BrowserStack vs LambdaTest comparison

BrowserStack and LambdaTest are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while LambdaTest is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. BrowserStack holds a 10.7% mindshare in FT, compared to LambdaTest’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of LambdaTest users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

5,815 Views
5,466 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

3,322 Views
3,023 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

LambdaTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

BrowserStack and LambdaTest are competitors in cross-browser testing solutions. LambdaTest may have the upper hand with its pricing and feature set, though BrowserStack is favored for its customer support and ease of deployment.

Features: BrowserStack offers real device testing, seamless integration with development tools, and extensive browser coverage. LambdaTest is known for automation testing, parallel testing, and integration with CI/CD tools.

Room for Improvement: BrowserStack could enhance its automation capabilities and expand its support for legacy browsers. LambdaTest might improve its setup ease, offer more real device options, and reduce the complexity of its configuration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BrowserStack provides a straightforward deployment process and excellent customer support, aiding in quick resolutions and onboarding. LambdaTest may require more initial setup effort but offers comprehensive support channels once integrated.

Pricing and ROI: BrowserStack has higher initial setup costs, though some find its value justified through its reliability and customer support. LambdaTest's lower pricing offers attractive ROI with a robust feature set, appealing to those seeking comprehensive testing solutions at a competitive price.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.7%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.6%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Dinesh Saharan

Presales at Net Solutions

The tool reduces the manual effort needed and helps automate certain tasks for users

I won't be able to comment on what could be improved in the solution since I am not the one who handles LambdaTest. It is our company's IT team that takes care of LambdaTest. Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis. If something is perfect, it doesn't mean that it doesn't need to improvise or improve, like in terms of adding new features. There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."

"Maintenance of the solution is easy."

"The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing."

"We like the model device factory for iOS and Android devices."

"The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."

"The main core concept behind this product is, it takes the overhead of maintaining all of your devices or particular computers. It continuously adds the latest devices that are coming into the market."

"The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."

"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."

More BrowserStack pros

"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."

"LambdaTest is easy to use, and the documentation provides all the needed information."

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"

"It is a scalable solution."

"The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."

"HyperExecute adds significant speed to execution, enhancing the overall testing process."

"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."

More LambdaTest pros

Cons

"The solution is slow."

"Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier."

"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."

"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."

"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."

"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."

"Occasionally, there are disruptions in the connection which can interfere with our testing processes, especially when testing on phones."

"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."

More BrowserStack cons

"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."

"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."

"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."

"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."

"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

More LambdaTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"The price is fine."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"I used the product for free."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

In terms of improvements, they can make it snappier. Everything kind of works. They have locked down the phones, which is problematic because there are some test cases that require access to things...

See all answers

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 24% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 3% of the time

Selenium HQ vs BrowserStack

Compared 3% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 14% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

Testsigma vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

July 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

July 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

July 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.