We compared TeamViewer and TeamViewer Tensor based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
TeamViewer is praised for its ease of use and reliable remote access, while suggestions for improvement highlight the need for enhanced performance and interface simplicity. In comparison, TeamViewer Tensor offers efficient remote access and collaboration capabilities, with mixed feedback on pricing and licensing. Users highlight the excellent customer support and significant ROI, but suggest improvements in interface usability and performance.
Features: The valuable features of TeamViewer include ease of use, reliable remote access, seamless screen sharing, efficient file transfer, and exceptional customer support. In comparison, TeamViewer Tensor offers efficient remote access, seamless collaboration, extensive device compatibility, reliable security measures, and excellent customer support.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for TeamViewer is reported to be relatively low, which is seen as a benefit. However, feedback on the setup cost for TeamViewer Tensor is mixed. Some users praised the ease of setup and the lack of significant costs, while others expressed concerns about the licensing process.It may not be straightforward or transparent., TeamViewer's ROI is reported as positive, with users highlighting seamless remote access and cost-effectiveness. TeamViewer Tensor provided a significant ROI, enhancing productivity, reducing travel expenses, and offering robust security measures.
Room for Improvement: TeamViewer has room for improvement in terms of speed, responsiveness, interface simplicity, audio and video quality, customer support, and advanced security features. On the other hand, TeamViewer Tensor needs enhancements in interface usability, performance, user-friendliness, speed, responsiveness, file transfers, and operating system compatibility.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews comparing TeamViewer to TeamViewer Tensor highlight that while some users of TeamViewer spent three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, others only needed a week for both deployment and setup. In contrast, TeamViewer Tensor users mentioned spending multiple months on deployment, along with an additional week for setup., TeamViewer's customer service has received positive remarks for both products. Users praise the helpfulness, promptness, and effectiveness of the assistance provided. The customer service experience is considered reliable and efficient for TeamViewer, while TeamViewer Tensor stands out for its exceptional support levels.
The summary above is based on 39 interviews we conducted recently with TeamViewer and TeamViewer Tensor users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The product and platform work well. That is why I have stay with them so long. The stability has typically been good."
"Getting started with TeamViewer was easy, with a very straightforward usage"
"The TeamViewer system has some built-in security. The TeamViewer client connects to the TeamViewer host securely. Only a certain number of authorized users on our side have access to the system. Even within that, an individual endpoint can be assigned to a group, where not everybody has access but, rather, just one or two people who are part of a support team might have access to that particular device. So TeamViewer has given us tools to be able to segregate who has access to different things."
"The solution is a very good tool for monitoring and for remote access. Anyone is able to use it, it is simple to use."
"It is a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature has been the ability to give control to others for support purposes."
"The solution is scalable."
"TeamViewer has a good interface."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer Tensor is the remote access."
"This product is very simple to use and you can connect whether you are behind a firewall or not."
"Remote desktop sharing is one valuable feature of the solution."
"TeamViewer could improve by adding support for other operating systems, such as Linux and CAKE."
"It would be useful if the solution could facilitate more than one remote user accessing my desktop at a time."
"There is a paid version of this solution with more features available. However, they should provide more free features to the user, such as factor authentication."
"It's pretty limited on the options they have."
"TeamViewer can improve connectivity. I had some problems connecting to my clients and now I use AnyDesk."
"TeamViewer could be more secure."
"In the next release, I would prefer to have a voice integration and collaboration feature to support multiple teams simultaneously."
"I don’t see any areas where improvement is needed."
"The SSO feature of the solution may sometimes not function perfectly…Pricing might be improved for TeamViewer Tensor."
"Having the ability to create subgroups and delegate permissions to the group members would be a helpful addition."
"The solution could include more AI (Artificial Intelligence)."
TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews while TeamViewer Tensor is ranked 8th in Remote Access with 4 reviews. TeamViewer is rated 8.6, while TeamViewer Tensor is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Tensor writes "A user-friendly and stable solution providing remote desktop sharing functionality to its users". TeamViewer is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online, BeyondTrust Remote Support and Webex, whereas TeamViewer Tensor is most compared with TeamViewer Pilot, BeyondTrust Remote Support, Parallels Access, LogMeIn Rescue and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. See our TeamViewer vs. TeamViewer Tensor report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.