We mainly use it to expose APIs for internal and external usage.
Integration Architect at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has the ability to have different packages based on the API keys but the setup is complex
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the ability to have different packages based on the API keys. The same core system can have different packages based on different environments."
- "The way agile life cycle is working needs improvement. I also want to see more support for open API standards. I want to see some improvement on the protocol transformation. That is quite missing now. These are the three main issues."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the ability to have different packages based on the API keys. The same core system can have different packages based on different environments.
What needs improvement?
The way the Agile life cycle works needs improvement. I also want to see more support for open API standards. I want to see some improvement in the protocol transformation. That is missing now. These are the three main issues.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using this solution for seven or eight months.
Buyer's Guide
TIBCO Cloud API Management
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about TIBCO Cloud API Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Based on my usage, it was quite stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We didn't reach the point where we tested the scalability of the system, because it was not productive. We only had three users.
How are customer service and support?
Their customer support was pretty good. They resolved the problem every time, but sometimes there were technical limitations of the product itself. Every time we asked for their support they were very supportive.
There were some drawbacks on a low level, not from a high level perspective.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was a little bit complex due to the fact that the first one was on premise, so we had some tech problems. We solved it, but it was a little bit complex in the beginning. The deployment took us two or three days, at least.
What about the implementation team?
I used an external consultancy company for the implementation.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The main difference was that it was a little bit more mature in certain areas and the fact that we were, as a company, already experienced with TIBCO is why we took the direction of TIBCO itself.
What other advice do I have?
My advice is to check all the features from a low-level perspective if they fit exactly the needs of the company at the moment that it is trying to using this solution. I have also checked other products and I'm working on other similar products. The thing that I experienced is that most of the high functionalities can be offered by everyone. Everything can be done by everyone, or at least the basic functions can be done by anyone. The main difference is at a low level. I experienced that sometimes only when you try the product can you really see the potential of it.
So the suggestion that I want to make is simply, before choosing it, try it. Whatever questions you can take to them, the answer will be every time, "Yes, we can do everything." But then when you try the product you see the real capabilities and the real pain points if there are any, not that there are pain points every time.
I would rate this as a seven out of ten. Besides the three main issues I mentioned, TIBCO is also missing some other features: ones that are quite standard for the market but not standard for this product, somehow. The ones I noted are the main reasons, but there are a lot of others.
I gave it a seven because it's mature as a product, but it's not mature enough regarding the differing needs around APIs these days. The solution is good, but it's not good enough.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Projects & Governance Manager at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
It's a stable solution for integrating mobile applications with our services
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable aspect of Mashery is its stability."
- "I'd like to see TIBCO integrate authentication and security features into Mashery."
What is our primary use case?
I use Mashery to integrate mobile applications with my services.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspect of Mashery is its stability.
What needs improvement?
I'd like to see TIBCO integrate authentication and security features into Mashery.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Mashery for one year.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Mashery is scalable, but it depends on the environment. I am running it on-prem, so it's limited by my hosting ability. It's scalable, but I am finding some limitations with my environment. My environment is old. I am using the open-source version of Kubernetes on top of old hardware. It's an issue with my environment, not TIBCO. We're a relatively large enterprise with between 500 and 1,000 employees.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before TIBCO, we had a custom API management solution that we created ourselves. We switched to TIBCO because it had a lot of features.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Mashery is easy, but it takes time, especially the configuration. I need one or two only technicians to maintain it.
What about the implementation team?
TIBCO technical support assisted us. They were very helpful.
What other advice do I have?
I rate TIBCO Mashery nine out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
TIBCO Cloud API Management
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about TIBCO Cloud API Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Global Head of eCommerce Web Operations at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Offering API services to customers has provided a new stream of traffic though management console is not intuitive
Pros and Cons
- "Conversion to RESTful and SOAP protocols and management console (can manage individually throttled settings to manage our service levels for customers)."
- "This has provided a new stream of traffic and exposure of our catalogue beyond the normal web store offering."
- "Very few outages or SLA issues."
- "The management console of API and customers' applications are not the most intuitive."
What is most valuable?
Conversion to RESTful and SOAP protocols and management console (can manage individually throttled settings to manage our service levels for customers).
How has it helped my organization?
We previously didn’t offer any API services to customers, so this has provided a new stream of traffic and exposure of our catalogue beyond the normal web store offering. We have also adopted the intercompany API Service as well.
What needs improvement?
The management console of API and customers' applications are not the most intuitive.
For how long have I used the solution?
Over five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Very few outages or SLA issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
None.
How are customer service and technical support?
Sometimes, we have had issues pushed back to us as our “issue”, which was proven not to be the case. This can happen too quickly, seemingly without their investigating the root cause, but it hasn’t been a regular problem.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
TIBCO/Mashery is our first provider in this area.
How was the initial setup?
I can't comment as I wasn’t involved initially, but we are going through a migration to a new endpoint for the API service and Mashery are supporting us for this complex area.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We have secured terms on which we have been happy to renew for a number of years. However, this is an older Mashery-based contract which have been informed will change over to TIBCO and may not have as favourable terms. Not involved, so I can't comment.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Not involved, so I can't comment.
What other advice do I have?
TIBCO/Mashery do offer good support and training options, so make sure you take full advantage of those to get as much as you can from the system, etc.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free TIBCO Cloud API Management Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2024
Product Categories
API ManagementPopular Comparisons
Microsoft Azure API Management
Amazon API Gateway
webMethods.io
MuleSoft API Manager
Kong Gateway Enterprise
IBM API Connect
IBM DataPower Gateway
WSO2 API Manager
Layer7 API Management
3scale API Management
SwaggerHub
Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Buyer's Guide
Download our free TIBCO Cloud API Management Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating API Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is the difference between an API Gateway and ESB?
- In a Digital Banking Environment how do we see the role of ESB/ API Managers?
- What is an API Gateway?
- How do you protect your API from security threats?
- What should one take into consideration when choosing an API management solution to manage Microservices?
- Which API Management tools have the best developer portal?
- Which API management tool is the best?
- What is your favorite API Management tool?
- What are the key parts of an API strategy at an enterprise?