We performed a comparison between N-able Take Control and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Take Control enables you to collaborate with end users. It's for supporting a workstation where you want the person on the other side to see you moving their mouse, and you can work with them."
"The most valuable part of N-able Take Control is being able to remotely access your customer's site. You are able to view their network. Once you have it set up, it's always available. N-able Take Control can be used even when other remote access controls have been made."
"TeamViewer is a step ahead of solutions like, for example, AnyDesk."
"This is a unique solution that is very easy to install."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is the ability to remote control a computer system. Overall it is a complete solution."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is user-friendliness."
"It is easy to use and has a pretty good UI."
"The implementation process is simple."
"I have found the solution to be user-friendly even for beginners. It is not that sophisticated. There are different types of security features available, such as encryption and random machine ID."
"The most valuable feature has been the ability to give control to others for support purposes."
"The dashboards I do not use because there are issues. The solution monitors your antivirus and other programs but it does not seem to work well."
"We've seen some latency problems in AWS environments. Aside from that, it's a pretty solid service."
"The support could improve their speed."
"We'd like to be able to work from mobile to desktop and vice versa. We'd like more mobility."
"TeamViewer could be more secure."
"I don’t see any areas where improvement is needed."
"In the next release, I would prefer to have a voice integration and collaboration feature to support multiple teams simultaneously."
"You can't configure multiple, unattended control passwords on the Mac. On the Mac, there's only one. On Windows, there are multiple unattended control passwords. I have people in different departments. My infrastructure people need to control a server and my developers may need to go into that same server. But I don't want them to have the same password... on the Mac, it can be done but it's extremely clunky and problematic."
"TeamViewer has a legacy and may not be using the latest UI trends."
"Considering the earlier versions of the product, I think TeamViewer used to slow down the systems."
N-able Take Control is ranked 19th in Remote Access with 2 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. N-able Take Control is rated 9.0, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of N-able Take Control writes "Valuable remote access feature, highly stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". N-able Take Control is most compared with Dameware Remote Support and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and Check Point Remote Access VPN. See our N-able Take Control vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
