OpenText Functional Testing Reviews

Name: OpenText Functional Testing
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 4.0 (97 reviews)

4.0 out of 5

97 reviews
87% willing to recommend

What is OpenText Functional Testing?

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

Get the OpenText Functional Testing Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and more!

OpenText Functional Testing is the #2 ranked solution in top Functional Testing Tools, #2 ranked solution in top Mobile App Testing Tools, #2 ranked solution in top Regression Testing Tools, #3 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools, and #7 ranked solution in top API Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Functional Testing an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. OpenText Functional Testing is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca. OpenText Functional Testing is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 64% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 19% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

July 2025

Get the report

Helped 863,679 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Functional Testing reviews

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

Pierre CAHAY

Senior Manager at Deloitte

We use OpenText as an archive server for archiving purposes from SAP, or we use OpenText in the context of vendor invoice management We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years. It depends on the business revenue. The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the…

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

The product can integrate with the process or test management tools. If you want to schedule and automate the run, and if a solution is in a certain process with some condition, OpenText UFT One can be set up and be a part of the workflow. Anywhere, if you understand DevSecOps or NetOps concepts, then OpenText UFT One can be used with the DevOps concept as well. I think it's quite easy to use if you know the product's command line in Windows, and it can be enabled by any tool that runs it. Though OpenText UFT One has API indicators, the scripts in Windows can also be helpful. Speaking of the challenges the tool helps users overcome in terms of testing workflows, I can say that the tool can be used for automation and testing purposes, and the benefits of it is that the solution can produce results and execute them in a certain period of time, making it one of the main capabilities of OpenText UFT One and OpenText's process automation and testing functionalities. When it comes to creating scripts, if you are familiar with OpenText UFT One, things will be easy for you. The AI technology that needs to be involved in the tool is to discover the best object on the screen. AI will match what we think is the right thing in the right place. If we click the cancel button, the users should be able to find the cancel button on the screen and then click it. Users should be able to find the object on the screen when they try to click it. Around twenty engineers maintain the tool. I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

OpenText Functional Testing mindshare

Product category:

As of July 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 9.4%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Functional Testing reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Functional Testing Tools	Jul 28, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jul 28, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca	Jul 28, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud	Jul 28, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Functional Testing vs BrowserStack	Jul 28, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Tricentis Tosca	4.1	19.2%	96%	111 interviews Add to research
Katalon Studio	3.9	N/A	89%	47 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

OpenText Functional Testing offers diverse automation frameworks like data-driven, keyword-driven, and BPT. Its versatility supports various technologies including SAP and Oracle. The tool excels in object identification, allowing easy testing across platforms with minimal coding. Integration with DevOps tools enhances functionality. API and UI testing are seamless with features like an object repository and descriptive programming. Built-in AI testing capabilities enable efficient test creation without coding expertise.

"OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier."
"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."
"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Functional Testing needs improvement in Chrome and Safari compatibility. Users desire a more intuitive IDE, enhanced object identification, and reduced memory usage. Functionality for multiple languages besides VBScript and lower costs are sought. They encounter stability issues and find test automation challenging to maintain. Integration with tools like Jenkins and better support for modern technologies would be beneficial. Many find UFT expensive and wish for simplified scripting with more support for non-technical users.

"Additionally, there are hanging issues where it becomes unresponsive, which can be improved."
"We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing."
"Customer service is a big drawback. From my personal experience, after creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody."

ROI

Users report ROI improvements with OpenText Functional Testing, citing automation efficiency, reduced testing time, and substantial cost savings. Some observe effort reductions by 20% and project shorter development times. A license offers 100% return as automation accelerates and enhances productivity. While some mention high costs and mixed benefits, others achieve ROI in a few years, stating navigation challenges with complex automation. Overall ROI remains dependent on implementation quality and specific organizational contexts.

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing presents a costly licensing structure with both seat and concurrent options, impacting initial and ongoing budgets. While concurrent licenses offer flexibility, seat licenses are more economical. High upfront costs can extend ROI realization to several years, but also reduce manual effort and improve test coverage. Despite the perceived expense, enterprise buyers often value its extensive capabilities and integration with tools like ALM/Quality Center. Pricing complexities, however, remain a common challenge.

"The tool's price is high."
"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."
"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

Popular Use Cases

OpenText Functional Testing is primarily utilized for functional and regression testing, automating wide-ranging business process scenarios. Companies harness its capabilities to streamline testing for web and desktop applications, API testing, and automate end-to-end processes. Its robust features aid in establishing automation frameworks, creating test scripts, and executing tests across diverse environments, enhancing testing efficiency and scalability. The tool facilitates data-driven approaches, allowing non-programmers to participate in test scripting.

Service and Support

Customer service for OpenText Functional Testing is generally rated positively, praised for their promptness and technical knowledge. Support is usually helpful, though some users note variability in response times, depending on the technician's expertise. Users highlight good experiences with third-party vendors, noting they often deliver faster solutions. Some express dissatisfaction with delayed ticket acknowledgments, suggesting improvements in efficiency. Support ratings vary, typically ranging from six to nine, depending on users' specific experiences and support levels.

Deployment

Most users found OpenText Functional Testing's initial setup straightforward with minimal complexity. Users appreciated the organized installation process and the helpful setup wizard. Some faced challenges due to technical requirements, custom libraries, and additional configuration for integration with other tools. While deployment was generally quick, the process could require repeated installations for add-ins or configuration updates. Many valued community support for troubleshooting and enhancements.

Scalability

OpenText Functional Testing demonstrates high scalability, with flexibility depending on license availability. It scales well across platforms, though browser support on Mac is limited. Users find it effective with proper framework design but note potential costs with multiple licenses. It integrates with tools like Jenkins for scalability management, allowing increased usage and concurrent testing capabilities. Effective for varying project sizes, it supports expansion despite occasional integration and execution speed challenges.

Stability

Users express mixed feelings about OpenText Functional Testing's stability. Many report it as stable and reliable, with some noting it's solid due to its long history. However, others experience crashes, memory issues, and freezing, especially with insufficient system resources or certain features. Some users emphasize stability depends on deployment setup. Stability has improved in recent versions, though new features may introduce instability. Browser compatibility and slow updates are other concerns affecting its performance.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our OpenText Functional Testing Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

Construction Company

Transportation Company

Non Profit

Consumer Goods Company

Performing Arts

Real Estate/Law Firm

University

Comms Service Provider

Legal Firm

Wholesaler/Distributor

Media Company

Outsourcing Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Engineering Company

Hospitality Company

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Logistics Company

Renewables & Environment Company

Compare OpenText Functional Testing with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Functional Testing

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText Functional Testing was previously known as Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro.