We're looking at the solution right now. We wanted to use it for mobile apps to implement workflows like e-services requests for users and backend approval for internal entities.
Software Engineer at Malomatia
Clear pricing and easy to set up with a useful learning academy
Pros and Cons
- "The pricing is very clear, with no hidden fees."
- "We'd like to be able to write in C Sharp to develop code for Mendix."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
From a technical perspective, I can use Mendix to provide native mobile applications and an external web portal for external users. However, at this point, I haven't touched half the features on it.
It is easy to set up the product.
The solution is stable.
It can scale.
Mendix Academy is quite helpful.
The pricing is very clear, with no hidden fees.
What needs improvement?
The product needs more connector integration with Microsoft products.
We'd like to be able to write in C Sharp to develop code for Mendix. However, that may be impossible. Still, we'd like to be able to modify the programming language.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for one month. I've just started using the product.
Buyer's Guide
Mendix
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Mendix. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable and reliable. there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. I'd rate the stability ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is quite scalable. I'd rate the ability to expand eight out of ten. The connectors can enter various products in Microsoft, especially here in the Gulf.
How are customer service and support?
I've only worked on a small project and therefore haven't had the need to reach out with technical support.
The product does have Mendix Academy and that can be used to troubleshoot a lot of general issues.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I'm also familiar with Microsoft. this product has a bit higher pricing in comparison; however, with Microsoft, you need some other components. Mendix is one easy price.
How was the initial setup?
The solution is very easy to set up the solution. I'd rate the ease of setup nine out of ten.
It hardly takes a minute to deploy. I can't speak for complicated projects however, since I have yet to be a part of one. As per my current experience, it's very fast and takes minutes or less.
You only need one person to handle maintenance tasks once it is set up.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the solution setup in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is very clear. It's easy to understand licensing. There are no hidden fees. It might show higher pricing. However, you know exactly what you are getting.
What other advice do I have?
We likely will become a Mendix partner.
I'd recommend the solution to others. It seems like a great product, even though I have only worked with it for one month. I'd rate it a nine out of ten in terms of functionality.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Junior Automation (Mendix) Engineer at Emergn
Easy to maintain with an excellent debugger and helpful support
Pros and Cons
- "You can scale the solution."
- "In the beginning, it is difficult to learn and work with."
What is our primary use case?
I built prototypes with it.
We did not really deploy anything for real clients. We only build prototypes in our local environment, and so far, we do not have any engagements with this platform. It was only for proof of concept projects, and we are still trying to gather engagements to work on if there are existing clients that would provide us with something to use.
What is most valuable?
The ability to model data and relationships between entities is easy, and the ability to write microflows and nanoflows is great. By that, I mean flows, in general, that achieve something which will function. Those are things I really like. On top of that, they are fast to learn and put into practice after a bit of experience.
Overall the platform is really good. I like it. I wish I was better at it, as there are plenty of things to learn, especially on the front-end side. I like the fact that you can integrate react widgets. It's really cool. The integration is really good.
The debugger is perfect. It's the best I've ever seen.
Technical support is great.
You can scale the solution.
It's easy to maintain.
What needs improvement?
In the beginning, it is difficult to learn and work with. I have to say it was difficult in the beginning to understand best practices.
Once I got the best practices for the back end part, for manipulating data, it was easier to use. For the front end, it was a bit more difficult. For the front end part, I don't like that it's not fully drag and drop there, and I have to know a bit of CSS, which I don't really know.
It would be cool if it could be completely drag and drop, and you could do it like other products, like PowerApps. With PowerApps, you can move it pixel by pixel. It's like PowerPoint.
I've experienced a few bugs. Sometimes it was really tiny things - not something big. There are issues with the versioning systems, et cetera.
It had errors deploying in the public cloud to publish a solution just for the sake of testing it.
I had an issue with a message definition. When you create a message definition and save it, and then close the project and open it again, the message definition did not save. I had to do it again. This has happened a lot.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for one year. I used it until last week.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
If you establish best practices at the beginning, it's good. There were some bugs here and there I had to deal with. However, they were small.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a scalable product.
I didn't really build something big by myself on it. I've seen with some applications if you respect good practices, if you don't overwhelm, if you put 100 entities in a module or something, and if you separate things properly, you can scale.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is great. They are very helpful and responsive.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did previously use the Microsoft Power Apps Platform. That's more like a system of services. It's not an on-in-one product.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is more complex. I've also noticed that people that have a first-time interaction with it find it more difficult to grasp. It is very difficult to do in the beginning. You need three to six months to start building something which is not breaking.
Of course, that's way better than trying to program, since that's even more difficult.
My previous experience with some automotive company. They had real-world projects that they were using, and they were deploying to the cloud. I don't know exactly how long it took to set up for them. I remember that the deployment was really fast, like a few minutes. They had a medium type of setup.
Maintenance and bug fixing is really easy. One person can handle it.
What about the implementation team?
I am able to deploy the solution myself. I did not use any consultants or integrators.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'm not in charge of licensing costs.
That said, my understanding is the product is very expensive, and Microsoft's offering is much cheaper.
What other advice do I have?
We build solutions and sell them to clients. We are intermediaries. We use this tool to deliver products.
I only use it for web applications and very rarely for the hybrid web. I never use it for the hybrid web. Mostly, I use it only on desktop web.
I would recommend this solution and encourage people to learn it.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's very top-notch as a product. It's one of the best.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Buyer's Guide
Mendix
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Mendix. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Device Manager at Nippurtech
Powerful and easy-to-use product, however, pricing and integration capabilities could be improved
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of the product are its ease of use and speed. My friend and I find it helpful as a team of just two developers."
- "One area for improvement is its integration capabilities. Creating a pluggable widget or integrating it with other systems is challenging. In terms of features, it would be great to see advancements such as AI services and the integration of third-party services. Additionally, connecting external devices to the application requires multiple steps. Improving this will make it easier for the developers."
What is our primary use case?
I used the solution to develop an application for a parking system. It manages everything from parking cards, payments, eGates, tickets, and more.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of the product are its ease of use and speed. My friend and I find it helpful as a team of just two developers.
What needs improvement?
One area for improvement is its integration capabilities. Creating a pluggable widget or integrating it with other systems is challenging.
In terms of features, it would be great to see advancements such as AI services and the integration of third-party services. Additionally, connecting external devices to the application requires multiple steps. Improving this will make it easier for the developers.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for the past three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable and powerful.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The tool is scalable. We had a single application in development, and there were two developers with 15 end users.
How are customer service and support?
Six or seven months ago, I interacted with the technical support team, but since then, they haven't reached out to me. I tried to get in touch with them by asking some questions, and they mentioned that someone would contact me, but unfortunately, no one has reached out yet.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I run my businesses and develop applications. My friends and I are a small group of developers. In the past, we worked with technologies like C# and React. However, we are now looking to take the next step using local platforms.
I switched to this solution because of its database handling. You can create and draw your structure. The UI has powerful microflow, workflow, and nanoflow capabilities. It has great speed. It is suitable for developers with varying levels of experience. You can achieve tasks with minimal coding. The CSS and paging capabilities are great.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not complex. The deployment process took two to three weeks.
What about the implementation team?
I set up the solution on my own.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I would not recommend the solution to small and medium-sized businesses because it’s expensive. It’s great for big organizations. I rate the pricing as a three out of ten.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have used React.js, JavaScript, C#, and Oracle Siebel. However, we strive to move to the next level for future projects.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I rate Mendix a six out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Principle Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Great user experience and fast development speed by UX capabilities are lacking
Pros and Cons
- "The user experience is great."
- "I struggle with solutions like Mendix in terms of creating enterprise solutions."
What is our primary use case?
The one big use case for one of the clients was to do a legacy organization. If they were on Java, we were trying to move to Mendix.
Use cases for PO approval, invoice approval, creating a better user experience for the user, or digital decoupling would be covered. Where you try to keep your core systems like SAP or PDM, PLM system as the core, you don't want to bring too much change in those for the use cases.
What is most valuable?
The user experience is great. Creating the user experience is fast and the development speed is excellent.
What needs improvement?
I struggle with solutions like Mendix in terms of creating enterprise solutions. When I say enterprise solutions I mean enterprise-grade solutions. Let's say if I create an application on Mendix and I want to roll it out to multiple countries, that kind of thing I can do with Mendix. I'll have to copy it. That's hard to do at an enterprise level which can be quite sizeable. I'm not sure how well it scales.
The setup itself can be complex and difficult.
The UX capacity is lacking.
I'm not sure how well the workflow capabilities will hold up.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for probably about a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have not had that kind of experience where I can make a statement on the stability of the platform. I don't know whether it is stable or not, as I did not work very deep on the platform in a live setting.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Looking at the architecture, scalability is going to be a challenge. I was part of the program, which I could not finish as I left the company. Yeah. Scalability-wise, I do see the technical approach that platform offers. Scalability will always be a question mark for me. I don't have data to prove whether it is not scalable. However, I am aware that it will be a challenge to scale.
There are two types of scalability we're talking about. One is putting more and more and more and more processes on top of Mendix. That should not be a challenge. However, taking one process, taking one application, and scaling it to multiple countries, is where I see this platform struggling. However, with the cloud version, scaling may be simpler.
How are customer service and support?
I have no experience with the technical support I cannot speak to how helpful they would be.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
My portfolio had Mendix, OutSystems, Pega, Appian, Bizagi, and on the RPA side, UiPath, Blue Prism, and Automation Anywhere, and all the cognitive technologies like AI and ML. My responsibility was to create solutions and take them to the client. And then, the team will take care of technical design and implementation.
How was the initial setup?
The solution can be complex to set up. Design-wise, I wouldn't say it is hard. However, you do have a lot of work to do. When you create a solution that needs to be rolled out to many countries, it gets complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I have no visibility in terms of the cost of the solution.
What other advice do I have?
We are at the initial stages of setting up a partnership with Mendix.
I was not involved in the technical part. I was leading as a principal architect. My responsibility was to come up with a strategic technical design, and we handed it over to the team, depending on which platform a customer would take.
I'd advise potential new users to look at the UX capability. They promise too much. Therefore, be careful with the UX capability, as generally, all these platforms struggle in that area. Look at what they offer and what you need.
Be careful with the workflow capability, as it's new, so it will have its own challenges, and look out for the scalability of the platform.
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Solutions Architect at Indium Software
Useful domain models, effective drag and drop functionality, and highly reliable
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of Mendix are the drag and drop functions, the data entities, domain models, and all the related features."
- "Mendix could improve by allowing the customization of different programming languages, such as Python and C++."
How has it helped my organization?
We are using Mendix as a low code or no code solution for creating POC origins for clients.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of Mendix are the drag and drop functions, the data entities, domain models, and all the related features.
What needs improvement?
Mendix could improve by allowing the customization of different programming languages, such as Python and C++.
In a feature release of Mendix, they should add 3D augmentations or other 3D visualizations, such as images. Additionally, more customizations would be a benefit.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Mendix for a couple of years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Mendix is stable and is very good. I have used multiple no code/no code platforms and Mendix is one of the best platforms I have used.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Mendix is good. However, whenever we deploy the application, it's heavily weighted on the server. It is not a light solution.
We have approximately 100 people using this solution in my organization.
How are customer service and support?
I have not used the support from Mendix.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Mendix is straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is a license required to use Mendix. The solution's price is high, but it is best suited for enterprise companies that have the budget. It is not for small or medium-sized businesses.
There are not any hidden fees but there is a cost for every user that uses the solution. The pricing model can be confusing whether it is user or application based.
What other advice do I have?
Mendix provides an academic course, which is free and I would advise people to take the course. If they take it, then it will be easy for new users to run through the Mendix development.
I rate Mendix an eight out of ten.
I did the certification in Mendix and it was nice and easy to learn first. Everybody can learn it easily with available resources. Everything is documented properly, from version to version, and is easy to learn. My area of expertise is with enterprise and I sell to clients which are enterprise companies.
I recommend this solution to others.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
Senior Product Manager at Deutsche Börse
Intuitive and can likely scale but needs more AI integration
Pros and Cons
- "We find it intuitive and easy to use."
- "There are not enough developers who are using Mendix. The knowledge base available online and in the market is not as rich as other competitors."
What is our primary use case?
One use case which we're thinking about at the moment is for a clearing platform for security clearing for risk assessment on margin accounts. It happens from time to time that there is a situation called margin call, which is basically a process where one of our operators from the risk unit behind securities needs to get more money or more assets from the client who owns the margin account.
At the moment, the process is that they have a spreadsheet or checklist in digital form and they go through a highly governed process. They follow a printed-out or virtual copy step-by-step. At each step, they're getting a sign-off and a peer review of each step by a peer in the risk department and it takes forever. It's a lot of admin.
The Mendix base automation is basically replacing this document, this checklist. It just makes it much more helpful as all this has to happen within an hour, that call and getting assets, for example.
The company is massive and each use case is very different, however, at the moment, those tend to be small processes and trying to cut down the administration, which normally means writing documents, archiving files, scanning documents, that kind of thing, which people currently do manually.
What is most valuable?
We like Mendix a lot. In terms of technology, it is really good.
We find it intuitive and easy to use.
We are quite happy with the solution and look forward to moving to the cloud. We have it hosted in the Docker systems on-prem. When we move to the cloud, we can see that it will be simple.
What needs improvement?
We specifically want version control of whatever we deploy in the production. However, with Mendix, unfortunately, storing things in binary is quite a lot. If you put it into Github and stuff like that, we'd like it to be a text type of source code rather than binary.
There are not enough developers who are using Mendix. The knowledge base available online and in the market is not as rich as other competitors.
In terms of workflow automation, local automation, they should focus on integrating AI modules. Many companies are trying to build their own models, however, if you compare with how much learning Google has done on their Google models, it makes sense to go for integrations rather than starting from scratch with teaching your AI. That's roughly how we see the domain of RPA and local automation platforms.
The integration or making use of some artificial intelligence and models which are out there could be a lot better. There should be some kind of marketplace.
The user interface styling is a bit tricky. It's got a restrictive and highly sophisticated styling which could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
We put the solution into production about a year ago now.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have a new platform, which we put into production about half a year ago, and we had an initial 10 sort-of automated processes on top of it at the moment. It's going to grow, obviously. That's the idea.
So far, we are happy with the potential it has for scaling, although in practice we have not yet tried.
How are customer service and technical support?
We haven't yet had to reach out to technical support and therefore I can't speak to how responsive or knowledgeable they are at this time.
How was the initial setup?
For Mendix, we're not using any kind of collaboration tools or deployment which Mendix provides as we have our own tools and deployment and task management and risk management right inside our organization. We're not going to jump from one tool to another. Just because we have Mendix code, we're not going to use its deployment. We are using current tools, which are established in the enterprise.
It's important that Mendix stays flexible in terms of source code, in terms of deployment, and that it doesn't lock things down. If, for example, there would be a restriction suddenly on which kind of deployment mechanism can be used, then that would cut some customers out. That goes through the approval of risk management. Risk management is very important when you're deploying to production.
What about the implementation team?
We use our own in-house team and tools for implementation purposes.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
At the moment, we are using Blue Prism for RPA. We are using also Mendix for the workflow, which is not quite RPA. We're combining those two. We do have an eye on UiPath due to the fact that, in the last year, we're feeling that Blue Prism is falling behind the competition at the moment.
We did look at other tools, however, it wasn't me who did that. It was about two and a half years ago. There was a lot of research on everything on the market. Honestly, I don't know why they picked Mendix, however, they were clearly a strong candidate. Looking at Gartner shows it's a very strong candidate. I was quite surprised that it doesn't have a bigger clientele.
What other advice do I have?
We are just a customer and end-user.
We're not using the latest version of the solution, however, we're going to upgrade to the latest one. In Mendix, we're using 8.9, however, we're now going to upgrade soon as some of our teams have just started using later libraries, and obviously, that needs upgrading.
We're heavily governed and our governance processes and approvals for cloud take forever. We have these automations deployed on-premise. Both Blue Prism and Mendix are hosted internally and will be for a number of years. We want to go cloud, however, first, we need to get our internal approvals in order.
I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. It's one of the best which we touched and we're still happy with it. However, dealing in binary makes me deduct a few points.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Project Leader / IT Architect at Hamburg Port Authority
User-friendly, low-code, and easy to set up
Pros and Cons
- "It is stable."
- "It is expensive."
What is our primary use case?
I am currently evaluating the product.
What is most valuable?
I enjoy the low-code nature of the product.
It's user-friendly and very easy to handle.
The product was easy to set up.
It is stable.
The stability is good.
What needs improvement?
I'm still in the evaluation phase. I have not fully vetted the entire product yet.
It is expensive.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been evaluating the solution for three months. Before I evaluated Mendix, I evaluated OutSystems for six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability has been good. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. it's reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product can scale and expand if you need it to.
We're planning to use it for 100 people.
How are customer service and support?
At the moment, I can't communicate with technical support. It's expensive. I've never dealt with them directly.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have using the OutSystems and now use Mendix.
How was the initial setup?
It's an easy, straightforward setup. It's not overly complex or difficult at all. Setting it up shouldn't be an issue.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution has been very expensive overall. It was not cheap.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
At the moment, I'm looking for a solution for low code, so I am evaluating any product or solution with low code as an option. We already tried OutSystems. Microsoft Power Apps is another solution that may be an option.
What other advice do I have?
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I can recommend it as a scalable option. It is easy to use and the evaluation is not expensive. The support is for the moment is good but expensive.
I'm just a partner and an end-user.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Chief Technology Officer at RealSoft
Easy to set up, minimizes the time-to-market and has an effective online academy
Pros and Cons
- "You can scale the solution."
- "While the community is great, they need to work on making their direct technical support services better."
What is our primary use case?
We are building our custom solutions based on Mendix for our clients. Most cases are e-services for the government sector.
It is really a rapid platform where you can minimize the time-to-market, where you can also engage the customer from business perspectives throughout the entire cycle of the development. It is providing really the acceleration to adopt an agility approach.
What is most valuable?
You can really minimize the time-to-market, which is great.
It is easy to set up.
You can scale the solution.
It's stable.
What needs improvement?
The cost of total ownership needs to be better. The licenses are very expensive. If you compare it with, let's say, a kind of BPM, or CRM solutions, the cost is very, very big.
While the community is great, they need to work on making their direct technical support services better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for a while.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability potential is very good. If you want to expand it, you can.
How are customer service and support?
There is a weakness in the support. That said, the community is good. You can post your question. You can get support from the community and the answers are quite effective.
They have an amazing academy. They have amazing content for self-learning. Maybe due to that, they don't have that much direct support. They instead seemed to have built a very amazing knowledge base where you can really develop your skills without any direct support and help. Most of our engineers could make the full cycle of e-learning without any class-based training. They also could acquire the certifications without any support. So, even without direct technical support on offer, they have a good online academy.
How was the initial setup?
It's a pretty straightforward setup. It's not overly complex or difficult. It's easy. One DevOps engineer can handle all this stuff for many solutions for many clients. It doesn't require that many resources.
What other advice do I have?
We're a Mendix partner. We have maybe 20 engineers. Most of them are certified. We have Rapid certification and intermediate and advanced certificates.
We are not a user. We're not a consumer. We are the provider building custom solutions based on Mendix for different clients and different customers in different domains.
I'd advise potential users that the principle of having a citizen developer and a business developer is a good idea. You can engage with the business people from day one with the entire cycle of development. This is maybe the key to having such a platform.
Overall, I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Mendix Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2024
Product Categories
Mobile Development Platforms Rapid Application Development Software Low-Code Development PlatformsPopular Comparisons
Microsoft Azure
Amazon AWS
ServiceNow
Microsoft Power Apps
Tricentis Tosca
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)
Appian
Red Hat OpenShift
Pega Platform
Oracle Application Express (APEX)
SAP Cloud Platform
OutSystems
Salesforce Platform
Bizagi
Pivotal Cloud Foundry
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Mendix Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions: