Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Spring MVC Logo

Spring MVC Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.2 out of 5

What is Spring MVC?

Featured Spring MVC reviews

Spring MVC mindshare

As of February 2026, the mindshare of Spring MVC in the Java Frameworks category stands at 5.1%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Java Frameworks Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Spring MVC5.1%
Spring Boot34.4%
Jakarta EE17.6%
Other42.9%
Java Frameworks

PeerResearch reports based on Spring MVC reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryJava FrameworksFeb 5, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersFeb 5, 2026Download
ComparisonSpring MVC vs Spring BootFeb 5, 2026Download
ComparisonSpring MVC vs Apache SparkFeb 5, 2026Download
ComparisonSpring MVC vs Jakarta EEFeb 5, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Spring Boot4.234.4%95%43 interviewsAdd to research
Apache Spark4.29.3%90%68 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise50
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Performing Arts
7%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Educational Organization
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Government
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Retailer
2%
University
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%

Compare Spring MVC with alternative products

Learn more about Spring MVC

Spring MVC customers

Related questions

 
Spring MVC Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5I use Spring MVC to address our business problems, valuing its modules like Spring Admin for ease of maintenance and integration. However, I find the documentation lacking and would appreciate more built-in functionalities to minimize reliance on third-party solutions.
Java developer at Marlabs Inc.4.5I find Spring MVC efficient due to its monolithic architecture and auto-configuration features, which streamline REST API development by minimizing code and fetching required packages through annotations. Previously, I used CodeJava.net before transitioning to Spring MVC after learning STS installation.
Java Software Engineer (Future Innovator) at Telenor Microfinance Bank (TMB)4.5I work for a financial institution in Pakistan, and we use Spring MVC mainly for microservices in our payment app. I find Spring MVC to be fast and reliable. There are no listed improvements or alternative solutions we considered.
Chief Technology Officer at Digital Solutions Expert5.0I use Spring MVC to create microservices and rest services, making it ideal for backend integration with front-end layers. It's highly valued for its strong community support and robust security features due to frequent updates.
Jaspersoft SME at NA4.0We used Spring MVC to create APIs connected to JasperReports via an adapter, though I preferred direct database connections for better performance. Despite some error messages related to AWS S3 bucket storage, the solution is stable and scalable.
Technical Development Lead at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5No summary available
Professor at UFERSA4.5I use Spring MVC to write APIs due to its simplicity and easy configuration with Java notations. However, recent changes in Spring Security have complicated using JW Token for frontend communication. I switched from JavaServer Faces for its simplicity.
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5No summary available