Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Ibrahim Izghari - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Consultant at CylancePS
Real User
Easy to manage with good fault tolerance and high availability
Pros and Cons
  • "The management was very easy and I was able to find all that I need in the software dashboard."
  • "They need to invest more in the support documents for real issues happening when integrating the solution with the hypervisor."

What is our primary use case?

I used the software as a virtual SAN solution. When I tried it for the first time, I found it easy to use and working perfectly. The most important thing is that the vendor keeps developing and enhancing the solution to include more robust features.

I have three servers running VMware ESXi and used the solution as a SAN for the VMware Cluster by connecting the servers as ISCSI targets to the StarWind vSAN using a 1GB network connection peer. That helped me to run my application with peace of mind.

How has it helped my organization?

I am currently running servers with a hosted application for my business, and I had a problem having them online all the time thanks to of server maintenance and updates. 

That's why I used a vSAN to avoid buying a hardware SAN and use my existing servers only. The software improved my productivity by allowing me to have high availability and fault tolerance in virtualization.

I plan to invest in NVME disks where the software provides perfect integration to speed up the systems and get cache capabilities.

What is most valuable?

We like the ease of management. The management was very easy and I was able to find all that I need in the software dashboard.

The ISCSI is good. The connection using software made it easy to me to connect my servers without extra investment in hardware SAN.

I like the vCenter plugin. This allows me to monitor the SAN performance in the VMware web interface.

It offers good fault tolerance and high availability. I can update or restart the physical server without worry.

It's got great deduplication and compression. I am planning to use this feature when investing in new NVme disks.

What needs improvement?

They need to invest more in the support documents for real issues happening when integrating the solution with the hypervisor. Also, they need to provide how-to videos on social video networks about the setup, upgrades, and migration from real hardware like HPE, DellEMC, or Fujitsu to vSAN solutions.

They need to make it easy for the customers to find a solution for any error happening during migration or setup. That way, it will be more accurate and have fewer errors.

Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution for ten years up until now.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Laurence Brazil - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Manager at STFC
Real User
Excellent value, very resilient, and has excellent support services
Pros and Cons
  • "The StarWind VSAN is always up and allows us to move VMS to other nodes for maintenance, without interruption to service."
  • "The documentation could be better."

What is our primary use case?

We are using the product for a three-node stretched cluster spanning three buildings based on VMWare and StarWind vSAN technology.

We use this to host all the company servers (as VMs), which are a mix of Windows and Linux systems, providing various services such as domain controllers, file servers, print servers, application servers, license servers, etc.      

This setup allows us to quickly migrate servers between buildings for service or in case of a network outage.

How has it helped my organization?

The product allowed us to deploy the three-node stretched cluster, which has, in turn, allowed us to fully virtualize our infrastructure with all the resilience, performance and ease of management that comes with it.

The biggest improvements have been:

1. Resilience. The StarWind VSAN is always up and allows us to move VMS to other nodes for maintenance, without interruption to service. It also enables vSphere high availability, so when there is a problem, service can be maintained

2. Management. Having everything virtualized has made it much easier to manage.

What is most valuable?

The solution's best aspects include:

Rock-solid performance. Since it has been in production (three years), we have had 100% uptime. This means that services have only needed to be briefly interrupted for maintenance and has created a great user experience for our end-users.

Easy management. The interfaces are intuitive and all IT staff can quickly be brought up to speed on how to use

Superb support. The support really is second to none. You can always quickly get through to a technician, and it's usually the same one you are used to dealing with.

What needs improvement?

The documentation could be better. It's not bad, however, it is quite often out of date. That said, this is mitigated by the fact that the support is so good that you rarely need the documentation.                                        

If I am really searching for a fault. To be honest, the licensing model is a bit confusing. They could definitely make that a bit more intuitive. However this is a minor gripe as it is such good value, and you only have to deal with it very occasionally anyway.                   

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for three years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

This was our first move to a vSAN solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This solution is of excellent value.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We looked at VMware vSAN.

What other advice do I have?

I highly recommended the product. It has transformed our IT infrastructure.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Virtual SAN
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about StarWind Virtual SAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Chief Information Officer at Scott County Hospital, Scott City, KS
User
Easy to use, reduces downtime, and offers great support
Pros and Cons
  • "StarWind allows us to move virtual machines from one physical host to another, which greatly reduces the downtime required for maintenance."
  • "The system failovers properly on its own without too much worry."

What is our primary use case?

We have a two-node hyper-converged system set up. Our main electronic medical record system runs on top of this system. We can fail over to one host, which lets the virtual machines run on the other. We can perform maintenance and move the virtual machines back. As a medical facility, it's important for our products to be up and available. This system allows us to do that. We have plans to purchase an additional host this fall, which I hope to be able to add to the VSAN. I believe there's an additional purchase to do so, however, I'll look into that when we get closer. 

How has it helped my organization?

StarWind allows us to move virtual machines from one physical host to another, which greatly reduces the downtime required for maintenance. I've been with the organization for about four months now and came in not knowing anything about StarWind. To become better acquainted, I asked if StarWind would give us a 'demo' of our current system. They showed us how our configuration was set up and helped us make a couple of suggested changes. We have since restarted one of the hosts without any trouble on the StarWind side at all. 

What is most valuable?

It's very stable and is easy to use. The system failovers properly on its own without too much worry. Support has been amazing. I wasn't at my position last year, but we had a hard disk in a host machine fail last year. Through a series of unfortunate events, a VM failed. StarWind support helped the technician pull the system back up and even assisted with restoring the VM, something he didn't have to do. I've since read other accounts of service like this. The community and KB articles are also very valuable. In any event, I know I can get help with this system.

What needs improvement?

I'm actually really satisfied with Starwind. Their product and support have been top-notch. They even have a version that is free, though it is a command-line only. 

As for additional features, perhaps some integration in with systems like IT Glue.  A way to push the configuration into IT Glue in the event of an outage or just for documentation purposes would be nice.  

Overall, however, the product does what it is supposed to do. Adding features for the sake of adding something may not be terribly appropriate in this case. The system just plain works.

For how long have I used the solution?

My organization has been using StarWind for several years now. I'm new to my company and have been learning how the product works.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We've had no stability issues with the product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Currently, we have this running on two nodes, however, I believe it can be scaled up significantly. For our limited purposes, I have no concern about scalability.

How are customer service and support?

Amazing! They've gone above and beyond with helping us when we had hardware issues last year and again this year when I asked for a demo of how things are set up.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not use a different solution.

How was the initial setup?

While I wasn't around for the initial setup, I performed a handful of test installations to become more familiar. StarWind has a wonderful KB article that covers the process, step-by-step.

What about the implementation team?

It's my understanding that it was all done in-house. The configurations are exactly as the KB article mentioned above has it spelled out.

What was our ROI?

We can keep our electronic medical record system running while we do maintenance. We've used Starwind for several years, so the investment has covered itself.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing is simple. You can buy a support package that gives you access to updates to the software or you can buy premium support, which expands the time in which you can get help from the company.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I was not around when the decision to use StarWind came about. I don't know if there are other 3rd party vendors like StarWind. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Indeep G - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Administrator at Prism Economics & Analysis
Real User
Good DR, saves costs, and eliminates the need for manual tape changing
Pros and Cons
  • "The virtual tapes can be uploaded to the object storage of your choice with object locking/governance which gives you an extra layer of protection."
  • "There needs to be more visibility on how long the cloud replication will take as there is no current ETA."

What is our primary use case?

We were looking for physical tape backups to protect against DR situations but were concerned about the fact that it would require the manual intervention of changing the tapes and sending them offsite as we could easily forget. 

Luckily, I came across  Starwind VTL which is the same as having a physical tape library without the hassle of changing tapes. 

The whole process is automated and we have the option of choosing between multiple cloud storage providers such as Amazon, Wasabi, Azure, etc. It's been six months and it has been working well without any issue with the jobs completed within 24 hours which meets our RTO. 

In regards to the cost, we ended up saving a few thousand dollars as well due to the high cost of the physical tape library.

How has it helped my organization?

With Starwind VTL, it eliminates the need to manually change and remove tapes and schedule them for offline pickup which users would not have the time to do.  It is also cost-effective as having a physical tape library would cost thousands of dollars. 

In addition, the virtual tapes can be uploaded to the object storage of your choice with object locking/governance which gives you an extra layer of protection.  

Furthermore, having virtual tapes locally and on the cloud provides an additional layer of protection in addition to our normal backups that are performed. 

What is most valuable?

The cloud replication feature is most valuable as it copies the local virtual tapes from our on-prem storage to object storage where we can set object locking and governance.  This is a great feature in case something happens to our on-prem storage. 

Also, since it's virtual tapes, there is no manual intervention of changing tapes and scheduling them to take them offsite which is another additional cost. The support team is also good as they were able to resolve the majority of issues during the initial implementation.

What needs improvement?

There needs to be more visibility on how long the cloud replication will take as there is no current ETA.  

Also, there is no date/time column so you don't know which is the latest tape that has been uploaded to object storage.  

You also cannot search by tape name so you have to scroll through the tape list if you ever need to cross-reference.  

Another shortcoming is that the tapes do not remove from the list once they've been deleted via the retention policy so you would have to manually remove them.  

I've requested all of these in a feature request with their R&D so hopefully, they will be included in future releases.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using this solution for over two years now.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not have a previous solution. This was an add-on solution to our existing backup solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is very reasonable compared to a physical tape library.  

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated the physical tape library, however, it was too costly.

What other advice do I have?

The initial setup will take time, however, their implementation team will assist all the way through.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Leone Athayde Salarini - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology infrastructure analyst at Centro Universitário São Camilo - ES
Real User
Top 10
User-friendly, intuitive, and optimizes performance
Pros and Cons
  • "The ability to keep data accessible even in the event of hardware failures is highly valued, as it ensures business continuity."
  • "Ongoing improvements in read and write performance would help meet increasingly demanding workloads."

What is our primary use case?

I recently underwent a server migration process, which involved converting multiple virtual machines to the QCOW2 format. This challenge required adapting various VMs to ensure a seamless transition, highlighting the importance of flexibility in IT infrastructure management.

StarWind Virtual SAN proved indispensable during our server migration, offering flexibility, high availability, and performance optimization. Its user-friendly interface simplified management and vendor independence ensured adaptability. This software has left a lasting, positive impact on our organization's IT infrastructure, positioning us for future success.

How has it helped my organization?

The use of StarWind Virtual SAN during the server migration process and conversion of virtual machines to the qcow2 format provided significant benefits to our organization. The software offered the flexibility needed to smoothly carry out this complex transition. Ensuring high availability and optimizing VM performance, StarWind Virtual SAN improved our IT infrastructure, resulting in more efficient and reliable operations.

One of the standout features of StarWind Virtual SAN was its independence from specific hardware vendors. This vendor independence is a boon in today's dynamic IT environment. It allowed us to make procurement decisions based solely on our organization's needs, free from the constraints of vendor lock-in. This autonomy ensured that our IT infrastructure remained agile and adaptable, capable of swiftly adjusting to emerging technologies and changing requirements.

What is most valuable?

The ability to keep data accessible even in the event of hardware failures is highly valued, as it ensures business continuity.

A user-friendly and intuitive management interface makes system administration simpler, saving time and resources.

Optimizing the performance of virtualized storage is crucial, ensuring that VMs operate efficiently.

The ability to perform well with multiple hypervisors offers flexibility and avoids vendor lock-in.

Vendor independence allows organizations to choose hardware components that best suit their needs.

What needs improvement?

Ongoing improvements in read and write performance would help meet increasingly demanding workloads.

A more comprehensive monitoring system with proactive alerts can enhance visibility and responsiveness.

Advanced automation features for storage provisioning and resource management can save time and reduce errors.

Enhancements in disaster recovery capabilities, such as faster failover and streamlined recovery procedures, would be valuable.

Adding support for emerging or less common hypervisors can increase flexibility.

Enhancing security features, such as data encryption and two-factor authentication, to meet stricter compliance requirements.

Integration with cloud storage services for greater scalability and backup options.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for just under one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Considering that StarWind Virtual SAN allows for scalability, it is important to plan accordingly as you add more resources and storage capacity, ensuring that the system remains stable through all stages of growth.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

StarWind Virtual SAN's performance is impressive and offers scalability as one of its main advantages. The solution is designed to grow with your IT infrastructure needs. This means that as your organization expands and requires more storage resources, you can add additional nodes to your StarWind cluster to accommodate this growth.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not use a different solution previously.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is very simple. The tool is very educational.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is advisable to conduct a detailed assessment of your infrastructure needs and compare setup costs, pricing, and licensing with alternatives in the market. Take into account scalability, technical support, and your specific environment requirements. Additionally, explore licensing options that best align with your budget and long-term planning. Evaluating your organization's needs and resources is crucial for making an informed decision regarding the investment in StarWind Virtual SAN.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate other options. 

What other advice do I have?

Establish a good relationship with the vendor's support team. They can provide valuable assistance during setup, troubleshooting, and ongoing maintenance.

Keep the software up to date with the latest patches and updates to benefit from security enhancements and performance improvements.

Consider your organization's future growth and ensure the solution can scale accordingly. This avoids potential disruptions due to increased demands.

Implement a robust backup and disaster recovery strategy alongside your virtual SAN solution to safeguard critical data.

Stay informed about industry trends and emerging technologies to ensure your infrastructure remains competitive and efficient.

Invest in training for your IT team to maximize the value of the solution and facilitate knowledge transfer.

Continuously monitor the performance of your virtual SAN to identify and address any issues promptly.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Raul Faria - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Axanet GmbH
User
User-friendly with a nice web-user interface and good flexibility
Pros and Cons
  • "StarWind vSAN was very easy to integrate into our system and ran flawlessly during our entire use time."
  • "While we had no problems setting the system up, and service technicians from StarWind could assist us very well, they could provide some form of in-depth documentation."

What is our primary use case?

We set up a virtualized environment with the need for extreme flexibility and reliability to provide our IT-Services. 

We had to implement a solution that could take on this task and was very pleased with StarWind Virtual SAN

We could implement it into our environment easily with low maintenance and could focus on achieving our central task. 

It made our whole project a lot simpler and more user-friendly. We benefited from the scalability to expand our Service capability and were able to do so easily with StarWind vSAN.

How has it helped my organization?

We had a rough time using our previous solution. StarWind vSAN made our whole operation much easier and added a lot of particularly useful features. 

In our highly virtualized environment, we had a requirement for high flexibility due to our wide spectrum of services. 

StarWind vSAN was very easy to integrate into our system and ran flawlessly during our entire use time. 

Scaling our systems was something we'd been worried about before due to growing demands and the complicated software we had before. With StarWind vSAN, we could easily accomplish all of our tasks and could benefit from the amazing performance and reliability this software had to offer.

What is most valuable?

The web-user interface was very user-friendly, and it did not take a lot of time to school our employees about this product. 

All administrative tasks could easily be done, and integrating new systems was easier than ever before. 

This saves us a lot of time as even more complicated tasks can be resolved in way less time than before. We used vCenter and were very happy to see a dedicated vCenter plugin for StarWind vSAN. 

It made our whole operation much more smooth and reliable, not to mention the saved time on schooling employees.

What needs improvement?

I would say a point that could be improved upon would be the level of documentation and guides that are available. 

While we had no problems setting the system up, and service technicians from StarWind could assist us very well, they could provide some form of in-depth documentation. User guides would be greatly appreciated by all of us. 

Preferably these documents could be directly in the console. That said, I wouldn't mind having it not as tightly integrated. We have some apprentices that use the console, and we don't want to make them call support every time they don't understand something.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very reliable, and we were confident storing data using StarWind vSAN.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is great. We were able to scale our systems effortlessly.

How are customer service and support?

They were very friendly and helpful, staying professional and competent at all times.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did use another solution. The previous solution was open source, and we needed some kind of real support on the other end to guarantee reliability.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very simple and straightforward. We were able to implement StarWind into our system, and we did not require special help.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it ourselves, in-house.

What was our ROI?

We prefer not to publish our ROI.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

StarWind vSAN has great value and is definitely worth the price.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options. We used other software from StarWind beforehand and were convinced of the quality of their products, so the first thing we looked into was StarWind's solution to our problems.

What other advice do I have?

I highly recommend the solution. It saves a lot of stress, hassle, and time.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Integration Engineer at Insight
Real User
Top 10
Great data compression, deduplication, and snapshots
Pros and Cons
  • "StarWind Virtual SAN is a highly flexible solution, as it can be deployed on physical servers or on top of virtual machines running on hypervisors such as VMware vSphere and Microsoft Hyper-V."
  • "Geolocation could be better, for example, for site mirroring for DR purposes."

What is our primary use case?

I write this from a value-added reseller (VAR) point of view. 

StarWind Virtual SAN provides us with a number of benefits:

StarWind Virtual SAN is a cost-effective solution, as it does not require additional licensing costs. This can help VARs to offer competitive pricing to their customers.

StarWind Virtual SAN is a highly flexible solution, as it can be deployed on physical servers or on top of virtual machines running on hypervisors such as VMware vSphere and Microsoft Hyper-V. This allows VARs to offer a solution that can be tailored to the specific needs of their customers.

How has it helped my organization?

From my point of view, we offer this product and it is installed, tested, and configured on our client hardware, often located in the public and private sectors in the UK. 

StarWind is known for its good technical support and customer service. This helps us to offer a solution that is supported by a reliable vendor, which in turn improves customer satisfaction and ensures sticky and repeat business for future activities. 

StarWind Virtual SAN fills a gap for our clients who can't justify the expensive hardware from Nutanix, HPE etc. Virtual SAN offers an opportunity to repurpose hardware or use non-badged hardware for a very high-end storage solution. This directly benefits my company and me since we are able to cater to this gap in the market.   

What is most valuable?

StarWind Virtual SAN supports both block and file storage protocols, which provides me with more options to choose from when placing Virtual SAN for a given role and client based on my customers' specific use cases and requirements. 

Data compression, deduplication, and snapshots help optimize storage utilization and protect data. 

This helps me to offer a solution that can help our customers to improve storage utilization and protect data at an affordable price, cutting out expensive enterprise-grade hardware.

What needs improvement?

Geolocation could be better, for example, for site mirroring for DR purposes. I would like a future release to explore the possibility of secure, reliable site replication. 

Disaster recovery site mirroring would provide several benefits, including business continuity. A disaster recovery site can be used to restore critical systems and operations in the event of a disaster, ensuring that the business can continue functioning.

The deduplication feature could also be more robust. That said, I am comparing it to the features of an HPE Nimble, which is a really unfair comparison given the cost difference.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for two to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The software is very stable, and I have personally never witnessed downtime if the hardware use exceeds the minimum requirements.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is not too scalable to geo-site redundancy. This could be a future feature.

How are customer service and support?

Support is timely, knowledgeable, and has good availability with lots of different contact options including phone, email, web, etc.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used to use VMware vSAN.

How was the initial setup?

The guides and support are very detailed. There is a large community that also runs this in their home labs. They are giving lots of community feedback, ideas, and solutions to problems you may encounter.

What about the implementation team?

I am speaking from a vendor point of view.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I would advise users to contact StarWind directly since we have always found they support pre and post-sales and are amazingly knowledgeable.  

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We looked into various hardware and software offerings from Nutanix, NetApp, and HPE. StarWind fills the void when the budget does not allow for the expensive hardware, and we have older systems we can repurpose.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Christiaan Engelbrecht - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Engineer at Lancet Laboratories
Real User
Top 20
Good AI, and offers excellent virtualization of storage and backups
Pros and Cons
  • "The StarWind products have enabled our organization to modernize stations where larger and more expensive equipment was not an option."
  • "The most disappointing side of the application is the free edition. There used to be GUI attached. That has recently changed to only CLI management of the application."

What is our primary use case?

Will definitely recommend this product and have been dealing with support for over three years. Normally, the biggest grievance we have in the IT industry is support and support is great. Sales representatives were knowledgeable and very helpful whether you use the free or paid version. 

This is perfect for mainstream organizations. Even small businesses can cover legacy methods and all new methods in terms of hypervisors and backup methodologies. 

I work for an organization that has standalone hosts in rural areas in Africa where tape backup is still a thing. With the assistance of StarWind, we were able to share a backup device on Hyper-V as Hyper-V does not support pass-through natively. It is a fantastic software that I highly recommended for the virtualization of storage and backup methodologies.

How has it helped my organization?

It is more appropriate for businesses that use Hyper-V and direct attached storage arrays. This solution works well with VMware as well as with smaller systems, although it is a bit of a waste using it when you have a strong SAN. 

It works very well in clustering smaller arrays to create a bigger array for storage platforms. It is the perfect software for interfacing Hyper-V components with other hosts sharing resources.

The StarWind products have enabled our organization to modernize stations where larger and more expensive equipment was not an option. 

What is most valuable?

I work for an organization that has standalone hosts in rural areas in Africa where tape backup is still used. With the assistance of StarWind, we were able to share a backup device on Hyper-V which did not support pass-through natively.

The ability to use older native technology integrated with 21st-century AI is what allows these applications to be above their competitors.

From vSAN all the way to their VTL pass-through technology, it is compatible with multiple platforms and is truly a universal application with great potential.

What needs improvement?

The most disappointing side of the application is the free edition. There used to be GUI attached. That has recently changed to only CLI management of the application. That might be a bit off-putting to customers as they would like to use and play with the application without the limitation of what the free license offers. 

Another downside is there is no way of downloading the older versions online. It would be great to have a content library to get the older versions.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using StarWind for about three years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not used a different solution. During my search, StarWind was the first site that I visited.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Do not waste any time on the free product; it's better to get a license. Use sales to evaluate and explore and you will be ready to implement a solid product.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

For storage, I have explored Open NAS (Linux) and Windows NFS 3.0.

What other advice do I have?

Try out all of the other solutions as well; there might be a solution offered by StarWind that might suit your organization's needs.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind Virtual SAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.