Ubuntu Linux Reviews

The use case for Ubuntu is not the information system production environment for the operating system. It is used to run applications.

We are not utilizing Ubuntu in critical applications.

Ubuntu Linux is developer-oriented.

Similar to Windows 10, I would like the ability to manage it on Azure or integrate it with Azure.

We have been using Ubuntu Linux for 10 years.

Ubuntu Linux is a stable solution.

It's a scalable product, but not the best. We have 2,000 systems. 

We have not contacted technical support.

With an expert, the installation was easy. We had no issues with the installation.

We completed the installation ourselves.

Ubuntu Linux is free, but you can pay for a supported version that is better.

I would recommend Ubuntu for development and to run applications that are non-information system critical.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux a ten out of ten.

I use this solution for running our personal applications and our day-to-day personal use. We install it on our laptops.

We can easily customize the NTS Client code.

We can customize the code ourselves.

Reducing the UA would be very helpful to reduce resource consumption. They need a less resource pack option. Currently, I am using the standard one.

The user interface could be improved.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for three years.

We were using the latest version.

Ubuntu Linux is a stable operating system.

Ubuntu Linux is a scalable solution.

I have not contacted technical support.

Previously, I was using Windows 7.

The installation was easy. It only takes 15 minutes.

I completed the installation myself. I did not use the help of an integrator or consultant.

There are no licensing fees, it's an open-source solution.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux a nine out of ten.

I use the solution as a hosting system, processing machine for my machine learning model, and for running applications.

The solution could improve by being more user-friendly, you need to know how to use the command-line interface which you might not understand.

I have been using this solution for approximately three years.

The solution is very stable, it does not need to restart to maintain stability. 

Ubuntu Linux is scalable.

We have approximately 25 people using the solution in my organization.

I use Microsoft Windows Server.

The installation is straightforward, it takes less than 10 minutes.

I did the implementation of the solution.

We have a team of five engineers that do the Ubuntu Linux server maintenance.

The use of the solution is inexpensive and the hardware it needs to operate can be priced very low. There is not a license for the solution but there is for the hardware.

Ubuntu Linux is the perfect solution for us. If they make the solution more user-friendly it will cost more overall. The current version is best.

I rate Ubuntu Linux a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for business use and running applications.

The solution is easy to use.

I have been using this solution for a couple of years.

The solution could be more stable and secure.

The solution is scalable.

I am satisfied with the technical support.

There is an annual subscription for this solution.

I would recommend it to others.

I rate Oracle Linux a ten out of ten.

I am using it for my personal use on my personal laptop.

It is scalable. I can customize it based on what I want to do.

They can make it user-friendly. It is not totally user-friendly.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for the last eight years.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

I never needed support for Ubuntu.

I used to work on Kali Linux and Windows.

I am using the free version. There is no subscription.

I would recommend this solution to others. I would rate Ubuntu Linux a seven out of 10.

Our primary use case is for implementing anything that's open source, like a network monitoring tool or anything connected to network, security or vulnerability scanning. It can all be done with Linux. 

The solution is open source and free with a fast OS.

The installation of Ubuntu is somewhat complicated. It requires searching online forums and installation takes time. If there was additional training and documentation available, better support for integration, that would be helpful. The UI could be improved. 

I've been using this solution for over 20 years. 

For business, the initial deployment is straightforward. If additional hard disk is required, then that will be difficult. Deployment took around 20 minutes and I believe we have around 10 users. 

The solution is open source, so no licensing costs.

I recommend this solution if it's appropriate to your needs. 

I rate this product a seven out of 10. 

I am using it for the desktop system. I have its latest version.

It is stable and quite easy to use as compared to other Linux operating systems. They have created a system like Windows. It is simple and without any problems.

When you upgrade the core of this operating system, it can crash. This is the only problem I had. It needs more stable upgrades. 

I have been using this solution for a few years.

For desktop, we don't need it to be scalable. Currently, it is for personal use, and there is only one user.

I have not used their technical support. Ubuntu probably has a lot of documents, but I never had to read something about it. I have used CentOS for dozens of years, so Ubuntu seems simple to me.

We use CentOS for our web servers. 

It is very simple. It took less than half an hour.

Usually, I do it by myself, and it is very simple.

It is free.

I would recommend Ubuntu Linux for other users who want to start using it.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux a 10 out of 10.

Ubuntu is a Linux OS. The solution is primarily used for web servers and web traffic.

The solution is easy to use for developers and DevOps teams. 

The commands and user commands are very good. 

The repository and the security repository are up to date, which is great.

The product is very user-friendly.

We've found the solution to be quite stable so far.

The solution is free to use.

There is a very good open-source community surrounding the solution that can help you troubleshoot if you run into any issues. 

You need a Linux operating system to be the host of the web servers. We don't use a GUI. It's not like Windows. It's not for daily users to write documents or browsing sheets or browsing the internet.

The product could be easier to manage.

I've been using the solution for five or six years at this point.

The stability of the solution is very good. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. 

The solution can scale if you need it to.

We don't really deal with technical support per see. It's a free-to-use open-source solution. The way it works is it has a community and you can submit to Ubuntu and you can get help from some of the people that lead this community. It's pretty good. You can find what you need to solve pretty much any problem you might have.

I've also used CentOS, and I would recommend Unbuntu over it.

I did not install the solution myself, however, if you decide to use the cloud you can choose it as a wizard. It's my understanding that it is pretty straightforward. 

The solution is free to use. It doesn't cost us anything. It's great that we have access without having to worry about licensing fees.

We don't use a GUI. We tend to focus on its OS layers. Therefore, we don't really deal with any dashboards.

I'd rate the solution at a perfect ten out of ten. It's been very reliable and we appreciate its capabilities overall.