Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix XenServer vs Oracle VM comparison

Citrix and Oracle are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Citrix is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Citrix holds a 5.3% mindshare in SVS, compared to Oracle’s 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Citrix XenServer
Read 48 Citrix XenServer reviews
  • 8,827 Views
  • 6,211 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Oracle VM
Read 82 Oracle VM reviews
  • 13,078 Views
  • 9,390 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Oracle VM and Citrix XenServer compete in the virtualization platform category. Oracle VM has an advantage due to its cost-effectiveness for Oracle users, while Citrix XenServer offers extensive management capabilities without additional costs.

Features: Oracle VM offers cost efficiency with enhanced network and storage configuration and real-time monitoring. Its key strengths include compatibility with Oracle databases and reducing licensing costs. Citrix XenServer focuses on high availability and resource management, making it suitable for diverse enterprises. It offers features like XenMotion for VM mobility and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Oracle VM needs to enhance hot snapshot capabilities and integration with backup solutions. Its GUI and orchestration processes require further development. Citrix XenServer could improve its networking capabilities and expand third-party integrations. Its management console is limited to Windows, impacting platform compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle VM is widely deployed in on-premises environments with good technical support, though some find the tiered service average. It integrates seamlessly into Oracle-centric infrastructures. Citrix XenServer also has a strong on-premises presence, with stable support that has improved over time.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle VM provides significant cost savings on Oracle licensing and is free for Oracle-heavy implementations. Citrix XenServer offers a free version suitable for small setups, while its full-featured versions are affordable compared to VMware. Both platforms deliver good ROI, with Oracle VM being cost-effective for Oracle users and Citrix XenServer serving varied ecosystems efficiently.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Citrix XenServer offered significant ROI with user satisfaction, virtualization benefits, and cost savings despite significant initial expenses.
Sentiment score
7.5
User opinions on Oracle VM's ROI vary, with some noting low ROI despite benefits like reduced licensing and ease of use.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.5
Citrix XenServer's support is inconsistent, with mixed reviews on response times and effectiveness, benefiting from paid options.
Sentiment score
8.0
Oracle VM users experience improving support, noting adequate responses and effective documentation, enhancing overall satisfaction with service.
They do not provide adequate support for midsize businesses.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle VM report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Citrix XenServer excels in scalable deployments, effective for varying business sizes, but needs more features, especially in storage.
Sentiment score
7.5
Oracle VM is highly scalable, effectively supporting various environments despite some constraints and is well-rated for adaptability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Citrix XenServer is a reliable, stable system with minimal issues, appreciated for uptime and dependability despite minor glitches.
Sentiment score
7.6
Oracle VM shows strong stability and reliability in production, with improvements mitigating initial storage and hardware configuration issues.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
Not every upgrade goes smoothly, and after an upgrade, it sometimes stops working.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle VM report
 

Room For Improvement

Citrix XenServer needs improved backup, flexibility, and support, addressing concerns over cost, interface, Linux support, and community assistance.
Oracle VM requires improvements in UI stability, backup, performance, integration, multi-language support, security, and synchronization features.
Although the product is technically competitive, it is not widely known or used due to poor marketing.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
Not every upgrade goes smoothly, and after an upgrade, it sometimes stops working.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle VM report
 

Setup Cost

Citrix XenServer offers free and paid versions; customers find it cost-effective but note licensing can be confusing.
Oracle VM provides cost-effective pricing, flexibility, and potential savings with free options and competitive licensing on Oracle infrastructure.
The pricing and licensing policy of Citrix XenServer is not transparent and quite confusing.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
Oracle VM is not a very expensive solution.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle VM report
 

Valuable Features

Citrix XenServer provides cost-effective, high-performance virtualization with seamless integration, intuitive management, and robust features enhancing user satisfaction.
Oracle VM is favored for its security, cost-efficiency, scalability, compatibility, and performance, especially with Oracle databases.
It provides secure access to applications and resources, which is crucial for us and our clients.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
It is easy to copy or clone one Oracle workstation to another.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle VM report
 

Categories and Ranking

Citrix XenServer
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle VM
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Citrix XenServer is 5.3%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle VM is 7.4%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

Siva Kuppala - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows us to allocate CPU, memory, storage, and network resources across VMs and minimizes downtime in case of hardware failure or maintenance
It is a scalable product and provides great benefits for virtualization needs. However, there are a few considerations: * Cost: Citrix Hypervisor can be fairly expensive. * Complexity: There's a learning curve, especially for those coming from a Microsoft background. Setting it up and managing it can introduce some complexity. * Hardware Support: Not all major hardware vendors fully support Citrix Hypervisor. * Third-party Integration: Integrating Hypervisor with other technologies within a large ecosystem can sometimes be challenging. * Community Support: Compared to solutions like Microsoft Hyper-V, the community support for Citrix Hypervisor is somewhat less extensive. It is not vast. If there are any issues or errors, the community support is not that good. Those are definitely important disadvantages.
Read full review
Robin Saikat Chatterjee - PeerSpot reviewer
Low cost robust VM soln with ability to patch with no downtime and free Live migration
The ability to live migrate VMs on the fly from one hypervisor to another has been very useful.The ability to pin cores to reduce licensing costs for our clients runnning core based oracel producs is also invaluable.One important factor to note is that to use live migration its important to create specifc pools devoted to certain products for exampel a pool for weblogic and a separate server pool for database. live migration is not permitted when using cpu pinnning to reduce license costs.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VL
Jan 13, 2015
vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer
We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
54%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Educational Organization
47%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Hypervisor?
The core function enables multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server. This maximizes hardware utilization and efficiency.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Hypervisor?
The pricing and licensing policy of Citrix XenServer is not transparent and quite confusing. The sales channel has deteriorated over the years and sales margins have dropped significantly, making i...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Citrix Hypervisor?
The marketing of Citrix lacks effectiveness. Although the product is technically competitive, it is not widely known or used due to poor marketing. Additionally, the technical support for midsize b...
See all answers
Which is better - Oracle VM or KVM?
I would prefer if KVM was easier to scale and not so limited. Overall the product has been helpful. It is easy to use, and was quite straight-forward to set up. Since I have been using KVM, I have ...
See all answers
Which is better - Oracle VM or VMware VSphere?
Oracle VM seems to me to be kind of outdated. Nevertheless, it is fairly straightforward to use and maintain. The solution can just be set and you can forget about it, and the scalability is consid...
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle VM?
If you want to access the VM from anywhere over the Internet, you put it in a public subnet. So, VMs are linked to that. The subnets are linked to it. So, it's perfectly secured if it's a private n...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 35% of the time
VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer Logo
VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 24% of the time
Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 20% of the time
KVM vs Citrix XenServer Logo
KVM vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 7% of the time
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 0% of the time
More Citrix XenServer Competitors
VMware vSphere vs Oracle VM Logo
VMware vSphere vs Oracle VM
Compared 36% of the time
Proxmox VE vs Oracle VM Logo
Proxmox VE vs Oracle VM
Compared 18% of the time
KVM vs Oracle VM Logo
KVM vs Oracle VM
Compared 18% of the time
Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Oracle VM Logo
Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Oracle VM
Compared 15% of the time
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Oracle VM Logo
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Oracle VM
Compared 0% of the time
More Oracle VM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer
January 2025
Citrix XenServer reportDownload Citrix XenServer product report
Buyer's Guide
Oracle VM
December 2024
Oracle VM reportDownload Oracle VM product report
 

Also Known As

Hypervisor
No data available
 

Learn More

Citrix
Oracle
 

Overview

Citrix XenServer is a virtualization platform used in industries such as banking, automotive, and data applications for cloud automation, server virtualization, and VDI scenarios. It supports infrastructure management, virtual machine hosting, and enterprise software deployment, reducing costs by migrating from other platforms.

As a virtualization tool, Citrix XenServer stands out for its ease of maintenance, support, scalability, and centralized management. Commonly deployed on-premises and in data centers, it provides real-time monitoring, live migration, and strong security features. With compatibility across many operating systems, users benefit from a Windows-based management interface that is easy to install and navigate. Integration capabilities with active directory, storage, and load balancing contribute to resource optimization and reliability.

What are the key features of Citrix XenServer?
  • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces operational expenses across IT environments.
  • High Performance: Real-time monitoring and live migration support high efficiency.
  • Security: Strong safeguards protect data and processes.
  • Management Interface: Windows-based, offering user-friendly controls.
  • OS Compatibility: Works with a range of operating systems for flexibility.
  • Advanced Integrations: Active directory, storage, and load balancing maximize resources.
What benefits should users consider in Citrix XenServer reviews?
  • Scalability: Easily adapts to growing demands.
  • Ease of Deployment: Streamlines the installation process for quick setup.
  • Comprehensive Virtualization: Offers extensive capabilities for seamless operations.
  • Centralized Management: Facilitates control through XenCenter.

Implementation in banking, automotive, and data applications leverages Citrix XenServer's strengths in cloud automation and virtualization. Organizations manage resources, deploy services, and ensure stable operations within their infrastructure. The platform is used both on-premises and in data centers, aiding in areas such as cost reduction and maintenance efficiency.

Oracle VM for x86

Oracle VM for x86 is a Xen based server virtualization platform for public and private cloud and traditional on premise deployment. Oracle VM offers full lifecycle and application deployment from disk to cloud.

Designed and optimized for security, efficiency and performance Oracle VM supports major hardware vendors x86 and storage platforms and can run workloads on Linux, Windows and Oracle Solaris. Uniquely for our virtualization platform it offers live patching via Ksplice enhancing security and minimizing service disruption. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

Oracle VM for SPARC

Oracle VM for SPARC is a firmware based virtualization platform for Oracle and Fujitsu SPARC based servers running Solaris. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

 

Sample Customers

U.S. Army Shared Services Center, SoftLayer, Educational Services of America, Independent Bank, and SK Telecom.
Ambulance Victoria, Australian Finance Group (AFG), Avnet Technology Solutions, CERN, cloudKleyer, Danish Tax Authority (SKAT), Data Intensity, Dubai World, Engineers Australia, Enkitec, Groupe FLO, Guerra S.A. Implemento, s Rodovišrios, Interactive One, IT Convergence, Jesta Digital, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, KT, Kyoto Prefecture, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory / National Ignition Facility, Multinet Pakistan, National Australia Bank (NAB), Navis LLC, Overhead Door, Overstock.com, Paragon Data, Parks Victoria, Pella, Sunway Shared Services, St. Louis Metro, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., University of Massachusetts, Versace,
Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM
January 2025
Free Report: Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.