LambdaTest Reviews

As a Fintech company, other than Chrome and Safari, we need to test our website regularly on IE and Edge as well. This is because our customers are dependent on legacy OS to use our web-application.

LambdaTest Selenium Grid has helped us radically reduce the manual testing effort and ensure browser compatibility. Our automation engineers are able to execute Selenium scripts in their preferred language, and the cloud infrastructure has allowed us to scale our automation test cycles effortlessly. A majority of our regression suites are now automated, and thanks to LambdaTest, we are now able to find more critical bugs with less manual testing efforts.

What really helped us improve our delivery cycle was live debugging while you automate the tests. We could break the script execution at any point and take it over from there by interactive live for the remaining test steps.

LambdaTest also provides video recording and screenshots of all your tests in their test logs, which makes tracking easier. It offers integrations with Jira and Jenkins, which ensures us better collaboration and a robust CI/CD pipeline respectively, which is an additional plus for us.

Test statuses such as Lambda Error and VM allocation allowed us to quickly troubleshoot any build that failed while executing, as we were able to identify whether the script is failing or is it something wrong from LambdaTest end.

In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues. They even helped us shift easily from our local instances to their cloud platform.                                              

The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive. The good part is that we have relayed some of our suggestions to the support and as per their support team, those suggestions are to be considered as a part of their upcoming sprint, so we look forward to seeing them onboard soon.

We have been using LambdaTest for one year.

Up to now, we have never had any issues with stability!

We evaluated Sauce Labs and CrossBrowserTesting.

In our project, we use LambdaTest for browser testing. The team has one shared account. We primarily use LambdaTest for mobile automation, real-time testing, and real device testing across various processes. We also utilize it for mobile testing, reporting, and API testing.

Automation and mobile testing have improved our efficiency.

LambdaTest is highly beneficial, especially for mobile automation testing. Because your company might not have access to various mobile devices or tools, LambdaTest provides a solution for mobile and cross-browser testing in such situations, making it extremely valuable.

The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device.

I have been using LambdaTest for six months.

The scalability is slow.

I've used Appium.

The initial setup is easy. There are other team members for maintenance.

If you want to control the versions of your computer or mobile device, you can do so quickly with LambdaTest. You don't need to change your browser, app, or phone versions manually. It's a wonderful and beneficial tool that saves me time and makes it easier.

I recommend the solution. Overall, I rate the solution as seven out of ten.

We are testing a website on the desktop. Our clients need to see how the website looks on different mobile devices. So, we use the solution to test the UI for different mobile devices and see how it looks.

The product provides a single platform to manage multiple devices simultaneously. It is easy to learn the product as a beginner. The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI. The integration process is good. We can get a real-time view of different devices without any glitches.

We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity. It causes some problems. Automatic logging out is the only issue we faced. We need time to check the requirements and specifications, but LambdaTest logs us out of the device.

I have been using the solution for three months.

The tool is stable. We faced some slowness in the website because we tested it in different environments. However, it was not an issue with LambdaTest.

We have four credentials to access the solution in our organization. Our clients also have credentials. We access the tool from different time zones.

The initial installation is easy.

The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive. It is moderately priced.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Using LambdaTest Selenium Grid, we have radically reduced the manual testing effort while ensuring our web application's cross-browser compatibility. It's crucial for us, as a healthcare provider, to make sure that there are no errors.

We had to incorporate a lot of changes due to COVID-19 and our in-house infrastructure plateaued the testing cycles, delaying our go-to-market. That’s where LambdaTest came to pull us through.

LambdaTest is brilliant.

The ease of testing locally hosted URLs over hundreds of browsers & operating systems without worrying about infrastructure issues has led us to deliver better software, faster!

Leveraging LambdaTest cloud infrastructure, we could scale our automation test cycles without much of a struggle. Our automation team could execute Selenium scripts in their preferred language, and the ability to test parallelly helped us optimize our continuous deployment.

Thanks to LambdaTest, we can find more critical bugs with less manual testing efforts.

LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing! You can select browsers, timezone, and country, then run the capability to start testing instantly.

We could scale up with parallel testing in local environments without any maintenance cost.

Support documentations are of good help to run tests parallelly.

Also, it offers integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, and Gitlab, which makes our cycle easier.                                             

Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon.

I would also like to test on real devices, and we have communicated the same to their support team.

I have been working with LambdaTest for one year.

The support team is highly responsive, so they will guide you better.

We previously used Sauce Labs, and we switched for better pricing.

The setup is super easy.

LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it.

We are doing manual testing, covering the overall scope. There are multiple dimensions that need to be tested. And regarding the trouble, like, there were some information issues on certain devices, and that's why we needed to check those on the same devices.

The solution is very handy. And the device support is very good. I like that the technical support team handles it all in one, too.

There is room for improvement in support. The community should extend support. Like, Lambda has a huge community, and support should be available online.

Another area of improvement is stability and performance of the solution. 

I have experience with the solution. 

The solution is stable, but I've noticed some issues with the speed and overall performance. For example, when I'm using my development laptop, and I switch to LambdaTest, the performance decreases. This is especially noticeable when I'm using a dimension that is working on the laptop, and I try to use the browser. In general, the availability of the device could be improved.

Other than that, I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow.

My main concern is that the camera is not available when I'm using LambdaTest. However, I've been able to work around this issue by using the camera to check my connections.

Overall, I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. 

It is a scalable solution. We are three end users, and we are planning to extend the usage. 

There is room for improvement in customer service and support. It's a solution that was implemented years ago, and not a huge community really good. So that's why maybe we can work on technical support.

Neutral

It was easy to set up. It was not hard. You just need credentials and set up the virtual devices, and that's good to go. I am looking forward to integrate it with Slack and Jira. 

It's pretty good to use and to write the code for the manual automation and even for the developers to debug this thing. It's a pretty wholesome solution. That's why we prefer to get the solution. Because not only the testers can look into this, but the development team can also use the tool.

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.

We were in the middle of launching a new website and being new to all of these things, I called a friend to ask if there is any step I need to do before making it live. He suggested that I should make my website responsive, and after I understood what he meant, I started to look for tools that can help me with testing my website for responsiveness.

After a brief Google search, I landed on LambdaTest and the best part was that they also offered a Freemium plan that includes a good amount of minutes for responsivity testing. I selected the combination that we thought our users will mostly use and ran the tests. To our surprise, our website indeed was not responsive. I took screenshots and showed it to my developer and asked it to be fixed for a seamless experience.

I am really glad that there are tools like LambdaTest that help freelancers like me to make sure everything is okay before finally making a website live.

This solution helped me in checking to see if my website was responsive, or not, by offering a cloud-based infrastructure that I can use to test on a combination of more than two thousand browsers and operating systems. 

The best part is that LambdaTest is free for all and it really helped freelancers like me.

The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems.

It can also help you fast-track the testing; however, for that, you need to buy their paid parallel session plan. This allows you to run two tests at the time time, saving you your precious time.

I would like to see all of the features available in the Freemium plan so that I can test them.

We have been using this solution for more than one year.

We did not use another solution prior to this one.

LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month.

We searched for a lot of tools, but for the most part, they required a paid license.

I could not find any cons for me as I was only looking for responsiveness testing, although a detailed look at LambdaTest may help me find some negatives.

We use the product to perform real-time testing of websites and mobile applications. This involves checking different operating systems and browsers for web and mobile functionality.

The platform’s most valuable feature is its ability to provide access to different versions of browsers and operating systems. This helps me ensure compatibility across various platforms and versions.

They could improve the product in terms of load testing performance. Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency.

I've been using LambdaTest for about six months.

The platform is stable, although there have been minor issues with UI. However, they haven't affected its overall performance significantly.

Currently, four people in our organization are using LambdaTest. The scalability depends on the plan purchased. 

We may use it more in the future, depending on our testing needs and requirements.

We chose the platform because it provides access to various browser and OS versions, essential for our testing needs. Additionally, the trial version allowed us to compare it with other tools before deciding.

The initial setup and deployment were easy.

I would advise them to consider LambdaTest, especially if they need to test across different browsers and OS versions. It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool.

I rate it as nine out of ten.

For testing and automation. We do cross browser testing for different versions of subproducts.

We don't use it for mobile app testing. We are planning on using it in the future for that. 

The real devices feature.

Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement. 

I have been using LambdaTest for one year. 

Twenty five users are using at the moment. The scalability is an eight out of ten. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

The pricing could be made cheaper. 

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.