TIBCO Cloud API Management vs webMethods.io comparison

TIBCO and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. TIBCO is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. TIBCO holds a 0.9% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of TIBCO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

TIBCO Cloud API Management

Read 11 TIBCO Cloud API Management reviews

1,123 Views
987 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

3,033 Views
2,148 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

TIBCO Cloud API Management

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

TIBCO Cloud API Management and webMethods.io are competitors in the API management space. TIBCO Cloud API Management appears to have an edge in pricing and support, while webMethods.io stands out for its feature richness, potentially justifying its higher cost.

Features: TIBCO Cloud API Management includes robust analytics, lifecycle management, and strong security protocols. webMethods.io offers superior integration capabilities, effective workflow automation, and impressive scalability. TIBCO emphasizes analytics and security, whereas webMethods.io focuses on integration and scaling flexibility.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO Cloud API Management could enhance stability in containerized environments and improve fine-grained configurations. It also needs better support responses for third-party code issues. webMethods.io can offer more intuitive data mapping, expand debugging features, and simplify deployment processes to speed up development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO Cloud API Management excels with straightforward deployment aided by comprehensive documentation and dedicated support. webMethods.io provides a quick cloud-native deployment model that accelerates integration along with responsive customer service. TIBCO's focus is on ease of deployment, while webMethods.io emphasizes rapid integration through its cloud-native design.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO Cloud API Management offers competitive pricing with a structured setup cost, delivering substantial ROI through its detailed analytics. webMethods.io, although higher in initial costs, compensates with advanced features offering significant ROI over time. This comparison highlights TIBCO's cost-effective approach and webMethods.io's balance of premium pricing with extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed TIBCO Cloud API Management vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO Cloud API Management vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TIBCO Cloud API Management

Ranking in API Management

27th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of TIBCO Cloud API Management is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Amitava Roy

Principal Enterprise Architect (Cognizant Digital Business) at Cognizant

Offers pre-built packages for quick and easy onboarding of APIs but configuration is not that easy

The configuration is not that easy. It's not that user-friendly, and security-wise when you try to implement the security layer on top of it, it's not that easy either. There are certain things where the performance is not that great. When the traffic is huge, we see some lag in performance.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Conversion to RESTful and SOAP protocols and management console (can manage individually throttled settings to manage our service levels for customers)."

"We can completely manage the APIs at the org level and BU (business unit) level."

"Very few outages or SLA issues."

"The reason why we selected the solution originally was because of its ability to have a gateway both on-premise and in the cloud. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us."

"It has something called packages. In that way, it's good because we have some pre-built packages. So, if you want to onboard different APIs, we can just add them to the package, and it's there."

"When we did the product evaluation, we saw that TIBCO Mashery offers end-to-end API life cycle management. It provides all API features that are required for managing the complete life cycle. It includes the developer portal and tools for API monitorization. The out-of-box security features that TIBCO Mashery provides are enterprise-grade, which gives it an edge over other API products."

"The solution is a good general API manager. They have a few propriety features but are offering items that are standard in the industry as well."

"The platform's most valuable features are its capabilities to support security measures such as tokenization, token refresh, throttling, and enforcement of payloads."

More TIBCO Cloud API Management pros

"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."

"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."

"The product is powerful, straightforward, and easy to use."

"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."

"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."

"One valuable feature is that it is event-driven, so when new data is available on the source it can be quickly processed and displayed. Integration is definitely another useful feature, and B2B is one area where webMethods has its own unique thing going, whereby we can do monitoring of transactions, monitoring of client onboarding, and so on."

"The developer portal is a valuable feature."

"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"TIBCO Cloud API Management should improve its installation and make it easy."

"We observed delays under heavy load conditions, and without proper tuning, changes could take an extended period to filter and become effective."

"It lacks many features at the API gateway compared to other solutions."

"They can fix some stability issues and probably make it more user-friendly so that not only an IT savvy person but an end-user can also easily navigate through this solution."

"The management console of API and customers' applications are not the most intuitive."

"Monetization is not that great in API management. You need customization. Improvements are needed with sandbox local as well as with monetization. Those features are missing."

"Policy management has been a bit of a concern."

"The way agile life cycle is working needs improvement. I also want to see more support for open API standards. I want to see some improvement on the protocol transformation. That is quite missing now. These are the three main issues."

More TIBCO Cloud API Management cons

"There are things that could be improved with the webMethods API gateway. One thing is that it's too attached to the integration service and we'd like it to be a little bit more independent. We would like for them to separate operations so that it doesn't rely on the bulky integration server and so that it can be used everywhere."

"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."

"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."

"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."

"Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion."

"Technical support is an area where they can improve."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

"With respect to the API gateway, the runtime component, the stability after a new release is something that can be improved."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"TIBCO Cloud API Management is not an expensive solution."

"Licensing is quite flexible."

"We have secured terms on which we have been happy to renew for a number of years."

"Its price is pretty reasonable. There are some lightweight API options available in the market, but given the feature set that TIBCO provides, its price is really reasonable."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

"I would like to see better pricing for the license."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about TIBCO Cloud API Management?

The platform's most valuable features are its capabilities to support security measures such as tokenization, token refresh, throttling, and enforcement of payloads.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO Cloud API Management?

My primary role was to assess the solution from a capability perspective. So, there are some issues with the licensing cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO Cloud API Management?

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs TIBCO Cloud API Management

Compared 29% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs TIBCO Cloud API Management

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs TIBCO Cloud API Management

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs TIBCO Cloud API Management

Compared 11% of the time

More TIBCO Cloud API Management Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO Cloud API Management

March 2025

Download TIBCO Cloud API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

March 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

Mashery API Management

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

APIs are critical business assets that form the foundation of digital business enabling new business models, improved operational efficiency, and connected customer experiences. TIBCO Cloud API Management empowers users to maximize the business value of their APIs products through an end-to-end solution that provides full lifecycle API management alongside capabilities for API discovery, implementation and analytics that speed business value realization across your digital ecosystem.

TIBCO

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

uShip, Sabre, TouchTunes, Best Buy, Cisco, Comcast, athenahealth, Coca-Cola Enterprises, CentralIndex.com, Constant Contact, Edmunds.com, FoodEssentials, Getty Images, Klout, Rovi, Rotten Tomatoes, Sportradar, TomTom, ACTIVE.com

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO Cloud API Management vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Free Report: TIBCO Cloud API Management vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO Cloud API Management vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our TIBCO Cloud API Management vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.