Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer2004534 - PeerSpot reviewer
Regional account manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Useful for web content delivery in business because it helps improve speed, reliability, and security
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature in managing web traffic has been the ability to handle vertical scaling effectively."
  • "One area for improvement with Akamai could be pricing."

What is our primary use case?

Akamai is useful for web content delivery in business because it helps improve speed, reliability, and security. Caching content closer to users reduces latency and improves load times. This is especially important for businesses like Azure, as it enhances the user experience and ensures content is delivered efficiently. Additionally, Akamai's security solutions help protect against cyber threats like DDoS attacks.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature in managing web traffic has been the ability to handle vertical scaling effectively. I appreciate the integration with Oracle business, but what stands out are the new capabilities and possibilities within Akamai's products. These enhancements are what I like the most.

What needs improvement?

One area for improvement with Akamai could be pricing.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Smaller companies may find Akamai less sustainable and scalable compared to larger enterprises.

Buyer's Guide
Akamai
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about Akamai. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

How was the initial setup?

Deploying Akamai can vary in ease depending on the technical requirements. While it is generally straightforward, some cases may encounter technical difficulties, particularly in complex security setups. The difficulty lies in integrating Akamai's solutions with the specific security needs of the organization.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Companies need to pay for an Akamai license, which can be yearly or monthly. It is not overly expensive but not the cheapest option available.

What other advice do I have?

My experience with Akamai in improving website security has been good. They are well-regarded for their technology, especially in their main area of expertise. However, expanding into other areas is a bit tough because people mainly know them for what they are already famous for. We're working on showing that they are effective in other technologies too.

Akamai's cloud security solutions have positively impacted our organization. While the market perception might not fully reflect their effectiveness, their products are highly regarded. This perception challenge may stem from Akamai's historical approach and the market's existing knowledge about the company. 

Akamai is stable, reliable, and user-friendly, typically delivering optimal performance. However, smaller companies might struggle to grasp the full value, particularly in complex security aspects like micro-segmentation.

For those considering using Akamai, my advice is to engage with others who have experience with the platform. While Akamai is a well-known brand, it is important to recognize that its expertise lies in complex security areas more suited for enterprise-level companies. For smaller businesses entering this market, it is essential to establish Akamai as a trusted name through effective communication and understanding of their specific needs.

The value and benefits of working with Akamai lie in their ability to provide real solutions to the problems they address. They are a strong company with robust products, capable of resolving the specific needs their customers face.

Overall, I would rate Akamai as an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
PeerSpot user
Network engineer at Ufinet
Real User
A great solution for data transfer, supports TV connections and has a valuable traffic monitoring feature
Pros and Cons
  • "We can see how much traffic can be downloaded on the portal."
  • "When we open tickets, we have a delay in response times."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for this solution is data transfer, and we deploy the solution on private cloud. Additionally, it allows content on the TV and supports TV connections.

What is most valuable?

We find the traffic monitoring feature valuable. For example, we can see how much traffic can be downloaded on the portal by pressing it.

What needs improvement?

The solution can be improved by creating a communication pathway with technical engineers because when we open tickets, we have a delay in response times.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the solution for approximately two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. We have approximately 100 people using this solution in our organization.

How are customer service and support?

We have had a good experience with customer service and support. I rate technical support a seven out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not previously use any other solutions.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward, and we have detailed information for deployment. Deployment took one week.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the solution a ten out of ten. The solution is good, but the communication pathways to senior-level support can be improved.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Akamai
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about Akamai. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Partner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Akamai vs. CloudFlare – Simple Stats

In the world of CDNs Akamai is the incumbent 500 pound gorilla, no question. They have a HUGE global presence, super solid technology and networks, and have the most experience with large enterprise clients.

However, now there other strong players in the CDN market. One of the most interesting is CloudFlare. They are a young company and have strong security and front end optimization (FEO) focuses, beyond just the normal CDN edge caching functionality. They started as a security company, and in fact recently absorbed the largest DDOS attack in history without a disruption in service. In order for their security service to not have a performance degradation associated with the overhead of proxying and filtering all traffic, they had to develop advanced performance improving functionality as part of their service. CDN-style asset caching is part of it, but their FEO services make a big difference.

CloudFlare is also VERY affordable! They manage this by the fact that when they built their business, global data centers, cloud computing providers, massive network infrastructure and bandwidth, were all ubiquitous and cheap, so they had relatively small capital outlay to build their service. Compare this to Akamai who had to invest massive amounts of capital into building data centers, servers, laying fiber, etc… The end result is that CloudFlare’s services are one to three orders of magnitude more affordable than Akamai. CloudFlare also includes their security and FEO services as part of their standard service, whereas Akamai’s security and FEO offerings are a substantial additional cost.

I recently used a moderate to heavy complexity Oracle Commerce eCommerce site to do some quick and dirty comparison testing. The results are interesting, but perhaps not unexpected. First off, this is not a comprehensive comparison, and doesn’t factor in Akamai’s FEO service, or their network locations vs CloudFlares, etc.. So don’t read into this more than you should, and don’t remind me that it’s not 100% apples to apples:)

First I tested the home page, which was image heavy and had large navigation, etc..

Site YSlow Score Pagespeed Score Download Size Load Time Time to OnLoad Number of Requests
Origin 69 (D) 74 1.1 MB 3.99 seconds 3.75 seconds 51
Akamai 73 (D) 79 1.2 MB 3.19 seconds 2.61 seconds 47
CloudFlare 94 (A) 85 0.7 MB 2.39 seconds 1.91 seconds 34

Then for a category page I got these results:

Site YSlow Score Pagespeed Score Download Size Load Time Time to OnLoad Number of Requests
Origin 68 (D) 71 1.2 MB 4.00 seconds 2.87 seconds 75
Akamai 73 (C) 76 1.1 MB 3.61 seconds 2.73 seconds 71
CloudFlare 93 (A) 82 0.4 MB 2.85 seconds 1.92 seconds 45

As you can see the difference is very impressive! Dramatically improved YSlow and Pagespeed scores (which you would expect since CloudFlare provides the FEO features as part of the main service). But overall page load time was also much better, even with Akamai’s larger network footprint. This is due to the significantly lower number of requests and overall smaller size of assets. These two factors have huge impact on the end user’s site performance. So even if you don’t look at CloudFlare (and you should), you shouldn’t be using any CDN without FEO features!

Disclaimer: My company is partners with CloudFlare and other vendors

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user71853 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user71853IT Manager at a retailer
Vendor

Even we as a team in Yepme.com have been using Akamai and still find that we get low scoring in YSlow even after using their DSA, DSR etc. Also there image rendering services from edge servers is quite costly and leaves no scope for negotiation. The same applies to FEO in akamai.

reviewer1760322 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Stable and scalable solution which offers good functionality once properly setup
Pros and Cons
  • "This solution can be used for web , video and media caching and streaming."
  • "Their support is very slow. If you file a support ticket, it takes a long time before it gets resolved."

What is our primary use case?

As a CDN we use this solution for web, video and media caching as well as for streaming.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have worked with this solution for 20 years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution is scalable. 

How are customer service and support?

Their support is very slow. If you file a support ticket, it takes a long time before it gets resolved.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was complex. This solution's features have expanded over time and require that settings are fine tuned for them to work properly. Although the setup is complex, the solution is good once set up is complete. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This is a very expensive solution but it works well. 

What other advice do I have?

It takes time to set up this solution to work. I would not recommend it for an on premises environment or if a client has a network of their own. In this instance I would recommend they build their own CDN instead of using a cloud CDN. This solution's suitability depends on a clients requirements. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Akamai Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: February 2025
Product Categories
CDN
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Akamai Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.