CAST AIP is a valuable solution for quality metrics and application security. It is beneficial for software architecture detection.
CAST's risk and security flow detection capabilities are highly effective, particularly in identifying security vulnerabilities. It is one of the most important and valuable features of the platform.
Areas for improvement in CAST AIP include enhancing support for implementation in complex environments and improving technical support to address organizational challenges alongside engineering issues.
I have been working with CAST AIP for almost three years.
I would rate the stability of CAST AIP as a ten out of ten. It is very stable.
I would rate the scalability of CAST AIP as an eight out of ten. My clients for CAST AIP are usually enterprise businesses.
I would rate the technical support as a six out of ten. It could be improved.
Implementing CAST AIP can be challenging in complex customer environments, but it is easier for software vendors and system integrators. I would rate the easiness of the initial setup as a five out of ten.
Deployment of CAST AIP typically takes at least a few weeks, sometimes even longer, but it's not a quick process.
CAST AIP is very expensive.
CAST AIP supports software process improvement by providing insights into code quality, security, and architecture, aiding in the enhancement of development processes.
CAST AIP helps identify and correct software flaws and it is one of the main strengths of the solution.
The automated code review process in CAST AIP is beneficial and can contribute to the digital transformation of IT shops.
Integrating AIP with existing development tools and ecosystems is challenging but beneficial. With proper support and technical assistance, the process becomes smoother.
I would recommend CAST AIP for organizations with well-established and clear software processes. However, for organizations with complex or less-defined processes, it may not be the best fit.
Overall, I would rate CAST AIP as a seven out of ten.