Top 10 Mendix Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

51 reviews
94% willing to recommend

3,171 followers

Top Mendix Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Mendix based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include OutSystems, Salesforce Platform, and Microsoft Azure App Service. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Mendix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Mendix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

OutSystems

4.2 out of 5

OutSystems

4.2 out of 5

Mendix and OutSystems are prominent low-code development platforms that simplify application building through visual interfaces and minimal coding. Mendix emphasizes ease of use, rich visual customization, and a cloud-native architecture that supports diverse deployment scenarios. OutSystems, on the other hand, focuses on enhancing developer productivity and offers robust features for enterprise deployment, including cloud and on-premise options.

Download Mendix vs. OutSystems Report

Pricing

Mendix's setup cost was manageable and received positively for its reasonable pricing and straightforward licensing terms. In contrast, OutSystems has varying opinions on pricing and setup costs, with some finding it worth the initial investment for long-term benefits and flexible licen...

View comparison

Pricing

Salesforce Platform

4.1 out of 5

Salesforce Platform

4.1 out of 5

Salesforce Platform excels in integration capabilities and comprehensive toolsets, making it ideal for complex needs. In comparison, Mendix offers rapid application development features and a user-friendly interface, perfect for fast prototyping. Salesforce’s advanced features justify higher costs, while Mendix provides cost-effective, quick deployment.

Download Mendix vs. Salesforce Platform Report

Pricing

Salesforce Platform has an initial high setup cost, while Mendix offers a more affordable setup option. Salesforce's setup cost may present a barrier for small businesses, whereas Mendix's pricing structure is more accessible for startups.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure App Service

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure App Service

4.2 out of 5

Mendix excels in rapid application development with a rich toolset, integrating well with various applications. In comparison, Microsoft Azure App Service offers scalability and serverless capabilities, benefiting those seeking efficient resource management and integration with Microsoft tools for cloud-native solutions.

Download Mendix vs. Microsoft Azure App Service Report

Pricing

Mendix typically involves higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Azure App Service, which offers more budget-friendly initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Mendix typically involves higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Azure App Service, which offers more budget-friendly initial expenses.

Appium

4.0 out of 5

Appium

4.0 out of 5

Mendix emphasizes rapid application development with flexible integration and swift deployment. In comparison, Appium's open-source model supports multi-platform mobile automation with zero initial costs. Mendix caters to businesses needing fast solutions, while Appium attracts cost-conscious developers requiring versatile testing environments.

Download Appium vs. Mendix Report

Pricing

Mendix offers a straightforward initial setup cost, while Appium is known for requiring more extensive configuration effort. Mendix's simplified setup can save time, contrasting with Appium's potentially lengthy preparation process necessary for optimal utilization.

View comparison

Pricing

Xamarin Platform

4.1 out of 5

Xamarin Platform

4.1 out of 5

Mendix offers rapid development with SOAP, REST integration, and microflows, ideal for fast application builds. In comparison, Xamarin provides cross-platform native app development using C#, focusing on performance and a native application experience. Mendix suits enterprises, while Xamarin appeals to cost-conscious developers.

Download Mendix vs. Xamarin Platform Report

Pricing

Mendix offers a straightforward setup with a competitive initial cost, while Xamarin Platform may involve higher setup expenses due to more complex configurations.

View comparison

Pricing

Mendix offers a straightforward setup with a competitive initial cost, while Xamarin Platform may involve higher setup expenses due to more complex configurations.

Ionic

4.3 out of 5

Ionic

4.3 out of 5

Mendix excels in rapid application development and integration, making it ideal for complex projects. In comparison, Ionic streamlines hybrid app creation with its support of popular frameworks, appealing to those seeking efficient cross-platform solutions. Both deliver ROI through reduced development times.

Download Ionic vs. Mendix Report

Pricing

Mendix generally involves higher setup costs compared to Ionic, which offers more budget-friendly initial expenses. This distinction highlights significant pricing differences between the two platforms.

View comparison

Pricing

GeneXus

4.3 out of 5

GeneXus

4.3 out of 5

Mendix excels in rapid development, ease of deployment, and customer support. In comparison, GeneXus offers extensive features, multi-platform support, and significant long-term ROI. While Mendix ensures quick setup and low costs, GeneXus provides automation capabilities and greater flexibility despite a steeper learning curve.

Download GeneXus vs. Mendix Report

Pricing

Mendix typically has lower setup costs, while GeneXus presents higher initial expenditures.

View comparison

Pricing

Mendix typically has lower setup costs, while GeneXus presents higher initial expenditures.

Magic xpa Application Platform

4.3 out of 5

Magic xpa Application Platform

4.3 out of 5

Magic xpa's integration capabilities and pricing support efficient deployments. In comparison, Mendix offers a robust feature set, including a collaborative environment and cloud options. Magic xpa suits straightforward applications, while Mendix appeals to those seeking extensive templates and scalability.

Download Magic xpa Application Platform vs. Mendix Report

Pricing

Magic xpa Application Platform has a more straightforward setup cost, while Mendix is noted for a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Magic xpa Application Platform has a more straightforward setup cost, while Mendix is noted for a higher initial investment.

SAP Mobile Platform

3.9 out of 5

SAP Mobile Platform

3.9 out of 5

SAP Mobile Platform offers strong SAP integration and enterprise support, appealing to businesses needing stable, complex environments. In comparison, Mendix's low-code, cloud-based model provides flexibility, making it ideal for teams prioritizing rapid deployment and adaptability over SAP's traditional deployment and pricing structure.

Download Mendix vs. SAP Mobile Platform Report

Pricing

SAP Mobile Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Mendix, which offers a more budget-friendly option. Mendix's cost-effectiveness contrasts with SAP's pricing, highlighting a significant difference in the financial commitment required.

View comparison

Pricing

Temenos Quantum

3.6 out of 5

Temenos Quantum

3.6 out of 5

Temenos Quantum excels with robust security and extensive integration capabilities. In comparison, Mendix impresses with intuitive design tools and rapid development speed. While Temenos Quantum benefits from lower setup costs, Mendix's higher initial costs are often balanced by its efficiency gains and feature set.

Download Mendix vs. Temenos Quantum Report

Pricing

Temenos Quantum has a high setup cost, while Mendix offers a more affordable initial expense, making them distinct in terms of budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Temenos Quantum has a high setup cost, while Mendix offers a more affordable initial expense, making them distinct in terms of budget considerations.

Related categories

Mobile Development Platforms

Rapid Application Development Software

Low-Code Development Platforms