Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1048086 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager Information Technology at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
A solution which offers simplicity and is scalable, stable, easy to install and offers good technical support
Pros and Cons
  • "Our customers value the solution's simplicity."
  • "It would be better if their updates would be released annually."

What is most valuable?

Our customers value the solution's simplicity. 

What needs improvement?

Occasionally, upon installation of the Energize Updates, the plans will go off track, something which necessitates us calling up their support team for another update. 

The frequency of the release of the updates is also an issue. In the production environment, Firmware cannot be frequently updated. It would be better if their updates would be released annually. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been dealing with Barracuda Web Application Firewall for more than four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Barracuda Web Application Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. 

How are customer service and support?

Our experience with technical support has been very positive. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

While I would have to check on the price of the solution, I feel it to be okay and it matches the market price.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

F5, Imperva and RedBear are the main competitors of Barracuda in our area.

I do not know if they possess certain features which Barracuda Web Application Firewall lacks. I would have to check. 

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend the solution to someone looking for a new web application firewall.

I rate Barracuda Web Application Firewall as an eight out of ten. I do not give the product a higher rating because there are other solutions in Sri Lanka of which the vendors are aware through the Gartner Reports. I believe the solution is not not counted amongst the Gartner leader Quadrant.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Porleng Phatt - PeerSpot reviewer
Pre-Sales Engineer at eCam Solution Co., Ltd
Reseller
Top 5
Policy updates could be improved; I like the dashboard
Pros and Cons
  • "Has a good dashboard."
  • "The policy updates could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is for banking compliance. I'm a presales engineer. 

What is most valuable?

I like the dashboard. 

What needs improvement?

The policy updates could be improved. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this product for four years. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is good but could be improved. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup isn't too complex, we have a master plan when we implement it for our customers and deployment usually takes around three months. We have several people on our team involved with maintenance; usually, our customers also have maintenance staff. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Barracuda Web Application Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Manager at Toshiba Tec Poland
Vendor
Simple to manage with a good client VPN and content filtering
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features are the client VPN and content filtering."
  • "The incident reporting needs to be improved."

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are the client VPN and content filtering.

This solution is simple to manage.

The interface and the dashboards are ok.

What needs improvement?

The incident reporting needs to be improved.

The local technical support in Poland is not very reliable.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the Barracuda Web Application Firewall for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is very stable. It is great.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have only the single web application firewall running on-premises, so I cannot comment on scalability other than to say that I haven't had any problems.

We have 18 people who are being protected by this firewall and we do have plans to increase to approximately 100.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have been in contact with technical support and while I feel that they are not very reliable here in Poland, they are good enough and I am satisfied with them. The escalation was okay and the troubleshooting was also okay.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of this solution is okay.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to find a good partner to assist with the implementation.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: reseller
PeerSpot user
IT Security Administrator at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
We run it with no downtime, because it has good support
Pros and Cons
  • "We run it with no downtime, because it has good support."
  • "It is not stable nor mature."

What is our primary use case?

We use it for mail protection.

How has it helped my organization?

It has helped the organizational function because we do not have an application hosted product. 

What is most valuable?

It mainly provides good support, and it is a good web application for us.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is not stable nor mature, though it is not a problem for us.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have had scalability issues. However, since we do not have that many applications, it is not an issue for us.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is very good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not previously use another solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very straightforward.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is less compared to other web applications, which is important to us.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We compared the solution to Imperva because of the support. Support is important to us.

What other advice do I have?

Just do it. We run it with no downtime, because it has good support.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
PeerSpot user
Director85d9 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Systems Infrastructure at a tech vendor
Real User
Allows us to scale out to multiple phase servers
Pros and Cons
  • "It allows us to scale out to multiple phase servers."
  • "If you know nothing about networks, then you can't set it up."

What is our primary use case?

We use it for low balancing phase servers.

How has it helped my organization?

It allows us to scale out to multiple phase servers.

It is a great product. We are very pleased with it.

What is most valuable?

It works exactly by design. It works very well.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There are no stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There are no scalability issues.

How is customer service and technical support?

Their technical support is great.

How was the initial setup?

If you are a networking guy, the initial setup is straightforward. If you know nothing about networks, then you can't set it up.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

They have competitive pricing.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Consultant & Instructor -Cyber Security,GovernanceRIskCompliance (CISO as a Services) at Independent
Real User
Top 10
Strong updating features but the tech support is weak
Pros and Cons
  • "The updating and signature features are my primary use case for the solution. These features are beneficial to my organization."
  • "I would suggest that someone implementing this product is knowledgeable in the IT field, and with the network needs. It is complex."

What is our primary use case?

The updating and signature features are my primary use case for the solution. These features are beneficial to my organization.

What needs improvement?

I would like this solution to be more detective of the needs of the organization.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I encountered issues with the stability of the product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I encountered issues with scalability.

How is customer service and technical support?

I would rate the level of tech support a six out of ten. 

How was the initial setup?

I would suggest that someone implementing this product is knowledgeable in the IT field and with the network needs. It is complex.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user848259 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network & Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Give us visibility into server connections/sessions, real-time alerts, KPIs
Pros and Cons
  • "This product gives us visibility into what is going on in two servers, including connections and sessions, real-time alerts, very good reporting, and KPIs. It makes managing security of a critical server very easy, with a friendly GUI."
  • "There is no one special feature, but the WAF itself is valuable: user-friendly protection against web attacks etc., authentication, reporting, accountability, alerting, and hardened OS."
  • "This product could easily progress to be among the industry leaders. I think they need to improve enterprise level automation. It integrates with a small number of vulnerability scanners, so report results should be imported manually; same for SIEM integration."

What is our primary use case?

I have two primary use cases, one for a bank and the other one for an operator. I will speak about the bank case. The environment is very critical: securing an e-banking server and SMS banking.

How has it helped my organization?

This product gives us visibility into what is going on in two servers, including connections and sessions, real-time alerts, very good reporting, and KPIs.

It makes managing security of a critical server very easy with a friendly GUI.

What is most valuable?

There is no one special feature, but the WAF itself is valuable: user-friendly protection against web attacks etc., authentication, reporting, accountability, alerting, and hardened OS.

What needs improvement?

This product could easily progress to be among the industry leaders. I think they need to improve enterprise level automation. It integrates with a small number of vulnerability scanners, so report results should be imported manually; same for SIEM integration.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Very stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues with scalability.

How is customer service and technical support?

Best support I have ever seen. I have experience with several products and their support. Barracuda support is very special: efficient, quick replies.

How was the initial setup?

There was some complexity because it requires special configuration in addition to some network changes.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Very good price compared to other products. Some products, like Fortinet, give you good performance as well, and their price is probably lower than Barracuda, but you should pay attention to renewal prices and options. The BWAF license includes everything, even cloud control, which requires a license in other products.

OPEX/CAPEX should be looked at closely.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Fortinet, but BWAF was much better.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate it a 10 out of 10 because all requirements from a product are there: very good performance, robust equipment, pentest/vul scan success, very good support. The cost to value ratio is tops.

If you have a limited budget it’s the best, and if you have an open budget why spend more since BWAF can do the job.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Presales Solutions Architect at Hilal Computers
Real User
Good technical support and security features but needs better documentation
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution offers multiple security features. There are machine learning features and great URL encryption. It also offers multi-protocol support against DDoS attacks."
  • "The documentation is lacking. It's not like what you'd get if you were using Juniper or Cisco. They need to expand on it and make it more useful."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution to secure most data centers. We also use it for mobile apps for malicious automated attacks. 

What is most valuable?

The solution offers multiple security features. There are machine learning features and great URL encryption. It also offers multi-protocol support against DDoS attacks.

The API security they offer is quite good.

The technical support on offer is very good.

There's multiple application delivery which is impressive.

What needs improvement?

The deployment isn't very user-friendly.

There are a lot of up and coming competitors in the space, and there's always new technology coming out. The solution needs to make sure that it keeps up with what's going on in the industry to make sure they don't get left behind.

The documentation is lacking. It's not like what you'd get if you were using Juniper or Cisco. They need to expand on it and make it more useful.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for almost four and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of the solution is good. It's pretty reliable. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability has been fine. It's been quite good for us. We don't have complaints in that regard.

How are customer service and technical support?

We've always been pretty happy with technical support. We find them helpful and knowledgable.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I also work with Fortinet solutions and I find that sometimes they can be limiting and have their own set of difficulties.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is okay, however, it's not particularly user-friendly. I wouldn't describe it as complex. It's more difficult.

What about the implementation team?

We are system integrators. We can handle implementations.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is okay. Unlike other competitors, you are able to negotiate a little bit, which can help drive down the cost to the company.

What other advice do I have?

We're a solution partner, an integrator. We have partnership-level agreements with the solution.

We have multiple deployment models. We use it on-premises as well as on the cloud using both Amazon Web Services and Azure.

Overall, I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. It would be hard for any product to rate a ten out of ten for me. However, to get a bit of a higher mark, it should offer better documentation and be more user-friendly, particularly where deployment is concerned. I'd still recommend Barracuda, though. It's pretty solid.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Barracuda Web Application Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Barracuda Web Application Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.