Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix XenServer vs Oracle VM comparison

Citrix and Oracle are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Citrix is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4. Citrix holds a 5.1% mindshare in SVS, compared to Oracle’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Citrix XenServer
Read 47 Citrix XenServer reviews
  • 9,106 Views
  • 6,440 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Oracle VM
Read 80 Oracle VM reviews
  • 13,524 Views
  • 9,690 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Oracle VM and Citrix XenServer compete in the virtualization platform category. Oracle VM has an advantage due to its cost-effectiveness for Oracle users, while Citrix XenServer offers extensive management capabilities without additional costs.

Features: Oracle VM offers cost efficiency with enhanced network and storage configuration and real-time monitoring. Its key strengths include compatibility with Oracle databases and reducing licensing costs. Citrix XenServer focuses on high availability and resource management, making it suitable for diverse enterprises. It offers features like XenMotion for VM mobility and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Oracle VM needs to enhance hot snapshot capabilities and integration with backup solutions. Its GUI and orchestration processes require further development. Citrix XenServer could improve its networking capabilities and expand third-party integrations. Its management console is limited to Windows, impacting platform compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle VM is widely deployed in on-premises environments with good technical support, though some find the tiered service average. It integrates seamlessly into Oracle-centric infrastructures. Citrix XenServer also has a strong on-premises presence, with stable support that has improved over time.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle VM provides significant cost savings on Oracle licensing and is free for Oracle-heavy implementations. Citrix XenServer offers a free version suitable for small setups, while its full-featured versions are affordable compared to VMware. Both platforms deliver good ROI, with Oracle VM being cost-effective for Oracle users and Citrix XenServer serving varied ecosystems efficiently.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 823,795 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Citrix XenServer support is praised for expertise and quick resolutions, but some find it slower than VMware with limited direct access.
Sentiment score
8.0
Oracle VM customer service excels with knowledgeable support, global issue resolution, and effective escalation, improving over time.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.5
Citrix XenServer faces challenges with usability, third-party integration, high-availability, and flexibility, needing better support and management tools.
Sentiment score
4.8
Oracle VM users criticize its interface, performance, integration issues, limited language support, and desire improved documentation, automation, and security.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Citrix XenServer offers scalability, supports diverse business sizes, seamless upgrades, and user-friendly management despite some storage concerns.
Sentiment score
7.6
Oracle VM is highly scalable with some flexibility but may present licensing and hardware limitations for certain organizations.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
Citrix XenServer offers a free solution with optional paid features, viewed variably as affordable or costly, yet competitive.
Sentiment score
7.0
Oracle VM offers cost-effective virtualization with flexible licensing, favorable pricing, and manageable support costs compared to VMware.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Citrix XenServer is praised for strong stability, with minimal issues, good support, and reliability, especially with regular updates.
Sentiment score
7.6
Oracle VM is stable in later versions, with resolved initial issues; users rate stability between 7 and 10.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Citrix XenServer offers robust virtualization with strong security, easy management, cost-effectiveness, and supports various operating systems and storage.
Sentiment score
8.0
Oracle VM offers enterprise virtualization with cost savings, scalability, OS compatibility, and efficient resource management, reducing downtime.
 

Categories and Ranking

Citrix XenServer
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle VM
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Citrix XenServer is 5.1%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle VM is 7.3%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

Siva Kuppala - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows us to allocate CPU, memory, storage, and network resources across VMs and minimizes downtime in case of hardware failure or maintenance
It is a scalable product and provides great benefits for virtualization needs. However, there are a few considerations: * Cost: Citrix Hypervisor can be fairly expensive. * Complexity: There's a learning curve, especially for those coming from a Microsoft background. Setting it up and managing it can introduce some complexity. * Hardware Support: Not all major hardware vendors fully support Citrix Hypervisor. * Third-party Integration: Integrating Hypervisor with other technologies within a large ecosystem can sometimes be challenging. * Community Support: Compared to solutions like Microsoft Hyper-V, the community support for Citrix Hypervisor is somewhat less extensive. It is not vast. If there are any issues or errors, the community support is not that good. Those are definitely important disadvantages.
Read full review
Rasika Sudasinghe - PeerSpot reviewer
A cheap option available for Linux environments which is useful for many workloads
Oracle VM is an obsolete product in that no new features are coming for it. The new version is called Oracle KVM. The only improvement needed for Oracle VM is the look and feel of the interface. When comparing the user console with vCenter, the interface used to control VMware environments, Oracle VM's user interface is not that rich in terms of user experience. If Oracle could improve that, it would be good. Besides that, we don't know if the solution comes with a roadmap because it comes free of charge with Oracle x86. We can't expect something similar to vCenter in KVM, but at least if you can improve what users can experience, then it would be good.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VL
Jan 13, 2015
vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer
We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
53%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Educational Organization
46%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Hypervisor?
The core function enables multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server. This maximizes hardware utilization and efficiency.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Hypervisor?
I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with one being very inexpensive and ten being very expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Citrix Hypervisor?
It would be very helpful if I could browse the data store directly in the GUI, similar to VMware and Hyper-V. This feature would be particularly useful when something goes wrong with a virtual mach...
See all answers
Which is better - Oracle VM or KVM?
I would prefer if KVM was easier to scale and not so limited. Overall the product has been helpful. It is easy to use, and was quite straight-forward to set up. Since I have been using KVM, I have ...
See all answers
Which is better - Oracle VM or VMware VSphere?
Oracle VM seems to me to be kind of outdated. Nevertheless, it is fairly straightforward to use and maintain. The solution can just be set and you can forget about it, and the scalability is consid...
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle VM?
If you want to access the VM from anywhere over the Internet, you put it in a public subnet. So, VMs are linked to that. The subnets are linked to it. So, it's perfectly secured if it's a private n...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 36% of the time
VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer Logo
VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 24% of the time
Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 21% of the time
KVM vs Citrix XenServer Logo
KVM vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 7% of the time
XCP-ng virtualization platform vs Citrix XenServer Logo
XCP-ng virtualization platform vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 1% of the time
More Citrix XenServer Competitors
VMware vSphere vs Oracle VM Logo
VMware vSphere vs Oracle VM
Compared 37% of the time
Proxmox VE vs Oracle VM Logo
Proxmox VE vs Oracle VM
Compared 18% of the time
KVM vs Oracle VM Logo
KVM vs Oracle VM
Compared 17% of the time
Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Oracle VM Logo
Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Oracle VM
Compared 14% of the time
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Oracle VM Logo
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Oracle VM
Compared 0% of the time
More Oracle VM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer
December 2024
Citrix XenServer reportDownload Citrix XenServer product report
Buyer's Guide
Oracle VM
November 2024
Oracle VM reportDownload Oracle VM product report
 

Also Known As

Hypervisor
No data available
 

Learn More

Citrix
Oracle
 

Overview

Citrix XenServer is a virtualization platform used in industries such as banking, automotive, and data applications for cloud automation, server virtualization, and VDI scenarios. It supports infrastructure management, virtual machine hosting, and enterprise software deployment, reducing costs by migrating from other platforms.

As a virtualization tool, Citrix XenServer stands out for its ease of maintenance, support, scalability, and centralized management. Commonly deployed on-premises and in data centers, it provides real-time monitoring, live migration, and strong security features. With compatibility across many operating systems, users benefit from a Windows-based management interface that is easy to install and navigate. Integration capabilities with active directory, storage, and load balancing contribute to resource optimization and reliability.

What are the key features of Citrix XenServer?
  • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces operational expenses across IT environments.
  • High Performance: Real-time monitoring and live migration support high efficiency.
  • Security: Strong safeguards protect data and processes.
  • Management Interface: Windows-based, offering user-friendly controls.
  • OS Compatibility: Works with a range of operating systems for flexibility.
  • Advanced Integrations: Active directory, storage, and load balancing maximize resources.
What benefits should users consider in Citrix XenServer reviews?
  • Scalability: Easily adapts to growing demands.
  • Ease of Deployment: Streamlines the installation process for quick setup.
  • Comprehensive Virtualization: Offers extensive capabilities for seamless operations.
  • Centralized Management: Facilitates control through XenCenter.

Implementation in banking, automotive, and data applications leverages Citrix XenServer's strengths in cloud automation and virtualization. Organizations manage resources, deploy services, and ensure stable operations within their infrastructure. The platform is used both on-premises and in data centers, aiding in areas such as cost reduction and maintenance efficiency.

Oracle VM for x86

Oracle VM for x86 is a Xen based server virtualization platform for public and private cloud and traditional on premise deployment. Oracle VM offers full lifecycle and application deployment from disk to cloud.

Designed and optimized for security, efficiency and performance Oracle VM supports major hardware vendors x86 and storage platforms and can run workloads on Linux, Windows and Oracle Solaris. Uniquely for our virtualization platform it offers live patching via Ksplice enhancing security and minimizing service disruption. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

Oracle VM for SPARC

Oracle VM for SPARC is a firmware based virtualization platform for Oracle and Fujitsu SPARC based servers running Solaris. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

 

Sample Customers

U.S. Army Shared Services Center, SoftLayer, Educational Services of America, Independent Bank, and SK Telecom.
Ambulance Victoria, Australian Finance Group (AFG), Avnet Technology Solutions, CERN, cloudKleyer, Danish Tax Authority (SKAT), Data Intensity, Dubai World, Engineers Australia, Enkitec, Groupe FLO, Guerra S.A. Implemento, s Rodovišrios, Interactive One, IT Convergence, Jesta Digital, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, KT, Kyoto Prefecture, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory / National Ignition Facility, Multinet Pakistan, National Australia Bank (NAB), Navis LLC, Overhead Door, Overstock.com, Paragon Data, Parks Victoria, Pella, Sunway Shared Services, St. Louis Metro, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., University of Massachusetts, Versace,
Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM
December 2024
Free Report: Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.