What is our primary use case?
Usually, when clients have agile requirements and want to bring historical data into the new HANA architecture, we use Data Services. This may involve multiple years of data from different systems. We need proper business use cases to map and set up the tools. Additionally, after the data is brought in, we perform reconciliation to show the before and after data transformation. This helps the business understand the changes that occurred during the transformation.
Data Services, along with tools like Information Steward, allows the usage of machine learning and artificial intelligence to maintain business rules and mappings, making the process easier. When we want to handle data migration internally, instead of relying on external tools like Xfinity, we usually use Data Services.
How has it helped my organization?
What is most valuable?
I have worked with Data Services for a long time, and currently, I find the dashboarding and reporting part to be the most important function. Earlier, this function was not as advanced, but now it provides excellent dashboarding and reporting capabilities. After every data load for each object, we can identify and understand any errors. This helps us schedule and manage data migration projects effectively. It has improved significantly.
What needs improvement?
The only thing is that it's a very specific product. It works well only for our SAP clients. That is its limitation. There is a lot of competition in that regard.
It will work fine only in an SAP environment. It could be said that the integration with other vendors could be better. It is built specifically for the SAP environment and follows best practices for SAP. When we want to work in a different environment, it becomes a bit more complex.
On adding additional functionality to improve artificial intelligence, machine learning, and integration, I think most of it is already considered in the roadmap.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with SAP Data Services for a very long time. I started using it at the time for business projects. We have extensively used it for data migration and other purposes.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a very stable product now because it has been around for many years. I would rate it a ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Data Services is a highly scalable product. I would give it a nine or ten.
Around two hundred users use Data Services.
How are customer service and support?
We seek technical support from SAP when we encounter errors that we can't resolve on our own, especially those related to standard master data. We have a support agreement with SAP, and our customer has maximum attention, so we get immediate assistance. It's been very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I mainly work with SAP, but I do familiarize myself with competitor products to stay informed. There are reasons why competitors have an edge. Flexibility and scalability are areas where other vendors like Xfinity or SMP might perform slightly better. They are more heterogeneous in that regard.
How was the initial setup?
The setup process is not very complicated, and the integration is also straightforward. Connecting to systems and using prebuilt extractors through interfaces make it easier. So the setup is not very complicated.
Only one or two people are required from a system maintenance perspective because there aren't many technical problems. Additionally, there are four people dedicated to technical development. So, in total, it's less than five or six people handling the technical aspects.
What about the implementation team?
Usually, we work with the business team. Once they bring in the system, they install the best practices and such. Then they connect the system, and that's when I get involved to start the integration process, mapping, and working with tables. It's quite easy. I also do some test driving. So, I work with teams.
In our current project, we are using it in a hybrid manner. However, in other projects, I have worked with both on-premises and cloud deployments.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I would give it around a three, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price. It's relatively expensive compared to other vendors, but it is competitive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I work with HANA, group reporting, analytics cloud, and other BW-related solutions as a functional architect. I've been working in SAP for more than 22 years. I primarily focus on finance and controlling.
What other advice do I have?
In general, I would give it a rating of nine or ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Hi every one,
I think for that use case mentionned up, the two product will be comparables if in the side of ODI team is strongly competent in ODI knowledge and configuration.
For Gartner overall comparison I recommend this article
www.gartner.com