Teradata Reviews

The purpose that we are using Teradata for is to migrate data to the cloud.

The most valuable feature of Teradata is security. It runs on Unix and Linux platforms which provide better security.

Teradata could improve by being less complicated. There are some aspects that are not available on the Unix server and a Unix system is required to access some data, such as in case of an emergency.

I have been using Teradata for approximately one year.

Teradata is stable.

I rate the stability of Teradata a seven out of ten.

We have more than 1,000 people using Teradata in my company.

I have not used the support from Teradata.

The initial setup of Teradata is not simple.

We have different teams of approximately 200 people total that are supporting Teradata in many cities and branches.

The price of Teradata could be less expensive.

I rate the price of Teradata a seven out of ten.

We did not evaluate other vendors before choosing Teradata.

I rate Teradata an eight out of ten.

We are using this solution to check and validated our data.

The performance is great, we are able to query our data in one operation.

I would like to see more integration with many different types of data.

I have been using the solution for one month.

I have found the solution to be stable.

We have four users using the solution in my organization and we plan on increasing our usage.

The solution requires a license.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Teradata an eight out of ten.

Data mart implementation for the insurance industry.

• Increased the speed of reporting
• More accurate data scientist answers

• Shared-nothing architecture
• Recoverability

• Cloud implementation
• User-friendly products

I have not encountered any issues with stability for Teradata solutions.

I have not encountered any issues with scalability for Teradata solutions.

Their level of technical support is adequate. It could be better.

We previously used Oracle, though not Exadata. We switched for better reporting performance.

The initial setup was complex as we had to rewrite a lot of the code.

I would advise others to look into migration and setup as a fixed price and incorporate a SaaS option for other Teradata services.

We evaluated this product versus Oracle Exadata.

When looking into implementing this product, pricing is the main issue followed by technical expertise.

Throttle

Columnar

Faster query response time.

Concurrency is still a challenge, pricing is still high.

Three years.

No.

None.

Yes.

6/10

6/10

Oracle. We switched because of TD distributed architecture and it is the best product for EDW.

Done by Teradata PS.

Teradata PS.

Stats, QueryGrid Autostats with collecting stats automatically with the threshold values assigned, QueryGrid has multiple new features i.e data migration, extraction, tool loading, other utilities.

Business, Analytics, Hybrid.

It should be compatible and free on CLOUD/ AWS. Currently many DB's on AWS are free , Teradata is also on Amazon Web Services, but its charged and no documentation available to practice those LABS .

5 years.

No issues.

No issues.

No issues.

8/10

Larger data warehouse / reporting and compatibility to analytics.

It was straightforward.

It architects the databases well. Right from data modelling, the correction appliance to be chosen, the queries hitting the system, strategic, tactical etc, and that business knowledge should be easy to understand to end developers.

The optimizer is the most valuable feature for us.

We are into DWBI (Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence) and Teradata is number one in the market for these solutions. They stood on top even for changing business needs and beat other competitors in benchmarking.

The Query Response time needs improving.

We have been using the solution for 12 years.

We did not encounter any issues with stability.

We did not encounter any issues with scalability.

I would rate the technical support at 9/10.

We never used a previous solution. In fact we migrated straight to Teradata.

There were a few ups and down with the initial setup but it's only one time during the initial phase.

Go for it.

It's already proven so we did not evaluate other industry solutions.

Go for it.

We tried to use case Teradata for a data warehouse system, but we had some problems in relation to the Teradata system, CDC tools, and source databases. We were unable to transfer data from HPE Integrity mainframe to Teradata.

It didn't improve the way our organization functions.

None.

There is a need to improve performance in high transaction processes, as well as the reporting system.

No issues with stability.

No issues with scalability.

I would rate tech support at eight out of 10.

Yes, we already had SAP IQ and were using it. We didn’t switch. We tried but it failed.

Very complex.

I rate Teradata two out of 10. At first, support was very good, but during and after they ended their operation in Turkey it was very bad. We had some agreements and they gave us some promises but...

We bought it three years ago but we couldn't use it in production. We have SAP IQ data warehouse now and I don't have a major problem. I would recommend SAP IQ for data warehouse.

If you are going to buy Teradata, you have to make a very solid contract with them.

Business intelligence and data warehousing solutions for our client.

Auto-partitioning and indexing, and resource allocation on the fly.

Compatibility with more Big Data platforms.

I rate Teradata at eight out of 10. It provides high performance.