Xpanse provides a complete, accurate and continuously updated inventory of all global internet-facing assets. This allows you to discover, evaluate, and mitigate cyber attack surface risks. You can also evaluate supplier risk and assess the security of acquired companies.
Manual asset inventory maintenance is slow and prone to error. An outside-in view of your attack surface catches assets and exposures you never knew existed to help with attack surface reduction.
Get ahead of your ransomware risk assessment by discovering and remediating RDP exposures, the leading attack vector in ransomware attacks. Find exposed assets before attackers do.
Integration with Cortex XSOAR, Prisma Cloud, and our broader portfolio allows our ASM findings to enhance security workflows, and secure unknown, unmanaged risks on your cloud attack surface.
I use the solution in my company since Cortex Xpanse is good in installation and full control devices, but the firewall is not that simple.
The most valuable features of the solution are its firewall and antivirus. I also like the fact that the tool serves as an XDR product. My company uses Sophos as it is easy to link our branches to our headquarters.
I use Cortex Xpanse and Sophos for endpoint security purposes.
With Cortex Xpanse, there is an issue with connectivity in the cloud. Sometimes, the machine cannot be uninstalled easily or installed, so you may lose control when trying to get the password.
In our company, we are using most of the connectivity as endpoints with the help of Cortex on cloud. The endpoint connectivity in the cloud is an area where improvements are required.
There is an issue with the old versions of Cortex, and so when we have an older one with Windows or any OS, we have a problem with its connectivity with the cloud.
I have been using Cortex Xpanse for two years. My company uses the tool.
It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
My whole company uses the tool.
My company follows a schedule to check the portal, and we have to check it to prevent any issues in any of our company's regions. The antivirus processes everything before we do any testing, and we can follow the schedule and check the issue. If everything is good, there is no harm. The tool would block the issue if needed.
My company has not used much of the solution's technical support. When we forgot the password, it didn't take us a long time to restore the password. The support is not bad, but it is not too fast. I rate the technical support a seven out of ten. There is no support for the tool in Egypt, and Palo Alto is not trying to get much market share.
Neutral
I have experience with Sophos. Earlier, we were using Kaspersky, but there were issues with the machines, leading to many errors.
The solution is not easy to deploy and is more complicated than Sophos.
The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.
The deployment process took a few days to be completed. We were able to build the endpoints for the whole enterprise.
Cortex Xpanse is more expensive than the firewall tools from Sophos.
The tool's cost is too high.
Cortex is more expensive than Sophos, Kaspersky, or any other solutions. We chose Cortex XDR because of its technology. Cortex is made more expensive every year.
Our company uses continuous monitoring capability. There is no problem using the tool as an antivirus product. It is an expensive tool for our company.
Speaking about the tool's AI, the product is good and helps block malicious parts, but it does not have a specification.
I recommend the tool to large companies because of its price. For medium business or small business, Cortex Xpanse is not the best.
I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
