What is our primary use case?
We are running Dell PowerEdge Series as Hyper-V hosts with StarWind providing a virtual SAN infrastructure to allow for CSVs and data replication between the hosts without having to add dedicated storage hardware.
This serves to allow us to have a fault tolerance of suffering not just a drive loss (RAID Configurations on each server allow for that) but it also allows for the loss of an entire server since we are running N+1.
The servers are directly connected to one another using 10GB NICs, allowing for fast connectivity and support for direct wiring. This meant that we did not have to invest in a dedicated 10GB SAN switch, either.
How has it helped my organization?
Prior to the implementation of this solution, our servers were all standalone Hyper-V Hosts. VMs resided on a host and were unable to live migrate or sustain connectivity when a host had a reboot or maintenance item.
StarWind vSAN has allowed us to leverage our server infrastructure more completely without the need to add more hardware.
The failover ability has proven useful already in maintaining connectivity to VMs during a power event that impacted one host. VMs failed over immediately and the data replication brought the downed host back to fully synced status quickly after reboot.
What is most valuable?
The ability to utilize my onboard disk from the Hypervisor hosts, not requiring the purchase of dedicated SAN hardware, SAN switching, etc., is a real cost value.
The replication of data between the hosts that StarWind does also allows us to create redundancy since we are able to operate at an N+1 configuration. This feature allows for much greater fault tolerance than we have had before.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see options for automated notifications of any changes, including, for example, synchronization issues.
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
It has been a few months since we implemented StarWind Virtual SAN.
How are customer service and support?
The support team, from implementation to general operating questions, has been an incredible value add and well worth our support contract already.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Not at this employer, but my experience previously does include HP, Dell, EMC, and Nimble hardware-based SAN units.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. StarWind provided good documentation and access to engineers to help guide the process at each step.
What about the implementation team?
StarWind provided guided installation with an engineer. He was quite well prepared and great to work with on the project.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The support contract is well worth it. The price for it was very reasonable and their team has been very engaged whenever we reach out.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did preliminary pricing on HP, Dell & Nimble, but the costs associated with hardware were going to present a challenge to our school at this point.
What other advice do I have?
As of this time, I really do not have a wishlist of features beyond perhaps some automated notifications of any changes, sync issues, etc. That being said, we have not had any operating issues come up that I would have really needed automated alerts for, so this would just be a wish list item.
From what we have implemented, we are not finding any lacking features or issues with our configuration that we would like to see improved. If this changes over time, I would certainly update my opinion, but for what was advertised, we feel like this is a pretty stable product that is meeting its goals.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.