OpenText Functional Testing and LambdaTest compete in the automated software testing category. LambdaTest seems to have an edge due to its simplicity, integration with CI/CD tools, and cross-browser testing capabilities, while OpenText offers a more feature-rich platform suitable for complex environments.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers extensive compatibility across a variety of programming languages and environments. It supports desktop to web applications and versatile automation frameworks. LambdaTest specializes in real-time testing across multiple environments with geolocation testing and strong integration with CI/CD tools, offering robust browser combination and device testing.
Room for Improvement: OpenText requires improvements in memory usage optimization, stability, and modern language and browser integration. Better support for .NET applications and easier implementation would benefit users. LambdaTest needs faster automated test speeds, addition of native app testing, and more intuitive analytics on its automation dashboard.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is mostly on-premises, with some cloud support, and its complex installation can be time-consuming. Customer service receives mixed reviews, often noted for slow technical support responses. LambdaTest, being cloud-based, ensures quick deployment and provides timely customer service, with feedback often getting prompt action.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is seen as an expensive solution with high licensing costs justified by its comprehensive functionality, offering long-term favorable ROI in complex setups. LambdaTest presents a more affordable cloud-based pricing model, scaling per usage, promising cost-effective solutions with fast automation and testing features.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| LambdaTest | 5.4% |
| Other | 85.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).
**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.
**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).
**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
