Ubuntu Linux Reviews

We use the solution to run our business applications.

The solution works well. It represents the standard product in our field. 

The solution could be more user-friendly, as I use Mac on a day to day basis. 

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for five years. 

The solution is definitely stable. 

The solution is definitely scalable. 

In our experience with customer service we have definitely been satisfied. 

The installation did not propose an issue for me as I was not involved in this process. 

We have a company which helped us with the installation. 

All the people involved are technical. 

The solution is open source and its use is included in the monthly fees we pay.

The solution provides good security. 

It is both on-premises and cloud-based. 

The solution really fulfills our purposes for the moment, so there is not much to note by way of improvement. 

I rate Ubuntu Linux as a ten out of ten. 

I used Ubuntu Linux for my desktop and for web servers.

I like this product much better than some other similar solutions.

The user interface could be improved, as it looks a little bit older.

We have been using Ubuntu Linux for many years.

Ubuntu Linux is stable and I plan to continue using it.

This is a scalable product. It is not used throughout the organization. Rather, I use it privately on my desktops.

I have not needed to contact technical support.

Prior to Ubuntu, I was using Debian Linux.

The installation is straightforward and it is very quick to complete.

I deployed it myself.

This is a product that I can recommend.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

It's a very stable and very popular solution.

If I run an application, I need it to show up in Microsoft, so Microsoft can run in Ubuntu. It needs to connect better with Microsoft products.

This solution is stable.

This solution is scalable. We have 10 users at the moment. We plan to increase usage.

I don't have any experience with technical support. I have experience with Linux, so I am okay.

We've only ever used Microsoft products. But Microsoft is very expensive, and the system is complicated.

The initial setup is simple.

We had a consultant assist in the implementation. We need 15 people for deployment and maintenance.

I would advise using the solution because it's a very stable system and very fast and you are charged no money for using them.

My number one choice, for the work I do, is Red Hat, but it's very expensive. Number two is Ubuntu, which works for small systems and has good value.

I think that Ubuntu offers more than Microsoft. Microsoft is no good. There are lots of versions of Windows, but many errors and there's no stable system.

I would rate this solution 2 out of 10.

I am using it for the desktop system. I have its latest version.

It is stable and quite easy to use as compared to other Linux operating systems. They have created a system like Windows. It is simple and without any problems.

When you upgrade the core of this operating system, it can crash. This is the only problem I had. It needs more stable upgrades. 

I have been using this solution for a few years.

For desktop, we don't need it to be scalable. Currently, it is for personal use, and there is only one user.

I have not used their technical support. Ubuntu probably has a lot of documents, but I never had to read something about it. I have used CentOS for dozens of years, so Ubuntu seems simple to me.

We use CentOS for our web servers. 

It is very simple. It took less than half an hour.

Usually, I do it by myself, and it is very simple.

It is free.

I would recommend Ubuntu Linux for other users who want to start using it.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux a 10 out of 10.

The most valuable feature of this solution is that Linux has cost-effective licenses.

If they had GUI features similar to that in Windows, it would be good.

The biggest problem we are facing with Ubuntu is that we cannot have group policies and Active Directories. The Windows Active Directory is a more granular level where you can deploy the group policies, which we don't see in Ubuntu.

I would like to see the group policies and the GUI improved in the next release.

I have been working with Ubuntu Linux for eight years.

Ubuntu is stable but when you running with 1,000 people or more, you have to go with a high-speed directory, and we don't have the same control thatwe have with Windows.

Ubuntu pricing is reasonable.

We moved to Linux for financial obligations.

Ubuntu Linux is good as long as you have a good resource to manage it. For us, it's really good.

I would rate this product a seven out of ten.

It is useful for web servers, email servers, and file servers. I am using its latest version.

It is open-source, secure, and easy to use.

It can have more security.

I have been using this solution for 20 years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. We currently have around ten users. We don't have any plans to increase its usage.

I am satisfied with their technical support.

I have used FreeBSD.

Its initial setup is straightforward. It took about 20 minutes.

I did it myself. We have a team of six engineers for deployment and maintenance. 

It is open-source. We don't have to pay for its license.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux a ten out of ten.

We mainly use this solution for application-related uses. We use it as our main Linux platform of choice. 

One of the best features is that it is constantly updated.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for more than 15 years.

Ubuntu Linux is both stable and scalable.

I have never contacted their support team.

We actually use both Ubuntu Linux and CentOS, but CentOS is being decommissioned so our choice is Ubuntu.

Ubuntu Linux was very easy to deploy. You can install Ubuntu in many different ways and all of them are pretty straightforward. I also have a lot of experience with Ubuntu, so for me, the initial installation is very easy.

A team of four people is required for maintenance and deployment.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Ubuntu Linux a rating of ten. More people should use this solution.

1. stable

2. easy upgradable

3. secure

4. light

I always use it at home.

Backoffice tools should be improved: xls and doc files should be edited with light and faster tools.

15 years

No.

No.

No.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

First I used Fedora. I switched for stability reasons.

No.

By myself.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Already answered.

No apart my thanks to ubuntu community.