Oracle Database Appliance Reviews

Users report a positive ROI from Oracle Database Appliance, attributing this to reduced issue resolution time and superior support compared to other hardware. Though initial setup can be straightforward with scripts, complexity varies based on user experience and deployment type. The ROI benefits are linked to the appliance's higher upfront cost yet justified quality and support over competitors like Nutanix. The implementation time has significantly decreased from days to hours over the years.

Oracle Database Appliance offers a pricing model that is perceived as high, but justified by its high-quality hardware and robust features. Users appreciate the Pay-As-You-Grow licensing and capacity-on-demand benefits. While some find the setup and licensing costs reasonable compared to traditional architectures, others suggest exploring discounts or choosing the ODA models aligned with their needs. Subscription options for cloud and on-premises licenses provide flexibility. Affordability compared to Oracle Exadata enhances its appeal for enterprise buyers.

• "The solution's pricing is very high."
• "I would rate the pricing a four on a scale of one (high price) to ten (low cost)."
• "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing seven and a half or eight out of ten."

Oracle Database Appliance is primarily used for database consolidation, boosting performance with NVMe storage, OLTP systems, operational systems, enterprise applications, and data warehousing. It supports diverse applications like core banking and insurance operations. It integrates tightly with network data warehouses and supports ERP solutions, enabling microservices on Kubernetes clusters. Organizations use it to implement cloud infrastructures, enhance database security and performance, and facilitate enterprise-grade analytics across various industries. Oracle Database Appliance is favored for its efficiency.

Oracle Database Appliance customers report varied experiences. Support is often described as knowledgeable and responsive, though some find the first-level quality has decreased. Response times are mostly fast, but some experience delays or too much reliance on documentation. Cost concerns and limited Standard Edition support also arise. Many find local support effective, yet not all issues are resolved quickly. Some customers choose third-party assistance, while others note improvement in recent hardware support.

Many users find Oracle Database Appliance's initial setup to be straightforward and quick, often taking a few hours to a day. While automation and documentation facilitate the process, a basic understanding of infrastructure is beneficial. Some encounter difficulties due to complexity or network dependencies, and a minority require support. Teams may vary in setup experience but typically manage efficiently, especially when prepared with necessary information and familiar with similar deployments.

Oracle Database Appliance is generally scalable, suitable for enterprise businesses, with users noting its capability to add storage as needed. While some experience issues with storage and scalability limits in on-premises deployments, other users find it satisfactory and easy to scale, especially with cloud options. Challenges include limited expandability and higher costs for extensive scalability. Many appreciate its consolidation abilities, rating scalability highly despite some constraints compared to other options like Exadata.

Oracle Database Appliance is recognized for its robust stability, with users highlighting its reliable performance. While initial setups experienced minor issues, the appliance has consistently proven stable over time. Some rare instances of instability have been reported, particularly with older versions, but these were generally resolved with assistance. Ratings frequently range between eight to ten out of ten, reflecting satisfaction with its stability and operational reliability.