Teradata Reviews

Our use cases are all about data ingestion, data manipulation, and data exploration. It's the core database for us.

It's the same as your visual database. I like the fast load feature for data, BTQ nd storage procedures are very good. They can avoid table locking, which is very good.

Sometimes the large ingestion jobs takes days to load data, and some of our stored procedures take longer. I don't know whether it's the tool or the network, but it takes a long time to execute complex commands.

I've been using this solution for around five years Now. We currently use the latest version. 

It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. It is scalable. 

There are more than 100 users currently using Teradata in our organization.

The customer service and support are good. But they take a long time to respond.

So there is room for improvement in response time. 

It's a very straightforward installation process. It's good in terms of installation.

The solution requires maintenance. Our team of ten engineers manage and maintain the solution.

It is yearly basis. The licensing is based on a contract. It's a very expensive product.

I would rate the pricing model a three out of ten, where one is very expensive and not cost-effective, and then ten is a very cheap product. The solution is fairly expensive. 

Overall, if I consider the expense, features, and everything, then I would rate the solution a six out of ten.

We primarily use the solution as a relational database. We use it mainly for logistics. 

The solution offers very good features. It's useful when you are working with data. 

The level of complexity is okay.

It can handle very large amounts of data. It is very powerful. 

Designing the database is easy.

The solution is stable.

It is easy to set up.

The scalability is good. 

Technical support was fine to deal with.

I'd like to see a better relationship with the business itself. Business users have trouble finding solutions when they run into issues in the data warehouse.

It can be a bit complex to work with.

Regarding data warehousing, I'd like to see more data and business analysis to help with the design and development. 

It's primarily designed for big projects and therefore, the pricing is pretty high. It's not suitable for smaller companies. 

I've been using the solution for 20 years.

The solution is stable and reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. As long as it was designed well, a company shouldn't have issues. 

The solution can scale well.

I'm not sure how many users are on the solution. Likely, it is up to hundreds of users. 

We do not have plans to increase usage. We stopped using it this summer. 

We've used support in the past. I had worked closely with them. The technical team was fine to deal with.

It's not too complex. It's designed for huge amounts of data, and it's planned out well. As long as you follow some principles, it won't be too complicated. 

I've used the solution for more than a decade. It was a while since I deployed the solution. 

You start with business analysis and design the database structure from there. After that, you can start populating and developing. 

How many people you need for deployment or maintenance would depend on how big the implementation is. 

Typically, we handle the initial setup in-house. It is possible to get help if we need it. Whether or not a company needs help depends on the customer and their level of comfort with the setup.

I have witnessed an ROI while using the solution. 

The pricing makes sense for bigger projects. It wouldn't make sense for smaller companies or smaller projects.

We are primarily using the latest version of the solution. 

It works well both on-premises and on the cloud. 

I would recommend the solution. However, it depends on the project itself. Based on the stability alone, I would recommend it. It's good for bigger projects. If it is used for small projects, the complexity and price may be too high. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

There are two very useful features. 

One is the fast data input for more or less any online data. It performs rather well. Two, it also has a lot of tools for data engineering or data manipulation that are compatible. 

The solution offers an easy setup.

It's stable and reliable.

The solution like scales just fine.

Some of our clients are looking for on-premise installations as well. Although we don't have any, some of our prospects are also asking, and we are not sure if that part is easily doable or is as effective. We haven't tried on-premises, so we don't know how good it is. We are not confident about proposing on-premise to them, since we are more familiar with the cloud. Maybe some documentation on how on-prem works or what other things to look for in on-premise deployment would be helpful. We'd love to see more tutorials. 

Our company does data science and AI machine learning algorithms on the data that is deciding on the Teradata, so that's the value we add. From my perspective, it would be good if they gave better ITIN/R plugins to use the data for AI modeling, or data science modeling. We can do it now; however, it could be more elegant in terms of interfacing.

I've been using the solution for four or five years. 

The solution is very stable, and the performance is good. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

Our clients do not have very large data sets. So far, the environment has scaled fine, however, once the volumes grow, we will have to see whether we are facing any problems or not. Right now, we don't see any problems. We just haven't tried to scale massively.

We haven't needed much technical support. That said, some of my colleagues have been able to contact them and get service as and when required. It's all right. 

Positive

On cloud, it is very easy to set up. 

It's moderately priced. It's not cheap. I'd rate it 2.5 out of five in terms of affordability.

I am not knowledgeable about the other vendors to make a meaningful comparison. I haven't really taken the time to evaluate other options. 

The solution is most suitable for medium to large-scale businesses. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

I would recommend the solution to others. 

We have all our workloads on AWS.

Having Teradata in AWS:

• Helps us with connectivity.
• Making sure the data is secure.
• Reduces the hops.
• Helps us more with real-time data.

We had few reports which were taking more than 45 minutes. Then, with Teradata, we received results within minutes, and a few under a minute. We thought that something went wrong, and we hadn't done the work properly, but we saw the exact same results on both. So, our end users were pretty happy.

It is quick, secure, and has less hassles because we don't have to involve our networking team, infrastructure, etc. It is very easy to deploy and make market ready.

Teradata wants to come out of the hardware business and to run its own cloud on other public clouds. I think that is a great way to go. However, there are challenges to doing this. There are multiple layers of security and caching. E.g., if you have a lot of compute or a caching that will offload a lot of compute activity because it's already there, it will save its cycles for something which needs to be done. This way, you are offloading your compute, so you can go with a lesser capacity than a higher capacity. That is what this appliance does.  If they are moving off of the appliance, I am curious to see if their software will withstand the change, or will Teradata still run but need a bigger box?

I would like more security and speed. These days, everyone is not just moving to cloud, but they are moving to clout. In a multi-cloud environment, you have to be cognizant of data transfer, bandwidth, and egress charges, not just from a performance and scalability point of view, but also how to keep costs low.

We haven't had any outages in one and a half years. That is a good statement.

I have not heard anyone complain about performance.

The technical support is pretty good. The response rate is good.

We had a bunch of legacy warehouses, which we wanted to consolidate, as well as stay up-to-date with warehousing options. This is why we moved into Teradata.

The integration and configuration were seamless for us.

We have multiple sources of data, so Teradata has a lot of connectors which pulls all our data from different workloads. The integration works really well.

We had help with the integration and configuration.

When your customer is happy, dollars and cents sort of blur. Our return on investment would be customer satisfaction, which I think is priceless.

We had a lot of parties involved when purchasing from the AWS Marketplace. They are very flexible and aggressive in trying to close the deal. They are good at what they have to offer and listening to the customer. It's a two-way street.

In this day and age, we want to get things done quickly. So, we go to the AWS Marketplace.
Also, we have a consistent experience with Teradata usage on its cloud, so we already know the product.

For what Teradata has to offer, their price is comparable to its competitors.

We evaluated Redis and Teredata, doing PoCs with both. We had more support from Teradata to start with, and we were new to both. We were not in a situation to tell which one was good, because both were new to us. We just had more support from Teradata to help us see the results on what we are looking for.

Do your homework before you make a decision. Everyone is different; every shop is different. That is what makes it fun to be in IT.

When you look for a solution, you will uncover many advantages. All those hidden things which are not clear initially when you do a cost analysis. A cost analysis is something that you have to do from the get-go, but it also has to be an ongoing process. Your workloads change, requirements change, everything changes, so it has to be a constant feedback.

We have used both the on-premise and AWS versions.

Teradata is a great, industry-leading data warehousing product that has MPP architecture. In recent times, there have been many other products available in the cloud space. It has a lot of other features like linear scalability and unconditional parallelism.

Teradata hardly supports unstructured data or semi-structured data. Teradata is very costly, and it's not easy to upgrade or expand the components in Teradata. A lot of infrastructure needs to be set up in order to use Teradata.

I have been using Teradata for more than 15 years.

Teradata is a very expensive solution.

Many other products equivalent to Teradata are available in the market, like BigQuery, Redshift, and Snowflake.

Teradata is a suitable solution for small customers.

Overall, I rate Teradata an eight out of ten.

We use it primarily as a dedicated platform for aggregating structured data, essentially serving as our structured data repository or data warehouse.

Their extensive experience in data warehousing, the platform's performance, and their strong reputation in the market are the most valuable.

One issue we've identified is that its performance varies across different on-premises setups and doesn't consistently meet our standards. This limitation necessitates the purchase of Teradata's proprietary hardware to ensure the desired level of performance. The capability to implement it with comparable performance across various private cloud environments, ensuring adaptability to different infrastructure setups would be beneficial.

I have been using it for four years.

The stability is excellent, and I would rate it nine out of ten.

The challenge lies in the necessity to purchase additional hardware for scaling, so I would lean towards a rating of around four out of ten for the overall experience.

The technical support is satisfactory; I would rate it seven out of ten.

Neutral

I would rate the initial setup six out of ten when it comes to complexity.

I would rate the return on investment eight out of ten.

The cost is significantly high. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.

IntelliFlex is used in the banking sector as a production system.

IntelliFlex's best feature is its reliability.

I've been using IntelliFlex for three years.

IntelliFlex is very stable, aside from some issues with the Unity Software, though I believe those are being resolved now.

IntelliFlex is easy to scale - one of its best features is that you can upscale it to the size you want. For example, we started in vertical with a six-node system and now have a twenty-four-node system.

IntelliFlex's technical support is excellent.

Positive

The initial setup is complex because there are a lot of factors that come into play, including the amount of software and applications that require access. Deployment takes around two to four months, assuming that all the company's applications are compatible with the system - if not, it may take longer.

IntelliFlex is the Rolls Royce of data warehousing. I would recommend it to other users and rate it nine out of ten.

Our use case is for data warehousing and BI reporting. We are customers of Teradata.

The solution is speedy and doesn't require much of a DBA team, it's kind of baked right into the product.

Any value this product provides is offset by the high cost and lack of scalability. We're moving to Snowflake because of the scalability and cost differentials. There are better, more flexible, robust, and economical options out there.

I've been using this solution on and off for 20 years. 

The solution is stable, it's a best-of-breed product, but the architecture is old school.

The technical support is fine. 

The initial setup was fine but whenever we needed to increase the size and capacity, it would literally take a room full of people, a very coordinated effort and it was a huge project, in contrast to a product like Snowflake, where you literally just change the warehouse size and it auto-scales. So those types of things really hindered Teradata prem. 

The cost depends on the size and it can be quite expensive. If you have 1,000 users, the cost can be anywhere from half a million to a million dollars a year. 

It's hard to compare their on-prem solution to current cloud environments. From an on-prem perspective, it's expensive but fantastic.The problem is that nobody's playing in that space anymore. People are using the cloud, and the cloud has better options.  

Because it's on-prem, I rate this solution four out of 10.