With respect to pricing, they are a bit expensive. I would rate the licensing model a six out of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap. So, the price could be a bit decreased.
Right now, we pay for the solution monthly. It is not overly expensive. I'd rate the solution four out of five in terms of affordability. It is slightly more expensive than, for example, Perfecto.
Automation Test Analyst at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2021-12-09T15:54:14Z
Dec 9, 2021
There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit. We have licenses to use this solution and it is on a per-user basis. It is a bit expensive compared to other tools are the market.
They have different pricing plans for BrowserStack. We are looking to grow our presence with a particular client quite a bit. With that in mind, we are going to be adding a lot more teams and users so we looked into competitive pricing. For BrowserStack, the pricing for 25 users is similar to the pricing for 10 users on Perfecto. At the end of the day, our cost per user would be significantly higher using Perfecto versus BrowserStack. I can not say what the exact price is. BrowserStack is an expensive solution as well, but it is certainly a more cost-effective solution than competing products. The price per user license is lower. At least that is what we are seeing.
For small scale projects with 200-500 test cases involved, it is costly. But if it's a large project then it is much cheaper than purchasing real devices.
BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.
My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.
In terms of pricing, BrowserStack is more expensive than other tools.
With respect to pricing, they are a bit expensive. I would rate the licensing model a six out of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap. So, the price could be a bit decreased.
Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest.
The pricing for BrowserStack is fine. However, I am not involved in the licensing decisions, so I do not have specific details.
Right now, we pay for the solution monthly. It is not overly expensive. I'd rate the solution four out of five in terms of affordability. It is slightly more expensive than, for example, Perfecto.
The price of BrowserStack is high. I rate the price of BrowserStack a three out of five.
There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit. We have licenses to use this solution and it is on a per-user basis. It is a bit expensive compared to other tools are the market.
The price is fine.
They have different pricing plans for BrowserStack. We are looking to grow our presence with a particular client quite a bit. With that in mind, we are going to be adding a lot more teams and users so we looked into competitive pricing. For BrowserStack, the pricing for 25 users is similar to the pricing for 10 users on Perfecto. At the end of the day, our cost per user would be significantly higher using Perfecto versus BrowserStack. I can not say what the exact price is. BrowserStack is an expensive solution as well, but it is certainly a more cost-effective solution than competing products. The price per user license is lower. At least that is what we are seeing.
For small scale projects with 200-500 test cases involved, it is costly. But if it's a large project then it is much cheaper than purchasing real devices.