We have been running Starwind Virtual SAN in a production environment since 2009 with VMware.
We run all types of software on top of Starwind (Different types of databases, factory software, security software, ERP, etc.).
We don't have performance issues with the software in fact it responds more than enough to our needs.
Since we are a mid-size company; Starwind is perfect for us.
Not everything is great, in the very first editions (a long time ago) there were some annoying issues with the software however, naturally, it evolved.
For us, in the last six or seven years, the uptime has been 100%. It has proven to be a great choice for us and of great value for money.
There are no future plans in changing to a different solution.
We have had Starwind in our infrastructure for about 13 years. It's easy to manage and understand. You can learn it very fast.
For those that aren't familiar with it, they can do a trial try and I am sure users will be surprised at how well it works. It has been a great investment!
Our Datacenter is based on VMware vCenter and initially, after some testing with other vendors and VMware vSAN itself, Starwind, in our case, was a better solution. We prefer to have the storage layer separated from the hypervisor kernel.
We have also products in our Datacenter like VxRail, however, in an honest storage level, in comparison, Starwind has an easier interface.
It's quite easy to manage. Good storage hardware is a must in our case, however, you can also run it in a software solution despite not being recommended in some cases.
Like many solutions today, Starwind should focus a bit on the alarmists of the product.
NVME Target for windows is taking a bit to become available!
There are so many potential alarmistic features and protocols that should be incorporated into the software.
Security on the ISCSI protocol could be improved by adding features like OS-type control access, especially for the data center environment.
I have seen 13 years of evolution in the product. Previously, it was short in features. Many customers' requests have been done. I do hope the solution continues to evolve in this way.
I've used the solution for more than 13 years.
The solution offers good value for money.
Licensing needs to consider future needs.
We also looked at Microsoft and Dell.
The solution is very stable.