Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs NetScaler comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Web Application F...
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (15th)
NetScaler
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
85
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Barracuda Web Application Firewall and NetScaler aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Barracuda Web Application Firewall is designed for Web Application Firewall (WAF) and holds a mindshare of 2.0%, down 2.3% compared to last year.
NetScaler, on the other hand, focuses on Application Delivery Controllers (ADC), holds 16.1% mindshare, up 12.4% since last year.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
 

Featured Reviews

SF
Dec 12, 2022
Stable, great visibility, with smooth deployment.
Our primary use case is for web applications utilizing it primarily for DDoS and cross-site script protection Our organization has improved because it has created a new layer of security analytics. Typically we used to do study code analysis, but then by adding that capability we now have dynamic…
Mazhar Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 18, 2024
A effective solution for load balancing with gateway
We used Citrix NetScaler for load balancing in our application, where our users connect via the portal. This portal is load-balanced via a ServiceNet NetScaler. Additionally, our core banking application also runs on this infrastructure Citrix NetScaler has its capabilities and benefits. From a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Some of the most valuable features are the ease of deployment, the Barracuda support, the easy-to-use console, and the granularity of the reports."
"The product has fantastic support services."
"There is no one special feature, but the WAF itself is valuable: user-friendly protection against web attacks etc., authentication, reporting, accountability, alerting, and hardened OS."
"We use Barracuda to protect the application. That's the main feature we use it for."
"The solution offers multiple security features. There are machine learning features and great URL encryption. It also offers multi-protocol support against DDoS attacks."
"The solution ensures layer seven is secure from attacks."
"The solution's most valuable feature is that it actually protects our website, and it provides all the required security functions."
"The product's advanced bot and threat protection capabilities are valuable."
"Most of the functions are user-friendly and great."
"It's very easy to configure."
"The load balancing and VPN features are most valuable. AAA authentication is also valuable."
"Load balancing, cache redirection, content switching, all connected with traffic management."
"The web application firewalling component is a powerful feature."
"The most valuable feature of Citrix ADC is its ease of use."
"Provides resiliency for applications that reside on servers, as well as connectivity to remote applications."
"One feature that works really well is the SSL VPN. It's very easy to set up and you can go very granular with it. You can define what user groups get what kind of access and the management overhead is very low."
 

Cons

"The incident reporting needs to be improved."
"An area for improvement in Barracuda Web Application Firewall is attack identification. Other banks identified attacks and tracked logs that the solution wasn't able to identify because of its ready-made rules pre-deployed by the vendor. My organization raised this issue with the technical support team. Another area to improve in Barracuda Web Application Firewall is its service desk. The team resorted to stonewalling because they couldn't accept that a feature was missing in the solution, and it was only after a lot of drilling down that the service desk team accepted that, and would be adding that feature in the future. My organization had to submit a report to the Reserve Bank of India with information on the logs identified and the attacks that happened, and that there was a failure on the part of the Barracuda Web Application Firewall. The Reserve Bank of India conducts a tri-monthly cyber risk audit in all Indian banks. Even smaller banks identified and caught attacks that my organization wasn't able to do, so I was looking into other solutions that competitor banks could be using because Barracuda Web Application Firewall failed to identify some of the attacks."
"I would like to see a native multi-cloud cover."
"Barracuda Web Application Firewall’s scalability needs improvement."
"The platform's pricing needs improvement."
"The usability of the interface could be improved."
"They should improve their features, so they easily compare to the competition."
"The policy updates could be improved."
"The tool needs to add a feature where we can access the network policy access manager."
"We would like the licensing model for this product to be improved, as it isn't currently very transparent. There isn't a standard package available, and each extra feature creates an additional cost."
"This is an expensive solution."
"Technical support sometimes takes a little longer because of the multilevel ticket priority."
"Its GUI should be improved. Its CLI is powerful, but GUI needs more features."
"The setup for Citrix NetScaler has room for improvement. It could be easier."
"Scripting and writing expressions need to be improved by putting logic behind the rules and improve policies involving some of the scripting part, which is a tedious task to do."
"The solution could be more secure."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable, more so than other products."
"The pricing is less compared to other web applications."
"The price of this solution is okay."
"The solution is based on a licensing model and might be $360 for the hybrid version."
"Cost is a bit on the higher side. Big companies can afford it."
"They only offer a yearly licensing plan."
"The price of the solution is a little expensive. There is a license for this solution and it can be purchased every one, two, or five years."
"Our licensing fees are paid annually and the cost is between €600 and €800 (approximately $665.00 to $885.00 USD)."
"We have a yearly licencing fee, and there are no additional costs."
"NetScaler does the same thing as an F5 and it's cheaper."
"The firewall license is included by default, with no additional costs."
"After deployment, Citrix Netscaler shifted to a subscription-based license scheme for support, which is slightly more expensive."
"Licensing is adequate. I wanted to have a more prominent license, but until I do they don't give enough support. The additional cost would be too much."
"Citrix ADC could improve the price and make it less expensive, other competitors have a better prices. This would allow Citrix ADC to keep dominating the market."
"The solution is undoubtedly very good, but it is expensive."
"The licenses for this product are payable as a yearly subscription, and carry a high price-point. The subscription scheme is quite complicated, and costs will increase with each additional feature that is required, outside of the basic setup."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Barracuda Web Application Firewall?
It significantly improved our overall web security posture, addressing intrusions and enhancing control over web URLs in our environment.
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Web Application Firewall?
I use the solution in my company to protect our website.
What do you like most about Citrix ADC?
The most valuable feature for us is the application firewalling in Citrix NetScaler, ensuring only valid traffic enters our environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix ADC?
After deployment, Citrix Netscaler shifted to a subscription-based license scheme for support, which is slightly more expensive.
What needs improvement with Citrix ADC?
Citrix NetScaler is a robust product, but mastering it requires significant learning and training due to its complexity. While it could be easier to manage, it is like transitioning from driving a ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Citrix ADC, Citrix NetScaler VPX
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oracle, CBS, Pioneer, Hyundai, Publix, Barnes Noble, Calzedonia, Nordstrom, Samsung, Nascar
ABB Schweiz, Aer Lingus, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Amnet Technology Solutions, Aramex International, Ascenty, Atos, Autodesk
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: September 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.