LambdaTest vs OpenText UFT One comparison

LambdaTest and OpenText are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. LambdaTest holds a 5.1% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText’s 10.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 26 LambdaTest reviews

3,439 Views
2,402 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Read 96 OpenText UFT One reviews

7,140 Views
4,477 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT One and LambdaTest compete in the software testing tools category. OpenText UFT One holds a stronger position in extensive technology support for complex environments, while LambdaTest offers faster solutions for cloud-based browser testing.

Features: OpenText UFT One supports a wide array of technologies, making it suitable for complex environments. It accommodates legacy systems, API testing, and integrates with various enterprise tools. LambdaTest focuses on rapid cross-browser testing on a cloud platform. It provides geolocation testing and integrates well with CI/CD tools, making cloud-based testing more accessible and faster.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One needs enhancements in performance, browser compatibility, and integration with modern programming environments like .NET. Users have reported high resource consumption and stability issues. LambdaTest could improve its mobile testing features, specifically real device support, and speed in automated tests on cloud platforms. Better analytics for test results are also recommended to improve insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One is primarily deployed on-premises, requiring more setup and maintenance. Its customer service receives mixed feedback regarding response times and expertise. LambdaTest offers straightforward cloud deployment, which is flexible and easy to scale, and has less feedback on customer service, indicating either efficiency or low demand due to user-friendly features.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is a premium solution with a higher pricing model, justified by its extensive features and comprehensive testing capabilities. Despite the cost, it often provides a significant return on investment through reduced manual testing and improved productivity. LambdaTest presents a cost-effective pricing model, available in both free and paid plans, making it suitable for various organizations seeking affordable and scalable browser testing solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. OpenText UFT One Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. OpenText UFT One

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

7th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.1%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.1%, up from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Andrew Rorat

Automation Engineer at SoftServe Ltd.

Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation

We had a regression run every two weeks. During every regression testing, we had similar issues from LambdaTest's side, which was a huge problem for our tests, stability, and productivity. I had to call them every two weeks and spend two to four hours on one call to understand why this happened. The LambdaTest engineer we communicated with decided that he didn't need to fix this issue. So, I had to create a workaround from my side. This was the biggest issue I faced with the solution.

Read full review

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"The primary feature that has significantly improved our test execution times is automation."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."

"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."

More LambdaTest pros

"For traditional automation, approximately half of our tests end up automated. Therefore, we are saving half the testing time by pushing it off to automation. That gives it an intrinsic benefit of more time for manual testers and business testers to work on possibly more important and interesting things. For some of our applications, they don't just have to do happy path testing anymore, they can go more in-depth and breadth into the process."

"Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need for special programming knowledge."

"Micro Focus UFT One is a great tool and can be used in a variety of ways."

"The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."

"I like the fact that you can record and play the record of your step scripts, and UFT One creates the steps for you in the code base. After that, you can alter the code, and it's more of a natural language code."

"The stop automation is a great feature."

"It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting."

"It's simple to set up."

More OpenText UFT One pros

Cons

"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features."

"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."

"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."

"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

More LambdaTest cons

"The tool needs to improve its performance since it can become heavy."

"[Tech support is] not a 10 because what happens with some of our issues is that we might not get a patch quickly and we have to hold on to an application until we get a proper solution."

"Technical support could be improved."

"Micro Focus UFT One could improve by having more maintenance. Every time when we run the solution and develop something, the next time when we run it it doesn't recognize the object. I have to redesign the object again and then run the solution. It's really a headache, it's not consistent."

"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."

"It doesn't support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this."

"We'd like it to have less scripting."

"Previously, the product was a script-based solution. Presently, the tool offers non-script, no-code, or low-code functionalities, making it an area where improvements are required."

More OpenText UFT One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

"I used the product for free."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

35%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

I am not responsible for the payments, but from what I hear, it costs about $30,000 a month, which is quite expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

LambdaTest ( /products/lambdatest-reviews ) needs to improve its speed and memory because it takes a long time to load. The ease of installation is also an issue; they need to open up a few things ...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 66% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Testsigma vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

April 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

April 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

Overview

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. OpenText UFT One

April 2025

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. OpenText UFT One

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. OpenText UFT One and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. OpenText UFT One report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.