What is our primary use case?
Our team was looking for a reliable and cost-effective solution for our VMware vSphere platform.
VMware vSAN wasn't an option due to cost and scalability issues.
Enabling storage high availability across multiple nodes was our top priority as we couldn't risk having any downtime in case a node was to fail.
We ideally wanted a dedicated set of tools to administrate and perform maintenance on our hyperconverged storage.
That solution had to be as platform agnostic as possible so that we could reuse it with another vendor.
How has it helped my organization?
The product provides a robust and cost-effective alternative compared to other available products.
StarWind Virtual SAN allows our team to aggregate our cluster storage in a scalable way without seeing an explosion in the licensing costs.
It let us decouple our hyperconverged storage from the actual virtualization plartorm.
As an agnostic software solution, StarWind Virtual SAN could be re-used in other projects across different teams with another virtualization vendor. That aspect was key to the success of our department as all teams were able to work together.
What is most valuable?
Data replication is useful as it enables storage high availability on the cluster.
The fact that the solution is vendor-agnostic allows it to be used with any virtualization vendor while remaining a powerful abstraction over storage.
There are easy-to-use tools for the administration and maintenance of hyper-converged storage.
StarWind Virtual SAN also let us fine-tune the desired level of replication across all nodes, allowing the administrator to specify a custom number of fault to tolerate across the cluster nodes.
What needs improvement?
StarWind Virtual SAN architecture is slightly complex and requires the team to carefully identify and study how the solution integrates with VMware vSphere.
Tooling is spread across web UI plus desktop clients which can sometimes be confusing as the team isn't always sure which tool to use during maintenance procedures.
Also one drawback, when compared to VMware vSAN, is that StarWind Virtual SAN requires a lot of network interfaces in order to provide the same data replication and node redundancy features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have never encountered any bug or problem that would bring the cluster down.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We are very happy with scaling, especially regarding licensing.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is very responsive, helpful, and friendly.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use a different solution previously.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was a bit hard to do by ourselves as there are many moving pieces and tools to operate. However, support helped us a lot with setting everything up.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'd advise users to consider the scalability of the project as licensing can become a problem with competitors' products.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did ook at VMware vSAN.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.