Microsoft Virtual Server Reviews

Microsoft Virtual Server has brought significant savings, reducing costs by approximately 15% while saving time. Users experienced a nearly immediate return due to the absence of upfront capital expenditures, thanks to its pay-as-you-go model. Furthermore, the service's reliability and accessibility have proven valuable.

Enterprise buyers report mixed experiences with Microsoft Virtual Server's pricing and licensing. While some find it cost-effective with options like perpetual licensing and SaaS offerings, others consider it expensive, citing inconsistent licensing models that vary between monthly and yearly fees. There is a perception that costs should be reduced by 40%, as initial pricing often fails to cover long-term operational needs. Choosing a subscription model may lower overall annual costs despite higher monthly fees.

• "Microsoft Virtual Server’s licensing is expensive."
• "Microsoft Virtual Server is a low-cost solution."
• "The tool's cost has been taken care of with the help of Microsoft Fabric and with a consolidated or unified interface, where the entire product serves as a SaaS offering for the user."

Organizations primarily use Microsoft Virtual Server to virtualize environments, including applications, engineering tasks, and internal systems. It centralizes and manages Active Directory and file servers, reduces hardware costs, and provides flexibility for cloud or hybrid setups. Virtual Server facilitates testing, data handling, backups, and disaster recovery, while supporting diverse applications, including ERP and SQL Server, across different platforms. Companies benefit from creating virtual desktops and running virtual machines for development and system management.

Customer service and support of Microsoft Virtual Server is often considered efficient and responsive. Users rate technical support highly, though response times can vary. While some find support cooperative and timely, others note difficulty in reaching assistance. Licensing doesn't always ease access, and opinions on credibility vary. Many users rely on in-house expertise or have not needed support, yet when contacted, the support team is deemed satisfactory, fast, and globally available.

Microsoft Virtual Server's initial setup experience varies. Some users find it straightforward and quick, especially with cloud deployment. Users with Microsoft server knowledge can efficiently configure environments. Others experience complexities, particularly with on-premises setup or network design. Setup duration ranges from minutes to hours, depending on factors like infrastructure and specific requirements. Some organizations resort to support or external tutorials for assistance. Maintaining the setup can require dedicated personnel, especially for more intricate deployments.

Microsoft Virtual Server is highly scalable, suiting small to large enterprises. Users report effective management of user numbers ranging from tens to thousands. Organizations appreciate its capacity for expansion, as it effectively manages heavy workloads and diverse client needs. Some users suggest scalability improvements, while others highly rate it, indicating varied experiences depending on company size and deployment specifics. Scalability ratings vary, highlighting a balance between excellent scaling capabilities and areas for enhancement.

Users consider Microsoft Virtual Server highly stable, frequently using it without encountering critical issues. It is generally rated between seven and ten out of ten for stability. Occasionally, restarts are needed, especially during firmware updates. Users appreciate its reliability and robust performance, with suggestions for improvement in handling new features more smoothly. Microsoft Virtual Server is often described as sufficiently stable, providing flexibility through different SKUs for various workloads.