HeadSpin vs LambdaTest comparison

HeadSpin and LambdaTest are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. HeadSpin is ranked #29, while LambdaTest is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. HeadSpin holds a 0.6% mindshare in FT, compared to LambdaTest’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HeadSpin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of LambdaTest users who would recommend it.

HeadSpin

Read 6 HeadSpin reviews

596 Views
340 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Read 25 LambdaTest reviews

3,620 Views
2,455 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HeadSpin

LambdaTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

HeadSpin and LambdaTest compete in software testing solutions. HeadSpin seems to have an edge in features, while LambdaTest leads in ease of deployment and returns on investment.

Features: HeadSpin provides an extensive global device infrastructure with real-world conditions testing and performance monitoring. It integrates with other solutions, allowing quick debugging and offers unique AV box testing for live streaming quality. LambdaTest excels in cross-browser testing on a cloud-based platform, allowing testing on over two thousand combinations of browsers and OS. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and provides geolocation testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: HeadSpin's complex setup can be challenging for quick implementations, offering room for simplification and enhanced user guidance. It may also benefit from more competitive pricing strategies. Additionally, expanding support options could enhance user experience. LambdaTest could enhance mobile device testing capabilities and focus on expanding parallel testing sessions for greater efficiency. Further improvements in detailed analytics and insights could also elevate its value proposition.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HeadSpin's robust deployment model offers detailed performance insights, but complexity may impede quick setups. LambdaTest provides easy and fast deployment with strong customer support, making setups effortless with minimal time investment.

Pricing and ROI: LambdaTest offers competitive setup costs and delivers appealing ROI, making it budget-friendly. HeadSpin, despite potentially higher initial costs, provides deep insights and analytics, presenting significant potential ROI in performance optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed HeadSpin vs. LambdaTest Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HeadSpin vs. LambdaTest

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HeadSpin

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

29th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile APM (7th), Mobile App Testing Tools (10th)

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of HeadSpin is 0.6%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LambdaTest is 4.9%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Abhishek-Mehta

Associate Vice President at Onnivation

An advanced platform that provides visibility into the performance in the real world and enables us to test AV content

There is definitely room for improvement in terms of marketing. Marketing is something that is not that great. If you look at some of the other companies in the space, they have a lot of published case studies and tested models. They make a lot of noise. They have got some of their best customers talking about them, which is where HeadSpin needs to work. They should automate their onboarding. A lot of things are still manual. They can create a video assistant or something like that to completely automate the entire process. There is a great scope to improve professional services. The time to deploy is quite long. They can increase and improve the scope of their professional services and set up automation through scripts. They do it at this stage, but they're very expensive. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing for companies that are startups or low on funds. Apart from these, they have been on top of the game in terms of features. I can't think of any other new set of features at this point in time because they're already on top in terms of innovation.

Read full review

Andrew Rorat

Automation Engineer at SoftServe Ltd.

Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation

We had a regression run every two weeks. During every regression testing, we had similar issues from LambdaTest's side, which was a huge problem for our tests, stability, and productivity. I had to call them every two weeks and spend two to four hours on one call to understand why this happened. The LambdaTest engineer we communicated with decided that he didn't need to fix this issue. So, I had to create a workaround from my side. This was the biggest issue I faced with the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the product are the performance parameters it gives us."

"The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to. We can use Zoom or Google Meet to interact with them directly, and if there is an issue in our system, they will help us by reproducing the issue in their machines and trying to figure out a solution. The support is really smooth, and we like that they're very supportive."

"The initial setup of HeadSpin was very easy and user-friendly. It was easy to configure and write a script."

"The most valuable feature is that this is the first connected intelligence all-in-one platform."

"It has an interesting feature called AV box testing. A lot of companies that are in the OTT segment don't really understand what their streaming is like. They can't test for streaming quality. There are restrictions where you cannot simulate live streaming. For example, on Netflix, you can't simulate how a movie is being streamed on a remote device. That's why HeadSpin has got this AV box testing feature. It is a patented feature. They send an AV box to your location, and you can test live streaming, which is something that no other company does."

"The most valuable feature of HeadSpin it's the integration with other solutions. It is great. I can search for an element or do a quick debugging on the application right on HeadSpin. It's very useful."

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

"Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."

"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."

"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."

More LambdaTest pros

Cons

"If you want to do some testing or check the devices manually or check the application in a particular device manually, it is really laggy. That's a disappointment because sometimes we would like to do manual testing when our local devices are not available."

"They should automate their onboarding. A lot of things are still manual. They can create a video assistant or something like that to completely automate the entire process."

"Sometimes, devices go offline and some features are not functioning on some devices, specifically on iOS."

"HeadSpin could improve on the user interface because it is very poor. The checks that are done on the iOS devices are very difficult, but for Android, it runs great. For all iOS devices, the user interface and how it interacts with the device are very poor."

"Support and pricing could be improved."

"HeadSpin needs to improve the hardware. With the mobile, the battery life reduces and must be continuously charged."

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."

"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."

"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."

"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."

"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."

"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."

More LambdaTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a yearly license. There is no other option. It is expensive. There are a lot of other cheaper players in the market, but it is like a Mercedes. You pay an extra premium for it, but you get the benefits. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing. Companies that are low on funds or new-age can do with pricing that is easily digestible. They can give them a pricing model for three months. They can provide a startup package."

"We have a yearly license for 16 devices."

"It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions."

"I believe the licensing cost is cheap because it's a total solution, hardware, license and software."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

"This is an affordable product."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Educational Organization

44%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

BrowserStack was expensive compared to LambdaTest. We switched to LambdaTest to save money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features. Challenges and glitches exist, such as handling notifications dynamically and gaps ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs HeadSpin

Compared 55% of the time

BrowserStack vs HeadSpin

Compared 31% of the time

Kobiton Mobile Device Testing vs HeadSpin

Compared 15% of the time

More HeadSpin Competitors

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 65% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HeadSpin

February 2025

Download HeadSpin product report

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

February 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Overview

Headspin is a data science-driven Mobile APM platform that leverages an AI platform to combine global device infrastructure, test automation, machine learning-driven performance, and quality of experience analytics. HeadSpin was founded to answer the demand for a global testing, performance monitoring, and quality of experience (QoE) management platform to assist businesses in ensuring optimal digital experiences across mobile, audio, online, and video delivery channels.

Headspin facilitates seamless collaboration between product managers, SREs, developers, QA/release engineers, and support staff to:

Quicken development times using intelligent automation in test and production.
Optimize digital performance across devices, networks, and apps.
Automate insights discovery with practical, context-aware AI and analytics.

Headspin Features

Headspin has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Global device infrastructure allows end-to-end monitoring and testing with thousands of devices in numerous locations on real carrier and WiFi networks around the world. SDK is not required.
Test automation and APIs integrate into CI/CD workflows to enable functional and performance testing pre and post release. Support for all testing frameworks.
Performance, QoE, and machine learning automatically expose issues and points to underlying root causes across all layers of the stack, from quantifying audio/video quality of experience to code and packet visibility.
Insights-to-actions delivers regression and aggregation insights throughout the digital experience lifecycle. These insights take you from planning and development to troubleticketing and operations. Trending, alerts, and analytics.

More features include:

Hosted Device Cloud
On-prem Device Appliance
Performance & Experience Analytics
Professional Services & Support
Education, Certification & Training

Headspin Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Headspin. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Use data science to identify problems and root cause analysis

Empower QA and DevOps teams with data science insights and test automation

Global teams can work together using remote access

Capture performance and UX issues

Reviews from Real Users

Headspin stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its easy setup, scalability, and robust customer support. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

Abhishek M., Associate Vice President at Onnivation, notes, “A lot of companies that are using other solutions do not get access to the kind of metrics that HeadSpin captures…HeadSpin is highly advanced. It has got all the performance structures to provide visibility into how my app is performing in the real world. It also helps to identify the gaps.”

Shiba S., Automation Engineer at GlobalLogic India, writes, “The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to…They support multiple devices. Plus, they support distribution testing.”

HeadSpin

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Sample Customers

Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, Telstra

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Buyer's Guide

HeadSpin vs. LambdaTest

January 2025

Free Report: HeadSpin vs. LambdaTest

Find out what your peers are saying about HeadSpin vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HeadSpin vs. LambdaTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.