Ubuntu Linux Reviews

It is used for everything. We use it for our mail server and cloud solution server. You can also use it as an Active Directory (AD) Server instead of a Windows Server.

It is stable and modern.

It should be easier and lighter. I am more experienced in working with CentOS, and I find CentOS much easier to use than Ubuntu. Ubuntu is more complicated than CentOS. Ubuntu is also heavier for hardware than centOS.

I have been using this solution for several years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. Its usage is being increased all the time.

I have never used their support. I am technical support.

I only use the server version.

It is open source.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate Ubuntu Linux a seven out of ten.

We use the solution for internal application deployment.

Our SmartVista solution is based on Debian Linux, that is really similar to Ubuntu.

Some of the highlighted valuable features are that is based on Linux, configurable, functional, and robust.

Test automation and application maintenance could be improved. 

Better integration between the interface of the software and the operating system itself would be a benefit in the future.

I have been using the solution for 17 years.

The solution is stable, it is based on 20 years of history.

I have found it to be scalable. 

The solution is open source and has no technical support.

Yes, Red Hat 4, SuSe 6.3, . . . .fro the 90s. Because of functionality and easier management

It is a free product.

Since I have been using the solution for a long time I have used many version. Currently, I use 20.04, and previously versions 18.04 and 16.04. I would advise others to trust in open source solutions, they are really configurable and do not give up too early.

I would recommend this product.

I rate Ubuntu Linux an eight out of ten.

We pretty much use it to run everything that we have at the moment.

For us, OpenStack is awesome. We want something that will be much simpler than a broad and complicated solution.

In terms of what could be improved, I would say management and storage. Mostly, the storage mechanism. There have been some subsequent versions that have improved on this. But I'm talking about the version that we are currently running. We are aware that there have been some subsequent versions that have addressed this challenge.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux between six and 10 years, and I joined the company about three years ago.

In terms of stability, it has been very stable.

Because the version we are running is the community version, we are on our own. We rely on information available in the community to address support cases. I heard that there was going to be some training at some point. For now, we pretty much manage it by ourselves. But we've not really had any cause for support. Because of how very broad the solution is, you need some substantial budgets to be able to manage it.

On a scale of one to ten I would rate Ubuntu Linux an eight.

Off the top of my head, I would advise to check out the management of the storage.

Also, the UI can always be improved.

I find the stability of the solution the most valuable aspect. It's also easier software than Microsoft Windows.

The portal for the active directory needs to be improved. I cannot include my work station as I want to the active directory to the Microsoft domain. 

The solution could be better integrated with Microsoft.

The solution is stable. 

I cannot answer this question. I haven't tried to scale the solution. Directory as a workstation is used by a few hundred, but all servers are for Oracle databases. And that users work on Windows work stations, but with Oracle client issues, databases on the servers. But we don't plan to scale.

We don't deal with technical support. If we need answers, we usually use the internet.

We previously used 3BD and Oracle Linux. We switched because this solution is more user-friendly.

The initial setup was pretty easy.

We did not evaluate other options.

I would rate this solution at 8 out of 10. 

For me, its different user interfaces is not a good idea because sometimes it's hard to find the best interface. It's better to have one, but an excellent one. I think the stability is very good.

We use Ubuntu Linux as an operating system for daily use. We use it for many purposes, for example, supporting, developing, configuring, and scripting.

The solution has high fantastic performance.

Ubuntu Linux could improve by having better documentation because sometimes their documentation is not very good.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for approximately 10 years.

Ubuntu Linux is stable.

We have 200 people using this solution in my organization.

Ubuntu Linux is easy to install. We already configured it to auto-install for other Linux servers. The process takes not more than 15 minutes.

For the implementation and maintenance of the solution, we have approximately six people.

We are saving money from not having to pay for an operating system that costs our company money because Ubuntu Linux is free to use.

We are using the free and open-sourced version of the solution.

I would recommend this solution to others because it is free and you can save licensing costs.

I rate Ubuntu Linux a ten out of ten.

• Package management
• Stability
• Customization

Using LAMP services really improves all of the infrastructure.

Patch management.

We have been using this solution for six years.

I did not encounter any issues with deployment.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

I have not used customer service.

I have not used technical support.

We used FreeBSD. We moved to Ubuntu, because FreeBSD package management is very difficult.

I was involved in the setup and it was straightforward.

We implemented it on our own.

It is free.

We evaluated other options.

Great job, Ubuntu team. Keep it up.

I use Ubuntu mostly for private purposes.

I think Ubuntu's performance is fine and so is its user interface. However, the latter is not as fancy as Microsoft Windows. It could be a bit fancier and easier to use. 

I have used Ubuntu only occasionally. I am not an experienced user. 

Ubuntu is a stable solution. 

Ubuntu is a scalable solution.

The initial setup is absolutely straightforward. 

There are no costs associated with Ubuntu. 

Ubuntu is rather stable, simple to deploy, stable, and well supported by an open-source community. I would recommend it as a possible alternative to Windows for those looking to avoid the cost associated with that operating system. It is definitely a cost-effective alternative for private usage.

We use the solution to run our business applications.

The solution works well. It represents the standard product in our field. 

The solution could be more user-friendly, as I use Mac on a day to day basis. 

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for five years. 

The solution is definitely stable. 

The solution is definitely scalable. 

In our experience with customer service we have definitely been satisfied. 

The installation did not propose an issue for me as I was not involved in this process. 

We have a company which helped us with the installation. 

All the people involved are technical. 

The solution is open source and its use is included in the monthly fees we pay.

The solution provides good security. 

It is both on-premises and cloud-based. 

The solution really fulfills our purposes for the moment, so there is not much to note by way of improvement. 

I rate Ubuntu Linux as a ten out of ten.