Azure DNS and Amazon Route 53 compete as authoritative DNS providers, each offering unique benefits. Amazon Route 53 seems to hold the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and advanced traffic management capabilities.
Features: Azure DNS integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, offers ease of use, and has robust security features. Amazon Route 53 provides advanced traffic management, high scalability, and geographic routing options.
Room for Improvement: Azure DNS could enhance its traffic management capabilities, expand feature offerings, and improve user interface options. Amazon Route 53 can improve its interface, offer better reporting features, and enhance user experience simplicity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure DNS deployment is simple with seamless Azure services integration, though its customer support is considered reactive. Amazon Route 53 has a complex setup process but is supported by responsive and helpful customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Azure DNS is cost-effective with clear setup costs, providing good ROI with Azure tools. Amazon Route 53's pricing is higher but reflects its comprehensive feature set, offering value for users needing advanced functionalities.
The main factors are time-saving and security, even if the cost is slightly higher.
The ROI is always high because Azure DNS setup is essential and does not incur high charges.
Amazon's customer support is very good with a quick response time.
Amazon services are very stable, and there are few problems.
They provide a normal developer level of support, and within twenty-four hours for non-critical issues, which is acceptable for us.
Technical support is minimally required for DNS-related tasks if you have previous experience.
We haven't faced any scalability issues, thanks to its integration with AWS services.
The scalability is maintained by AKS, and Route 53's scalability part is primarily involved with load balancing.
Amazon Route 53 is scalable as I use automation with YML files to handle scalability needs, and it works well.
The solution is stable.
Have not faced significant downtime due to its reliability.
I have not encountered any stability issues.
There could be improvements in the configuration process, particularly in the options provided during setup, such as subdomain configurations and certificate management.
There is a need for technical knowledge to use Amazon Route 53 effectively.
In my project, everything is already configured, and we focus on monitoring and health checks.
The pricing of Route 53 is slightly higher compared to other services, however, it is justified by its high availability and reliability.
Route 53 is more expensive.
Azure DNS charges based on the number of zones enabled, offering some free queries monthly, which keeps costs low.
I find Amazon Route 53 valuable for its ability to manage DNS records and efficiently route traffic with features like failover routing and geolocation routing.
Amazon Route 53 is beneficial for managing traffic and domain names, offering features like latency-based routing and multi-deployment options.
Route 53 is valued for its health check feature and reliability.
Azure DNS provides end-to-end P2P connectivity and enhances security, making it more secure and reliable.
Amazon Route 53 is a highly available and scalable cloud Domain Name System (DNS) web service. It is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Amazon Route 53 is fully compliant with IPv6 as well.
Azure DNS is a hosting service for DNS domains, providing name resolution using Microsoft Azure infrastructure. By hosting your domains in Azure, you can manage your DNS records using the same credentials, APIs, tools, and billing as your other Azure services.
We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.