Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
User
Easy to manage with 100% uptime and an easy interface
Pros and Cons
  • "It's quite easy to manage."
  • "Security on the ISCSI protocol could be improved by adding features like OS-type control access, especially for the data center environment."

What is our primary use case?

We have been running Starwind Virtual SAN in a production environment since 2009 with VMware.

We run all types of software on top of Starwind (Different types of databases, factory software, security software, ERP, etc.).

We don't have performance issues with the software in fact it responds more than enough to our needs.

Since we are a mid-size company; Starwind is perfect for us.

Not everything is great, in the very first editions (a long time ago) there were some annoying issues with the software however, naturally, it evolved.

How has it helped my organization?

For us, in the last six or seven years, the uptime has been 100%. It has proven to be a great choice for us and of great value for money.

There are no future plans in changing to a different solution.

We have had Starwind in our infrastructure for about 13 years. It's easy to manage and understand. You can learn it very fast.

For those that aren't familiar with it, they can do a trial try and I am sure users will be surprised at how well it works. It has been a great investment!

What is most valuable?

Our Datacenter is based on VMware vCenter and initially, after some testing with other vendors and VMware vSAN itself, Starwind, in our case, was a better solution. We prefer to have the storage layer separated from the hypervisor kernel.

We have also products in our Datacenter like VxRail, however, in an honest storage level, in comparison, Starwind has an easier interface.

It's quite easy to manage. Good storage hardware is a must in our case, however, you can also run it in a software solution despite not being recommended in some cases.

What needs improvement?

Like many solutions today, Starwind should focus a bit on the alarmists of the product.

NVME Target for windows is taking a bit to become available!

There are so many potential alarmistic features and protocols that should be incorporated into the software.

Security on the ISCSI protocol could be improved by adding features like OS-type control access, especially for the data center environment.

I have seen 13 years of evolution in the product. Previously, it was short in features. Many customers' requests have been done. I do hope the solution continues to evolve in this way. 

Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for more than 13 years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

The solution offers good value for money.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing needs to consider future needs.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also looked at Microsoft and Dell.

What other advice do I have?

The solution is very stable.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Head of Information Technology at Baker Tilly BVI & Baker Tilly Cayman
Real User
Top 20
A simple to use, cost-effective replacement for our physical SAN that has reliable storage replication
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the reliable storage replication, which enables me to create a robust infrastructure to run our business."
  • "I wish the sync after a failure, such as hardware failure or power-related issues, for example, was faster."

What is our primary use case?

StarWind Virtual SAN, along with two Fujitsu Primergy servers, forms the backbone of our hyper-converged solution. This storage, network, and compute solution is used for our Hyper-V cluster. From this cluster, we run all of our virtual servers, which in turn run our business-critical infrastructure. This includes domain controllers, file servers, database servers, application servers, and everything to support it.

How has it helped my organization?

We once operated with a physical SAN, several servers, along with the networking equipment and the required fiber-channel infrastructure.

StarWind Virtual SAN allowed us to eliminate the need for any physical SANs. We also got rid of the expensive fiber-channel equipment. Now, we just have two servers that form the StarWind nodes and that's it!

All of our storage, networking that includes 1GB and 10GB Ethernet, and compute power are all housed in the StarWind Virtual SAN solution. 

It's simple and very reliable.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the reliable storage replication, which enables me to create a robust infrastructure to run our business.

Presenting Cluster Shared Volumes (CSVs) from StarWind Virtual SAN to Hyper-V simplifies my storage management and reduces costs vs having a physical SAN.  

What needs improvement?

The solution has matured and I have no points for improvement.  

For how long have I used the solution?

We have had StarWind Virtual SAN for nearly nine years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I've now been using StarWind Virtual SAN for over nine years. While I have had underlying hardware go bad during this time, the Virtual SAN never failed. I have replaced an entire hardware node with zero downtime. It's rock solid.  

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to adopting StarWind Virtual SAN, I had multiple Dell Equallogic SAN devices.  When it was time to replace the Equallogic with new hardware, the costs were unjustifiable after learning about and evaluating StarWind Virtual SAN.  

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Communicate with StarWind, they will work with you and your team to size a solution that works for you.  

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Arcwell R. Hernandez - PeerSpot reviewer
Director/Solutions Architect at TechOps Trinidad & Tobago LTD
User
User-friendly and flexible with good support
Pros and Cons
  • "It has improved our organization in terms of its uptime as our main cluster has never been offline due to a SAN failure."
  • "It could have a dashboard so that you can check all servers' SAN health and performance."

What is our primary use case?

This solution was implemented for a Hyper-V production build, where we used StarWind virtual SAN to create and build a redundant DataStor for our clusters. Once this was completed, management and troubleshooting were simple as the application is very user-friendly and highly flexible in terms of configurability. We have never encountered any issues with this product, as it is very reliable.

How has it helped my organization?

It has improved our organization in terms of its uptime as our main cluster has never been offline due to a SAN failure. This is a huge plus for us as we need our data available 24 /7. 

What is most valuable?

There are not many futures I can recall that would stand out to me the most, as the entire application functions as one working function.

What needs improvement?

It could have a dashboard so that you can check all servers' SAN health and performance.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for approximately five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable.

How are customer service and support?

very good

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not previously use a different solution.

How was the initial setup?

Technical support was more or less straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

it was done in-house

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did evaluate VMware.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Owner at a media company with 1-10 employees
User
Flexible with good performance and great support
Pros and Cons
  • "The customer support provided by StarWind is excellent."
  • "Regular updates to the software are required, and subtle design changes would be welcome."

What is our primary use case?

StarWind vSAN allows the use of commodity hardware, reducing the dependency on proprietary hardware. 

It ensures that data and applications are always available, reducing downtime and increasing productivity. 

It eliminates the need for expensive storage hardware and provides an affordable software-defined storage solution. 

By using StarWind vSAN with our current hardware and Microsoft Hypervisor capabilities, expenditure can be reduced. 

The easy-to-use administration interface makes light work of required configuration changes and settings that must be applied.

How has it helped my organization?

The customer support provided by StarWind is excellent. The company offers a variety of support options, including phone, email, and chat, and their support team is responsive and knowledgeable. 

Another advantage of StarWind vSAN is its performance. The solution is designed to deliver high-speed storage performance, with support for SSD caching and advanced data compression techniques. This can help to improve application performance and reduce latency, particularly for high-demand workloads. 

The product is highly flexible and provides excellent performance and customer support from StarWind Software Inc.

What is most valuable?

The valuable aspects of the solution include:

Cost-effectiveness. It eliminates the need for expensive storage hardware and provides an affordable software-defined storage solution.

Simplified management. It provides a simple and intuitive interface to manage storage infrastructure.

Flexibility. It allows organizations to use commodity hardware, reducing the dependency on proprietary hardware.

High-availability. It ensures that data and applications are always available, reducing downtime and increasing productivity.

What needs improvement?

Any product, service, and solution always have room for improvement. By continuing to utilize emerging technologies and integrations with relevant storage technologies, the StarWind vSAN platform has ample room for growth.

Regular updates to the software are required, and subtle design changes would be welcome. 

To make it easier for new customer adoption, the software setup and configuration could be presented in a more simplified manner. Instructions in email communication to obtain support during the implementation and configuration of the software need to be more visible. 

Using a "Newsletter" design approach during email communication would be beneficial. This would allow clients and newcomers to see that StarWind Software Inc. is able and ready to accept support and assistance requests as required. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I started using the solution this year.

What other advice do I have?

StarWind vSAN is a robust and reliable software-defined storage solution that can help organizations create a highly available and fault-tolerant storage environment. While there may be some challenges with setup and configuration, these can be overcome with proper planning and support from StarWind Software Inc.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
IT Director at Marion County R-II School
Real User
Good performance, data replication and shared storage capability reduces downtime, and the GUI works well
Pros and Cons
  • "This solution enables us to make better cost-effective use of our existing hardware and leverage the current infrastructure at a higher level than we could before."
  • "This product would benefit from having automated alerting functionality."

What is our primary use case?

We are using this to replicate the onboard disks from our Hyper-V Hosts (Dell T640 Servers) for both replication/data protection, but most importantly, to function as shared storage enabling us to have a functional Hyper-V cluster with failover through the shared storage without needing to purchase oversized and pricey dedicated SAN hardware.

This solution enables us to make better cost-effective use of our existing hardware and leverage the current infrastructure at a higher level than we could before.

How has it helped my organization?

The data replication and shared storage have enabled us to dramatically reduce unplanned and planned downtime. With our Hyper-V cluster now able to do automatic failovers of our Virtual Machines, we have reduced the effects of reboots that would have interrupted access before.

We have also noticed performance benefits with this new deployment over the previous configuration that was implemented. This has also allowed us to increase our storage capacity by adding more cost-effective disks rather than pricier SAN solutions.   

What is most valuable?

As a technical admin, the GUI is a nice bonus that allows sometimes faster actions rather than going into the CLI. A great benefit in my current solution is showing off GUI configurations and monitoring to our non-technical administration in the school and helping them understand implementations and values from that.

What needs improvement?

This product would benefit from having automated alerting functionality.

For how long have I used the solution?

We deployed StarWind Virtual SAN in March of 2021.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is great, so proper sizing makes entering into the solution easy and without waste. We should not exceed the scalability options available.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have been very impressed with the support team. Every encounter I have had has been quickly responded to with both the right person and the needed solution. I feel very confident that they are available and accessible if any issue arises that I need to get help addressing or just ensuring my configuration is best practices.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not use another similar solution prior to this one.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward and guided by a very knowledgeable engineer on their team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This solution is very accessible and the pro-level for support is well worth the cost. 

What other advice do I have?

Other than automated alerting, there is no real product feature that I feel would be useful to us. We have had no issues with the software as is. There are no gaps that we have had to fill in with other solutions or challenges that have caused us to redesign or change our intended implementations.

I have installed a few updates from the initial installation and found that process to be quite easy and successful each time as well. I look forward to seeing how they may innovate in the future and bring benefits we have not considered.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1423983 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at WARREN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC
Real User
Impressive speed performance and high availability has improved our user experience
Pros and Cons
  • "Speed and high availability have been the most valuable for us."
  • "I think the setup could be streamlined a bit."

What is our primary use case?

We use this product in our VMWare vSphere environment.

We use vSphere 7 Enterprise Plus and have a four host system. All four hosts have matching solid-state storage in a raid 10 array. We have two pairs acting as sync pairs so that one host in each pair can fail before we lose access to the VMs on those hosts. They are connected via 40GB redundant links for both iSCSI and sync.

We have really tried to focus on both speed and redundancy and feel that this setup was the best way to accomplish that goal.

How has it helped my organization?

StarWind vSAN has translated to a huge improvement in speed and high availability compared to our old iSCSI shared storage solution. Previously, we had a network-attached storage device with tiered arrays. Part of it was a standard spinning disk and the other was solid-state drives.

With this new solid-state local storage, we have massively improved our user experience.

The sync functionality is amazing as well, compared to our old replication system, in that it happens in realtime as data is written so that high availability is as fast as possible.

What is most valuable?

Speed and high availability have been the most valuable for us. Again, I would say the speed for our users has been extremely valuable. I wouldn't say it was terrible before but you know it's fast when normal, non-tech-savvy users are asking if we upgraded something because some local database app feels faster today!

From a business continuity standpoint, I love how it has improved our failover processes in vSphere. Having the data replicate in real time between host pairs has almost completely automated the process. 

What needs improvement?

I think the setup could be streamlined a bit. I was already familiar with iSCSI and setting up shared storage, but the abstraction process of getting from configuring the raid array on the local host machine, and making sure all the correct values are set to get the best performance, was a bit finicky.

Then, you had to prepare the appliances on each host and again make sure your VMDKs are properly formatted and then mounted correctly so they can be shared as iSCSI disks. It just felt like a lot of opportunities for a user to make big mistakes that would affect the end performance.

I was very impressed with the tech who walked me through the whole process, as I'm just not sure I would have gotten there on my own. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using StarWind Virtual SAN for five months.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not use another solution prior to this one.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I think the bang for the buck is much better with StarWind Virtual SAN.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I evaluated VMware vSAN.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Jarmstrong - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Officer at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
User
The 2-node virtual SAN technology is fantastic

We have been using StarWind VSAN since 2023.

We previously evaluated implementing Broadcom VMWare's VSAN product and it would have required us to purchase a minimum of three physical host servers. Those servers would have had to been VMWare certified which severely limited our purchase options. We also looked at a couple of solutions from HPE that required between three and four server systems and had costs that ballooned to more than double our budget. We also looked into Dell VX Rail and it was very disappointing to see all the negative reviews on Reddit and on review sites regarding poor support experiences and problems doing basic tasks such as updates. Not what you would feel comfortable with when dealing with mission-critical systems.

It has greatly improved our shared storage performance and the availability of that storage. We passed through the NVMe drives in our Dell PowerEdge servers directly through to the StarWind VSAN virtual appliances. Then we used the web interface to configure a software RAID 10 equivalent. I ran a Windows server with MS SQL installed on it and ran some workload tests to compare it to our previous solution and I was very happy with the IOPS performance as well as the throughput. After migrating actual workloads for an ERP system onto StarWind VSAN storage I have had zero issues with performance or reliability. I've contacted their support a couple times regarding different topics and questions and it has been prompt and helpful. They often suggest getting to doing a remote session rather than wasting time going back and forth for days on end like other vendors tend to do.

The 2-node virtual SAN technology is fantastic and I have been impressed with how reliable it is. Even if you turn off one server node when you power back on it re-syncs rather quickly given how large the data storage array is.

The iSCSI performance has been great for our workloads and it doesn't seem to get overwhelmed to the extent our previous solution was.

The high availability works as expected and I have even tested suddenly powering off the secondary host. This has made me more confident in our information technology infrastructure.

The web management interface is great and makes it easy to integrate into our existing infrastructure systems as it can be put onto a specific subnet.

It would be good if they took steps to better secure the virtual appliance password and not include it in the logs. This may require building a new password recovery system but it would be worth the effort to follow industry best practices for security.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Diogo Carvalho Maia - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect at PSA Informática Ltda
User
Top 20
Hardware-agnostic with an easy to use GUI and good compatability
Pros and Cons
  • "Being hardware agnostic is a must and definitely scored points for us."
  • "The GUI deserves a little love."

What is our primary use case?

In our company, we started searching for a cost-effective SDS solution to include in our portfolio since there aren't many reliable and affordable alternatives around. 

For testing, we've set up a small VMware environment with a couple of VMs and connected to StarWind VSAN through Fibre Channel. This is a common environment for most of our customers, who tend to be SMBs, and their environments go from one to six hosts and one block/file storage, on average. 

However, the most frequent pain point is managing and delivering storage for different applications while maintaining reliability and performance. That’s where StarWind comes into play.

How has it helped my organization?

We have come to the conclusion that it fits nicely in small/medium environments that, despite their size, still need a swift and reliable storage delivery while being affordable. 

In smaller markets, like the one we operate in, there’s not much money hanging around to spend on software, especially when SMBs have budget constraints and must choose between keeping IT staff or improving the infrastructure. That said, spending $100k+ on VMware vSAN is madness. 

StarWind VSAN offers an interesting alternative that is both enterprise-level and cost-effective without compromising companies' budgets. Having a free version is also a nice, welcoming sign of commitment.

What is most valuable?

Being hardware agnostic is a must and definitely scored points for us. Despite our portfolio being a little selective, it was nice to see that our hardware options were also supported and there would be no surprises in the future.

The simple (a little dated, yet easy-to-use) GUI was another good thing. We’re in 2024, and most SMBs can’t afford IT-specialized teams, so they rely on service providers like ourselves to keep things running. 

VMware/Hyper-V compatibility has got us all covered since our customer base all runs on one of those two players. However, after three months of testing, we still haven't tested replication features. We'll do it soon.

What needs improvement?

The GUI deserves a little love. It is simple and works fine. However, the overall design is a little bit dated. 

Updating the documentation would be welcome, too, since there are docs that point to Windows Server 2016 as the latest version, and the vSphere guide comprises 6.5, while we’re currently on 8. 

Being ZFS-based, it would benefit so much to have deduplication and encryption. Immutability would also be a nice addition as it is a hot topic on data protection, and the solutions that offer it are either too convoluted or too expensive.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for three months.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: February 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.