Azure Key Vault Reviews

We use the solution to secure and store managed sensitive information and cryptographic keys in an application secret.

The solution uses the encryption technique to store the secret information data that uses EPCE. There is also one feature that monitors Azure Key Vault.

They should improve its policies, which sometimes reapplied but don't sync properly between the Key vault and the role-based access. When I put some roles on the user side, it sometimes misses the end data to secure.

One feature that could be added is the transparency of Key stored. There could be a feature to monitor the Key Vault because we can't monitor the Key Vault with a third party. We can't configure the automation or sync the key vault. We store passwords and all those things.

The user intervention also needs to be implemented there. This allows the user to automatically change the password, ensuring that it synchronizes and updates across all stored keys.

I have been using Azure Key Vault for two years.

The product is stable.

The solution is scalable. If they improve certain things with the update, that will be a more scalable product. There are a lot of users that use the Key Vault because it is the organization’s choice.

The initial setup is super easy.

There is a key that says, 'MS bug is there.' Azure has keyword secret information and connectivity issues. Azure File Share has Key connectivity issues. If we share some files and link through the Key, it loses connection.

The product is expensive compared to other products. It is costly to install as data records are charged based on the data. The Key type and plans are the factors that affect the pricing.

We are implementing Azure Key for certain projects. It completely depends on the project. Suppose your company gives us a project and asks us to implement Azure Key for other users.

I don't recommend it to everyone. It completely depends on the scenario base if you use a VM application or shared data. You can use Key Vault to secure information when transferring over the network. Sometimes, you are trying to assess your web information, and it is not working because of the connectivity issue due to some access control policies.

If you are the user and can work on the Azure portal or have access, you may be the support or IT person. You have the right to choose the architecture we must implement in our organization. They want to implement that on their user, but that's not a suitable option for everyone. We have 2,000 employees using this solution. We should have a strong plan to implement the Key Vault.

Anyone can learn Azure Key Vault within a day or two days.

There's a lot of work to do on the standalone side. If we are required to create a different workflow or automate it, then it's not possible or difficult to do that. If I want to keep the alerts on my email or team channel, that isn't easy to automate with the help of the Sentinel.

I need to use Azure Key Vault to ensure my application sends me refined data weekly. This data includes high and low alerts, which are sent to my email address or possibly generate an incident using a third-party API such as ServiceNow or Jira.

We can automate several things. We can fetch the log, but we can't automate that defender workflow itself in Container.

The solution is best because it completely secures passwords, which we can use to access.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We are working with a lot of our clients who use the solution to protect sensitive information and to store it in the key vault within their infrastructure.

The sensitivity of the data needed to be kept in a secure environment so that only people who had proper access would be authorized to access it.

We are using infrastructure as code. So any of the services which require sensitive data can directly use service principles, manage identities, and access key items and then retrieve information from the Key Vault.

Since we are partners of Microsoft, we don't implement it for ourselves. We implement it for our clients. For our clients, many were using on-premises solutions and had connectivity from on-premises to the cloud. With this solution, they get the same level of data protection (or more) on the cloud.

The features on offer are very good.

We are using Key Vault as an optical store for the sensitive data and then retrieve the data and use access policies. So access to policies is quite valuable for us based on the regulations and compliance requirements that we are working with.

There is advanced data protection available. We're working in a highly regulated environment, and this is essential to us.

Perforamnce-wise, it's very good. We haven't had any issues in the past three years. There are no errors or downtime. It's always been available to us.

Microsoft's Key Vault availability is around 99%.

A lot of new features have been added, and it has nice regional availability as well. 

It is stable and scales well.

Technical support has been fine overall. 

It's currently very self-sufficient and doesn't need improvements. It's already a good service. 

We haven't faced any problems with the solution as such. The only issue we are facing is around the comparability with TerraForm, which we use to code the infrastructure. Sometimes there are issues there, even though it's not directly related to Microsoft. 

So far, it's served all of the client's purposes. We haven't come across a use case the solution could not handle. 

There are additional charges for data transfers. However, the pricing is mostly reasonable for the licensing overall. 

I've used the solution for three or four years at this point. I've used it for a while. 

The solution is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash.

We have 60 different teams that deploy their own Key Vault. They are purely developers that make applications for users. Those users may be from anywhere and may use the application portals.

I'm not sure, behind the scenes, what Microsoft does. However, I've found it to be scalable across regions. If we wanted to use 100 Key Vaults, we could do so.

We do not have plans to increase usage at this time.

Technical support is pretty good. I haven't had any issues with them over the past three years. 

Neutral

The client has used other on-premises versions in the past. Many needed a cloud option, and we helped them move to Key Vault. 

The initial setup was straightforward. We do not deploy it as it is a SaaS. We simply configure it for clients. There are APIs available, and we use them within Key Vault to implement.

We require the business use case and strategy in order to implement the product. For example, if we are in energy or health care, we need to know what is the area that is sensitive and where they are being used. Then, once we have that, we can protect those items.

The only maintenance that is required is service access. For example, if we need to add authorized personnel, we would do that. 

We can handle the implementation for clients. 

The cost is quite cheap. There are no extra costs beyond the standard fees, beyond maybe data transfer charges. It's $0.025 per 10,000 data transactions, so it is quite cheap.

We are a partner of Microsoft.

We haven't exported or imported information in Key Vault.

This solution is worth the cost and is useful to use. 

It's a service that can be used in multiple regions in Azure. They are mostly deployed in UK South and UK West. It can be deployed and used in other regions as well; however, we have data constraints. 

I'd rate her solution eight out of ten overall. 

Potential new users should consider the types of sensitive information they want to store and how they want to retrieve the information, and from where. These are critical to understanding as they will govern the configuration of Key Vault.

You can deploy Key Vault both publicly and privately. For example, if you do it privately, you can ensure you will ensure it can only be accessed from within your environment, and that ensures a very high level of security.

We were using the solution to store our keys that includes secrets, passwords, and also application properties.

The application properties and the ability to store our certificates too have been great aspects of the solution. 

Mainly, having the application properties where all our applications' configurations were stored in the key vault was very useful.

The initial setup is pretty simple. 

The stability is very good.

The solution can scale up as needed. 

The solution offers very reasonable pricing. 

I can't recall coming across any missing features or elements. 

The solution does not allow you to integrate with XML parties if it is not inside Azure itself.

I used the solution during my previous project that I handled last year. I used it for a full year, from January to December.

The solution is stable. I never had issues, for example, with stability, bugs or glitches, or crashing. It's reliable.

The solution can scale. It is already a platform as a service, and therefore, it's already scaled up.

Our entire company is currently using the product.

I did not use technical support when I worked with the product. Therefore, I cannot speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

We did use HashiCorp Vault. We used to use it, and then we moved to Azure Key Vault due to the fact that it's a cloud platform as a solution and it is easy to implement.

The initial setup was straightforward, however, we never used the console. We always used to use the Azure CLIs to set everything up.

The pricing is very reasonable. It's not overly expensive.

We're a Microsoft partner.

I cannot recall which version of the solution I used for the project I worked on.

Overall, it's a great product.

There's nothing I dislike about the solution. I would rate the solution at a ten out of ten.

We use the solution for a lending platform in the BFSI domain. It helps to store secrets. 

Azure Key Vault's performance is excellent. It makes infrastructure management easier. 

The solution needs to improve reliability and protection. 

I have been working with the product for three years. 

Azure Key Vault is stable.

The product is scalable. 

Microsoft's support is good. 

The tool's deployment is straightforward. 

Azure Key Vault is expensive. 

I rate Azure Key Vault an eight out of ten. 

I primarily use the solution to secure our DevOps processes and store all the essential secrets for our project's services.

The integration with other Azure services is one of the standout features for me. It allows us to use secrets from the Azure Key Vault seamlessly without direct interaction.Additionally, the ability to easily mark secrets for expiration and receive notifications is invaluable.

One area for improvement is the notification system for secret expiration. It would be beneficial if the service could handle this more autonomously, eliminating the need for additional integrations.

I have been using Azure Key Vault for about three years. 

I rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten. 

I rate Azure Key Vault's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has more than 50 users. We use it daily. 

I rate the tool's deployment an eight out of ten. It takes less than a minute to complete. You need two resources to handle it; no maintenance is involved since it is a managed service. 

I rate the solution's pricing a four out of ten. 

I rate the tool an eight out of ten. 

The product’s advantageous feature is integration.

It is complicated to use different services and products along with Azure Key Vault. There should be a single vault for virtual servers, containers, and other services. It could be universal with the possibility to use all types of technologies. 

We have been using Azure Key Vault for two years.

The product is stable as it is cloud-based.

We have an enterprise agreement for support services. We encountered difficulties in communicating with the first-line support team.

Neutral

We use other products in parallel, including ARIS, AWS, HashiCorp, etc.

I rate Azure Key Vault an eight out of ten.

We use the solution to authenticate security features for environments. Using it, we can encrypt keys and protect the databases from getting hacked.

The solution works as an effective tool for securing our organization's databases.

They should add a key vault feature for the databases temporarily integrated into hybrid clouds. Also, they should make the key accessible once the databases migrate to another environment.

We have been using the solution for seven years.

The solution's customer service is excellent.

Positive

The solution's initial setup process is moderately complex. It is a time-consuming process if you are new to the product. But, if you know source applications and target databases, it just takes a few hours. Whereas in the case of larger environments, it might take days to complete.

Our in-house team deploys the solution. It requires three executives to work on larger deployments. Also, it requires a huge team when there are multiple databases to work with. 

The solution is affordable compared to other competitors.

I advise others to use the solution if they already work with Microsoft Azure environment. In such cases, they should not prefer integration with a third-party tool. They should consider other products if the databases are distributed to on-cloud and on-premises infrastructures.

I rate the solution as an eight.

We use the solution for API keys. We are migrating most of the data, including the application built in react native from the IBM server to Azure. AWS Key Vault stores secret keys and API keys.

Azure has its SLAs and Vault. We were never worried about the impact on security or any compliance with GDPR or others.

The product is very helpful. AI has been introduced to Azure. The services are being introduced thoroughly in Azure, especially in AI and IoT.

The solution could be cheaper.

I have been using Azure Key Vault for a year. We started migrating 20-22 applications from IBM server to Azure.

The product is stable. A few others are dynamic in Azure. We might need an extension for those. So, we moved to the cloud.

We've around three to four million users in one application.

During the migration process, we utilized Microsoft support for Azure Key Vault. We encountered a couple of issues that the vendor couldn't resolve, so we had to turn to Microsoft support for assistance.

The initial setup is easy. We have migrated around 20 applications in six months with the help of a vendor. There were a few architecture glitches otherwise it had a good impact on the deployment.

We have conducted this code assessment using the tool. Initially, we had two environments; development and production. We have set up multiple environments including development, and production. Additionally, we have initiated a force support assessment. We have commenced licensing for a few applications, utilizing both the relationship method and the refactor method. We have undertaken additional work on the porting part for a couple of applications. We are also focusing on automating this process as DevOps has been introduced.

Azure Key Vault is more expensive than Amazon.

I recommend the solution.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.