IBM Engineering Test Management Reviews

Reusability and integration capabilities which make it a great choice for organizations that use a variety of development tools and platforms.

The software lets users register their role and create task or test-specific teams, and it allows users to assign each other tasks and view the status of the assigned tasks.

Mainly Quality Assurance and DevOps, but of course the whole company and management areas with more knowledge of quality and client success approach.

At least 10 years.

Few configuration issues on different browsers, not that serious.

Yes, I had some, but after sending requests to the IBM support team, some fixes were applied and we could keep going.

No, always thinking of sizing, we can keep the services online.

Very good, attention and velocity to understand and solve issues.

Very good, attention and velocity to understand and solve issues.

No.

For the CLM tools, IBM provides a good 'automatic setup', but on the WebSphere side, there is a lot of complex configuration to attend the services.

There were a lot of projects. Many of them through a vendor, some as an IBM employee and few as a consultant, in-house.

Always delivered with high expertise.

Good to high.

There are various licensing and pricing options available for the software, so organizations should be sure to contact IBM to decide which license best serves their needs. Each license includes 12 months of customer support. A free 90-day trial of the software is also available.

HPE Quality and some others.

It is a very good choice on ensuring the expected software quality for projects.

Integration throughout the complete product development process. Also, the integration of third-party automation test tools.

Easy collaboration between several development teams such as design, development, and testing.

• Management of artefacts
• Support of paramater needs to be easier
  

I've used it for three years.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

It was easy.

It was done in-house.

Project realization has been carried out much faster. The integration of test automation tools.

Use workgroup licenses for smaller environments.

Plan the training and usage properly. Also, proper planning of the architecture and test execution artefacts needs to be dond.

VF dashboard view looks okay. It allows user to add whichever widget (predefined) based on the need. It has integration with CCM and RM to achieve traceability.

Organizing the test cases is tedious. There is no mechanism to keep and maintain the test cases as hierarchy. This should be seriously addressed. As the number of test cases grows, it’ll be really difficult to maintain the test cases. The tool should be able to support and maintain the test cases in a folder-wise structure to identify the different module/phase-wise test cases.

Around three years.

No.

No.

Not applicable.

Yes. Customer requirement.

Not applicable.

I suggest to go for other tools. As the number of test cases grow, it’ll be really difficult to maintain the test cases. The tool should be able to support and maintain the test cases in a folder-wise structure to identify the different module test cases.