We use Microsoft 365 for email, PowerPoint, Word, and Dynamics 365 for financial needs.
Head of Information Security at Pallion
Availability of native tools within Azure, easy to install but room for improvement in security
Pros and Cons
- "I appreciate that all the tools are available natively within Azure. It's all set up nicely. It's all minor."
- "If you look at the documentation set, there are rims and rims of it. You try to drive something from the console, and it's quite complex. It's not it's not easy and straightforward. You've gotta sit down and review it, look at the documentation, and work your way through it. It's not intuitive."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I appreciate that all the tools are available natively within Azure. It's all set up nicely. It's all minor.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in terms of security. The security tooling could be better. It could be easy to drive. The alerts could be a lot quicker in delivery because it's coming out of Azure Stack, it's coming out of their tools. It it could could be a lot better. It could could be a lot more straightforward. Okay.
Additionally, having clear pricing in the marketplace would be beneficial. In this marketplace, everything comes with a price tag. If something isn't initially priced, you can try it for free, but we'll let you know the cost after the trial period.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for a couple of years. I worked with it in my previous position and now in my current one.
So, it has been around five years.
Buyer's Guide
Azure Stack
April 2025

Learn what your peers think about Azure Stack. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
848,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
For our use cases, the solution is scalable. There are around 300 end users in our company. We mostly work with medium-sized businesses.
How are customer service and support?
We don't have direct technical support with them; we go through our partners.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy. It is in the clear. We have a multi-tenant environment.
I can set it up in a few hours, but configuring everything may take a few days.
What about the implementation team?
We have a service provider that handles the deployment and maintenance of the solution for us. Our experience with the provider was good.
Maintenance is easy and fairly straightforward, mainly point-and-click.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing costs are expensive. I pay on a monthly basis. We pay through our managed partner. So, it's bundled with other services provided by our partner.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
In the past, I used AWS. Personally, I prefer Azure Stack because it offers scalability across availability zones, elastic computing, and a robust marketplace with options for bringing your own license. It's user-friendly and has readily available scripts and patterns. Everything is there for me.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise you to clearly define your objectives and what you want to get out of it. It may not be the silver bullet that you might be looking for, as it requires shared responsibility.
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. If you look at the documentation set, there are rims and rims of it. You try to drive something from the console, and it's quite complex. It's not it's not easy and straightforward. You've gotta sit down and review it, look at the documentation, and work your way through it. It's not intuitive.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
User-friendly, easy accessibility of resources, and good support
Pros and Cons
- "The beauty of Azure is that most of the features are easily accessible. It is user-friendly. Almost all resources in Azure are very easily accessible. For example, you can access a virtual machine, and you can scale it up. You can go ahead with different infrastructure-as-a-service in Azure for the platform or for the cloud. Different levels of development could be done using it."
- "It should be improved in terms of integrations. It could be integrated more with external tools."
What is our primary use case?
We are using it in our company and the customer's company as well. So, it works on both sides. For certain development environments, we need to build our internal environment, and we need it for that. Similarly, we need to build the production environment for the customer, and we use it for that.
What is most valuable?
The beauty of Azure is that most of the features are easily accessible. It is user-friendly. Almost all resources in Azure are very easily accessible. For example, you can access a virtual machine, and you can scale it up. You can go ahead with different infrastructure-as-a-service in Azure for the platform or for the cloud. Different levels of development could be done using it.
What needs improvement?
It should be improved in terms of integrations. It could be integrated more with external tools.
We have Azure Purview for governance, but that is for data governance. For code governance, we have to use SonarQube or WhiteSource for vulnerabilities and license management. We would like to have a native code compliance tool.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with this solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is absolutely stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable. The resources in Azure are scalable for a smooth transaction.
How are customer service and support?
Their technical support is very good. They are always easily available when we need them.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have been working with different automation tools such as Jenkins. Jenkins is a good tool to start with. Being a DevOps person, I had to go with Azure ADO and Azure DevOps, which basically gives you the view of how DevOps actually works.
How was the initial setup?
It is easy to set up. It takes you minutes to set it up.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Azure has a subscription version. It has a pay-as-you-go subscription with a subscription ID. So, you have your particular subscription with an enterprise agreement. There is a dev-type subscription for development and testing.
The pricing seems pretty reasonable. The pricing could be per resource. For example, you have Databricks, Data Factory, Scaled DB, and Cosmos. You have everything in Azure. They have an Azure pricing calculator that you can use to check the price of every resource. It gives you a proper cost estimation. You can compare the cost and then go for the best resource for your project.
What other advice do I have?
I would definitely advise others to implement it as an infrastructure service only because you get to learn more. You get to explore the code more and know different steps. You can automate more and better. You can get automation done on top of what is already there, which could lead to another invention.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Buyer's Guide
Azure Stack
April 2025

Learn what your peers think about Azure Stack. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
848,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cyber Security Specialist at a consultancy with self employed
Provides end-to-end comprehensive protection, but vulnerability remediation could be improved
Pros and Cons
- "The solution's front door and web application firewalls have proven most beneficial for our edge computing needs."
- "The way this solution gives you steps to follow to remediate vulnerability is not very well done."
What is our primary use case?
We have used the solution for IPS, IDS, and security incident response. We have used Defender as an antivirus, anti-malware, and intrusion detection. We used Intune for endpoint management and endpoint detection response. We use Purview for insider threats, data leakage detection and response, and data classification.
You can use the Azure security policies to enforce your compliance objectives. We also used web firewalls and identity governance, which is a security feature or can be used as such.
What is most valuable?
The solution's front door and web application firewalls have proven most beneficial for our edge computing needs. The solution provides end-to-end comprehensive protection across the services.
What needs improvement?
You have vulnerability management tools as well. The way this solution gives you steps to follow to remediate vulnerability is not very well done. It can't be an idealized process. It needs to deal with what really exists and provide more support to people who are remediating.
The main challenge with the tool for a security person is protecting the data in transit between the on-premises or hybrid application and the public cloud. Knowing how to move the data securely at a reasonable cost was difficult.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Azure Stack for eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Sometimes, Microsoft services fail without warning. The solution sends you a warning, but it's not enough of a warning in advance, which they could improve. Sometimes, we would think our application failed, but it would actually be the underlying Microsoft services that failed.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Azure Stack is a highly scalable solution. Our organization had around 500 users using the solution. We had plans to increase its usage to minimize the use of third-party tools because of cost considerations.
How are customer service and support?
Sometimes, the technical support was excellent, and sometimes, they knew nothing. It's not that the people on the support team were not good, but they were not necessarily well-informed about new services.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
The solution's initial setup is usually straightforward. However, it's not simple unless you have experience in that field. The only complexity I encountered was integrating it with Business Intelligence (BI). However, that could have been my own ignorance about BI rather than Microsoft.
When I tried to scrape data out of the rest of the services and dump it into BI to analyze it, I didn't find it very helpful. I also didn't find the documentation helpful, but that's probably my ignorance. If I had known more about data analysis, I would probably have had an easier time.
What about the implementation team?
The solution's deployment time took about nine months, but there were many significant enterprise-level applications to migrate. The holdup was more about the application team ensuring they could meet the business's needs before migrating.
To deploy the solution, you follow a typical business analysis process, where you gather requirements from the business, the cybersecurity team, or stakeholders. Then, you work in the cloud to find out how to meet those requirements using that solution. Earlier, you had to have a third-party VPN, but now they have their own VPN. The cloud was not quite mature until the last few years.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I find Azure Stack to be very costly. The people who manage the budgets are satisfied with the solution’s medium pricing, which is neither very expensive nor very cheap. I think the solution has a reasonably good value for what it provides.
What other advice do I have?
The solution's integration with other Azure Services is extremely valuable. Since everything is designed to fit together, you don't have to do a lot of work to integrate the services with the security protections or vice versa.
The way the solution handles data sovereignty could use some work. You still need to do a lot of work to determine where the processing occurs. Suppose you have a Canadian residency requirement. Many services still have processing in the United States or Asia, where sensitive data can be an issue. It would be better if the tool were more forthright about where processing occurs or could actually move processing into the countries where sovereignty is required.
Some third-party tools were well-adapted for integration with the solution. However, this was the result of the third parties' work, not of Microsoft's. The third parties ensured that all the work was done to integrate them with Azure Stack.
The solution consistently provides support and integration. Azure Stack tries to consider and meet the needs of cybersecurity professionals as best it can. Also, I like how the tool adapted to shift left, where security became the responsibility of the whole IT team, and they met that need very well.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Independent consultant at a hospitality company with 1-10 employees
Easy to use, flexible, elastic, and makes AI projects easier
Pros and Cons
- "The product is easy to use."
- "We face some challenges with database rebuilding."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for data lake and storage. We also use Fabric. We have some applications running in Oracle. We take the data from there and bring it into Azure for storage. We use Synapse Analytics to build the tables. We do the data analysis and data cleansing and visualize it using Power BI.
What is most valuable?
The product is easy to use. It is fantastic. It's integrated directly with Azure DevOps and Visual Studio. It is easy to integrate the product with other solutions. It makes our AI projects easier. We can use SQL or machine learning.
What needs improvement?
We face some challenges with database rebuilding.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable. I rate the stability an eight or nine out of ten. In the software industry, nothing is ten out of ten. Everything has room for improvement.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is very flexible and elastic. Around 100 developers use the solution in our organization.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very easy. We can use the cloud infrastructure and the Azure template to deploy the solution. Or else, we can use the GUI and click till the installation is finished. The ease of setup depends on how skillful the person is in deploying the product.
What other advice do I have?
We also use tools like Power BI. The system should be dynamic after the process change. The data and table must be fully responsive dynamically. The rebuilt table command must be scheduled. After that, the statistics must be collected dynamically. Many people working with data management do not know this process and say that Azure Stack has delay issues.
The engineering team in our organization has ten people, including the manager. The machine learning and AI team has 15 people. The database, Oracle, and operating systems teams have 15 people each. I recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Chief Technology Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees
Provides good security and configurability, but its transparency over cost management could be improved
Pros and Cons
- "The solution's most valuable features are security, configurability, and recoverability."
- "The solution's transparency over cost management could be much easier because it's very difficult to manage costs."
What is our primary use case?
We use Azure Stack for everything, and it drives our entire business.
What is most valuable?
The solution's most valuable features are security, configurability, and recoverability.
What needs improvement?
The solution's transparency over cost management could be much easier because it's very difficult to manage costs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Azure Stack for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Microsoft has outages from time to time that affect everybody, and it takes the whole system down.
I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Around 200 users are using the solution in our organization.
I rate the solution’s scalability ten out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
It's very difficult to get our issues dealt with quickly because we're a small company.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
The solution's initial setup is not complex, but it requires a lot of training. The solution's deployment took a few weeks because we built the entire company on the cloud.
On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the solution's initial setup a six out of ten.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Azure Stack is a very expensive solution. The costs are very opaque and coming out of control quite quickly.
What other advice do I have?
Azure Stack is deployed on the cloud in our organization. Azure Stack is a very fast and flexible product. I would recommend the solution to other users because it is a safe and standard system.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Sep 2, 2024
Flag as inappropriateManaging Director at CompTech Network System Ltd
Simplifies application development and enables easy integration and management of on-premises resources
Pros and Cons
- "The tool has simplified our application development."
- "Some tools do not run without the internet."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution to run our ERP software and mail servers.
How has it helped my organization?
The product has impacted our edge computing needs in a good way.
What is most valuable?
The best thing about the product is that it is very complex. Microsoft has a solution for everything we need. We just need to use it. The tool has simplified our application development. Integrating and managing on-premises resources using Azure Stack is easier than other platforms like Canonical and OpenShift. The solution is more mature than its competitors.
What needs improvement?
Some tools do not run without the internet. If we have connectivity problems or need to install an application without the internet, we cannot do it.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for four to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The tool is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The tool is very scalable. We have around 50 users in our organization.
How was the initial setup?
The tool is very simple to deploy. The deployment takes two to three hours. It is easy to maintain the product. We need a team of two to three persons with expertise in networking, storage and server setup, virtualization, and Kubernetes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing model is consumption-based. We pay as we go. Our overall cost is lower. Some things in the pricing model are a bit confusing. The vendor has two pricing systems. One is for Azure Stack, which is on the cloud. We also install and use it on-premises. The difference in price for the two is not very clear most of the time in the documentation. The tool is affordable.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Overall, Azure is better than Canonical and OpenShift. The overall portfolio is better. Canonical and OpenShift have limited product lines. I also need to use third-party products along with them. With Azure, everything can be installed from the dashboard, and Microsoft has a very rich product portfolio.
What other advice do I have?
We are using Microsoft products. We also bundle it with some of the solutions we provide to our customers. We don't need compliance at this moment. Azure Stack is not very popular in the HCI industry. We have used VMware and Nutanix. Compared to them, Azure Stack is a better solution. When it comes to Kubernetes, Microsoft is a leader in Gartner. It is very mature. Overall, I rate the products a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
General Manager at Advance Record Management
Though the solution offers great features like scalability and ease of use, the setup phase needs to be made easier
Pros and Cons
- "The product has remained stable so far in our company."
- "I feel that Azure Stack has so many different variables which are not very clear...In general, the initial setup phase of Azure Stack is an area with concern that needs improvement."
What is our primary use case?
My company uses Azure Stack to host the records management software.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of the solution are scalability, ease of use, and its ongoing maintenance process that takes away a lot of trouble when one has to do an on-premises installation.
What needs improvement?
I feel that Azure Stack has so many different variables which are not very clear. Unless you have a great deal of knowledge or a really good integrator, you may encounter a few surprises when you begin with the implementation phase of Azure Stack. In general, the initial setup phase of Azure Stack is an area with concern that needs improvement. The initial setup affected me the most from the point of view of the cost structures related to Azure Stack.
I can't comment if I would like to see any additional functionalities added to the solution since I currently don't use even 10 percent of its capabilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Azure Stack for six months. My company just uses the product internally.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product has remained stable so far in our company.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution.
There are around 30 users of the product in our company, and I get it to the needs of approximately 250 clients of our company who use the solution.
My company does not necessarily plan to increase the use of the solution in the near future. The usage of the solution will organically grow if required.
How are customer service and support?
I have faced no issues with the technical support provided by Microsoft. I haven't had direct contact with Microsoft since it is the vendor from Microsoft that provides me with good technical support. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I currently use Fortinet FortiGate.
I haven't previously worked with products similar to Azure Stack since every product in our company was deployed on an on-premises model.
How was the initial setup?
The solution was initially deployed on an on-premises model, and currently, my company is shifting the product to the cloud.
The solution's implementation phase took place over a span of approximately two and a half months.
People from Azure managed the deployment of the solution in our company from their end, so I don't know the efforts people put in to deploy the solution.
What about the implementation team?
I have a consultant who takes care of the deployment, configuration, and migration part of the solution. I haven't faced any issues with the solution's deployment, configuration, and migration phases since I got help from a third-party integrator, who was very helpful.
What was our ROI?
I have not seen any return on investment from the use of the solution in my company.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Azure Stack's price falls on the higher side of the spectrum. The licensing costs for Azure Stack in our region range somewhere between 40,000 to 50,000 USD. Though my company makes monthly payments towards the licensing costs of Azure Stack, I have plans to purchase a three-year plan in the future. The licensing costs for Azure Stack include the cost of the additional facilities it provides, like maintenance and support.
What other advice do I have?
I am satisfied with the overall product.
I recommend those who plan to use the product in the future to do their homework and learn everything about it before purchasing it.
I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
ICT Leader at Safripol (Pty) Ltd.
Ability to store and process large amounts of data
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Azure Stack is its ability to store and process large amounts of data."
- "Azure Stack is an expensive product that should be made more cost-effective."
What is our primary use case?
We use the analytics side of Azure Stack extensively. I use Azure Stack for advanced analytics, AI machine learning, and business intelligence to report and interpret data. We also use the solution to store our data repositories from a data lake perspective.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Azure Stack is its ability to store and process large amounts of data. The analytics side of Azure Stack is pretty influential to our business.
What needs improvement?
Azure Stack is an expensive product that should be made more cost-effective.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Azure Stack for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate Azure Stack a ten out of ten for stability. Azure Stack is very stable. We just had one glitch in five years, and the glitch was for a couple of hours. So, Azure Stack's stability is very good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate Azure Stack a ten out of ten for scalability. Azure Stack is very scalable. Around 100 IT users are using Azure Stack in my company. Finance engineers are using it for reporting. From a finance perspective, Azure Stack is extensively used by cost accountants.
How was the initial setup?
Fortunately, we used a partner to set up Azure Stack instead of doing it ourselves. It was relatively simple for them to set up the solution. If we had done it ourselves, it would be pretty complex. The partners who set up Azure Stack for us have done it for a number of organizations. It was pretty quick, and it took a matter of weeks to set it up.
What was our ROI?
Azure Stack definitely gave us a return on investment in my previous organization. My previous organization was a mining organization, and the value we got from the system was improved utilization of fleets. We could monitor and improve fleet utilization, which had a monetary return but was never quantified. We managed monthly to increase the utilization closer to a significant eighty percent from about forty or fifty percent.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Azure Stack has an annual licensing fee, which is very expensive. We pay service costs to the integrator or the partner to support and maintain Azure Stack.
What other advice do I have?
We have a Microsoft Edge device to transfer data between the cloud and on-premise. However, the backing for Azure Stack is purely cloud-based.
The deployment of Azure Stack was done through an integrator. The first step in deploying Azure Stack was to set up the Azure platform in the back end, to put down temporary Edge devices, and then later on, the actual dedicated Edge devices were shipped from Microsoft.
Fortunately, the deployment and maintenance of Azure Sack are done by an integration partner. They maintain it, and we pay them a service level agreement. I don't know what they've got operating in the back end, but a relatively small team of no more than five people keeps it running.
Regarding Azure Stack, I would ask users to be very mindful of what services they consume. It is like a buffet. So the more services you subscribe to, the higher the cost. So, the cost can escalate quite rapidly. There's a lot of convenience, but it comes at a cost.
Overall, I rate Azure Stack an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Azure Stack Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2025
Popular Comparisons
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
VMware Software Defined Data Center
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Azure Stack Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What are the constraints of Azure Stack and VMware Stack?
- When evaluating Software Defined Data Center (SDDC), what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is a software defined data center?
- What is the best software defined data center?
- Why is Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) important for companies?