Tricentis NeoLoad Reviews

Ease of use. Technology support, and robust features.

We are able to use NeoLoad to quickly expand performance testing to all critical business applications and address some key performance issues.

Team Server - Neotys Team Server - This currently stores project data on the local drive. I suggest having Neotys Team Server Data stored on an actual server.

Since 2014.

No issues. Simple deployment process.

None.

Excellent.

Excellent.

Yes, HP LoadRunner. We switched due various reasons including cost, ease of use and robust features.

Yes, the initial setup process is really straightforward.

In house.

• Codeless scripting
• Easy correlation
• Features for mobile such as WAN emulation collaboration with Perfecto

It provides easy mobile performance testing solution for our customers.

The product keeps its pace with the updates, however I would like them to offer online advance training certification and better support material.

I've used it for around three years.

They provide very quick responses.

It is very simple compared to other tools on the market that it competes with.

Through collaboration with Neotys, we have free licenses for 50 users. I think we would buy more if they could provide hands on training for newly added features to specific sets of people.

It's a great product, especially if you are looking into mobile performance testing.

Less manual scripting and ease of setting up monitoring are very valuable features of the tool.

Loadrunner has extensive list of analysis features available whereas NeoLoad had limited when I worked.

It helped us deliver the solution for various customers within budget and efficiently.

Analysis can be further improved. I have been using LoadRunner analysis and it has been a very powerful tool.

I have used it for six months.

I have not encountered any deployment issues.

I have not encountered any stability issues.

I have not encountered any scalability issues.

Technical support's turnaround time for issue response is too good.

I have worked on various different performance testing tools, and I found NeoLoad very much within budget without compromising the quality of the product.

Initial setup was straightforward.

A vendor team implemented it.

More protocols can be added, and I would love to see if any profiler is included in it.

We were customers of NeoLoad and I'm an automation test engineer and team lead.

I do like this tool, it's very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good. It's also simple for anyone who doesn't have a technical or coding background. I liked that we could record the script and use it multiple times. 

Our issues with the solution were related to the license and the support. We had a technical issue related to our software and they weren't able to solve the problem. 

We used this solution for 18 months. 

I don't find this to be such a stable product because our requirements mean we need to be able to change the script on a monthly and sometimes weekly basis.

The support is not great - they don't respond in a timely way. 

We purchased a two-year license but broke the contract after 18 months. 

We're currently looking for a NeoLoad alternative. I prefer dynamic tools because we should be able to change the script and NeoLoad didn't allow us to do that. I'm looking for a tool that will allow for a weekly or monthly script change and provide us with the ability to update whatever has been recorded. 

I would rate this solution a seven out of 10. 

It’s very easy for a person without any performance testing experience to use. It was a breeze to install and start using.

Monitoring Agents, Dynamic Parameters and Automatically Recording of all the Requests and Responses.

We did not have any idea as to why our application was breaking during normal loads. NeoLoad helped us to determine the huge issues and factors which were completely hidden if not for NeoLoad.

It would be nice if they could make it so that the dynamic parameterization in the requests came back without the values from the previous responses. Also, it needs the ability to capture SQL queries that are being fired.

I've been using it for eight months.

We had scalability issues for loads over 1000 when using one Load Generator. Now we have increased the Load Generator to two.

They are very good and prompt in resolving tickets that we raise with them. They did help us in resolving certain issues over the phone call with a NeoLoad Expert.

This was our first performance testing tool.

It was very straightforward as it comes with an installer and you just need some space and a server to install it on.

We implemented it in house and my advice is to follow the installation document.

If you install it, you can have fun.

We use this solution because we want to know the difference between two different tools to suggest for our clients.

As we are a services company, we have used NeoLoad also as part of our exercise.

I like the scripting and parameterization features.

While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.

We pretty much use the majority of the features, but two of the key things are the cloud integration and the ability to spin up the load tests. That is the key driver to using this tool.

It's impacted us in a positive way. Prior to NeoLoad, we needed to simulate heavy volumes. We're now able to generate loads from our side and quickly spin the load tests. This process has been greatly improved.

We had some initial issues with the number of tests, memory leaks, and the controller itself.

I've used it for three years.

In the beginning we had some issues with the number of tests, memory leaks, and the controller itself. We worked with them and they came out quickly. After some time now, it's pretty stable.

It didn't scale well at first but now it does.

The setup itself is straightforward. We are in a strict environment so we had some challenges installing it on some machines, but that was down to us internally. We're OK now.

The implementation was done in-house.

We looked at some others, but NeoLoad really stood out in the end.

I would strongly recommend this tool highly. It's improved our business a lot.

It is primarily used for load testing, stress testing and performance testing. It is a very good product.

It is a bit easier compared to our LoadRunner, and it is cheaper. It can select to upload and it is based on cloud services. It is really easy to learn and to use. 

It needs improvement with post-production. 

It has good support. 

It is cheaper than other solutions.