I am using it for my personal use. I am mainly using it for some experimental things.
I am using its latest version.
I am using it for my personal use. I am mainly using it for some experimental things.
I am using its latest version.
Its performance is valuable. I am satisfied with it.
They can improve the interface and give it an appearance similar to the Windows 11 operating system.
I have been using it for eight years.
It is stable.
It is scalable. We can scale it.
I have never used their support.
I have used Windows and Unix.
Its initial setup is straightforward. If I remember correctly, it took around 10 to 15 minutes.
I did it on my own.
On a personal level, I'm using the free version.
I would recommend it to others. I would rate it a 10 out of 10.
We primarily use the solution for web applications.
The solution is very flexible.
We've found the solution to be stable and the performance is reliable.
The solution has proven to be scalable. It can scale quite well.
The initial setup is pretty straightforward.
I have less experience with this solution than others, however, I can't recall specific improvements or features I would like to see.
It could always be a bit more secure. If they could continue to work on making it more and more secure in upcoming releases, that would be ideal.
I've been using the solution for about two years or so at this point. It's been a while.
The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Its performance is good. It's reliable.
The scalability potential of the solution is good. If a company would like to expand the solution, it can do so with relative ease. It's not hard.
We have about 50 people in total who are currently using the solution.
Whether we continue to use the solution or increase usage will depend largely on end-user requirements. It's not really up to us for the most part.
The solution has been very easy to install. It's not overly complicated or difficult. it's pretty easy in general.
Normally, the deployment is pretty fast.
We have a technical team of two administrators that can handle any maintenance requirements.
I can handle the implementation myself. I do not need to call on consultants or integrators. It can be managed in-house.
We are not buying any licenses at the moment.
We are simply customers and end-users. We don't have a business relationship with Unbuntu Linux.
We are using the latest version of the solution. I cannot recall the version number off-hand.
I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten overall.
I would recommend the solution to other organizations and other users. We've had a good experience overall.
We are at a University and use this solution for teaching and research.
The most valuable features are that it's free and that it is simple to use.
It could be easier for beginners and the user interface could be more user-friendly.
I have been using Ubuntu Linux since it's existence, which has been approximately 20 years.
This solution is stable. We use it on our laptops and we deploy it in our virtual machines. We are pleased with it.
We plan to keep using this product.
This is a scalable operating system.
We have approximately 2,000 students and teachers using it.
The technical support is quite good. It's a large community with many tutorials and books available.
Previously, we had used many other operating systems such as CentOS, SUSE Linux, and a few other operating systems based on Linux.
The initial setup is straightforward.
It only took a few minutes to install.
We did not use an integrator or vendor team. We have a team of 10 technicians who can help if someone doesn't know how to install it. Most users can install it themselves.
It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge.
Ubuntu and Linux, in general, are very common operating systems. Many people have knowledge of it. There is a large community of people who can tell you what is needed and tell you about the bugs it may have. They can contribute because it is open source.
It is a good product and one that I recommend.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
I use this solution on my desktop.
The most valuable feature is the user interface. The user experience is really good.
On the gaming side, things are happening but there are some games that should be ported to Ubuntu. Gamers generally don't adopt Linux, and the choice is normally Windows.
The stability of this solution is ok. The previous version of this solution had some glitches. When I locked the system, I would come back and it would not unlock. I had to remotely log in and kill something before it would unlock. After the update it was ok.
I haven't used Ubuntu as a server operating system. Obviously, Linux is scalable because we have been using Red Hat and other distributions, but with respect to Ubuntu, I haven't used it on the server side very much.
I have never contacted technical support.
We do not use Ubuntu Linux in our production environment. For production, we use Red Hat and similar ones, such as Oracle Enterprise Linux. On the server-side, we haven't introduced Ubuntu yet.
With Ubuntu, I think the recent versions have pretty much everything in place. Some other operating systems may not take all of the hardware devices and drivers, but here it picks up most of the things, so I don't see anything wrong in there. The user experience is good, the interface is good. It's all good.
Being a desktop user, I can say that using this solution on a desktop is a very good choice. Ubuntu also supports a cloud-based installation, so it should be a good choice there as well.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
With Web services, many DevOps require different configurations that could cause problems with each project's needs. We are able to supply a cheap, stable server that can cover the DevOps team, using standards we can apply very easily.
RTO with the use of templating support for VMware for fast deployment of recovery or new systems, with the least amount work needed on custom settings, within application installed from install repositories. Shorter overall time with the vetted packages. Normally install and go. Time from Dev to Prod has been reduced from months to weeks in most cases.
Each server has been installed to serve as a solution for a service needed. LAMP seems to be the most used package over all.
Stability of our systems has only improved since moving from CentOS to Ubuntu LTS.
Scale would normally be limited to the hardware. As with most Linux distros, HA packages for most apps are available in the repositories and many great support forums with how-to's.
With the great support forums available, I have not needed to contact support as of yet.
We still have a mix of servers and must support our legacy systems that range from Red Hat, CentOS, and FreeBSD. As time goes, on we require more stable services with updated security, and we replace them with Ubuntu LTS to unify our systems to a standard that is easy to support and deploy.
With all the systems our network requires, this was one of easiest deployments thus far.
Many other Linux distros were selected for testing, but Debian core was very stable. However, the Debian distro itself was very annoying, missing many basic packages, and had little to no support for template deployment in VMware vCenter 5.5 to current.
We are a non-profit consumer with a small budget, hence the need for a stable, low-cost server to provide services to our users.
While I would recommend Ubuntu LTS (stable v16.04.3 at time of this review) try other distros to see how long it takes to deploy, and how much tweaking it will take to implement your project.
We are planning to use the solution for hosting, but we haven't yet started anything. It is still in the testing phase.
Ubuntu Linux is an easy-to-use solution.
The solution could improve its GUI personalization. The solution's in-built version does not have many applications like File Explorer. Ubuntu Linux is more suitable for new beginners. It would be good if applications could be pre-built into the solution.
I have been using Ubuntu Linux for two to three months.
The solution’s initial setup is easy.
I use Ubuntu Linux free of cost.
Before choosing Ubuntu Linux, I evaluated SUSE. I chose Ubuntu Linux because it has a low maintenance cost.
Overall, I rate Ubuntu Linux an eight out of ten.
We primarily use it for our personal applications. We use it in our day-to-day work.
It's easy to deploy. We can deploy it whenever we want.
It's great to use with the Linux system. They work well together.
If you know what you want to program, they make it very easy to do so.
The solution is very stable. It's great for security and it is very safe.
The installation process is simple.
We don't have enough information about this system. When we run into problems, we'd like for it to be more clear what a valid solution might be. For example, if I try to deploy a certain technology, I have to look all over the internet to figure out how to accomplish this. There aren't enough experts in my country to be able to help troubleshoot or to post answers to problems. I'm not sure if there are enough domestic or regional experts who know enough about the solution.
The interface could be better.
I have used this solution for quite a long time. It's been more than five years.
The solution is quite stable. Its performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
I'm not sure if the product is scalable. I haven't attempted to scale it and therefore could not accurately comment on that aspect.
We have the solution in different departments and on different servers. In our department, maybe five or six people use it.
We don't get technical support from people. If we need an answer to a problem, we need to seek it out online.
I have found that the solution is
That said, it depends on the type of server that you are using. You need to ensure it has enough resources. The deployment is quick and we were able to do it in 30 minutes or so.
While we have a technical team of about 15 people in our department that can handle deployment and maintenance tasks, there are other departments and other people on different teams that can as well.
I'm quite comfortable with the solution. I can handle the implementation process myself. I did not need the help of any integrators or consultants.
The solution is free to use and free to explore. People can go ahead and discover it and experiment with it.
I would recommend the product to other users and other companies. It's a good solution in general.
I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
We use Ubuntu Linux for software development to create a desktop environment for our developers, and we also have some VMs running Ubuntu-based services.
Ubuntu is great because you get most of the packages or software you need. You get the latest updates and stuff fairly fast.
We don't have any support, so we search for answers online. However, it can sometimes be a little messy to find the information if you have a highly specific question or a strange problem. It would be nice if finding information were a little simpler. Maybe they could have some portal that could point you to where you can find information. I think that's more of a general issue with open-source stuff. That's how it works.
We've been using Ubuntu for three or four years.
For desktop usage, we find Ubuntu is quite stable. We seldom have a problem with it even running on laptops. I think it's one of the better Linux distributions for running on laptops, and it supports various kinds of laptop hardware.
We don't have any paid support. We use open-source knowledge bases or forums. We're used to that, so that works fine actually. We haven't tried any professional services for support because we manage the clients ourselves.
We use different Linux distributions depending on our needs. Ubuntu is good for our desktop workstations, but Red Hat is server based, and it's more stable over time, so we use that on the server for backend stuff. It depends on where it's going to run. We use Ubuntu for workstations and Red Hat or CentOS on the server side.
Ubuntu might have some room for improvement on the server side. But then again, we haven't used it much for that use case, so I don't know. It's easier for me to say what Red Hat or CentOS are missing on the desktop side. Nothing comes to mind that Ubuntu is missing in terms of desktop deployments.
Setting up Ubuntu is fairly simple. It's just a workstation, so that's a relatively straightforward setup.
We have special workstations with Ubuntu preloaded because it was the best for artificial intelligence within the hardware. We got the whole system, including the hardware, software, and setup. We have support with the total package, but that's the only thing we have to pay for, and we haven't needed to use that support. In general, we don't have any license costs for Linux systems. Some of the Red Hat systems have license costs, but most are open-source or free versions.
I would rate Ubuntu eight out of 10.
Ubuntu is considered a good distribution for beginners. The operating system was intended primarily for personal computers (PCs) but it can also be used on servers.