We performed a comparison between New Relic and Alluvio Aternity based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Ease of Deployment: New Relic's setup is easy to follow, but may be time-consuming if there are many devices. Alluvio Aternity, on the other hand, is more user-friendly and requires minimal configuration. Aternity's deployment process is relatively quick with the help of one engineer, and maintenance is practically non-existent.
Features: New Relic has a focus on in-depth application information, scalability, and traceability, with synthetic alerts and transparent pricing. Alluvio Aternity, on the other hand, specializes in providing data on machine health and performance, with unique features like DXI for customization and UXI score for measuring user experience.
Pricing: New Relic's cost is a worry for some users due to monthly or yearly licenses and extra charges for added features or data ingestion. Alluvio Aternity's pricing is a mixed bag, with some finding it worthwhile while others believe it to be pricier than other options. However, Aternity's analytics may have a positive effect on IT budgets and increase efficiency.
Service and Support: Despite positive feedback on documentation, New Relic's team has delays when resolving issues. On the other hand, Alluvio Aternity is praised for its highly competent and responsive support, with a dedicated technical team that successfully resolves issues. Assistance is available both locally and overseas.
ROI: New Relic has demonstrated varying levels of success in generating ROI for its users. On the other hand, Alluvio Aternity's ROI is challenging to quantify as it is focused on the expense side of the business.
Comparison Results: New Relic is the preferred solution in this comparison. New Relic offers more versatile features, accurate alert mechanisms, and in-depth application information. Alluvio Aternity provides valuable data on machine health and performance, but lacks detailed performance counters and database monitoring capabilities.
"The most valuable features for us are the Incident Management dashboard, Application Status dashboard, and Activity Analysis UI."
"The most valuable feature is the alerting. As soon as we click on an incident, it takes us directly to the problematic PC. It's a direct solution. We click on an alert and it takes us to the incident details. The details show in different colors, in a graphical representation, and I like that the most."
"The ability to monitor crash and health event issues at a user level"
"Aternity easily provides visibility of all the endpoint machines to my clients."
"We could resolve issues that they had been facing for months or years. They had been having the same issues, the same performance problems, whether it was Excel taking a long time to load, or network instability, or voice call problems, and we would fix it in minutes, in front of them in a meeting, with absolute confidence. It would just blow their minds."
"As a financial institution, we have a lot of applications that are either written internally or bought from a vendor and customized for us. Having a tool that lets us monitor specific transactions in those applications allows us to focus on the transactions that are important to the business."
"The dashboard is very effective."
"While it also provides desktop metrics, the main thing we use it for is monitoring our applications."
"New Relic has helped us in terms of the optimizing our print and loading times."
"It has the ability to monitor random URLs not tied to the one pinger per application (though it costs extra)."
"The synthetic alert is the most valuable feature in New Relic APM. I also like the time travel feature and find traceability useful in the solution. New Relic APM also has good response times."
"Working with the solution is very easy. It's user-friendly."
"The best feature of New Relic is its simple look and feel, making it easier to use than other tools."
"What I like best about New Relic APM is its user interface because it's simple. The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is end-to-end monitoring."
"The most important thing is that it tells us where the latency in throughput and response time are."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The solution's downloadable reports could be improved."
"Its user interface and features should be improved. They don't support new versions of certain Linux editions. That is one of the reasons why we have to move to another solution."
"They've additionally added some great color coding, but they need to explain better and drive down further on the meanings of this workflow."
"Being able to add custom monitoring to dashboards would be nice. Right now, if you want to monitor the value of a registry key on your systems, to get that added into the dashboard you have to reach out to Aternity so they can start looking for that value. It would be interesting if that were more of a self-serve function."
"In terms of a new feature, it would be good if we could restrict a user to a specific application or server. We have several customers, and we have to set up one or two servers for each customer. We have to set up one server for production and one for the test environment. Each user at the customer level can see all applications and the data of all applications, which is not really useful and good. We should be able to restrict user access at the application level or server level."
"I want more reporting around asset management, with greater flexibility and customization ability."
"Potentially, the one thing that could probably help with better levels of enterprise adoption is around creating the application monitoring signatures. That process can be a little bit difficult. If one thing could be simplified a little bit, it would be the application monitoring signature creation process."
"The other place for improvement, as an on-prem, non-SaaS customer, is that the system administration and management in Aternity are very difficult. They've even told me that most of their support calls come in due to configuration and system administration on their on-prem. Their on-prem solution is not easy to use."
"They don't have an opportunity to share the dashboard with the public. If you want to share it with stakeholders or people outside the organization who just want to have a look at a couple of metrics, you can't do that without onboarding them to the product itself."
"It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works."
"It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level."
"We have had issues with our agents going offline."
"I would like to see the company implement the AI auto-baseline feature which Dynatrace has."
"The customization of the start and end time is kind of cool."
"We would like a dashboard feature to be created for this product. This would allow us to monitor both the front and back-end of our UIs performance, and then report on it."
"The product has good documentation for Linux, however, their documentation for Windows is lacking substantially. It's something they need to develop."
Alluvio Aternity is ranked 21st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 37 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. Alluvio Aternity is rated 8.4, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alluvio Aternity writes "Not only helped us know which devices to refresh, but helped us determine if a refresh was even necessary, with factual data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Alluvio Aternity is most compared with Dynatrace, Nexthink, SysTrack, AppDynamics and AppNeta by Broadcom, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus. See our Alluvio Aternity vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Mobile APM vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
