BrowserStack vs LambdaTest comparison

BrowserStack and LambdaTest are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while LambdaTest is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. BrowserStack holds a 11.2% mindshare in FT, compared to LambdaTest’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of LambdaTest users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 25 BrowserStack reviews

6,113 Views
5,107 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Read 26 LambdaTest reviews

3,533 Views
2,419 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

LambdaTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

BrowserStack and LambdaTest compete in cloud-based software testing. BrowserStack offers more comprehensive features, making it a top choice for teams needing extensive testing options.

Features: BrowserStack offers real device cloud, extensive mobile device support, and broad browser compatibility. LambdaTest provides an automated Selenium grid, smart visual testing, and seamless integrations.

Room for Improvement: BrowserStack could enhance scalability, cost efficiency, and ease of use. LambdaTest might improve its browser/device availability, integration depth, and debugging tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BrowserStack offers streamlined deployment and robust customer service, essential for reducing downtime. LambdaTest has effective deployment and quick customer support but fewer resources.

Pricing and ROI: BrowserStack's higher initial cost is offset by its features and ROI. LambdaTest’s lower setup cost makes it appealing for budget-conscious teams wanting essential functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 11.2%, up from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.2%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Andrew Rorat

Automation Engineer at SoftServe Ltd.

Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation

We had a regression run every two weeks. During every regression testing, we had similar issues from LambdaTest's side, which was a huge problem for our tests, stability, and productivity. I had to call them every two weeks and spend two to four hours on one call to understand why this happened. The LambdaTest engineer we communicated with decided that he didn't need to fix this issue. So, I had to create a workaround from my side. This was the biggest issue I faced with the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found that BrowserStack is stable."

"Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable."

"The most valuable features are the variety of tools available."

"It's helpful for me to test on different devices."

"Maintenance of the solution is easy."

"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."

"The integration is very good."

"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."

More BrowserStack pros

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."

"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."

"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."

"Automation and mobile testing have improved our efficiency."

"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."

"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

More LambdaTest pros

Cons

"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."

"We had some execution issues."

"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."

"BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster."

"If you are inactive for 30 minutes, the solution will close."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."

"I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product."

More BrowserStack cons

"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."

"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."

"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."

"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."

"Their smart testing module needs improvement."

"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

More LambdaTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"The price is fine."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"I used the product for free."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"This is an affordable product."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Educational Organization

39%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.

See all answers

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

BrowserStack was expensive compared to LambdaTest. We switched to LambdaTest to save money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features. Challenges and glitches exist, such as handling notifications dynamically and gaps ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 24% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 3% of the time

Katalon Studio vs BrowserStack

Compared 2% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

Testsigma vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

March 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

March 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

March 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.