Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PeerSpot user
Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Video Review
Consultant
One of the most intriguing things about Oracle VM is that it's a free enterprise-grade hypervisor.

What is most valuable?

I think the most intriguing thing about Oracle VM is it's an enterprise-grade hypervisor. So it handles all the virtualization, and it's free. You don't hear the word Oracle and Free a lot, but there's a lot of stuff at Oracle that is free and Oracle VM is one of those.

It does most everything that you need in the enterprise for a hypervisor for virtualization. I can run VMs in it, I can do farms of VMs, I can run Linux, I can run Windows, I can run Solaris, I have a lot of choices of operating systems. It does everything that you need it to do for most of your needs for hypervisor.

There's a lot of benefits with Oracle VM that I like. I've been working with 3.4.1 which just came out. I've been working that prior to release. There's some features there that they added like Live Storage Migration that is really a key feature for that enterprise ability in the environment. The other thing is how it handles what are called partitions, from a licensing aspect. When I have Oracle licensing challenges that I have with some of the other hypervisors, Oracle VM is able to be configured so I don't have those challenges.

How has it helped my organization?

Cloning VMs helps a ton, especially when interface into EM, so users can build their own sandbox environmentnt, complete with WebLogic AND Database

What needs improvement?

What features would I like to see in Oracle VM in future releases? I can think of a ton of them. Some of them are just coming out. Better disaster recovery, though they just introduced a new technology called Oracle VM Site Guard that's helped a lot in disaster recovery. I would like to see better integration to Oracle networking hardware, so that would be nice, the integration between the Oracle physical networking hardware, the S2 switches would be nice for that integration.

For how long have I used the solution?

For about 5 years now

Buyer's Guide
Oracle VM
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about Oracle VM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Just issues on my part

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Not in newer versions, but 3.0.1 had some issues, of course that was years ago

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability of the solution, we use it all in our labs and we have some small production use. I also have clients that are using it, not had an issue with scaling systems very large. Getting into server individual pods or pools or servers, 16 nodes, no problem. Getting into farms running thousands of VMs, no problem at all.

How are customer service and support?

Customer Service:

Great, the few times I have needed it.

Technical Support:

Oracle technical support for OVM is one of the strong areas I've seen from Oracle support. The support staff are fairly knowledgeable on the product. I haven't had too many issues. When I had the few cases to open up as a port issue where they weren't able to help the surprising thing though with that is I haven't had to call Oracle support a lot for the product. It's a very stable product, very robust product. The number of tickets I've had to open up with Oracle have been minimal since I've been using the product heavily now for the last five years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I think it becomes more of a why do you use it situation. One of the things is it's a cost savings. Since Oracle VM is free and the support's free when you have Oracle hardware, you don't have to pay the expense you pay with a lot of these other hypervisor packages out there. It's an immediate cost savings out of the gate. The other times you look at what do you want to run Oracle VM is when you have performance issue. The way it works technically under the covers, the lower level of the hypervisor, the VM runs faster and I get better performance. In small environments it's nice my application runs a little faster unvirtualized. In larger environments, it's actually a bigger deal. Not only do my applications runs faster but because of the efficiency I actually have to buy less hardware.

How was the initial setup?

Up and running with VMs in an afternoon. Easy!

What about the implementation team?

The initial setup for Oracle VM is pretty straightforward. Installing the hypervisor on what's called an OVS, Oracle VM Server takes maybe five minutes and you're up and running. Installing the management software itself, they may take a little longer, maybe an hour for a complete install from scratch before you're up and running, and it's all web based which is really nice. You don't have to have any special clients on it. Often I'll be managing the system either from Windows or even from my iPad.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The hard partiton technology really helps with Oracle licensing. For OVM, it's free!

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, but non could beat Oracle VM's price!

What other advice do I have?

If I have to give it a rating between one and ten I would give it a nine. The reason I would give it a nine is there is some room for improvement with some of the areas in the manager. Some of the integration to the networking layer with the Oracle products would be nice.

My recommendation to peers is if you're looking at hypervisors, have an open mind. The market's not just dominated by single hypervisor. Look at the technology out there and give it a fair evaluation of what it's capabilities are.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We're partners.
PeerSpot user
ADM - PeerSpot reviewer
ADMSenior Techical Support Engineer at A Cloud Compute Company
Real User

Yes, you can run Window Servers in Oracle VM.

See all 8 comments
reviewer2142180 - PeerSpot reviewer
Auditor at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
It provides a good UI along with high availability to most servers
Pros and Cons
  • "Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
  • "The configuration can be more flexible. It is a necessity."

What is most valuable?

Feature-wise, the solution's high availability to most servers is good. The virtual sellers don't have a host. I think that one is the most valuable for me.

What needs improvement?

I know they moved from OVM, and I think right now, they are moving into KVM or something else. I don't have much to say about the improvement if they are already shifted to the KVM.

The configuration can be more flexible. It is a necessity.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Oracle VM since 2014. Also, I am not using the solution's latest version. I am using Oracle VM 3.4. I am a customer of the solution.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Right now, no one in my company uses the solution.

How are customer service and support?

I rate the solution's technical support a ten out of ten. I have used their support, and it is good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

On a scale of one to ten, where one being difficult and ten being easy, I rate the setup a five because the vendor was supposed to have done the biggest part, and they actually don't configure everything.

The deployment was done in a week or two.

Three people, along with the vendor, were needed for deployment.

What other advice do I have?

The solution's UI is good enough.

I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Oracle VM
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about Oracle VM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1395378 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
A decent amount of features, however needs better integration and Snapshot capabilities
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is very stable. I don't recall any bugs or glitches. It's reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze."
  • "If you do a gap analysis between VMware and Oracle VM, you can't do VM Snapshot. That's one thing you can't do. It's a sort of a snapshot, but it's not really Snapshot technology. It requires that you're running on CFS-2."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use this solution strictly for Oracle licensed products.

What is most valuable?

The solution has the exact features we need.

What needs improvement?

The solution lacks a lot of extra key features.

If you do a gap analysis between VMware and Oracle VM, you can't do VM Snapshot. That's one thing you can't do. It's a sort of a snapshot, but it's not really Snapshot technology. It requires that you're running on CFS-2.

There's an overall lack of integration with other software and there is also a lack of integration with backup solutions.

Oracle has stated that they intend to improve the solution. I'm not sure when this will happen, however. It may have been declared end of life, therefore, I can't imagine that they'll actually add to it at this point.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for a little over three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable. I don't recall any bugs or glitches. It's reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of the solution is pretty good. If an organization needs to expand it, they can do so.

We don't plan to increase our usage, however. We plan to move off it in the near future.

How was the initial setup?

The solution was not necessarily complex. It was very straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

The initial installation was a combination of a hired individual that had had some experience, and ourselves. Mostly it was done by our team getting training as much as we could, due to the fact that they kept on canceling the classes. Mostly we handled the implementation on our own.

What other advice do I have?

We're simply customers. We don't have a business relationship with Oracle.

I wouldn't necessarily recommend this product, as we are moving off of it. I would suggest that other organizations go with a KVM-based product. It's my understanding that Oracle will not be continuing with the product, and therefore no more work will be done to add features or improve the product.

Overall, I'd rate the solution six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Director- Technical Services at Soft Alliance
Real User
Top 20
Can easily migrate and VMs across different hosts
Pros and Cons
  • "I don't need to create a repository to allocate storage to my virtual machine, rather I can just use store locally."
  • "An expanded data transfer option is one of the features I would like to have added."

What is our primary use case?


What is most valuable?

I really like two features. The first one is the configuration of direct usage of logs on virtual machines. I don't need to create a repository to allocate storage to my virtual machine, rather I can just use store locally. The second one is the ease of migration or the ability to migrate VMs across hosts.

What needs improvement?

An expanded data transfer option is one of the features I would like to have added. It should allow virtual machines in one site, and replicate them to a different side.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Oracle VM for the last ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is stable. It has some configuration issues. We experienced some instability. However, since we left the high score, it has been relatively stable. I would rate it seven out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I've scaled the product recently. We had success with about eight nodes and extended it to ten. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

How was the initial setup?

Back in 2014 or 2013, during my tenure in the installation, I found it to be straightforward. It had simple steps including, installing the OVS server and OVM manager. The Oracle VM is installed on-premises. The initial deployment took over four days. But now if install any other environment, it won’t take more than four hours. It involved two people and we had done it ourselves. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment was done in-house.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Oracle VM was recommended by the top management, and we deployed just that. This didn’t give us much chance to evaluate other options.

What other advice do I have?

As per my experience using it, it's been wonderful. I recommend Oracle VM to anyone. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
SyedAbid Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Cloud Infrustructure Engineer at LogicEra
Reseller
Top 5Leaderboard
A good native product for Oracle applications and databases
Pros and Cons
  • "Cloning is the best feature in Oracle VM."
  • "Oracle VM should have centralized storage, without which you can't clone or move one VM to another."

What is most valuable?

Cloning is the best feature in Oracle VM.

What needs improvement?

Oracle VM should have centralized storage, without which you can't clone or move one VM to another. If you have two Oracle KVM hypervisors without central storage and want to replicate a clone from one hypervisor to another, there is no technology to do that.

Oracle VM needs to change or refine its partition system. Oracle OVM takes five minutes to one hour to clone a system.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Oracle VM for seven years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

As compared to other solutions, Oracle VM is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate Oracle VM a seven out of ten for scalability. Around 500 users were using Oracle VM in my previous organization.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked with Hyper-V and VMware.

How was the initial setup?

Oracle VM's initial setup takes around twenty minutes. I rate Oracle VM an eight out of ten for its initial setup.

What about the implementation team?

Since I'm a technical person, it takes half an hour for me to deploy Oracle VM.

What other advice do I have?

Oracle VM is a good native product for Oracle applications and databases.

I rate Oracle VM a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Computer Engineer at NITC: IT Agency of Government of Nepal
Real User
Top 10
A simple solution that is easy to use
Pros and Cons
  • "The product is simple and easy to use."
  • "The tool's price and stability could be better."

What is most valuable?

The product is simple and easy to use. 

What needs improvement?

The tool's price and stability could be better. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with the solution for four years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the solution's stability a seven out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have around 150 users for the solution. 

How was the initial setup?

The tool's deployment was straightforward. The deployment took around 10 minutes to complete. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We use the product's free version that is not licensed. 

What other advice do I have?

I would rate the product a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
CTO at Datacell
Real User
Highly scalable, perfect support, free, and easy to manage
Pros and Cons
  • "Its ease of management and simplicity are most valuable. It is free, and you can provision an unlimited number of VMs at no cost for clients. They also provide perfect support."
  • "The user interface of the version that we have requires improvement. They have already improved the user interface in the latest version, but we are yet to migrate to that. The new UI is much better. I would like it to be simple. It is serving all of our needs, and I don't think it is necessary to keep adding. We are able to provision a VM in ten minutes, and provisioning it in five minutes will not have any added benefit."

What is our primary use case?

We have a few servers, and I tag them to the storage. Through that, we create VMs by provisioning some RAM, CPU, and storage. The RAM and the CPU get adjusted when we buy more servers to add to the cluster. 

We are not using its latest version. We are yet to migrate to its latest version.

How has it helped my organization?

It has saved us millions of dollars by generating many VM's out of a simple server added to a server  pool which is highly available.

What is most valuable?

Its ease of management and simplicity are most valuable. It is free, and you can provision an unlimited number of VMs at no cost for clients. They also provide perfect support.

What needs improvement?

The user interface of the version that we have requires improvement. They have already improved the user interface by moving away from OVMM to OVM or KVM which uses the oVirt engine and has a completely new feel for the user interface, but we are yet to migrate to that. The new UI is much better and more intuitive.

I would like it to be simple. It is serving all of our needs, and I don't think it is necessary to keep adding. We are able to provision a VM in ten minutes, and provisioning it in five minutes will not have any added benefit.

Just keep it simple.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for over ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very stable. That's why I've used it for all my clients.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is highly scalable. It can be scaled to any amount that you want. The RAM, CPU, and storage can be easily scaled.

It is suitable for big and small organizations. We have deployed it for financial institutions and banks with lots of users and VMs. They use it for all kinds of things.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have their 24/7 support. The hardware that we're using is Oracle hardware, and it is mandatory that you have the HW support. We also have field delivery engineers for the hardware support and premium support for Oracle Linux and virtualization.

Their support is perfect and wonderful. They respond immediately, but it also depends on the severity.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used a different solution which had license limitations but Oracle VM is free and unlimited VMs can be provisioned at any time if there is adequate compute power.

How was the initial setup?

It is very simple and straightforward. You just need to connect a bunch of servers to the storage, and you're done. For installation, you just download the parts of the software and install them on the server. Once installed, you discover them through the management interface, and that's about it.

The software installation takes about 20 minutes, but it also depends on how many services you are attaching to the storage. Its maintenance involves just upgrades.

What about the implementation team?

We are Oracle Field Engineers and have lots of Specialization around the product.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

All other vendors are selling their licenses to use the VM, but Oracle isn't doing that, which is its biggest advantage. 

It is free. All you have to do is get the hardware. You can create an unlimited number of VMs for free. With VMware, you have to purchase licenses for the number of VMs that you want to create. You only pay for their premium support, and even that is optional. I am now learning this product, and we can even do without the support.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We considered the following below:

1. The physical memory supported by Oracle VM is higher

2. No of vCPU supported on guest(VM) is higher 

3. Product is free and this is the best part 

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others. I have recommended this to many different clients. It is for free, which is its biggest advantage. We are also Oracle partners, so we tend to go for Oracle.

I would rate Oracle VM a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Works at hadafq8
Consultant
A cloud-based solution that is inexpensive
Pros and Cons
  • "It is simple and straightforward, and it will only require you one system integrator to do the job."
  • "The management can be improved more, and become more agile. It would be nice for it to become more rich in terms of UI. In addition, the replication to disaster recovery needs improvement."

How has it helped my organization?

It is cloud-based, so I can access the management consoles from anywhere within or outside my organization if I have VPN access. Its a very light pool so its quite fast in nature, the hypervisor itself is very small its around one and half gig in size so its very light, and boots very fast. It consumes no overhead. For example, if there is a physical server of say 128 gigs and 4 core CPU, all of these 4 cores and 128 gigs are available to you.

In addition, on the network card you can do WLAN tagging, you can do non WLAN tagging, you can do IP based multi-passing and you can do storage level multi-passing.

What is most valuable?

I think the most valuable features are:

  • Excellent support team
  • Compatibility with: Linux, Windows, Ubuntu and Solaris

What needs improvement?

The management can be improved more, and become more agile. It would be nice for it to become more rich in terms of UI. In addition, the replication to disaster recovery needs improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This product upgrades or updates comes in two flavors, one is a community update and one is subscription based updates. For the subscription based updates you have to pay Oracle, its a very small amount of money for the subscription. In contrast, the community support is free. You can choose whichever way you want.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Again, it is extremely scalable. Notes can be added on the fly, but it needs to do better form work before it is a true virtualization software. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

If you compare Oracle VM vs VMware or Oracle VM vs Hyper-V, there is a definite difference in GUI. The GUI of Hyper-V and VMware are phenomenal. The GUI of Oracle VM is not that great, it is sluggish in nature, but it does everything that it is supposed to do. So, you have command line access, you have the GUI based access too, so my recommendation is to make the GUI better. It has improved in the past couple of years, and it should continue to do so.

How was the initial setup?

It is simple and straightforward, and it will only require you one system integrator to do the job. If you can read the English directions on the screen, then you can do it.

What was our ROI?

It is a cheap solution for a company's VM needs. It is simple to use, and has a great support system. It appears to be a win-win for any organization.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing and licensing is one of the main decision making reasons for going to Oracle VM because it was cost-effective.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user