Tricentis NeoLoad Reviews

The most valuable feature that we've found useful is that NeoLoad provides a variety of bandwidths.

I was able to use this product in the past for simulating mobile performance after recording a script over the LAN. This feature wasn't available in other testing products that I evaluated.

Neotys was extremely promising when they launched and it had features that older versions of HP LoadRunner and HP Performance Center did not (automatic correlation, for example). However with newer releases of HP ALM (especially 11.52 onward), these features were readily available with HP products.

I also ran into installation issues with NeoLoad when the installation never completed.

I've used it for over two years.

I uninstalled the product and tried to install the latest version. However, it sort of kept hanging during the installation procedure.

We've had no stability issues.

There have been no issues scaling it for our needs.

In my experience, technical support was pretty good in those times I had to contact them for issues.

It was a simple initial setup.

We implemented it through our in-house team.

It’s very easy for a person without any performance testing experience to use. It was a breeze to install and start using.

Monitoring Agents, Dynamic Parameters and Automatically Recording of all the Requests and Responses.

We did not have any idea as to why our application was breaking during normal loads. NeoLoad helped us to determine the huge issues and factors which were completely hidden if not for NeoLoad.

It would be nice if they could make it so that the dynamic parameterization in the requests came back without the values from the previous responses. Also, it needs the ability to capture SQL queries that are being fired.

I've been using it for eight months.

We had scalability issues for loads over 1000 when using one Load Generator. Now we have increased the Load Generator to two.

They are very good and prompt in resolving tickets that we raise with them. They did help us in resolving certain issues over the phone call with a NeoLoad Expert.

This was our first performance testing tool.

It was very straightforward as it comes with an installer and you just need some space and a server to install it on.

We implemented it in house and my advice is to follow the installation document.

If you install it, you can have fun.

We were customers of NeoLoad and I'm an automation test engineer and team lead.

I do like this tool, it's very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good. It's also simple for anyone who doesn't have a technical or coding background. I liked that we could record the script and use it multiple times. 

Our issues with the solution were related to the license and the support. We had a technical issue related to our software and they weren't able to solve the problem. 

We used this solution for 18 months. 

I don't find this to be such a stable product because our requirements mean we need to be able to change the script on a monthly and sometimes weekly basis.

The support is not great - they don't respond in a timely way. 

We purchased a two-year license but broke the contract after 18 months. 

We're currently looking for a NeoLoad alternative. I prefer dynamic tools because we should be able to change the script and NeoLoad didn't allow us to do that. I'm looking for a tool that will allow for a weekly or monthly script change and provide us with the ability to update whatever has been recorded. 

I would rate this solution a seven out of 10. 

We use NetLoad for two different types of testing. We use it for load testing and automation testing. We use it test out the user experience. 

NeoLoad can be integrated with Selenium for testing the user interface and user experience.

The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good. It supports regular expressions that help us to correlate things.

NeoLoad integrates well with other solutions.

I would like to see support for auto-correlations.

I have been using Neotys NeoLoad for three years.

This is a stable solution from what I know. The frequency in which it is used depends on the project and the client.

We have 50 people who are licensed and using this solution.

The technical support is good.

I also have experience with Apache JMeter.

The implementation is easy. It is just about downloading the application and there are three modules to install and configure, including the monitoring, the agents, and the controller.

This is definitely a solution that I recommend. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

The way it interacts with applications and how the dynamic values are handled.

LoadRunner was not able to record a .NET application, we had many issues with correlations, requests were not capturing properly, it was time consuming and there were many other issues. When we tried the same application in NeoLoad, it worked like a charm without any hassle.

It needs improvements when handling binary values.

I am using it for more than 2 years.

None

None

None

First I tried HP LoadRunner, but it didn't work.

It was straightforward and easy to setup.

Vendor team

The market always pays for the one who comes up with something new and that is easy to customize.

Keep enhancing it and adding new features.

We use this solution because we want to know the difference between two different tools to suggest for our clients.

As we are a services company, we have used NeoLoad also as part of our exercise.

I like the scripting and parameterization features.

While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.

We pretty much use the majority of the features, but two of the key things are the cloud integration and the ability to spin up the load tests. That is the key driver to using this tool.

It's impacted us in a positive way. Prior to NeoLoad, we needed to simulate heavy volumes. We're now able to generate loads from our side and quickly spin the load tests. This process has been greatly improved.

We had some initial issues with the number of tests, memory leaks, and the controller itself.

I've used it for three years.

In the beginning we had some issues with the number of tests, memory leaks, and the controller itself. We worked with them and they came out quickly. After some time now, it's pretty stable.

It didn't scale well at first but now it does.

The setup itself is straightforward. We are in a strict environment so we had some challenges installing it on some machines, but that was down to us internally. We're OK now.

The implementation was done in-house.

We looked at some others, but NeoLoad really stood out in the end.

I would strongly recommend this tool highly. It's improved our business a lot.

It is primarily used for load testing, stress testing and performance testing. It is a very good product.

It is a bit easier compared to our LoadRunner, and it is cheaper. It can select to upload and it is based on cloud services. It is really easy to learn and to use. 

It needs improvement with post-production. 

It has good support. 

It is cheaper than other solutions.