Sophos Central Reviews

We are a vendor. In the last company, we were a platinum partner of Sophos. So we provided services to other businesses, like corporate businesses or many businesses.

I have deployed it in many scenarios. Many customer days come to us, and they're migrating their services, like, services to Sophos, like the other firewall to Sophos. They deploy a new one. So we tried different scenarios, like an active firewall with central services, central with active-active firewall, and the support central endpoint services. There are so many scenarios.

Sophos Central is good. It's also free for all those firewalls because, from Sophos Central, we manage the firewalls and push the policies to the firewall. 

Also, we manage the Endpoint with the endpoint and firewall, with Sophos Central in view, monitoring all the policies, logs, and various features in the Sophos Central orchestration features. 

We can push templates to all the firewalls, and they are updated automatically with the Central. It syncs automatically, and all the firewalls appear in Sophos firewall in our environment. So we can manage all firewalls, push policies, log our endpoint to endpoints, and update endpoints. Also, see the protection policy and all the various features.

There are areas of improvement because there are license restrictions.

In future releases, I would like to see more awareness about this product. Most customers don't know about Sophos Central. Sometimes, I have to ask customers to use Sophos Central because they don't know it exists. 

It's not well-marketed, so many customers don't know about this feature. Many vendors use firewalls, but they don't use Sophos Central. For example, if you have five firewalls, the reporting limit might be reached. So, many customers don't know about Sophos Central, and I sometimes have to force them to use it.

The stability of Sophos Central is generally good. Sometimes, issues arise due to server distribution, particularly from my region in Pakistan. There are two data centers, which can cause browsing delays. Overall, most of the time, it functions well, but there are occasional lapses due to these data center issues. Overall, I would rate the stability as seven out of ten.

I've noticed regional difficulties, such as high latency from the vendor's server. Generally, it's about eighty percent effective, but there are times when it's problematic.

I would rate its scalability an eight out of ten. As a partner, we handle multiple scenarios. Sometimes it's hundreds of end users, sometimes thousands, and sometimes it's even more. The number of end users varies from time to time.

The support is good. Initially, they escalate issues through the L1 and L2 engines. Often, the first few emails or days can be less productive, but after that, the L2 team becomes more engaged. For partners, I suggest a different support channel, which should allow direct quality reporting.

Neutral

We worked with Kaspersky and other key solutions. Each has its strengths, but for robust security and support features, Sophos Central is preferable. I find its antivirus software and firewall solutions to be highly effective.

The initial setup is easy. It's very user-friendly. We can push policies through the GUI, like threat protection and file protection. Scanning protection begins with the GUI. It's no problem. 

But for deployment, it's difficult, just like deployment purposes. If you're going to deploy the endpoint, it is difficult to deploy the central. We can go through the systems or through the active directory or something, but there are no other features like this.

There's no need to deploy. It's on the cloud. We have to create an account and sync our antivirus. It takes about three to five minutes to sync.

The pricing is very competitive. When compared to other vendors like Fortinet, Sophos stands out, especially in terms of firewall and endpoint pricing. It's more affordable than other American brands, and while not as cheap as Chinese brands, the quality and pricing balance is excellent.

On a scale, I would rate it a ten out of ten.  I would emphasize the range of features like DLP, file label protection, and user policies that align with your organizational needs. Sophos Central offers comprehensive protection and a variety of policy-based solutions that are highly beneficial for any organization.

I've been involved in installing and supporting Sophos Central for customers, particularly focusing on server security.

I have experience using Sophos Central for endpoint security management, particularly in two major companies: Dunkin' Brothers and Shop Up Limited. Dunkin' Brothers has approximately 500 support center users, while Shop Up Limited has around 700 users. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate my experience with Sophos Central as a six or seven at most, with six being the average.

We've observed significant improvements in threat detection and response capabilities since implementing Sophos Central, especially when compared to other endpoint solutions like Fortinet. This enhanced capability has made Sophos Central a highly sought-after solution in Bangladesh. Customers appreciate the effectiveness and efficiency of Sophos Central's threat response compared to other options in the market. One notable example is a client of ours who experienced attempted hacking. Sophos Central promptly detected and blocked the intrusion, alerting our client to the potential threat. Our client appreciated the proactive response and effective blocking of the hacker, highlighting the superior quality of support provided by Sophos Central.

Sophos Central's automated threat response played a crucial role in mitigating security risks, as exemplified in a recent case at Popular Pharmaceutical Limited. With nearly 300 users relying on endpoint security with threat response and managed detection, they detected suspicious activity indicating potential hacking attempts from external networks. Thanks to Sophos Central's automated response, the malicious traffic was promptly blocked, and the IT team was alerted to the suspicious behavior. Additionally, when a ransomware attack occurred on one system, Sophos Central's support center swiftly isolated the affected system, preventing the further spread of the attack.

Sophos Central's reporting and analytics capabilities greatly contribute to providing actionable insights to our customers. I genuinely appreciate the effectiveness of Sophos in generating comprehensive reports, which cover all aspects efficiently. I would rate this feature as an eight out of ten for its robustness and usability.

The interface of Sophos Central has significantly contributed to the ease of managing security policies and procedures. In my experience, I've found it to be highly efficient, especially when compared to other solutions like Fortinet. The features such as system heartbeat and automatic system updates are particularly commendable.

One of the significant advantages of Sophos is its affordability compared to other technologies like Check Point and Fortinet. This makes it a preferred choice for businesses, especially government and smaller operations.

The most popular features of Sophos Central are its heartbeat functionality, threat response and detection capabilities, and its rule management system. Notably, the rule management system is not limited to servers but extends to client systems as well. These three components are highly valued for their effectiveness. Additionally, the ability to manage rules through a drag-and-drop system adds further convenience to our administration tasks.

One feature that I find particularly valuable for maintaining our cybersecurity posture is the automatic update functionality. This feature ensures that our systems are consistently up to date with the latest security patches and enhancements. Additionally, the ability to push updates to every software center by default is highly convenient and efficient in ensuring that all endpoints are properly secured.

Although Sophos Central is well-established, there's a shortage of engineers available locally, which has hindered our ability to effectively support and implement solutions. I believe there's room for improvement, especially in terms of traffic monitoring. If Sophos Central could provide detailed traffic monitoring based on user counts, similar to what is available in Fortinet, it would enhance the overall value proposition for our customers. Sophos could potentially provide more detailed insights into user activity, such as the number of users currently logged into the system and those already under protection. Additionally, it would be beneficial to have visibility into network traffic, including guest networks, and identify any suspicious activities or attempts to access unauthorized resources. The main drawback lies in the weak after-sales support system.

I have been working with it for two years.

I find Sophos to be quite stable, especially considering its widespread usage in Bangladesh, with approximately 1.8 million devices currently relying on it. This stability is particularly beneficial for small businesses or offices seeking security solutions.

It provides good scalability capabilities.

The installation process in Sophos Central is significantly easier compared to other solutions. It's straightforward and hassle-free – we can simply download the necessary plugins from the Central warehouse and install them with ease.

The deployment time for Sophos Central varies depending on factors such as the number of users, desktops, or nodes being connected. For smaller deployments involving around ten or twenty users connecting to Sophos Central, the process typically takes a maximum of two to two and a half hours. During this time, the network may need to be disconnected temporarily. Once logged into Sophos, the license can be installed, and then the PCs will automatically receive installation prompts via email. Each computer usually requires around fifteen to twenty minutes to complete the installation of Sophos Central nodes. 

During our previous deployment, there were three of us, including myself, working as senior system engineers. Both of my colleagues had approximately two years of experience with Sophos. With such expertise within our team, deployment tasks were typically straightforward and didn't require much effort. However, when faced with customer requests for complex rules or configurations beyond our capabilities, we would engage with our local vendor and service partners for assistance.

The pricing of Sophos is quite reasonable and generally cheaper compared to competitors like Fortinet and Check Point. However, it's important to note that certain licenses may come with higher costs, which can be a drawback.

I believe incorporating Sophos Central into security infrastructure could further enhance the defenses. However, considering customers' perspectives and budget constraints, particularly for small and medium-sized organizations, it's essential to ensure cost-effectiveness. In Bangladesh, there's a growing preference for Sophos due to its suitability for various environments and budget scales. Therefore, I suggest focusing on improving sales and after-sales support to meet the increasing demand and effectively deploy Sophos solutions across Bangladesh. Overall, I would rate it six out of ten.

I mainly use Sophos Central to keep our clients' digital world safe. I focus on three main things: making sure emails are protected, managing the firewall, and handling endpoint protection to stop viruses and other threats on devices. These are my key areas, but I'm also familiar with other parts of Sophos' tech to ensure our clients have solid overall security.

Sophos Central made it easier to manage the multitude of Sophos Solutions currently in the market. It easy to switch between different products to quickly address alerts or make policy changes.

The best thing about Sophos Central is how it brings all its security solutions together in one place. It is like having a control center for everything. Since Sophos has been doing this for a while and has many tools, having them all in one platform makes my job a lot simpler. It beats jumping around different tools all the time. Having it all in one spot is a game-changer.

One area that could use some work in Sophos Central is the user experience. Despite the continuous improvements, the user interface could be more intuitive and user-friendly. It feels like there is still room to make it smoother and simpler for users to navigate and manage security settings.

I have been using Sophos Central for ten months.

In terms of stability, Sophos is generally solid and robust. However, during significant system updates or internal migrations by the Sophos team, there can be some shakiness. Overall, the solution has been reliable with minimal downtime or performance issues. I would rate its stability at a nine out of ten.

I would rate the scalability of Sophos Central as an eight out of ten. In my experience, if a client needs to scale up, like adding more licenses to protect additional devices, it is a relatively smooth process. Communication with the Sophos team and getting things in order doesn't take too long. So, in terms of scalability, it has been quite effective in adapting to changing needs. There are eight to ten users within our organization.

I would rate the support as a six out of ten. They do respond when necessary, but it seems like they are often busy. While they are continuously improving their technology, there are times when they don't respond promptly. If they don't reply immediately, it usually takes them until the next day to get back to you. There is room for improvement in terms of responsiveness, but they eventually address the issues.

Neutral

We previously used IBM Reaqta now formally known as IBM Security QRadar EDR for our endpoint protection and response. We always had Sophos Central but made the switch not too long ago.

The initial setup of Sophos Central depends on the specific technology being implemented. For software-based solutions like Intercept X or email protection, it is generally straightforward, with the bulk of the work handled by the software agents. However, if something goes unplanned, it may require a bit more technical know-how to troubleshoot. On the other hand, setting up hardware like firewalls varies based on deployment methods, each with its own challenges. It can be more complex, requiring a good understanding of deployment methods to navigate through the setup process. All in all, the ease or difficulty of the setup depends on the specific technology and deployment approach. The deployment time for Sophos solutions varies based on the type of technology. In my experience, it usually takes about three to five days to complete the installation and configuration for a hardware-based solution.

Sophos solutions are generally affordable, especially considering that we manage them in South Africa and Africa at large. The pricing is particularly favorable for software-based solutions, while the hardware side can be a bit more challenging. Overall, for software-based Sophos solutions, the pricing is reasonable and not overly expensive.

My advice for those looking into using Sophos Central for the first time would be to invest time in training. Sophos, particularly through its partner program, offers training courses for most of its solutions. From my experience, these courses are comprehensive, self-explanatory, and often include practical labs. Some are free, and some may have a cost, but they provide valuable material and hands-on experience. For newcomers, I highly recommend going through these training sessions to navigate the maze of Sophos solutions effectively. Overall, I would rate Sophos Central as an eight out of ten.

It acts as a central management platform that connects to all our mobile devices and laptops.

One of the standout features is its highly detailed and user-friendly graphical interface. In comparison to other device control software I've used, it provides a comprehensive and intuitive dashboard, and I can easily locate the information I need within the software by accessing the built-in help feature. Even users who are not familiar with Sophos can navigate the dashboard with ease.

Having a mobile app for Sophos Central would be a highly valuable addition. With the current hybrid work environment and travel requirements, having a mobile solution would greatly improve our ability to access and navigate Sophos Central on the go, enhancing the overall user experience and making it a more portable solution.

I've been working as an infrastructure engineer at my current organization for the past two years, but the organization has been using Sophos Central for about three to four years now.

Overall, it's a reliable and stable product.

It is indeed a scalable product. Whenever we required specific features or solutions, we engaged with Sophos sales and our trusted third-party provider. They have been instrumental in helping us scale up our existing solutions, whether it's related to firewalls, networking, or other technical aspects. The ease of scalability has been a notable benefit, allowing us to adapt to our evolving needs effectively. We have approximately two hundred users working with it.

The support service has been of good quality in my experience.

Our company primarily focuses on providing training services, with a specialization in firewall training. Our journey with Sophos began when we initially acquired Sophos firewalls. Subsequently, as we sought a comprehensive solution for managing various devices, including laptops, computers, and mobile devices used by our employees, we discovered Sophos Central Dashboards. This product offered the device control and management features we needed, complementing our existing use of Sophos UTM and firewalls.

The initial setup was relatively straightforward, and I found it to be less challenging compared to configuring other server software. I attribute this ease of setup to the well-structured and easy-to-follow documentation provided.

It's not considered a cheap solution and falls more in the moderate pricing category.

I would recommend exploring alternative solutions and assessing them to determine if Sophos Central is the right fit for your needs. While there may be other options available that could potentially be simpler, I still believe that Sophos is a strong choice. It has proven to be relatively easy to both install and configure, making it a viable and convenient option. Overall, I would rate it six out of ten.

We use it to centralize, manage, and upgrade our security infrastructure. This includes applying policies, revoking access, and working within established guidelines, all without the need for physical access.

It streamlines our operations, allowing us to remotely handle tasks, saving time and eliminating the need for running around to different locations.

The primary benefits include complete control over hardware devices and the valuable assistance provided in log shipment. Additionally, the analytics tools proved instrumental in effectively utilizing and interpreting data related to these aspects.

There were challenges we faced with generating reports for the physical firewall in certain instances. Despite escalating the issue through tickets, we haven't received a fully satisfactory resolution. Additionally, accessing user logs on the central platform is not as straightforward as we'd prefer.

I have been working with it for approximately five years.

I haven't encountered any significant downtime while working, ensuring a stable experience.

I would rate its scalability capabilities nine out of ten. Currently, there are five individuals responsible for overseeing and managing approximately twenty-five to twenty-eight firewalls.

The technical support in India is somewhat slow. They often require a considerable amount of time, and contacting them sometimes involves odd hours, which can be challenging, especially when it falls outside regular business hours.

We collaborate with two other vendors, Fortinet and Palo Alto. We recently adopted Palo Alto about a year ago, and while they make promising claims, we are still in the process of familiarizing ourselves with their offerings. Fortinet, on the other hand, has been part of our operations for the past two years, with our team gaining experience and expertise. Among the three, Sophos is the longest-standing partner.

The initial setup was straightforward and user-friendly.

It offers the most competitive pricing compared to other vendors. When considering security effectiveness, Sophos stands out as a cost-effective choice, especially in comparison to other prominent solutions available in the Indian market. It provides a comprehensive package that includes most features, making it more scalable and accessible for security needs in smaller organizations like ours. I would rate it one out of ten.

Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

We oversee the management of our wireless deployment through Sophos Central. Additionally, we handle the deployment of antivirus software for servers, users, and other devices.

The advantage of central management, particularly in antivirus management, is that I don't need to go to each user individually. Instead, I can handle everything from a single console, making it a unified and streamlined process.

I have been using it for approximately three years.

It provides impressive stability capabilities. I would rate it nine out of ten.

We never scaled it up.

We never submitted any tickets or reached out to technical support. The documentation proved to be helpful, enabling us to set everything up without external assistance.

The initial setup was moderately straightforward, around six or seven out of ten on the complexity scale. While it wasn't overly complicated, the multifactor authentication posed a challenge initially.

For the deployment, I received an email containing a link with step-by-step instructions to follow. That's all there was to it, and it was successfully completed by two individuals.

The pricing is highly affordable, with no additional costs. We renewed our annual license for the wireless component. I would rate it one out of ten.

Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

We incorporate it into our demo for its cloud-based security solution, similar to Trend Micro Logistics, ensuring robust security for both client machines and servers. The inclusion of features enhances the user experience, providing a friendly and intuitive interface.

It's highly valuable as it ensures that no unauthorized installations occur without the IT team's permission, maintaining a secure environment. This allows for precise application of security measures, similar to a firewall, where connectivity and application definitions are meticulously managed. The protection and enterprise-level features are commendable, offering robust control and firewall management for designated machines. Additionally, encryption can be applied seamlessly through the support center, providing comprehensive control over all aspects of security. The backend protection further enhances the overall security posture.

Vulnerability protection and monitoring any changes are crucial aspects that require attention. Considering the specific requirements of the banking sector where constant internet usage may not be permissible, it might be worthwhile for the company to reconsider offering an on-premises solution. This would cater to users who prefer or require an in-house solution due to security and permission concerns associated with internet networks. The DLP feature is present, but it may not be considered a comprehensive DLP solution and it should be improved.

I would rate its stability capabilities seven out of ten.

It caters to a wide range of customers, including small and medium enterprises. It is versatile and adaptable, working effectively in various scenarios and meeting the diverse needs of its user base, regardless of the size or type of business.

I would rate its customer service and support eight out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup posed some complexities in the process.

Being a cloud solution eliminates the need to set up client-server arrangements for databases as everything is readily available. You just need to create a login account, sign in, download or deploy the agent on servers, and apply policies. However, a lightweight agent is essential to prevent any adverse impact on machine performance during evaluation. The deployment process can be completed in five minutes.

The price is relatively affordable. When compared to other vendors, it is a more cost-effective option. I would rate it six out of ten.

If you're focused on client security, I recommend opting for Sophos Central. Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.

I primarily use Sophos Central to monitor endpoints with active antivirus. It helps me check which endpoints are active and have the Sophos disk encryption solution installed.

The most valuable feature of Sophos Central is its visibility. It provides a comprehensive overview of all endpoints in my system that have Sophos agents running, offering a single pane of glass. This visibility allows me to see that I have a hundred devices that are up to date.

The firewall capabilities of Sophos Central need improvement. I have found it somewhat limited, and I prefer to work directly on the device for firewall management.

I have been using Sophos Central for roughly five years.

I would rate the stability of Sophos Central as eight out of ten since I have never really tested its limits.

I only use it for a couple of functions, such as availability and monitoring elements in the environment, and thus I would rate it a five.

I have not communicated with technical support for Sophos Central.

I participated in the initial setup for a couple of systems, and I would rate the experience as seven out of ten in terms of ease.

Overall, I would rate Sophos Central as six out of ten. 

There is significant room for improvement, particularly in the firewall features.