for what we needed.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated other competitors (Pure Storage and NetApp), and it came down to cost per a dollar of what you could get.
Pure Storage had better deduplication rates, but it just cost three times more.
What other advice do I have?
The product comes down to budget, I/O, and the use case that you need.
It is really efficient in the size that it is.
Biggest lesson learnt: All-flash matters.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Network Analyst at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
It has improved the responsiveness of our servers and adds snapshots to help with our DR.
Pros and Cons
- "Its speed, ease of use, and it has been completely reliable."
- "They keep talking about doing one-to-many replication. This is what we'd like to see, just to help with data replication."
How has it helped my organization?
It has vastly improved the responsiveness of our servers. It adds snapshots to help with our DR. The snapshots are sent across the way into our DR site, so we have DR copies of everything. It’s all around just improved the flow of everything.
What is most valuable?
Its speed, ease of use, and it has been completely reliable.
What needs improvement?
They keep talking about doing one-to-many replication. This is what we'd like to see, just to help with data replication.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I think it’s very stable. We've never, ever, had it go offline and we've been using it for three years now.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We've scaled up and have had no issues with that. It’s easy, and it doesn't even take it offline when you do it. It’s pretty awesome.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have used technical support a couple times and they are very good. They keep going until they find a solution, if you're having a problem.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were using a different storage solution and we weren't getting the speed that we needed out of it for some of our applications. We couldn't run an SQL server on our old one. It was just too slow. We looked into 3PAR , because at the time, Nimble was not yet bought out. We looked into 3PAR , we looked into some of the bigger ones and decided that Nimble gave just as good performance for a much lower cost point.
How was the initial setup?
I was involved in the initial setup, and it was probably a little complex if you never set up any kind of storage system like that. Other than that, it wasn't too bad.
What about the implementation team?
We had the guy come in just because we had never done it before and their sales engineer really made it go a lot easier.
What other advice do I have?
I'd definitely tell them to go with Nimble. I would suggest that they have the Nimble engineer come on site. They don't charge you for that part. This is just so you can get all the thing set up correctly the first time so you are ready to go when you put it into production.
When looking for a vendor, I look for reliability, the features that we need, and the cost.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
CIO at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
The snapshot management helps ensure that new volumes get the appropriate replication and snapshot plan applied.
What is most valuable?
- Simplified storage administration: Due to this, a dedicated storage administrator is no longer needed. Now, we can easily handle the storage systems ourselves.
- Very efficient adaptive flash technology: Even without having hundreds of rotating disks like we had in our former SAN system or having to buy all-flash storage, we get predictable and low latency numbers for all of our storage systems.
- Simple snapshot management: This assists us to manage our snapshots through volume collections and protection plans, and helps ensure that new volumes get the appropriate replication and snapshot plan applied. The overview of snapshot used storage and ease of use when cloning are remarkable compared to legacy storage products.
- Central monitoring and health check via the Nimble InfoSight: The InfoSight portal provides an overview of all our storage systems and their volumes, snapshots and protection. It collects data and creates both automatically generated tickets for any problems or risk of problems, as well as predictions of storage use based on usage trends.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
For the most part, we have not encountered any stability issues. But there was one uptime-related firmware bug, which was possible to work around and fixed in a later release.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
So far, we have not encountered any scalability issues.
How are customer service and technical support?
We rate the support as very knowledgeable in the product platform
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used a different product. The switch was made to gain a less-complex design for setup and administration.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very simple and after one day of education, all technical staff were comfortable with the platform.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
One benefit with the Nimble Storage platform is that is doesn’t contain any software licenses. All functionality comes built-in to the platform.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We compared both traditional vendors including NetApp and HPE as well as upcomers like Pure Storage, Violin, SolidFire, Microsoft Storage Server and others.
What other advice do I have?
Embrace simplicity. You can dispense with in-house deployed administration tools or tricky CLI GUIs. All you need is just a simple and understandable web interface.
Depending on which product platform you are about to replace, you will either just gain far better and predictable performance or you will embark on a journey where you will have to leave the comfort of having a multi-protocol NAS into NFS and/or SMB file servers using Nimble block storage in the backend.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Director, Microsoft, Storage And Backup, Recovery & Archiving Services at a tech services company
InfoSight provides information about the array and the data that resides on it.
What is most valuable?
- Nimble InfoSight: Provides deep information about not only the Nimble array, but also some insight into the data that resides on it.
- Seamless OS upgrade
How has it helped my organization?
This provides for better decision making and forecasting of the evolution of customer data management infrastructures.
Additionally, the stability of the Nimble OS provides peace of mind even during OS upgrades, which are seamless and non-disruptive.
As a reseller, this product is an easy sell for customers who are price conscious.
What needs improvement?
This product could improve by adding support for file protocols such as CIFS or NFS, the ability to seamlessly migrate from one volume to another, and the capability to perform in-line deduplication.
Volume encryption must be done prior to occupying data on the volume. A data migration is required if the encryption requirement changes. This could be improved by being able to turn on encryption on previously created volumes without the need for data migration.
For how long have I used the solution?
Our first customer that we implemented this solution for was 5 months ago.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not encountered any stability issues thus far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
There have been no scalability issues. We added an ES1 expansion shelf with no issues.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is very eager to close tickets. They should verify that the issue has been resolved before closing.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are a provider of solutions. We will place technologies where they fit.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup was fairly straightforward. Some understanding of Nimble’s network architecture is required.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
This is a great solution if pricing and licensing is a concern.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated NetApp FAS, EMC Unity, and Pure Storage.
What other advice do I have?
Consider other options if file protocols are required. Enable encryption at the time of setup if required, prior to creating volumes.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are a solutions reseller with vendor relationships with Nimble, NetApp, Dell EMC, Pure Storage, and Tintri.
Data Centre Services Manager at a tech company with 201-500 employees
The VMVision feature grabs stats from our VMware environment. It allows us to troubleshoot our environment in one view.
What is most valuable?
- Nimble InfoSight is an extremely powerful and useful tool. We log in daily to look at any new alerts, mostly ones that have been cleared without us needing to do anything, as well as using it as a capacity management tool and executive dashboards to present information to our senior management team.
- Other than InfoSight, Nimble snapshotting and replications, as well as the zero-byte cloning, are invaluable to us as a company and has greatly improved our offerings to clients over our previous storage vendor.
- We also like the new VMVision. This grabs stats from our entire VMware environment and allows us to troubleshoot all levels of our environment in one view. This helps to diagnose where the issues lie, either storage, network or the hosts themselves. This has been absolutely invaluable when we have separate teams managing each part.
How has it helped my organization?
We supply hourly (or more frequent) snapshots on our private hosted clients. Under the previous vendor’s arrays, there was large management overhead to keep these working.
Since switching to Nimble arrays, we have not only been able to keep triple the amount of snapshots as standard, using, on average, around 70% less space than keeping 8 on the previous arrays, but the management overhead to keep these going has dropped down to about five minutes a month. Now, using InfoSight, we can see at a glance what we have.
What needs improvement?
There is not a lot of room for improvement. All the items that we wanted to have implemented when we first started using Nimble arrays were either already on their road map, or added after listening to us, and all bar one have now been fully implemented.
These included:
- Active Directory authentication for logging into the management of the array.
- Full audit logging of all actions taken on the array.
- Full VMware implementation for managing the arrays. This has and will continue to save us a lot of time.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have now been using Nimble Storage arrays for almost four years. We started with two arrays and now have 16, and support a further eight at client sites.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have never had any stability issues. The Nimble arrays have survived an awful lot within our environment. We now have 16 arrays and other than a single hard drive failure and a precautionary controller swap (predictive analysis from InfoSight flagged a potential issue, so Nimble replaced the controller rather than risk downtime), the Nimble arrays have been our most reliable hardware.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have never encountered scalability issues. Using InfoSight to help plan capacity, we know way in advance what we will need to increase performance or capacity. When we need to either increase capacity or performance, all upgrades are performed so simply and with zero down time.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support from Nimble is second to none. Whenever we have called them, we get straight through to a technician, who does not follow a script designed to frustrate you and waste all your time. They listen to your problem, and what, if anything, you have already tried. Then they help and most of the time, any issues are resolved there and then on a single call. Sometimes we have called them simply because we do not understand something, or even a new feature that we wanted to use, and they are happy to dedicate time to us to explain and show us how to do what we want. We have never had an ongoing ticket with Nimble other than when they are awaiting a response or action from us, that we can only perform during weekends.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used to use a different storage vendor. The two main reasons we changed were the terrible levels of support we received from the previous company and the arrays' performance. The support was important because once, when we had an issue with an array, we had a six-hour outage and the issue prevented DR as well as production environments working. The support was terrible, and it took months to finally resolve the issue.
Performance-wise, the arrays we had were simply not sufficient for our growing environment and the needs of our newer larger clients coming into our infrastructure. This, coupled with the management overhead required to simply keep the plates spinning on these arrays, prompted us to find a more-reliable, better-performing partner with a better support ethos.
How was the initial setup?
When we first started speaking to Nimble, they sent us two trial devices so we could truly perform a PoC that matched our planned deployment. They also sent a senior engineer along for a day to assist us in setting it up. The engineer ended up not really being needed as the array setup is very simple. There are two methods, both shown to us by the engineers.
Since the initial setup, all arrays have been configured by my in-house technicians and usually an array is fully configured, and up and running within half an hour (this doesn’t include time to get it in our racks and patched). After accidentally shipping our arrays to the wrong sites, we were able to easily and remotely talk others through the reconfiguration.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing for the arrays is very transparent. There is one cost for the array, and another for support. There are zero licensing costs. Whatever you pay for the array, you get all features included with full access to their InfoSight, knowledge base and downloads. It’s a very simple model, which our finance team love.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
When we went to market, the team already had a good knowledge of other vendors, having used a good variety of arrays between us. Nimble were the first new array we got in to test. They blew us away with their performance and their support. The personal touch they gave us really helped, too. They took the time to learn about our needs and our environment. It was easy to decide not to go to anyone else.
What other advice do I have?
If you’re looking to implement, ask for a trial; Nimble have been very accommodating with us and others. Their products speak for themselves and will show that the figures they post are actually lower than the performance you can get out their arrays. Speak to any Nimble client. There are lot that are happy to take reference calls. This alone speaks volumes for them as a company.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Sr. Systems Administrator at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We have a small datacenter with Nimble Storage SANs that replicates to Nimble Storage SAN at our remote Disaster Recovery location.
What is most valuable?
- CASL makes use of hybrid disks to retrieve frequently used data from a set of flash drives while storing actual data to high capacity SAS drives.
- Zero Copy Clone saves storage space by updating only changed blocks to the cloned copy.
- In-line Compression reduces the amount of space taken up by data without impacting performance.
- Very Efficient Replication – Only replicates changed blocks which eliminates the need for expensive compression/dedup devices such as Riverbed.
- Instantaneous snapshots provides a backup dataset of an entire server or the volume that can be restored or used to retrieve data or clone another server
- Encryption – Ability to encrypt the entire SAN or selected volumes to protect data at rest which meets many government requirements and security requirements.
- Easy setup, GUI interface and command line tools to administer the SAN.
- InfoSight provides access to call history, historical performance, updates, performance metrics for virtual environment, KB articles, Nimble community, all for free – very valuable site.
- Excellent Support Technicians – support techs are very knowledgeable and provides quick and efficient solution. They not only know Nimble SAN but are also very knowledgeable about virtual environments/technologies, switches, fiber, databases, applications and other networking devices that are involved in making a cloud technology.
- Full redundancy makes all the parts hot swappable and expandable.
- Grouping SANS and moving volumes between the SAN while the data is in active use on the servers – without any downtime.
- No licensing for individual features – everything is included.
How has it helped my organization?
We have a small datacenter with Nimble Storage SANs that replicates to Nimble Storage SAN at our remote Disaster Recovery location. We are able to replicate every two hours and some of the tests we have done shows very good data integrity upon recovery at the DR location. Along with virtual servers and Nimble Storage, DR is much easier now.
What needs improvement?
Over a year ago, Nimble was available with either iSCSI connectivity or Fiber. Controllers can be upgraded or replaced with either of the connectivity interfaces. But, a combination of iSCSI and Fiber unit will provide flexibility in connecting SAN with existing network switches or fiber switches which can reduce overall cost and help with connecting high IO devices to the fiber interface.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Not at all. It’s been up and running ever since. We have had a few hard drive failures. Support actually calls us to let us know that there is a problem and a replacement part is on the way. It arrives in less than 4 hours. If we unplug a wire or perform maintenance on switches, Nimble support gets all the alerts and they proactively contacts us to see if there are any issues. We also receive a call from our Service Engineer to check on the health of the device and whenever there are any updates to the software.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have expanded cache on one of the SAN which was very easy to do without any downtime.
How are customer service and technical support?
9.9999 on a scale of 1-10 (1=worst, 10=best).
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We had and EMC SAN in the past which took up a lot of space and required regular maintenance from a service technician including several downtimes.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup can be done using a Nimble setup client or via the console in about 5 easy steps.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
If you are looking for a scalable, easy, performance, expandable SAN which provides all the great features without charging you licensing fees for all these useful features, go with Nimble Storage.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Yes, EMC, NetApp, Simplivity and Violin.
What other advice do I have?
You will be up and running in an hour. Very easy steps to setup and five clicks to setup volumes, replication, etc.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free HPE Nimble Storage Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
All-Flash StoragePopular Comparisons
Dell PowerStore
Pure Storage FlashArray
NetApp AFF
Dell Unity XT
IBM FlashSystem
Pure FlashArray X NVMe
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
HPE Primera
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Dell PowerMax NVMe
Huawei OceanStor Dorado
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform
VAST Data
Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series
Lenovo ThinkSystem DE Series
Buyer's Guide
Download our free HPE Nimble Storage Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How does HPE Nimble Storage compare to VxRail?
- Which would you choose - HPE Nimble Storage or HPE Primera?
- How would you compare All-Flash Storage Arrays: Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F vs HPE Nimble Storage vs Dell EMC Unity XT?
- Dell EMC XtremIO Flash Storage OR Hitachi Virtual Storage F Series
- Pure Storage or NetApp for VDI?
- When evaluating Enterprise Flash Array Storage, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- IBM vs. EMC vs. Hitachi Compression
- Which should I choose: HPE 3PAR StoreServ or Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series?
- What is the difference between thick and thin provisioning?
- What are the advantages of all-flash storage over other types of storage?
Great review. I hope the one to many comes soon also as it would help us. I believe that Version 4 of the OS is when it is targeted for but not sure. Will be interesting to see where they go now being HPE.