There are 2 server clusters with a software-defined SAN. They are Hyper-V Windows 2016 clusters and have been working fine for several years. We are using both NVME and SSD disks with both are working fine with good levels of performance. We provide a SaaS solution hosted in external datacenters in one cluster and the other hosts our internal servers. Starwind replaced a Dell SAN that had failed. The SaaS solution runs on an Oracle database which has had excellent price-performance using Linux in Hyper-V VM.
CEO at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Extremely flexible, easy to scale, and stable
Pros and Cons
- "The most useful aspect is the hyper-converged SD SAN and the ease to expand it by just adding cheap SSD or NVME disks."
- "A great feature would be a wizard and to include a new disk in the SAN. At the moment, including a new disk requires several steps - some that must be done at the OS level and others in each node."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
The product allows extreme flexibility for SAN and hyperconverged infrastructure. Using Hyper-V combined with Linux VMs has allowed us to scale our solutions with additional clients and client volumes. We have customers using our platform with over 1.3 million accounts. The databases have scaled seamlessly. We now have over 16 TB of disks in our hyperconverged SD-WAN and Starwind has managed them flawlessly. The ability to grow SAN size by just buying more cheap SSDs or NVME disks has been very useful.
What is most valuable?
The most useful aspect is the hyper-converged SD SAN and the ease to expand it by just adding cheap SSD or NVME disks.
What needs improvement?
A great feature would be a wizard and to include a new disk in the SAN. At the moment, including a new disk requires several steps - some that must be done at the OS level and others in each node. We have no more recommendations for the product beyond that.
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
February 2025

Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using the product for over 3 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have had no stability problems whatsoever.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is very scalable. Right now, we have over 16TB of disks.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is always available and helpful
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we used a Dell EMC SAN which was failing.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was supported by Starwind.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did look at DataCore.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Works
A robust solution that makes us always available, and matched our limited infrastructure budget
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature for us is having the ability to configure our local storage using a limited number of disks and using the StarWind VSAN software to keep the cluster nodes in perfect sync."
- "The system performs as expected, but we're always looking for performance improvements regarding the best utilization of NVMe disks."
What is our primary use case?
We were looking for a Microsoft Windows 2016 Hyper-V clustered solution that didn't require an external SAN network. Something that could utilize the local storage on each server, and also allowed us to configure the storage as we required it. We had looked at Storage Spaces Direct, but it was too restrictive in terms of configuration.
How has it helped my organization?
We are operational 24/7, every day of the year, so prior to having a clustered system, our users were faced with downtime anytime we applied patches or upgrades to the system. With the StarWind VSAN software and Hyper-V Guest Cluster, we are able to create an environment where we can perform system updates without any downtime to the users.
What is most valuable?
We are not a very large organization and have a limited budget available for infrastructure.
The most valuable feature for us is having the ability to configure our local storage using a limited number of disks and using the StarWind VSAN software to keep the cluster nodes in perfect sync.
What needs improvement?
The system performs as expected, but we're always looking for performance improvements regarding the best utilization of NVMe disks.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for a year and a half.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not experienced any failures or problems with the software.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It handles our environment very well and I don't see any reason why it wouldn't handle a much larger environment.
How are customer service and technical support?
Their software support team had been very helpful in the initial setup of the system and also helped to reconfigure the system after we lost one node in the cluster.
Overall, their support has been excellent. They will stick with you until your issues are resolved!
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use another solution prior to this one.
How was the initial setup?
Their technical support team was available to install the software both during the demo phase and when we installed the licensed version. It would have been complex for us, as it was our first cluster experience, but their support team made it look easy.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, but it was too restrictive in terms of configuration.
What other advice do I have?
So far, the software is doing everything we need.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
February 2025

Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Works with 201-500 employees
Create new SANs on demand, making the most efficient use of existing hardware
Pros and Cons
- "When we need additional storage but want to keep the size of the SANs manageable, the StarWind Virtual SAN has allowed me to do everything needed."
- "The only thing that I have any difficulty with is that in order to perform upgrades, it is required that the SANs be detached from the Hosts before that can happen."
What is our primary use case?
I used their Virtual SAN software to add new SANs to my VMware environment. I began working for a company that had a Virtual Environment already in place and there was no documentation regarding the configuration of the system. The storage was not managed correctly and I had to find a way to make space with what hardware I had at the time.
How has it helped my organization?
The storage space in the VMware environment I walked into was mismanaged and we needed immediate access to more storage. There was a Dell PowerVault that had plenty of space, and this software enabled me to make the most of my storage.
Given that I could not purchase new equipment I had to find a way to make this PowerVault become the storage without disrupting things. StarWind Virtual San allowed me to achieve this quickly.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the ability to make new SANs on the fly. When we need additional storage but want to keep the size of the SANs manageable, the StarWind Virtual SAN has allowed me to do everything needed. There are times when we still need storage to be controlled and the software allows me to make the needed changes. It can be done right from their application and then pushed directly over to the hosts.
What needs improvement?
The only thing that I have any difficulty with is that in order to perform upgrades, it is required that the SANs be detached from the Hosts before that can happen.
In my industry, having one hundred percent uptime means that I must either migrate everything off of the existing SANs so I can perform the upgrade, or shut everything down, detach the SANs and then reconnect them after the upgrade is complete.
At this point, while I am running an older version and the features still work within the latest versions of VMware, I won't see it as being a problem until I add more storage to allow for the proper migration and upgrade to happen.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have never had any downtime. This software has managed the SAN connection to my VMs perfectly for the last four years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This software has done everything I need. It saved me a lot of time when I was given an extremely short time to add additional space to my Virtual Environment.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have only needed to reach out to the support team a couple of times since this software was implemented. They responded within a couple of hours and everything was figured out quickly.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
There were no previous solutions in place. The setup of the VM Environment was mismanaged initially. This software helped me regain control of the management of storage quickly.
How was the initial setup?
Straightforward setup and the configuration was no problem.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented this solution in-house.
What was our ROI?
I saw an immediate ROI as I had storage that was not being utilized. Instead of having to spend $10K-$20K to add new storage to the existing environment, wait on the hardware to arrive, and then configure it directly as a new LUN, I was able to use this solution. I purchased the software, installed it on the system that I had with excess space, and created a few new SANs the same day the request was being made with an urgent time frame.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The timeline to get the storage was extremely limited so I didn't have time to do evaluation testing.
What other advice do I have?
Their support team is terrific. I have only had to reach out to them on a couple of occasions. They responded quickly and helped me to get things resolved right away.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Information Systems Manager at a aerospace/defense firm with 51-200 employees
The way virtual SAN is set up, we don't have to buy a separate appliance for storage
Pros and Cons
- "One of the most valuable features is the way it sets up the virtual SAN, because we don't have to buy a separate appliance for storage. It uses the existing storage on the servers, which is definitely a cost savings for us."
- "The documentation could be a little more concise, but, for the most part, it just works."
What is our primary use case?
We needed to consolidate our physical servers, so we went with the StarWind cluster to virtualize our servers.
How has it helped my organization?
We went down from eight discrete servers to two, so it's saving us money and electricity in cooling.
It's definitely saving us a bunch of time as far as server maintenance is concerned, because it's all virtualized. I would guess it saves us a good 20 to 30 hours a year, just in maintenance.
We've also seen some performance gains over accessing the discrete servers, approximately five to ten percent faster access times to data. It has helped to maintain high-performance and data high-availability on minimalistic resources by doing load-balancing and resource-sharing seamlessly. The user never sees any downtime, any performance issues. It's just all done very well behind the scenes.
There's also a peace of mind aspect, knowing that we have failover now. Before, if a server went down, it could take days to get things back up and running, whereas now, if a VM fails, it's just minutes to get it back up and running.
What is most valuable?
One of the most valuable features is the way it sets up the virtual SAN, because we don't have to buy a separate appliance for storage. It uses the existing storage on the servers, which is definitely a cost savings for us.
What needs improvement?
The documentation could be a little more concise, but, for the most part, it just works.
For how long have I used the solution?
Less than one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a very stable platform. The only way you can really break it is if you do something that you shouldn't, like shut a server, shut one of the nodes down without moving your VMs to the other node first.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
As far as scalability goes, especially with adding storage, it's dirt-simple. It's so easy to do. I'm very impressed with that aspect of it.
How are customer service and technical support?
StarWind Proactive Support is fairly responsive. They definitely go above and beyond to address the issues, when there are issues. We had a minor crisis a few months back, and they spent hours on the phone with me over a weekend to get our servers back up and running. The quality of service is really good.
If I were to say anything - not so much critical - there is a language barrier to overcome, but that's a minor issue. It doesn't affect their knowledge, ability, or willingness to help. It's just sometimes a little difficult to communicate adequately.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not have a previous solution. We went with it for virtualization, and we chose StarWind because it was a software-only solution and we could use off-the-shelf hardware. Everybody else that I looked at was basically selling appliances. They were just outside of our budget.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was a little complex, just to get the cluster configured, the iSCSI, etc. That was a little bit confusing because I had conflicting documentation.
Overall, our deployment took about three weeks. Our implementation strategy was to get the StarWind cluster built, working, and tested before virtualizing our servers, and then migrating them a couple at a time.
What about the implementation team?
We set it up ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Their pricing seems pretty good, and their licensing structure is pretty straightforward.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked into Nutanix, as well as Red Hat's solution, but StarWind seemed to be the best setup for us, the best fit for our environment.
What other advice do I have?
Definitely get a trial license. I'm pretty sure they still have a free version that you can download. Set it up in a sandbox and see if it makes sense for your environment. The great thing about it is it is all Microsoft-based, so if you're familiar with Hyper-V, then it's really pretty simple.
In terms of our users, it's pretty much just me managing it. It's running our production environment. Ideally, I'd like to add our third node this year so that I have extra available overhead so that we can be more proactive with maintenance, etc.
I would rate StarWind at eight out of ten. There's always room for improvement.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Operations Manager at The Lipman Company, Inc.
Has excellent support in the rare case you need them
What is our primary use case?
StarWind is the highly redundant storage solution for our company-wide hardware agnostic Hyper-V environment.
How has it helped my organization?
StarWind VSAN allowed our small business to build a fault-tolerant storage architecture using SSDs and off-the-shelf chassis that is high-performing, high-functional, fault-tolerant, highly available, reliable, and easy to use. Best of all, we achieved all of this for a fraction of the cost of other solutions. For eight years now, StarWind has been extremely reliable and easy to use.
What is most valuable?
- Very simple to use
- Hardware agnostic
- Extremely reliable
- Feature rich
- Cost-effective!
- StarWind also has excellent support in the rare case you need them.
What needs improvement?
Encryption: I would love to see "at rest" data encryption as a new feature for organizations like mine looking for ways to simplify this mandated compliance issue.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not had a single major issue in eight years of using StarWind. Every release upgrade has been seamless and required no downtime. It has saved us from multiple hardware failures with no downtime. A truly redundant, reliable solution!
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Very easy to scale. I am not aware of any limitations.
How are customer service and technical support?
In eight years we have never needed support for an issue with the software. I have called a handful of times to have them confirm my understanding and review my configuration. They have always been very helpful and thorough. A+.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No.
How was the initial setup?
Very simple to use. Most of the UI is self-explanatory but StarWind's website has easy-to-follow documentation and recommendations, and their support staff is one of the most thorough and patient I have had the honor to work with in this industry. A+.
What about the implementation team?
In-house with minimal StarWind support.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I have not seen any other storage solution that delivers the features that StarWind does for anywhere near the price. Licensing and support costs are very simple and straightforward.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Dell EMC, Nimble, 3PAR.
What other advice do I have?
Make the switch to StarWind! Your life will be much easier, and you will have extra budget to spend elsewhere!
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Cyber Security Pre-sales/Solution architect/ SOC Consultant at Hilal Computers
Great support services, reduces costs, and improves performance
Pros and Cons
- "StarWind Virtual SAN can improve an organization's storage infrastructure by providing high availability, scalability, cost-effectiveness, performance, and ease of use."
- "StarWind Virtual SAN could benefit from better integration with other tools and technologies, such as backup and disaster recovery solutions."
What is our primary use case?
Previously, we were using a conventional storage platform, which was costly and not supporting many features. Now, we are using StarWind Virtual SAN, which is more reliable and has many features.
It works by mirroring data between servers, creating a fault-tolerant storage infrastructure. StarWind Virtual SAN is a cost-effective solution as it uses commodity hardware, such as off-the-shelf servers and disks. This reduces the cost of storage hardware and maintenance.
We are very satisfied with this product so far.
How has it helped my organization?
StarWind Virtual SAN provides a HA feature which actually immediately copies data to the second node over the network and ensures instant failover for our critical applications.
StarWind Virtual SAN is a software-defined storage solution that helps organizations to reduce costs, improve performance, and increase availability. It works by mirroring data between servers, creating a fault-tolerant storage infrastructure.
StarWind Virtual SAN can improve an organization's storage infrastructure by providing high availability, scalability, cost-effectiveness, performance, and ease of use.
What is most valuable?
The HA feature is the most valuable to us. Moreover, support services are very satisfactory.
StarWind Virtual SAN provides high-performance storage by leveraging the resources of multiple servers.
This improves application performance and reduces latency.
StarWind Virtual SAN provides the ability to scale out storage infrastructure as our needs grow. By adding more servers, we can increase storage capacity. StarWind Virtual SAN ensures that data is always available by replicating it between multiple servers. This means that if one server fails, data can still be accessed from another server.
What needs improvement?
The documentation of StarWind Virtual SAN could be improved to provide more detailed and comprehensive information about the product's features, functionalities, and best practices.
StarWind Virtual SAN could benefit from better integration with other tools and technologies, such as backup and disaster recovery solutions.
StarWind Virtual SAN could benefit from better integration with other tools and technologies, such as backup and disaster recovery solutions.
These are some areas where the product or service could potentially be improved
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for one year.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Works
Cost-effective with top-notch support
What do you like best?
- The software was easy to install
- Support is top-notch
- Overall, the solution proved to be much more cost-effective than the competition.
What do you dislike?
It has a slightly complex architecture Tooling spread across web UI and the desktop client requires a lot of network interfaces.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
StarWind is definitely a viable alternative to competitors' products.
What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
It has enabled Hyperconverging vSphere nodes storage without spending a fortune.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Systems Engineer at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
Easy to configure and simple to maintain with great cache features
Pros and Cons
- "The ability for us to manage all of our nodes from the same console makes systems administration very easy."
- "If there was one thing we could request, it would be the ability to shrink volumes. For example, we want to be able to decrease in the size of the volume."
What is our primary use case?
We are currently running a Microsoft environment. The Virtualisation stack is currently hosted through Microsoft Hyper-V. We are using local storage and hosting our storage via Starwind Virtual SAN for our production systems.
Currently, we are only running a two-node cluster to serve our Hyper-V storage. Both nodes are directly connected. This little two-node cluster currently supports all of our offices across the country.
Our business has a heavy reliance on the systems and systems uptime of 24/7 is required.
How has it helped my organization?
Starwind has significantly improved our performance in comparison to our previous environment. Our uptime and our internal SLAs are great. Over the years, it has not failed us once.
Their support has been amazing and is always there for us when needed. We have worked with various support members over the years and every single one of them knows the product without needing to escalate. Being Hardware agnostic has also helped us a lot to maintain our systems and update to new hardware without worrying about the usual compatibility issues.
What is most valuable?
Starwind is very easy to configure and even easier to provision.
Even better is how simple it is to maintain and patch without any downtime.
Over the years we have updated both the operating system and the hardware on several of our nodes without any downtime incurred.
The cache features that are available have significantly improved our performance.
The ability for us to manage all of our nodes from the same console makes systems administration very easy.
Tasks such as adding, removing, and expanding volumes are very easy.
What needs improvement?
Starwind Virtual SAN has fulfilled all of our requirements. There is not anything additional we require. The product does everything we need and more.
If there was one thing we could request, it would be the ability to shrink volumes. For example, we want to be able to decrease in the size of the volume. We understand this is not a limitation in the product as it can potentially cause more problems by leaving things behind. Also, even though we cannot decrease the volume at this time, it is easily addressed by creating a new volume with the appropriate size and migrating data over to it.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Starwind since 2015.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable. We have not had a single outage or drop due to Starwind. Software has never crashed or not performed as specified. Our uptime is only disrupted by server maintenance and scheduled periods.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is very scalable as you can add as many nodes as you require along with additional hardware.
How are customer service and technical support?
In over 20 years of working in the IT industry, I have never encountered better support than I have with the team at Starwind.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used Microsoft Storage Spaces.
How was the initial setup?
It was as if we didn't need to do anything. Starwind was there from the start to help us provision.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the initial setup all in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I would strongly advise companies to engage with Starwind very early in the design process as they can help with finding the appropriate path. The pricing model is very simple.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated HP SAN, Nutanix, and Dell Storage.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: February 2025
Popular Comparisons
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct
DataCore SANsymphony
Scality RING
StorMagic SvSAN
Red Hat Gluster Storage
HPE StoreVirtual
StorPool
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- I am looking to compare Nutanix and VMware vSAN. Which one is better in terms of functionality and management?
- Storpool vs. ScaleIO
- When evaluating Software Defined Storage, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are some design considerations to keep in mind for Software Defined Storage Solutions?
- What are the advantages and limitations of Software Defined Storage?
- What are the main storage requirements to support Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning applications?
- What SDS solution do you recommend?
- Why is Software Defined Storage (SDS) important for companies?