Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Engineering Test Management Logo

IBM Engineering Test Management pros and cons

Vendor: IBM
3.8 out of 5
1,357 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

IBM Engineering Test Management is highly reliable for maintaining continuous operations.
Its integration with other professional tools provides strong advantages, such as traceability between requirements and defects in Rational Team Concert.
The RFT feature is valuable as it enables automation of manual test cases.
RQM stands out for its integration with test automation and performance testing.
The integration with functional testing is a unique feature that prevents switching to alternative platforms.

CONS

Usability needs improvement.
Adding support for uploading a collection of test cases would be helpful.
RQM could be enhanced by adding a feature to select test requirements when creating a task plan.
It would be useful to assign a hierarchy to a group of test cases.
Enhancements in performance and speed are needed for running tests and viewing results.
 

IBM Engineering Test Management Pros review quotes

HZ
May 18, 2023
The one feature that has not allowed us to switch to any other solution is the integration with functional testing.
DP
Apr 13, 2020
Integration with the other professional tools is a very strong advantage, so that we can have a traceability between the requirements and defects in Rational Team Concert. That's the most important aspect.
HF
Feb 20, 2020
It's very reliable as a solution.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SL
Oct 16, 2017
Reusability and integration capabilities which make it a great choice for organizations that use a variety of development tools and platforms.
AB
Jun 18, 2020
The most valuable feature is the RFT because it allows us to automate manual test cases.
HZ
Aug 30, 2022
RQM is something that we use everyday, so it has to be up and running, otherwise we would lose everything.
ST
Sep 25, 2017
Latest features include versioning of testings which can be great when used for multiple releases of a product.
AD
Aug 31, 2017
It allows user to add whichever widget (predefined) based on the need. It has integration with CCM and RM to achieve traceability.
HZ
Aug 15, 2022
RQM's best features are integration with test automation and performance testing.
 

IBM Engineering Test Management Cons review quotes

HZ
May 18, 2023
While RQM allows for running tests and viewing results, it could be further enhanced in terms of performance and speed.
DP
Apr 13, 2020
I think it's fine from a performance perspective but usability is something that needs improvement.
HF
Feb 20, 2020
Currently, the user interface needs to be more user-friendly.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SL
Oct 16, 2017
Mainly Quality Assurance and DevOps, but of course the whole company and management areas with more knowledge of quality and client success approach.
AB
Jun 18, 2020
Adding support for uploading a collection of test cases would be a helpful addition.
HZ
Aug 30, 2022
It would be helpful if we could assign a hierarchy to a group of test cases.
ST
Sep 25, 2017
Integration capabilities with other vendors' tools should improve.
AD
Aug 31, 2017
Organizing the test cases is tedious. There is no mechanism to keep and maintain the test cases as hierarchy. This should be seriously addressed.
HZ
Aug 15, 2022
RQM could be improved by adding a feature that allows test requirements to be selected when creating a task plan.