Amazon Route 53 Reviews

I use the solution in my company for internet monitoring.

In my company, we are running some trials to see if Amazon Route 53 works well and to compare other internet monitoring solutions. So far, Amazon Route 53 looks fine.

The limitations of the tool revolve around the area of monitoring location, especially since the performance and selection options offered by the product are limited.

I have been using Amazon Route 53 for a year. I am just a customer of the solution.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. The scalability should be good.

I use a basic plan for technical support for the solution. My company really does not get hands-on support from Amazon. There is not sufficient information in the area of support unless you go for a higher pay plan to get more support. I rate the technical support a six out of ten.

Neutral

I am actively working on Docker, Kubernetes, and VMware, but not really in-depth. I am on the information security team, supporting different kinds of software and solutions. On the other hand, I use some tools for personal interest. I always browse through different product solutions and look for updates, etc.

I use quite a little bit of everything, but not in-depth. I didn't really come up with any particular solutions. I just tried out some AWS tools, like Route 53 and CloudWatch.

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward, especially since it is a web service, so we don't need to do any installations. There are more than a few clicks required to install the tool, but still, it is okay to follow the instructions and run the product.

The solution can be deployed in just a few minutes.

I don't handle the billing part of the tool.

The tool's health check functionality improved our company's service reliability since it is a good feature. Its use still depends on a case-by-case configuration. The tool has certainly fulfilled the basic purpose of monitoring.

There is no need to somehow maintain or support the solution.

I am not sure how Amazon Route 53 can handle traffic spikes and what difference it has made to our company's service availability.

The tool is not difficult to use, and it does what it is meant to do.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

I use the solution in my company to create or set up DNS for some projects.

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from its ability to help our company in the area of top-level domains, specifically generic top-level domains, and geographic top-level domains, which helps resolve DNS queries and use the hosted zone, which allows us to adjust the DNS part.

It is difficult to manage the product if the person involved in the setup process doesn't know much about the solution. From an improvement perspective, the product should be easy for everyone to understand.

I have experience with Amazon Route 53. I am a customer of the tool.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

For the web applications, the employees in our company need Amazon Route 53 to deal with the area of DNS. The product helps users assign the DNS to a particular IP address.

The product's initial setup phase was easy. The product is easy to manage for those who know about the product.

The price of the product is perfectly fine in my opinion.

The product can be used for DNS management if a user connects the DNS name with Amazon Route 53. The tool can be used for DNS-related purposes.

The product helps our company set up and register domain names. The tool also helps our company to add a domain name address to a website on the browser.

The product helps with the traffic flow feature as it allows you to assign CIDR blocks and IP addresses. The tool also helps in the area of DNS queries.

The product integrates with other services from AWS, like Amazon S3 bucket and load balancers. The product can also be used with AWS EC2 Instances, AWS Global Accelerator, Amazon SNS, and AWS Lambda.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. In our company, we use the services of the product without any cloud products.

I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

Our primary focus is on migrating from an on-premises infrastructure to a cloud-based solution. This entails handling multiple versions of modern applications, with a specific emphasis on cloud support, especially for API functionalities.

The ability to customize parameters for health checks within Amazon Route 53 enhances control and precision in system configurations, contributing to a more reliable and tailored deployment experience.

It stands out for its user-friendly interface, seamless integration with other AWS services, and ability to efficiently manage DNS, making it a valuable tool for various deployment scenarios, including those involving Kubernetes on AWS.

Streamlining and optimizing processes related to Procter, VPN workflows, and other subjects based on specific needs would allow for continual improvement and adaptation to the evolving requirements of the system.

I have been using it for three years.

I find it to be highly stable and reliable.

It offers good scalability abilities.

Technical support is highly dependent on the service. Each user equipment, excluding those under protection, falls within this range.

Most of our operations are centralized through a Microsoft domain controller. We've established connections among Microsoft servers and implemented rules governing communication. This setup is particularly crucial when there's a need to communicate with servers across various sites or establish connections between smaller data sites within the company.

Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

Amazon Route 53 provided the solution we needed to manage servers.

The solution is used to manage servers, and its interface is easy to use.

Since DNS is based on internet access, improving some security features would improve internet quality worldwide.

I have been using Amazon Route 53 for ten years.

I rate the solution’s stability ten out of ten.

Amazon Route 53 is a very scalable solution.

I rate the solution’s scalability ten out of ten.

The solution's technical support team is knowledgeable and respects SLAs.

Positive

I have previously used Cloudflare. I prefer Cloudflare over Amazon Route 53 because of my familiarity with it, as I have used it for a long time.

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the solution’s initial setup a nine or ten out of ten.

The solution’s deployment was very quick.

I would recommend Amazon Route 53 to other users because it can concentrate every configuration on the same platform.

Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.

We are using Amazon Route 53 for DNS management.

Using Amazon Route 53 is located in a central place in Amazon AWS which makes it easier to manage every DNS entry in one place. You are able to manage your public and private DNS from there. We can create rules based on weight and globalization is impressive.

It may not always be easy to integrate with on-premise infrastructure, especially with the complexity of the resolver and other factors involved. Improvements could be made to enhance the ability to integrate seamlessly.

I have been using Amazon Route 53 for approximately three years.

The support of the solution is good.

I rate the stability of Amazon Route 53 a ten out of ten.

The scalability of Amazon Route 53 is wonderful.

We plan to increase our usage of the solution.

I rate the scalability of Amazon Route 53 a ten out of ten.

The support is great.

I rate the support of Amazon Route 53 a nine out of ten.

Positive

We were using a server with DNS and Active Directory.

The initial setup of Amazon Route 53 is easy.

We used one person for the deployment of the solution.

I have received an ROI of the solution.

The price of Amazon Route 53 is reasonable.

I rate the price of Amazon Route 53 an eight out of ten.

My advice to others is for them to pay attention to the on-premise integration which can be difficult.

I rate Amazon Route 53 a nine out of ten.

I use AWS services such as EC2, Route 53, Elastic Beanstalk, VPC, and IAM. I use Route 53 specifically for DNS and managing domains and URLs.

I have used Route 53 to integrate applications and systems across different geographic locations.

Host zones and integrated features such as Health Checks and DNS routing are valuable features of Route 53.

The number of domain types available on AWS, such as the .br domain for Brazil, should be expanded.

I have used Route 53 for a few years.

The stability of the service with Route 53 is okay, and I have not experienced any problems with stability.

Scalability is okay. Route 53 is working very well, and I have never had any problems with it.

Amazon services are very stable, and there are few problems. The professional services on AWS are very specialized, and I rarely need support.

Positive

The initial setup and deployment are more difficult.

Route 53 is more expensive. It depends on the type of feature you use, as each feature has its own distinct pricing.

I recommend the service to other people, but Brazilian users may have difficulty because the .br domain is not supported.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use Amazon Route 53 primarily for routing purposes when trying to route to different environments.

During migration, if you want requests to move towards on-premises versus when you're trying to have DNS resolution done on cloud, the features in Route 53 are really good. We also love the health check features.

There are no detailed logs, and they should implement that in the solution.

We have been using this solution for quite some time.

It is a stable solution. However, I haven't used the solution extensively in the production environment, and we have not bombarded it with the load to see the results.

It is scalable. 

The initial setup is good and straightforward.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. It is a pretty good solution. Genesys routing also plays a significant role, so I think this should be part of the solution.

The product is a DNS service for AWS. It manages my DNS resolutions on the internet.

I used to use a free DNS service. I stopped using that, and I bought Amazon Route 53. It has been six years. I have had no problem so far.

The main DNS resolution is really, really fast. I live in Brazil. Most of my infrastructure is in Brazil. If I want my content to be reachable only to Brazilian servers or people using a VPN in Brazil, I can do that using the solution. It’s a really powerful tool.

The product could improve its price.

I have been using the solution for six years. I am using the latest version of the solution.

I never had a downtime.

The product’s scalability is perfect.

The support depends on the tier that we have.

Positive

The initial setup was pretty straightforward.

We see a 100% return on investment in the product.

The product is really cheap. It cost me $1.

People using the solution can just enjoy it. It is really fast. Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.