Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1564212 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Service Managment Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Good support, stable, and helpful in tracking hardware and software and reducing overall costs
Pros and Cons
  • "It has helped in tracking hardware and software and reducing overall costs."
  • "When running large queries within the system, it does have a tendency to bog down the system. This is something that should be improved. I would also like to see the HAM Pro module beefed up a little bit and integrated better into the SAM Pro module, which seems to be pretty much on the roadmap. Its pricing is pretty complicated and always fluctuating. Its pricing should be improved."

What is our primary use case?

I am with a consulting company that implements the tool. I am working to implement ServiceNow in different areas such as SACM and software asset management. CMDB is the underlying database, and I populate it with the data from the clients based on their input and needs.

What is most valuable?

It has helped in tracking hardware and software and reducing overall costs.

What needs improvement?

When running large queries within the system, it does have a tendency to bog down the system. This is something that should be improved. I would also like to see the HAM Pro module beefed up a little bit and integrated better into the SAM Pro module, which seems to be pretty much on the roadmap.

Its pricing is pretty complicated and always fluctuating. Its pricing should be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this tool for about seven years.

Buyer's Guide
ServiceNow CMDB
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about ServiceNow CMDB. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We do customizations for clients all the time.

How are customer service and support?

For the most part, I would probably give them a nine out of ten. They are quite responsive.

How was the initial setup?

Its initial process was very complex because there were a lot of customizations. The deployment took about six months.

In terms of the implementation strategy, we followed the standard waterfall methodology. Basically, we stood it up, did all our work and development, and pushed it to production.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is always fluctuating. It seems to change every six months. Every time they come out with a new iteration, it changes. It is pretty complicated, and they should improve it.

What other advice do I have?

I would absolutely recommend this solution to others. I would advise making sure that they know what they want. The biggest problem that we run into is the client not having a direction in which they want to go, or they don't have a use case to start with.

I would rate ServiceNow CMDB a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Consultant at HCL Technologies.
Real User
Stable with good documentation and good stability
Pros and Cons
  • "There is a lot of documentation online regarding CMDB."
  • "The initial setup is a bit complex."

What is our primary use case?

CMDB is used for capturing all the IT hardware assets and configuration items. That includes computers, servers, virtual machines, phone devices, switches, et cetera. It's for the network and the front and back end.

What is most valuable?

There is a data mixer that's called Management and Commission and Discovery. What it does is it helps us auto-populate the information directly by pinging that particular CI and capturing that information. That's a very good feature. It makes it so that we don't have to go for manual updates every time.

There is a lot of documentation online regarding CMDB.

The solution is stable. 

The solution can scale to a certain extent. 

What needs improvement?

Right now, it's a one-sided integration, which means that whatever information is available in SLCN, for example, the mixer will capture the information. Therefore, there are scenarios where some of the CIs get retired. It does not really update their status. For example, We have 10 servers. Two were retired, so they were not updating anything. For the rest of the eight, they updated information. However, for the two which were retired, there needs to be a modern option for modifying the state as well in mid-server. 

The need to work on how the Virtual Machine Centers are being discovered, and how the Cloud's CI is being discovered and flagged.

The initial setup is a bit complex. 

The scalability capability could be improved. 

The pricing could be more competitive. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good. there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable, however, there is some room for improvement regarding the vCenter and the Virtual Machine Center, for which we are actually struggling right now.

In our organization, CMDB is used by everyone.

How was the initial setup?

The initial implementation is a bit complex compared to other modules as it's really technical in the back end. The steps are clearly defined on how to do it and there's a use case library available. That said, it's a bit of a tedious process.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

You do have to pay for a license, however, I cannot speak to the exact details. It's not part of my responsibilities. My understanding, however, is that pricing could always be better. 

What other advice do I have?

I would advise that before a company starts implementing CMDB, they should look at the CSBM. They should understand CSBM as it is common, however, they need to understand the requirements, and how the structure should be set up before implementing anything. The reason being, there are scenarios where people put all the data into the system, and that causes a blockage, which means that you don't have to actually document every CI. A company should see what should be the scope of the CMDB, and only then start implementing it. Otherwise, it will be a lot of information available that serves no use. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
ServiceNow CMDB
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about ServiceNow CMDB. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Mario Tonatiuh Arreola Solis - PeerSpot reviewer
Account Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
An easy-to-use solution with a single database, architecture and data model
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution has a single database, architecture, and data model."
  • "The tool is not user-friendly. It has a lot of features and you can get lost in it."

What is most valuable?

The solution has a single database, architecture, and data model. 

What needs improvement?

The tool is not user-friendly. It has a lot of features and you can get lost in it. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for six years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There are about 250 users for the solution in our company. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product is pricey. 

What other advice do I have?

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. The solution is easy to use. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
uCMDB SME at NOVA
Reseller
Good scalability and features are always being improved
Pros and Cons
  • "The stability is about the same as other platforms. It's not perfect, but it's pretty good. The scalability of the solution is good."
  • "Because I'm a SME, the most important thing is the technical help that I can get, so better, more useful technical support would be good."

What is our primary use case?

My company is a reseller, we're not the end-user. We don't have ServiceNow ourselves. We develop and we're a service provider, so we only provide ServiceNow solutions.

What needs improvement?

All areas of the solution have room for improvement. I mean, it's a never-ending thing, everything's being improved all the time. Because I'm an SME, the most important thing is the technical help that I can get, so better, more useful technical support would be good.

I also think the solution would be better if it was more intuitive.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've only been using the solution for about six months, but the company that I work for has probably been using it for five to ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is about the same as other platforms. It's not better or worse than other products. It's not perfect, but it's pretty good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of the solution is good.

How was the initial setup?

It's a complex task, but the ServiceNow version is probably not any more difficult than any other platform.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

You pay for the service and whatever extra features you want. If you want minimal service and don't want the extra features, you don't pay for them.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for people looking into the solution would be to have a big bank account.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
PeerSpot user
UDAY THENTU - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
A good database management tool, providing a single point of reference to monitor the integration of CI with IT assets
Pros and Cons
  • "We like that this solution allows us to easily track the relationship between our CI and the IT asset module, for troubleshooting purposes, or to check the impact of an incident site."
  • "We would like the solution to be made more easily scalable in future updates."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution to visualize the performance of all of our operation via a table that shows all of our critical surfaces.

What is most valuable?

We like that this solution allows us to easily track the relationship between our CI and the IT asset module, for troubleshooting purposes, or to check the impact of an incident site.

What needs improvement?

We would like the solution to be made more easily scalable in future updates.

We would also like to see more flexible pricing models made available that are tailored to usage.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been working with this solution for nearly four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have found this to be a stable solution during our time using it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution is scalable, but not easily.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of the solution is straightforward as long as all of the requirements have been decided up and detailed beforehand.

What other advice do I have?

We would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Specialist (US IT Recruiter) at MOURI Tech
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Has the ability to extract the details of organizational hardware and provide the latest setup updates
Pros and Cons
  • "The product's most valuable feature is its ability to extract the details of organizational hardware and provide the latest setup updates."
  • "The platform's stability needs improvement."

What is our primary use case?

We use the product to maintain the hardware inventory.

How has it helped my organization?

ServiceNow CMDB helps us maintain hardware. We do not have to proceed manually.

What is most valuable?

The product's most valuable feature is its ability to extract the details of organizational hardware and provide the latest setup updates.

What needs improvement?

The platform's stability needs improvement. They could add a dashboard feature as well.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using ServiceNow CMDB for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the platform's stability a seven out of ten. It needs improvement.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have 20 ServiceNow CMDB in our organization. It has good scalability, and we plan to increase the usage.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup has medium complexity. It can be deployed on the cloud and takes a week to complete.

What about the implementation team?

We implement the product in-house.

What other advice do I have?

I rate ServiceNow CMDB an eight out of ten. I recommend it to other users. I advise others to understand how the product works, different prerequisites for setup, existing network, and rules that need to be activated.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Nureni Jimoh - PeerSpot reviewer
ServiceNow ITSM/ITOM/SAM/CMDB Technical and Implementation Consultant at Doublelight Technology Limited
Real User
Top 20
Can help quickly resolve status issues and is stable and scalable
Pros and Cons
  • "The support of the whole infrastructure is one of the main features that makes ServiceNow CMDB suitable for every type of company. It integrates with all other modules like change, business management, HR, and customer service management."
  • "The initial setup can be very bad if the roadmap is not set up properly. You need a specialist to help you set up the roadmap."

What is most valuable?

The support of the whole infrastructure is one of the main features that makes ServiceNow CMDB suitable for every type of company. It integrates with all other modules like change, business management, HR, and customer service management.

Whenever there is an issue on statuses, you can quickly resolve it.

What needs improvement?

The initial setup can be very bad if the roadmap is not set up properly. You need a specialist to help you set up the roadmap.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using it for almost 8 years.

Most of the customers have the cloud solution.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a very stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's very scalable. You can start from a very small size and grow. You can configure, customize, etc.

How are customer service and support?

ServiceNow moves very fast to fix any problems. I would rate their technical support at ten out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

CMDB is like a journey that requires a specialist's help to build your roadmap. If you get the right resource to build your roadmap, then it's very easy to launch, depending on the process of the company. If it's not properly set up, then it can be very bad.

What other advice do I have?

ServiceNow CMDB is an excellent solution, and I would rate it at ten on a scale from one to ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Consultant / Integrator
PeerSpot user